Title: Quiz: Which of these three people made seven billion dollars on 911? Source:
americanjourney.blogspot URL Source:http://americanjourney.blogspot.com/2008/02/que-bono.html Published:Jun 3, 2008 Author:que-bono Post Date:2008-06-03 17:33:26 by Itisa1mosttoolate Keywords:None Views:194 Comments:6
Quiz: Which of these three people made seven billion dollars on 911?
And let us not forget the three TRILLION which vanished from the Pentagon.
http://www.free-conversant.com/realtruth/947
Subject Jeff Wells on 9/11 Pentagon Deaths
Posted 6/17/2006; 7:40 PM by Bruce Tanner
Last Modified 6/17/2006; 7:40 PM by Bruce Tanner
Saturday, June 17, 2006
Flight of Capital
They say I shot a man named Gray and took his wife to Italy. She inherited a million bucks and when she died it came to me. I can't help it if I'm lucky. - Bob Dylan
This may be old news to you, but just a quick note here of something I'd missed about Flight 77, thanks to "Bismillah" and the RI forum, that I hope you won't miss, too.
At least among those with a mind for such things, it's fairly well-remembered that on September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld made the shocking announcement that the Pentagon "couldn't track" $2.3 trillion of its transactions. "Iroquois" observes, "What's interesting to me is that he made his press release on a Monday. In DC, I always see bad news given on a Friday, usually late in the afternoon on Friday. The exception, of course, would be when someone happens to know that there is a far bigger story coming out."
And we know that Flight 77, allegedly piloted by an incompetent, made an aerobatic, spiralling descent over Washington, effecting a 270-degree turn to strike the Pentagon from a western approach at ground level. The side struck was the only one with an exterior wall hardened against attack, and was relatively empty while renovation continued.
Relatively. The unfortunate construction workers perished outside, but who were the expendables within?
From The Pittsburg Post Gazette, December 20, 2001: "One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck."
The Arlington County After-Action Report noted that the "impact area included both the Navy operations center and the office complex of the National Guard and Army Reserve. It was also the end of the fiscal year and important budget information was in the damaged area." And Insight Magazine editorialized that "the Department of the Army, headed by former Enron executive Thomas White, had an excuse [for not making a full accounting]. In a shocking appeal to sentiment it says it didn't publish a "stand-alone" financial statement for 2001 because of "the loss of financial-management personnel sustained during the Sept. 11 terrorist attack."
High Crimes of State often come down to the movement of capital, and so the high criminals generally share the gray and black economics of common felons. Money is money; it's the magnitude of the heist that's different, and the means to effect and cover-up the crime. And part of the cover-up of the Pentagon heist has been the no-plane shell game, played smartly by Rumsfeld himself who "misspoke" that a "missile" had struck the Pentagon the same week Thierry Meyssen's original no-plane website was launched.
It's such disinformation that has drilled irrelevance and folly into a once potentially dangerous and angry army of authentic skeptics.
And let us not forget the three TRILLION which vanished from the Pentagon.
DOD Can't Find $1.1 TRILLION - Rumsfeld Inherits Financial Disaster
By Kelly Patricia O'Meara
komeara@InsightMag.com
InsightMag.com
8-15-1
The Defense Department cannot account for $1.1 trillion that seems to have vanished within the tangled system of financial accounting put in place by private contractors.
Every year trillions of dollars are unaccounted for by federal agencies, and every year these same agencies are called before congressional oversight committees to explain this mismanagement of taxpayers' funds.
Year after year the bureaucratic mea culpas are longer on process and shorter on substance, leaving overseers with little or no information that is useful to correct the gross mismanagement. Take, for instance, the financial mess at the Department of Defense (DOD).
In May, DOD Deputy Inspector General Robert Lieberman reported to Congress that "the extensive DOD efforts to compile and audit the FY [fiscal year] 2000 financial statements for the department as a whole and for the 10 subsidiary reporting entities like the Army, Navy and Air Force General Funds, could not overcome the impediments caused by poor systems and unreliable documentation of transactions and assets."
Without ever using the word "money," a practice common among inspectors general (IGs), the deputy IG at the Pentagon read an eight-page summary of DOD fiduciary failures. He admitted that $4.4 trillion in adjustments to the Pentagon's books had to be cooked to compile the required financial statements and that $1.1 trillion of that amount could not be supported by reliable information. In other words, at the end of the last full year on Bill Clinton's watch, more than $1 trillion was simply gone and no one can be sure of when, where or to whom the money went.
#4. To: TwentyTwelve, wbales, Itisa1mosttoolate (#2)
And we know that Flight 77, allegedly piloted by an incompetent, made an aerobatic, spiralling descent over Washington, effecting a 270-degree turn to strike the Pentagon from a western approach at ground level.
And we know that Flight 77, allegedly piloted by an incompetent, made an aerobatic, spiralling descent over Washington, effecting a 270-degree turn to strike the Pentagon from a western approach at ground level.
Do you think a full-sized airliner hit the pentagon, let alone after doing a 3/4 turn around? I've seen a simulation of the supposed airliner and its supposed path including a rough size match-up to the CCTV camera with the actual CCTV record, but it's very dependent on the CCTV camera lens for the rough match. Besides that the details in the enlarged stills of the moving blur do not match, in my opinion. It's a mismatch not creatable by any image motion artifact, as far as I can see. The plane also looks like it flies through a large cable spool in the simulation that the said "missile" object missed in reality. Maybe the spool rolled, but really, where's all six huge wheels and all the rest? The wings? They can't fold in, no time for that, they can't evaporate. No engine holes in the wall, no huge collection of engine parts in front. In front mostly just a hole about the size of the alleged fuselage, seems to me.