[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination

CNN Stunned As Majority Of Americans Back Trump's Mass Deportation Plan


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Barr campaign to white supremacists: ‘Don’t let the door hit you on the way out’
Source: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
URL Source: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/sh ... arr_to_white_supremacists.html
Published: Jun 2, 2008
Author: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Post Date: 2008-06-02 19:40:42 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 310
Comments: 27

Barr campaign to white supremacists: ‘Don’t let the door hit you on the way out’

Monday, June 2, 2008, 04:34 PM

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Libertarian blogs are reporting that Bob Barr is having it out with the same group of white supremacists who sullied Ron Paul’s Republican presidential campaign.

A pair of web sites, including something called Stormfront.org, on Monday ran an endorsement of Barr by James Buchanan:

“A vote for Bob Barr would at least send a message to the Republican Party that conservatives and Whites won’t sit still as they are stuck with a liberal presidential candidate like McCain.”

David Weigel at Reason.com offers this bit of essential background on Libertarian politics, and why that endorsement struck a nerve:

One of the bigger media blunders the Ron Paul campaign made was its handling of endorsements from the bigots at Stormfront. White nationalists slithered around the fringes of the Paul movement, and Paul refused to return a donation from Stormfronter Don Black on the grounds that he’d rather the money be spent on the Paul campaign than spent by racists.

Thirdpartywatch.com reports Barr campaign manager Russ Verney is having none of it. He immediately issued this statement:

”The Barr campaign is not going to be a vehicle for every fringe and hate group to promote itself.

“We do not want and will not accept the support of haters. Tell the haters I said don’t let the door hit you on the backside on your way out!

“Anyone with love in their heart for our country and for every resident of our country regardless of race, religion, nationality or sexual orientation is welcome with open arms.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 24.

#20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

Funny how LIBs and PUBs are expected to jump through the enemy's PC hoops. Just who wrote this book of absolutes, anyway?

The left's candidates are never asked to return donations from Angela Davis or Sista Soulja or anti white extremists. I'd be willing to bet that scrutiny of leftist candidates' supporters would turn up 60's rads with blood on their hands from bombings and bank robberies or even the murders of cops and judges.

Ron Paul said something like, "They're supporting me, I'm not supporting them!" An important distinction, I'd say. So, why should he return donations?

So, THE LOBBY wants to define the acceptable parameters for all parties and then make sure that only the two controlled sock puppet parties are invited to televised debates. Others are excluded because they don't have enough media exposure to qualify as serious candidates. But, the only publicity they get in the MSM is when they receive donations from groups or individuals who are "outside the parameters."

Because Ron Paul cannot be cowered by this shabby tactic and because he speaks to the hearts of patriots, they truly fear him.

Bob Barr is a political opportunist/chameleon, which is to say that his principles are indistinguishable from his pragmatism. And, his past preference for (or, lip service to) traditional conservative "values" doesn't make him an acceptable alternative to Ron Paul by any reasoning in my book. Although there was a time when Barr would have warranted a five alarm response, standing in Ron Paul's shadow now he appears beady-eyed and untrustworthy.

The fact that he's now acceptable to "MR. OIL" "CORPORATE LORDS INC.", and "MRS. ISRAEL" tells me that he's compromised. I have to assume that for whatever reason his personal code of ethics is written in pencil and subject to editing by "unknown power brokers."

(Can we all agree that "they" are behind the scenes, even if we don't agree on just who "they" are?)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-06-02   22:51:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: HOUNDDAWG (#20)

Ron Paul was correct. It's bad form to reject the support of ANY citizen. I bet the Stormfront support came to Bob Barr not because of Barr's apparent segregationism (not) but for other reasons. Possibly because he promises to defend the constitution, or certain parts of the Bill of Rights that the Stormfront members support as well. As American citizens they have the right to express their views and they have the right to representation. They have the right to run for public office themselves and there is nothing that should prevent them from supporting someone outside their own organization.

The Barr rejection of a 'hate group' contribution validates or reinforces the guilt by association theory which, strangely, seems to be accepted when support comes from 'racist' or 'extremist' groups - see Ron Paul, Barak Obama - but it does not apply when the support comes from groups associated with Israel or extremist 'good causes' such as global warmism or the anti-deodorant movement.

As a note of the observation that only 'rightwing extremism' is found unacceptable, we see how 'leftist' support or associations are used whenever it is necessary to take down a non-establishment political actor. See the constant attacks on Obama based on 'facts' such as the identity of his neighbors, the pronouncements of his pastor or his pastor's friends or his receiving support from Sharpton or Jessie Jackson.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-03   6:46:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 24.

#25. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#24)

Ron Paul was correct. It's bad form to reject the support of ANY citizen. I bet the Stormfront support came to Bob Barr not because of Barr's apparent segregationism (not) but for other reasons. Possibly because he promises to defend the constitution, or certain parts of the Bill of Rights that the Stormfront members support as well. As American citizens they have the right to express their views and they have the right to representation. They have the right to run for public office themselves and there is nothing that should prevent them from supporting someone outside their own organization.

The Barr rejection of a 'hate group' contribution validates or reinforces the guilt by association theory which, strangely, seems to be accepted when support comes from 'racist' or 'extremist' groups - see Ron Paul, Barak Obama - but it does not apply when the support comes from groups associated with Israel or extremist 'good causes' such as global warmism or the anti-deodorant movement.

As a note of the observation that only 'rightwing extremism' is found unacceptable, we see how 'leftist' support or associations are used whenever it is necessary to take down a non-establishment political actor. See the constant attacks on Obama based on 'facts' such as the identity of his neighbors, the pronouncements of his pastor or his pastor's friends or his receiving support from Sharpton or Jessie Jackson.

There was a time when I very much appreciated Bob Barr's support for gun owners.

But now I see all of the blue suits as forked tongues who'd compromise with the Devil if it was the path of least resistance.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-06-03 13:37:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 24.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]