[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.

Debt jumps $366B in one day.


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Obama and McCain, the same?
Source: LA Times
URL Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/printed ... ain8-2008jun08,0,3502370.story
Published: Jun 8, 2008
Author: Editorial
Post Date: 2008-06-09 08:01:52 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 172
Comments: 11

Obama and McCain, the same? Not quite. But here are their surprising policy overlaps. June 8, 2008

It has been a refrain during the exhausting battle for the Democratic presidential nomination that once Hillary Rodham Clinton or Barack Obama emerged as the party's choice, we could finally dispense with the personality battles and get down to nitty-gritty policy differences. Indeed, now that Obama seems to have the position locked up, he and presumptive Republican nominee John McCain will have plenty to argue about. But some might be surprised at the breadth of issues on which they largely agree.

On McCain's side, this is understandable. With a Republican president experiencing some of the worst approval ratings ever, it's no shock that the party opted for an unusually centrist candidate. Yet Obama, too, represents a break from Democratic orthodoxy and is reaching out to the middle. This could indicate that on certain policies, something like a national consensus is developing. It at least signals a lessening of the partisan divide that has blocked progress on important changes.

Here are the biggest plots of common ground:

* National security. Surprisingly, given McCain's reputation as a hawk and Obama's as a peacenik, they don't differ much in their ideas about how best to protect the country. Both want to increase the size of the military and provide more training and equipment. Both oppose the use of torture as an interrogation technique, and both would like to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center.

* Immigration. Lately, McCain has been trying to shore up conservative support by backing away from bills he cosponsored in 2005 and 2006, which would create a guest worker program and provide a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants; now he says he'd focus on securing the border first. Yet that doesn't stop him from touting his immigration reforms when visiting states like California, with high populations of Latino voters and many companies that employ immigrants. Obama backs identical goals.

* Environment. The differences between the two on the environment tend to be a matter of degree. They support the same policies, but in general Obama wants tougher (and costlier) regulation. Both want to create a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gases -- Obama's would reduce them to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, while McCain's would cut them by 60%. Both want more energy-efficiency programs and renewable energy, though Obama would spend more to get them. McCain is a big proponent of nuclear power, an issue Obama has largely avoided thus far.

* Social issues. Of the three biggest issues of the day -- abortion, same-sex marriage and embryonic stem-cell research -- Obama and McCain agree on two. That is, both oppose a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, and both would like to eliminate restrictions on federal funding for stem-cell studies. McCain, though, is an outspoken abortion opponent who wants to see Roe vs. Wade overturned and would appoint Supreme Court justices who share that view. Obama is pro-choice.

The two candidates disagree more often than they agree, and are poles apart on Iraq, taxation, international trade, healthcare and gun control, to name just a few issues. Yet there is common ground even in areas of opposition. On foreign policy, much has been made over their dispute about negotiating directly with rogue states like Iran. Yet nuclear nonproliferation is a top foreign policy priority for both. They have different plans to solve the mortgage crisis, but both favor government assistance to help people stay in their homes.

Some might complain that this means voters will have little to choose between in November. We say: Welcome to the middle, candidates. We hope you stick around here once you're in office, unlike the White House's current occupant.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: All (#0)

It's interesting that some of the Obama critics seem to be suggesting that there is little or no significant difference between Obama and McCain while, at the same time, claiming that Obama is the most leftist (an extreme communist/racist) candidate that ever sought the US presidency. Either view is worth defending but anyone holding them both is not to be taken seriously because, if there was no difference between Obama and McCain and Obama was an extreme leftist/communist/racist then one would have to offer proof that so is McCain.

I am posting this article because I hope that it may ignite some fact-based, interesting discussion. I am not interested in Obama's neighbors book-reading habits or on what his former or current pastors are having for dinner on Friday nights but I can see how such items may get some hysterically excited.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-09   8:08:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#1)

McCain v Obama

Charlie Reese made a strong point this morning, one many here have been making for months - as posted by Ada

-Snip

I've been leery of Sen. McCain because he seems inclined to bomb Iran. However, now that Obama has sold out to the Israeli lobby, that's a moot point. Furthermore, there is not a stupid idea about gun control that Obama hasn't supported either verbally or with his vote.

The Second Amendment was not written for duck hunters. It was written for self- defense and for defense against tyranny. Obama ought to talk to some of the people who survived the civil-rights revolution about how they stayed up all night with their private firearms to protect their families. He ought to research the old Jim Crow laws, which banned blacks from owning certain kinds of firearms.

If my choice is between a guy who may bomb Iran and one who shows such contempt for the Constitution as to support gun control, then the Iranians need to start working on their bomb shelters. A man ignorant of or contemptuous of the Second Amendment cannot be trusted to obey any of the Bill of Rights. He cannot be trusted to appoint sensible judges. Americans need to send a clear message to all politicians that our rights are non-negotiable.

If people think the Second Amendment is archaic, then try to repeal it. Until then, it is as binding as the rest of the Constitution and must be respected.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-09   8:18:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

Excellent post. His various votes in favor of gun grabbers and against gun owners prove that Obama is unworthy of consideration for the job he seeks. Neither is McCain but then I knew that out of all the people running the only one of them worth voting for was Ron Paul. I believe everyone else running were all people who could be controlled and most, if not all of whom were owned, lock, stock and barrel by the establishment and they would have been happy with any of them. Once again the scum rose to the top just as it does every (s)election.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-06-09   9:36:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: James Deffenbach (#3)

only one of them worth voting for was Ron Paul.

Our two party system relies on honesty to be competitive. In theory, there should be a sharp contrast bet. two candidates. Opposing views could then be weighed and intelligent decisions then made. For many years now, the Rs and Ds have both moved in tandem to the left, leaving virtually no distinction between the actors. With this debacle - Obama v McCain - the only difference I see is in domestic policy. With both being unacceptable, McCain is slightly less appalling in the tax, gun issue. We'll need both more money and guns with whoever ascends to the throne. And the real irony; There would be no such candidates were it not for voters who insist it's their civic duty to choose one POS over the other. Yep, I'll be sitting this one out again :P

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-09   10:25:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

Yep, I'll be sitting this one out again :P

The voters have voted for more war, more oppressive big government and they will have both.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-09   10:36:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Cynicom (#5)

The voters have voted for more war, more oppressive big government and they will have both.

And some folks presented themselves as liberty lovers, pre Obama. Hypocrites.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-09   11:41:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

        There are no replies to Comment # 6.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]