[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Barr campaign to white supremacists: ‘Don’t let the door hit you on the way out’
Source: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
URL Source: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/sh ... arr_to_white_supremacists.html
Published: Jun 2, 2008
Author: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Post Date: 2008-06-02 19:40:42 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 330
Comments: 27

Barr campaign to white supremacists: ‘Don’t let the door hit you on the way out’

Monday, June 2, 2008, 04:34 PM

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Libertarian blogs are reporting that Bob Barr is having it out with the same group of white supremacists who sullied Ron Paul’s Republican presidential campaign.

A pair of web sites, including something called Stormfront.org, on Monday ran an endorsement of Barr by James Buchanan:

“A vote for Bob Barr would at least send a message to the Republican Party that conservatives and Whites won’t sit still as they are stuck with a liberal presidential candidate like McCain.”

David Weigel at Reason.com offers this bit of essential background on Libertarian politics, and why that endorsement struck a nerve:

One of the bigger media blunders the Ron Paul campaign made was its handling of endorsements from the bigots at Stormfront. White nationalists slithered around the fringes of the Paul movement, and Paul refused to return a donation from Stormfronter Don Black on the grounds that he’d rather the money be spent on the Paul campaign than spent by racists.

Thirdpartywatch.com reports Barr campaign manager Russ Verney is having none of it. He immediately issued this statement:

”The Barr campaign is not going to be a vehicle for every fringe and hate group to promote itself.

“We do not want and will not accept the support of haters. Tell the haters I said don’t let the door hit you on the backside on your way out!

“Anyone with love in their heart for our country and for every resident of our country regardless of race, religion, nationality or sexual orientation is welcome with open arms.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#1. To: All (#0)

I am sorry to see that Bob Barr chose to be a divisive candidate and robotically reject the support of some fine Americans while his campaign regurgitates a ton of PC-like cliches about sexual orientation, race and the color of one's undies. The way the rejection was staged shows lack of class.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-02   19:43:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#1)

related:

Bob Barr A Poor Representative of Liberty

christine  posted on  2008-06-02   19:49:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: christine, a vast rightwing conspirator (#2)

There seems to be a systematic effort underway to undermine the effectiveness of party politics. The disgruntled New Yorker who was unhappy at being unable to participate in the Democratic rules meeting is just one more example. Barr seems highly unlikely as a libertarian having voted for the Patriot Act. It seems they could do a lot better. But like the DNC and the GOP, they're not. Honestly speaking I can't quite come to terms with Chuck Baldwin, either. The Constitution Party should be leading the way against the TV evangelists, and I don't think we want people who are tainted by Falwell in charge of the country.

It's sad all the way around, but one positive aspect about it is that people are starting to talk. That's important.

buckeye  posted on  2008-06-02   19:57:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: buckeye (#6) (Edited)

Ron Paul was right to accept a contribution from a group of American citizens. Bob Barr is wrong to reject it.

After all, it's the stupid politicians who should be representing ALL the citizens and it's outrageous that they have the arrogance to refuse representing certain citizens because some of their views disagree with today's PC dogmas.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-02   20:02:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#8)

Ron Paul was right to accept a contribution from a group of American citizens. Bob Barr is wrong to reject it.

AIPAC is made up of american citizens, as is every other lobbyist group. Money buying loyalty is one of the reasons we are in this mess.

I bet you would be happier in the dem or rep party. They take all the money they can get, and you get the added bonus of voting for the lesser of 2 evils.

Either stand on principle or be a part of the problem. If you lose, then the people get what they deserve.

PSUSA  posted on  2008-06-02   20:13:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: PSUSA (#11)

The AIPAC is a group of American citizens who wish to represent the interests of a foreign country and it just happens that their contributions are not rejected by any politician.

The Stormfronters are not seeking to represent a foreign power.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-02   20:16:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#12) (Edited)

The AIPAC is a group of American citizens who wish to represent the interests of a foreign country and it just happens that their contributions are not rejected by any politician.

"just happens"? LOL! It's an accident! A fluke! I guess that makes it all OK. And to equate that with stormfront, just because they dont represent a foreign power? How does that make stromfront more acceptable than AIPAC?

I get it. It's the lesser of 2 evils again. If the ends ($ in Barrs' pocket) justify the means (Taking donations from zionist stormfront maggots) then all is well.

PSUSA  posted on  2008-06-02   20:32:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: PSUSA (#16)

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=81534
Bob Barr, Born-Again Libertarian, Backsliding On Mass Immigration

buckeye  posted on  2008-06-02   20:35:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: buckeye (#17)

FWIW, I dont support Barr. I dont trust him.

PSUSA  posted on  2008-06-02   20:39:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: PSUSA (#18)

No surprises there. I think most of us have strong doubts.

buckeye  posted on  2008-06-02   20:41:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

        There are no replies to Comment # 19.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]