See other Religion Articles
Title: Pastor Hagee: The Antichrist Is Gay, "Partially Jewish, As Was Adolph Hitler" (Paging Joe Lieberman!)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-b ... gee-the-antichri_b_104608.html
Published: Jun 2, 2008
Author: Max Blumenthal
Post Date: 2008-06-02 23:12:19 by PoliticallyIncorrect
Keywords: None
Views: 340
Comments: 15
On March 16, 2003, on the eve of the United States' invasion of Iraq, Pastor John Hagee took to the pulpit to warn of the coming Antichrist. In his sermon, "The Final Dictator," Hagee described the Antichrist as a seductive figure with "fierce features." He will be "a blasphemer and a homosexual," the pastor announced. Then, Hagee boomed, "There's a phrase in Scripture used solely to identify the Jewish people. It suggests that this man [the Antichrist] is at least going to be partially Jewish, as was Adolph Hitler, as was Karl Marx." This "fierce" gay Jew, according to Hagee, would "slaughter one-third of the Earth's population" and "make Adolph Hitler look like a choirboy." Exposed here for the first time, Hagee's comments identifying the Antichrist as a partly Jewish homosexual arrive in the wake of a furor the pastor provoked by describing the Holocaust as an act of God. Hagee's chilling sermon about the Holocaust prompted Sen. John McCain to reject the preacher's support, an unexpected turnabout after McCain spent over a year soliciting his endorsement. Days after McCain's rejection, I reported that a key McCain ally, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, planned to deliver the keynote speech at Hagee's upcoming Christians United For Israel (CUFI) summit. As the story exploded into the mainstream press, pressure mounted on Lieberman to withdraw. But Lieberman stayed the course, declaring in a prepared statement, "Pastor Hagee has devoted much of his life to fighting anti-Semitism and building bridges between Christians and Jews... I will go to the CUFI Summit in July and speak to the people who have come to Washington from all over our country to express their support of America and Israel, based on our shared eternal values and our shared contemporary challenges in the war against terrorism." Lieberman will be joined at CUFI's conference by Rep. Elliot Engel, a Democratic congressman from New York with a fairly progressive voting record. On Thursday, May 29, I asked Engel's press secretary, Joseph O'Brien, if Engel still planned to attend Hagee's gathering in light of his remarks about the Holocaust. O'Brien told me Engel would respond shortly. So far, Engel has said nothing. Engel is slated to speak on CUFI's "Middle East Briefing" panel this July. He will be joined on the panel by Republican Rep. Mike Pence, Weekly Standard editor and New York Times columnist Bill Kristol, and Christian right activist Gary Bauer. Perhaps these Hagee allies could not fathom that a zealous "supporter" of Israel like Hagee could also be an anti-Semite. They may have believed, as conservative Jewish columnist Jeff Jacoby apparently did, that Hagee's remarks on the Holocaust, as jarring as they were, were theologically correct, and therefore excusable. "As anyone even fleetingly familiar with the Hebrew Bible knows," Jacoby wrote, "it is not 'crazy,' let alone anti-Semitic, to believe that Jewish suffering can be a punishment from God." But now... But now that Hagee's political allies have listened to the preacher's sermon identifying the Antichrist as a homosexual Jew, how can they still share a stage with him? Is attributing Jewish ancestry to the Man of Sin not anti-Semitism in its most classical form? Are the conspiratorial screeds of Nesta Webster,Henry Ford, and David Duke not replete with passages disturbingly similar to this most recently revealed jeremiad of Hagee and to many of his past sermons? Hagee's allies must ask themselves what price they are willing to pay for the backing of his political empire. All of them diminish themselves by standing by side. But those who are Jewish like Lieberman, and who have highlighted their faith to enhance their moral authority, must know now that the price of entering Hagee's kingdom is their soul. No more excuses. All elected officials must withdraw from Hagee's upcoming summit. Hagee hears voices.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
Hagee worships money. He will say whatever will get him the most money from the people he is speaking to at the time. His followers in his church follow him, not Jesus Christ. They back him up even when he says contradictory things, just like Obama supporters do when Obama says contradictory things. "Oh, he was just tired." Yeah, whatever!
God is always good!
Actually I can see this happening.
God is always good!
Hitler's father was illegitimate. A court ordered to pay child support to Alois Heidler's mother from her former employer a DR Frankenberger. She was a maid in Dr Frankenberger's home.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
Need I say more ???
As every good fascist knows, the perpetuation of the fascist fraud depends, in the long run, on the training of fledglings in the faith. The dictators catch their conscripts young and discipline them to think in goose-step. Promises of reward for the faithful and ominous warnings about the dangers of nonconformity play their part in making apprentices firmly believe a mass of lies, half-lies, and nonsense. Doubt, even the tiniest wondering doubt, is the cardinal sin. There are few heretics.
Bush is not gay and he is not a jew. He might be retarded and a evil SOB, but he isn't the anti-Christ.
God is always good!
Will the Antichrist be a homosexual? This question arises from the following Scripture about Antichrist: “Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all” (Dan. 11:37). Many Bible scholars believe that the phrase “desire of women” here means that Antichrist, the world’s last and most terrible tyrant, will be homosexual. Other scholars believe that the “desire of women” mentioned here refers to Jesus Christ, the Messiah, as longed for among Jewish women who desire that the prophesied Christ be born to them. Another opinion might be more accurate. That is, this man will be so arrogant that nothing and no one can deter him from loving himself above all else. He will, much like Adolf Hitler, consider himself far too important to give much regard to women –especially to one woman. As far as the Antichrist being a homosexual, Hagee hasn't said anything that many Bible scholars haven't said.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I guess it all depends on which bible those "Bible Scholars" are reading from!
This "fierce" gay Jew, according to Hagee, would "slaughter one-third of the Earth's population" and "make Adolph Hitler look like a choirboy." Somebody please lock this raving lunatic away in a padded cell. I wish our talking heads would stop talking about how crazy Ahmedinijad and the Iranian Mullahs are when we have nuts like Hagee sticking their fat paws into politics. They live in a third world country - what's our excuse?
Yes, there certainly are differences of opinion about it.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. And this raving lunatic wants to do what? Hagee and others of his antichrist kind want to slaughter 1/3 of the population so they can somehow force Christ to return to whisk away him and his deluded minions in some kind of "rapture". This is unbelievable! Talk about in-your-face hypocrisy! If people cannot see that antichrist is not some kind of dictator, but are people JUST LIKE HAGEE that substitute their homicidal insanity with what Christ actually teaches, then there is nothing more I can say. There are people looking for this dictator, and antichrist is staring them right in the face every time they look in a mirror. It blows my mind that these idiots can somehow miss seeing the pink elephant stampeding thru their living rooms.
HAVE CHRISTIANS ALREADY ACCEPTED THE MARK OF THE BEAST? Christians throughout church history have debated the nuances of Eschatology. These debates will doubtless last until Jesus Himself decides to end them. Until then, the theological battles extolling or condemning premillennialism or postmillennialism, pre-tribulation Rapture or post-tribulation Rapture, etc., will continue. To be sure, this column is not an attempt to resolve or even argue these interpretations of Scripture. Let every man be persuaded in his own heart. Personally, I don't think it's worth arguing about. Whether a Christian is premillennial or postmillennial, whether he or she believes in the pre-tribulation Rapture or not is immaterial to our responsibilities. We Christians have a duty to be the "salt" and "light" of society until Jesus returns--whenever that is. And, frankly, the time of His return is His business, not ours. If we would concentrate on those matters that truly belong to us, we would be much more effective. Arguing and battling between Christians over the nuances of Eschatology only serves to advance the cause of the Enemy. It is counterproductive and fruitless to anything worthwhile. That being said, a brief reference to the belief that a literal antichrist is yet to come is in order. Accepting this interpretation of the Book of Revelation, there will come in the days of "great tribulation" a Western World leader, known as the antichrist, or beast. Christians accepting this interpretation believe that the antichrist will unite the Western World, mainly Europe and the United States, and will implement a satanic despotism. Part of the antichrist's reign upon the Western World (called, by some, The Revived Roman Empire) will be the demand that everyone accept "the mark of the beast" in his hand or forehead. Of course, the number Scripture uses is 666. Everyone who does not accept this mark will be deemed to be an outlaw: unable to buy or sell, or contract normal daily business of any kind. However, acceptance of the mark will also mean rejection of God and salvation. Premillennialists believe they will be "raptured" to Heaven before these events take place. Some believe the church will go through the "great tribulation," while most postillennialists don't believe in a literal "tribulation" at all, but believe these Scriptures are related to other events altogether. Regardless of how one interprets the Book of Revelation, I think most all believers will accept the Apostle John's warning that the spirit of antichrist is already in the world. (I John 2:18; 4:3) Can we not readily agree that anything that resembles antichrist is a form of antichrist? Accordingly, did not the German church have an obligation to resist Adolph Hitler? Of course they did. However, at the end of the day, out of over 14,000 pastors and church congregations in Germany at the time, only 800 properly discerned the evil Hitler for who he was and openly opposed him. The rest not only tolerated him, but openly praised him, promoted him, and punished anyone who failed to do the same. Yet, Hitler definitely personified the spirit of antichrist. While publicly professing to be a Christian, he privately disdained Christians and was caught up in secret societies and the occult. He was driven to lead Germany into preemptive wars of aggression. He cast off Germany's republican form of government and consolidated power unto himself. He implemented a total surveillance society in the name of national security. He was so completely accepted and adored by Germany's churchmen that German congregations were told that in order to be good Christians they had to be good Nazis and that to support any other political party than Hitler's was to fight against God. He enacted strict gun control laws. Why did Germany's pastors and Christians not recognize Hitler for who he was? Can we not say that, in their own way, Germany's pastors and churches accepted the mark of the beast? Sure they did. No, Hitler was not THE antichrist, but he certainly exemplified the spirit of antichrist. As such, he deserved to be resisted. However, before we become too judgmental toward the Christians of 1930's Germany, we should look in the mirror. Are not many Christians in these United States behaving in the exact same manner? Have not many of us already embraced the spirit of antichrist? And if so, have we not, in our own way, already accepted the mark of the beast? Sure we have. Many pastors and Christians embrace the authoritarian policies of one George W. Bush with the same enthusiasm and blind loyalty as Germans did Hitler. For example, according to White House insiders, while publicly embracing conservative Christians, the White House is privately said to have nothing but disdain for Christians. Mr. Bush acknowledged being a member of Skull & Bones, a secret society with a dark history. Others have reported that he is a member of Bohemian Grove, which, according to some, is an occultist society of the most sinister variety. Yet, all of this is rejected out of hand by most Christians today. Plus, George W. Bush (as did Adolph Hitler) has led America into a preemptive and aggressive war against a foreign nation without provocation. Now, there is even talk at the White House of expanding the war in Iraq with attacks against Iran and Syria, and maybe even Pakistan. In addition, he is in the process of turning America into a Hitlerian surveillance society where our every move, phone call, and email are being monitored by federal police agencies. Yet, conservative Christians are still so infatuated with President Bush that they actually believe that anyone who resists the President is resisting God. They further believe that if anyone votes for any candidate who is not a Republican (Bush's party), they are fighting against God. They gladly surrender their constitutional liberties and safeguards. They enthusiastically support an unconstitutional war in Iraq and would no doubt support expanding the war to wherever Bush decided. They happily cede Bush the power to tap their phones, read their emails, or open their mail (without warrant or court order, no less). Regardless of one's politics or religion, the spirit of Big Brother, the spirit of military aggression, the spirit of occultism, the spirit of a police state mentality, the spirit of deception are all part of the spirit of antichrist. Therefore, whether one identifies himself as a premillennialist or a postmillennialist or anything in between; whether we believe in a Rapture or not; no matter what our understanding of Eschatology might be, every Christian has a duty to "resist the devil" in any form in which he reveals himself. And that certainly means that any political leader, regardless of party, who embodies or exemplifies the spirit of antichrist, must be resisted. Anything less means to accept, in a way, the mark of the beast. www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin390.htm Dr. Robert Morey Pres. Bush Worships in Muslims Mosques and Buddist Temples Sun Jan 23, 2005 04:11 64.140.158.75 President Bush Worships in Muslims Mosques and Buddist Temples Dr. Robert Morey's 02-23-02d Intelligience Briefing #21 February 23, 2002 American Christians were both grieved and shocked when President Bush, professing Christian, went to a Mosque and joined in prayer with the Muslims to the “Universal God.” President Bush evidently assumes that all religions worship the same “Universal God” under different names. Thus any name of any deity will do. This is, of course, not acceptable to Bible-believing Christians because Allah and all other pagan deities are demon-gods according to I Cor. 10. President Bush and his wife have now managed to alienate the Japanese and Korean Christian communities by going to a Shinto shrine and worshipping the demon spirit in the shrine. They both bowed to the demon and clapped their hands to awaken him. Then they signed the book of those who have worshipped the demon spirit who inhabits the Shrine - you can see the article from the Japan Times: Bushes take in archery show at shrine Koizumi takes in 'yabusame' but gives Meiji hall a miss U.S. President George W. Bush and his wife, Laura, on Monday visited Meiji Shrine, a major venue for Shinto worshippers in Tokyo. Bush and the first lady paid their respects by bowing in front of the main shrine hall before signing a registry book, including a brief comment on their visit. Japanese Christian leaders confirm that the Bushes engaged in pagan worship and not just a show of respect. The Japanese news services used the religious term sanpei to describe the worship performed by the Bushes at the temple. During WW II, Japanese and Korean Christians who refused to worship the demon-spirit at Shinto shrines were put to death. Now, their descendents see the Bushes making a mockery of those who, like Daniel and his three friends, refused to bow before a heathen idol. According to the Japan Times, the Prime minister of Japan remained in the car because he could not join the Bushes in worshipping at the shrine. This was due to a wall of separation between temple and state set forth in the Japanese Constitution. It forbids the heads of state from participating in Shinto worship because that was the religion that motivated the carnage of WW II and the attack on Pearl Harbor. American WWII veterans are particularly outraged at the Bushes worshipping the spirit of past Japanese Emperors as this was the motivating force behind the Japanese attack on America. By Chuck Baldwin April 12, 2002 During the eight years of Clinton's presidency, I was repeatedly asked, "Chuck, do you think Bill Clinton is the antichrist?" (Of course, I answered no.) Therefore, it is more than interesting to me that since G.W. Bush became president no one has asked if I thought he was the antichrist. Not one single person! Instead, many people attribute to Bush god-like qualities, which actually makes him a better candidate than Clinton was. You see, one of the chief characteristics of the coming antichrist is that he appears "as an angel of light." Therefore, an obvious reprobate such as Bill Clinton is immediately disqualified. The antichrist, by very definition, is a master deceiver. He must be someone who appears as good and benevolent. The bite is in his tail not in his tongue. In reality, Bush's angelic persona makes him much more dangerous than bad boy Billy. For example, while Clinton was in the process of appointing numerous homosexual activists to his administration, copious letters from Christian leaders such as Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and D. James Kennedy flooded America's Christian community. Appeals for protest and resistance were heard from pulpits throughout the country. A massive media campaign began against Clinton. Today, however, President Bush is in the process of copying Clinton's numerous appointments of open homosexuals to high positions of government, but there are no letters, no warnings from pulpits, and no media campaigns opposing it. Just the opposite. Bush is being defended, lauded, and glorified for everything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or unscriptural it might be. When Clinton only talked of legalizing embryonic stem cell research, he was castigated and condemned. Bush actually made the procedure legal, and yet, he was praised and honored. Clinton was denigrated when he tried to convince Israel to give up land for peace. Now, Bush is in the process of actually trying to create an independent Palestinian state for Israel's enemies (with Jerusalem as its capital, no less), yet continues to receive glowing adulation. If Clinton even suggested that America's immigration laws might need to be liberalized, he was denounced in the harshest terms; but Bush can actually grant limited amnesty to thousands of illegal aliens, and there is not the faintest whisper of protest. Do you recall how Clinton was criticized for the "low lifes" he invited to the White House? Well, Bush recently invited wild man rocker, Ozzie Osbourne, to the White House. Have you heard any notable Christian leader take Bush to task for that? You remember Ozzie Osbourne, don't you? He is the former front man for the heavy metal band, Black Sabbath. He is famous for stage antics such as biting the heads off birds and bats. His abuse of drugs and alcohol are also well known. Furthermore, Ozzie Osbourne desecrated The Alamo by pissing all over it. In spite of this, George W. Bush is said to be one of Osbourne's biggest fans. As such, Osbourne was recently invited to the White House for dinner. Have you heard any criticism of Bush for this? Obviously, I do not believe President Bush is the antichrist any more than I believed Bill Clinton was. However, I do believe that Bush possesses more deceptive qualities than Clinton did and, therefore, is more dangerous. I also now understand more clearly how even "the elect" can be deceived. Bush' s acceptance by the overwhelming majority of Christian people proves the country is ready for the antichrist, whoever he is. © Chuck Baldwin Christian Groups Disturbed by Bush's Choice of Homosexual to Head AIDS Office By Chad Groening and Jody Brown April 11, 2001 (AgapePress) - Christian organizations are reacting to the appointment of Scott Evertz to lead the White House Office of National AIDS Policy. Evertz is the first open homosexual to be appointed to such a high post by a Republican President. One of those groups expressing their dismay in President Bush's decision to appoint Evertz is Wisconsin Christians United. Pastor Ralph Ovadal, the group's director, says he has debated Evertz several times and has known him on an adversarial basis for about seven years. He believes Evertz will bring the "sodomite agenda" to Washington. "Scott Evertz is an out-of-the-closet homosexual," Ovadal says. "From what I've seen of him, he's going to promote the mainstreaming, the acceptance of homosexual behavior. This is what he's done ever since I've known [him]. He wraps it in a so-called 'conservative' facade, but the bottom line is he himself has been involved in this sort of behavior, he is promoting this sort of behavior, and it really doesn't matter if it's an elephant or a donkey -- sodomy is still wrong." Ovadal says putting a homosexual activist in charge of the White House AIDS office makes no sense. "Putting him in charge of finding a cure to AIDS ... is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house," he says. "[Making Evertz overseer of] the government department dealing with AIDS is like putting a drug addict in the office of the drug czar. It doesn't make any sense." In a statement released by his group, Ovadal accuses Bush and Evertz of being "soul mates" who both know how to get what they want. "They are both using the influence of their positions to desensitize a nation to a lawless behavior which God calls a filthy, grievous abomination," Ovadal says. "Simply put, George Bush asked the sodomites to scratch his back and now he is scratching theirs." Reaction From Other Christian Groups Dr. James Dobson, President of Focus on the Family, is sharply critical of the Evertz appointment. He says given the fact that AIDS is primarily caused by rampant homosexual behavior, the appointment sends the message that the AIDS problem can be resolved without addressing that behavior. Echoing that sentiment was Family Research Council President Kenneth Connor. In a press release, Connor says that promoting an openly homosexual person to lead the office suggests the White House is not prepared to deal with the root cause of the behaviors causing the problem. "If personal responsibility is off the table," Connor says, "it is unlikely that the White House's approach to solving the AIDS crisis will be effective." Rev. Lou Sheldon of Traditional Values Coalition says his organization will be closely monitoring Evertz' actions to ensure the post does not become "a bully pulpit for the advocacy of homosexuality." Human Rights Campaign Not surprisingly, the appointment is being praised by the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's preeminent homosexual advocacy organization, saying it shows the Bush Administration is "fully committed to fighting HIV/AIDS on a national and global scale." A spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign says Evertz' selection signals the Administration's desire for "active leadership" in the battle against HIV and AIDS. ================================================== Bush Uses Profanity About Reporter The Associated Press Monday, Sept. 4, 2000; 10:02 p.m. EDT NAPERVILLE, Ill. –– George W. Bush made a disparaging remark Monday about a reporter from The New York Times that was picked up by a live microphone. As Bush stood on the podium waiting for music to finish, he turned to running mate Dick Cheney and used an obscenity to describe reporter Adam Clymer in the nearby press area. Cheney agreed with Bush's assessment. Both men thought their remarks were off-mike. When asked about the comment at a brief airport news conference in Allentown, Pa., late Monday, Bush said, "I regret that a private comment I made to the vice presidential candidate made it through the public airways." Asked if he felt he owed Clymer an apology, Bush did not answer directly, only saying, "I regret everybody heard what I said." Karen Hughes, Bush's spokeswoman, said the remarks were "a whispered aside to his running mate. It was not intended as a public comment." Clymer said, "I'm disappointed in the governor's language." Cheney refused to discuss it. "The governor made a private comment to me. It was a private comment, and I don't plan to say anything about it," he told reporters later in Chicago. © Copyright 2000 The Associated Press http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp...04/aponline220243_000.htm =================================================== In Turnaround, Bush Says He'd Meet With Gay Republicans 'Log Cabin' group open to 'positive' overture March 6, 2000 Stockton -- Texas Gov. George W. Bush -- who previously declined a meeting with the gay Log Cabin Republicans group because he said it would create a political "nightmare" -- said yesterday he is now willing to meet with them. "I welcome their support," Bush said in an interview with The Chronicle. "I've got Log Cabin Republicans supporting me all across America." Log Cabin spokesman Kevin Ivers said yesterday that no meeting had been scheduled, but that representatives of the group and the Bush campaign had discussed the possibility in the past several days. "Some signals have been yes, some signals no," Ivers said. "If Governor Bush wants to reach out to our organization it would be a very positive development." Bush made the statements during a stop in Stockton -- where he was met by an enthusiastic crowd of 2,000 -- during a final barnstorm of the nation's most populous state before tomorrow's primary. The Texas governor, looking relaxed and confident, said he was upbeat about his California prospects. But he expressed tangible anger and outrage at yesterday's criticism from Vice President Al Gore, who accused Bush of being "in the pocket of special interests" after it was revealed that Texas supporters had spent millions of dollars in soft money on advertising attacking John McCain's environmental record. "For the Democrats, and for Al Gore, to talk about campaign funding reform when they have violated every standard, it's beyond me," Bush told The Chronicle. "Maybe that's the way this guy's gonna run the campaign: hope people forget the last seven years," he said. "But we're not going to let 'em forget." But Bush's most surprising comments came regarding the Log Cabin Republicans, the organization that has been running radio ads in San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York, accusing the governor of "pandering to the right" for refusing to meet with them. Arizona Sen. John McCain -- who, like Bush, opposes most of the group's legislative agenda -- met with the group in November. At the time, he told them he is "unashamed, unembarrassed and proud to work with you." Bush surprised Log Cabin officials last fall when he said on NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would "probably not" meet with them. "It creates a huge political scene," Bush explained at the time. "I am someone who is a uniter, not a divider. I don't believe in group thought, pitting one group of people against another. And all that does is create kind of a huge political, you know, nightmare for people." Bush later explained that he regards homosexuality as a "personal" matter that he did not wish to "politicize." Asked why he would meet with Jewish Republicans but not Gay Republicans, Bush responded: "I meant to say personal and private. It's private as far as I'm concerned. I don't want to politicize someone's private life." The organization leaders said yesterday they now consider Bush's words to be a verbal commitment for a meeting. "I think he realizes his comments were a mistake," said Log Cabin executive director Rich Tafel. Yesterday, Bush noted that "these are people who have made up their mind to be for my opponent," -- since they have endorsed McCain. But Bush added, "I've got Log Cabin Republicans throughout my campaign. I do. There's a lot of gay people who are supporting me. And I welcome their support." Informed of their ads appealing for a more diverse Republican Party, Bush said, "Surely, they need to save their money." "What I don't want to do is make meetings so darned political." Asked whether he would vote for Proposition 22 if he were a state resident -- as John McCain has said he would -- Bush said, "I don't get involved in propositions in states. It's up to the people of California. I will just tell you I happen to believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I believe in the sanctity of marriage." http://www.logcabinwa.com/archive/200003061333.shtml ===================================================== Rapper's Inaugural Invite a Shocker, Say Family Advocates By Fred Jackson, Bill Fancher, and Jody Brown January 6, 2005 (AgapePress) - Christians who helped re-elect George W. Bush are in for a major shock. WorldNetDaily reports that organizers of this month's inauguration festivities have invited one of the most vile rock starts in the country to entertain Republican young people. WorldNetDaily describes Kid Rock as "a popular vulgar rock-rapper whose lyrics wouldn't begin to pass muster with the Federal Communications Commission." But that is who Republican organizers have chosen to headline the entertainment at the inaugural youth concert, hosted by none other than the president's two daughters Jenna and Barbara. Pro-life activists are criticizing President Bush's choice of Alberto Gonzales to replace John Ashcroft as attorney general, worrying the White House counsel will not aggressively uphold the administration's anti-abortion stance. Gonzales is a former member of the Texas Supreme Court, where he voted to allow a teenager to get an abortion without notifying her parents, circumventing the notification law in that state. At the time he criticized the position taken by his colleague on the court, Priscilla Owen, who voted against allowing the abortion. Gonzales said dissenting from his majority opinion "would be an unconscionable act of judicial activism." His comments later were used by Democrats in the U.S. Senate who blocked Owen's confirmation to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Chuck Baldwin, a pastor and columnist, slammed Gonzales, citing the Texas case and stating, "Gonzales is anything but pro-life." http://LifeNews.com reported not all pro-lifers condemn Gonzales for voting to allow the Texas abortion, quoting Ramesh Ponnuru, the pro-life senior editor of National Review. "My conclusion was that while the dissenters had the better argument about how to construe the statute, the cases do not prove Gonzales to be a lawless judge, a supporter of Roe v. Wade, or even a proponent of a right to abortion," Ponnuru said. The site pointed out there may be a silver lining to the Gonzales appointment: It takes him out of the running for a Supreme Court appointment should Chief Justice William Rehnquist leave the court due to health problems. Tom Minnery of Focus on the Family Action, offered guarded praise for today's AG pick. "We know the great personal regard President Bush has for Mr. Gonzales, and we wish him well in his challenging new assignment," Minnery said in a statement. "It will now be Mr. Gonzalez's duty to defend the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act against the federal court challenges that have blocked its implementation – a duty handled admirably by Attorney General Ashcroft. American families will also look to Mr. Gonzalez to aggressively prosecute obscenity cases against pornographers who continue to flout federal law." Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, on the other hand, effused about Gonzales. "Alberto Gonzales is an outstanding attorney who … will bring a wealth of experience to the post and a keen understanding of the law that will enable him to excel as the nation's chief law enforcement officer," Sekulow said in a statement. "Gonzales has been with the president for many years and served on the Texas Supreme Court. He will be an attorney general who will work diligently to protect America, the Constitution and the rule of law. During this dangerous time for our nation, Gonzales is the perfect person for this demanding job." Gonzales was Bush's general counsel when he was governor of Texas and also served as secretary of state there. http://www.apfn.net/Messageboard...05/discussion.cgi.43.html
I wouldn't be so hasty ... The Bush cabal are the most under reported bunch of thugs to have ever existed in America. I have an uncanny ability to spot fags ... and Bush is one. Many in the intelligence community and other secret societies are butt boys for whatever reasons, which I believe are multiple, but primarily to compromise them and as initiation ritual at the higher levels of illuminati membership. Scroll down the sweetliberty link and witness for yourself another George Bush that WAS A JEW. (Then look at the Bush family history for what it IS ... Eastern Establishment, Ivy League educated Bankers/thieves.)
Anyone that promotes the current State of Israel is either a fascist zionazi, a rapture nutter or simply too stupid to be considered.
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
This question arises from the following Scripture about Antichrist: “Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all” (Dan. 11:37). Many Bible scholars believe that the phrase “desire of women” here means that Antichrist, the world’s last and most terrible tyrant, will be homosexual. Other scholars believe that the “desire of women” mentioned here refers to Jesus Christ, the Messiah, as longed for among Jewish women who desire that the prophesied Christ be born to them. Another opinion might be more accurate. That is, this man will be so arrogant that nothing and no one can deter him from loving himself above all else. He will, much like Adolf Hitler, consider himself far too important to give much regard to women –especially to one woman. I was of the same opinion back when I first read this, and was going to comment on it, but my computer crashed and I lost track of it. I happened upon it again today, and since last night I also happened on the subject I think it may refer to, I thought I'd link them: Zionists prepare to draft young women: judicial-inc.biz/Draft_Girls.htm http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/1Sa/1Sa008.html#7 In 1 Samuel 8, it is said that tyrant kings would take the young women to be "confectioners and cooks and bakers". This is right after the declaration about taking the young men for war. Whether the confectioners are taken for war is not stated, but at any rate, this final tyrant will be a step "above" [or rather, below] anything preceding him. The women serving today are not supposed to be in combat, but very often find themselves there. I see this last tyrant completely heartless to the idea of women wanting to fulfill their God-given nature as women. Somewhere in the Bible, it even says women are not to dress as men, so putting on combat fatigues would definitely be contrary to the word of God, let alone shouldering a gun or piloting a plane to kill other mothers and their children. I could see George Bush signing a law to draft women to "protect our homeland" and for the sake of "Israel", particularly since "Israel" has given him his marching orders as "Gog": Send your troops to protect "Israel", whereas the secret plan is for "Israel" to destroy US troops once there, to fulfill the Zionist Armageddon Plot. George Bush Jr wailing at wall in Israel Luciferian Communist Nazi Jew George Bush Jr wailing at wall in Israel "...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Hagee has gone certifiable.
#2. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
This "fierce" gay Jew, according to Hagee, would "slaughter one-third of the Earth's population" and "make Adolph Hitler look like a choirboy."
#3. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
#4. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
This "fierce" gay Jew, according to Hagee, would "slaughter one-third of the Earth's population" and "make Adolph Hitler look like a choirboy."
#5. To: noone222 (#4)
(Edited)
#6. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
Lord Acton
#7. To: James Deffenbach (#6)
As far as the Antichrist being a homosexual, Hagee hasn't said anything that many Bible scholars haven't said.
#8. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
(Edited)
Pastor John Hagee took to the pulpit to warn of the coming Antichrist. In his sermon, "The Final Dictator," Hagee described the Antichrist as a seductive figure with "fierce features." He will be "a blasphemer and a homosexual," the pastor announced. Then, Hagee boomed, "There's a phrase in Scripture used solely to identify the Jewish people. It suggests that this man [the Antichrist] is at least going to be partially Jewish, as was Adolph Hitler, as was Karl Marx."
#9. To: robnoel (#7)
I guess it all depends on which bible those "Bible Scholars" are reading from!
Lord Acton
#10. To: Rupert_Pupkin, All (#8)
(Edited)
This "fierce" gay Jew, according to Hagee, would "slaughter one- third of the Earth's population" and "make Adolph Hitler look like a choirboy."
#11. To: RickyJ (#5)
#12. To: RickyJ (#5)
(Edited)
www.sweetliberty. org/issues/israel/calendar.html
#13. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
#14. To: James Deffenbach, PoliticallyIncorrect (#6)
Will the Antichrist be a homosexual?
#15. To: PoliticallyIncorrect (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest