See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Air Force - 5.6 Airborne Holographic Projector
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/af.shtml
Published: Jun 12, 2008
Author: US Air Force
Post Date: 2008-06-12 20:59:26 by AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt
Keywords: None
Views: 187
Comments: 5
Webmaster's note: I found the following on the Air Force's official web site at: www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm The following page is appears as it originally did at the above web address. 5.6 Airborne Holographic Projector Brief Description The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator. The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management. It is also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary. Capabilities * Precision projection of 3-D visual images into a selected area Enabling Technologies (MCTL) * 4.1.4, Image Processing (holographic displays) White Papers * Q, Special & Humanitarian Operations Poster Comment: Okay, now I get it. I knew about Project Blue Beam as far as projecting Armageddon/'End Times' deception, and had heard about the possibility of hologram images at the Pentagon, but wasn't sure about what they were referring to. Y'all probably know all about this, but it was news to me. Actually, I think I have seen this page in the past, but didn't make the connection. Makes more sense to me now. The C130 I read, can deliver multiple precision-guided payloads. People saw two planes. One was real, one was a mirage. The real one shot off the missile, took out the lamposts, and dropped an engine and a few spare plane parts as it passed over the Pentagon, and provided the jet noise. That's my wild conspiracy theory for the night.
* Supports PSYOP and strategic deception management
* Provides deception and cloaking against optical sensors
* 10.1, Lasers
* 10.2, Optics
* 10.3, Power Systems
* N, Strategic Attack
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#5. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#0)
"....Re: Letter to Alex Jones « Reply #3 on Apr 24, 2008, 2:55pm » Apr 24, 2008, 12:56am, JakeReason wrote: I know that burning jet fuel didn't bring down the towers because I once co-owned a Industrial Concrete Repair Training company. The damage caused could not have been enough. Additionally I know the buildings could not have fallen on it's foot print without controls. I also know that a commercial airliner can not disintegrate upon impact of a brick structure - Pentagon. Or the ground - Pennsylvania. I don't need anyone else's science to prove the science I already know. BUT John, we did see a plane hit Tower Two. And so, how can there be a "no plane" theory? The supposed airplanes were either holographic images or computer graphics displayed on TV. The E-4B (Boeing 747) that was flying around was controlling all communications, inserting CGI in television feeds and broadcasting alleged hijacker communications. It also inserted false transponder (secondary radar) targets for the alleged hijacked airplanes onto FAA radar scopes. Look carefully at the alleged UAL 175 footage, particularly the CNN footage of the airplane allegedly hitting the south tower and keep in mind that the south tower core was only 30 feet inside. Then ask yourself how a 155 foot long aircraft hitting the WTC steel core could have possibly disappeared inside the building. If that had been a real crash much of the tail section would have dropped onto the street. Nothing hit the Pentagon. Controlled demo was used to make the hole and the thick black smoke came from a 55 gallon barrel of diesel fuel next to the building. Nothing crashed in Shanksville, that was just a shallow hole with a few alleged airplane parts in it. No part on any airplane alleged to have crashed on 911 has ever been indentified by serial number with any maintenance records of any airplane owned by United Airlines or American Airlines........" "....Re: Letter to Alex Jones « Reply #5 on Apr 24, 2008, 9:32pm » I have the utmost respect for John, and enjoy reading his articles and watching his interviews immensely. I also think that having him as an active member is a huge asset to this forum. While I certainly believe that there were no planes involved in the Pentagon attack and Shanksville crash, I have trouble believing that there were no planes involved in the WTC crashes. The doctoring of images on the news networks is one thing, but what about the 'live' witnesses in Manhattan? Surely they can't all be lying? I have seen so-called 'proof' of the no-planes theory, where there's one witness who, during all kinds of confusion on the streets of Manhattan says something along the lines of "there was no plane, it was a bomb!" (paraphrasing here). There are 100s of witness interviews where they all say they saw a plane go into the building. There are 1000s of witnesses, 100s of photos and god knows how many hours of amateur footage. I find it hard to believe that all these images/videos have been doctored and that all witnesses are lying or have been brainwashed about having seen airplanes hit the WTC towers. Now, this doesn't mean that I believe the 'official' story. It doesn't mean I think the planes were the commercial airliners that we were told they were. It's entirely possible that the planes that went into the WTC were remote-controlled and/or had explosives in them that went off before they hit the buildings (the white flash that seems to be visible before it actually hits.) This might also explain why the planes 'vanished' into the building, maybe they were made of very light material.. Other theories are also possible. But I don't think that a no-plane theory is plausible. Who go to all this hologram/TV Fakery trouble when a remote controlled airplane will do? These links raise further questions on the whole no-planes theory, and I thought they were interesting. http://www.911disinformation.com...lanesCounterEvidence.html http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html Again John, I have nothing but respect for you, but I hope it's ok to disagree with you on this. :) I will readily admit that I don't have access to the inside information you are privy to, but this idea seems to be too far fetched (even for me! ;)) P.S. I am not sure that this thread is appropriate for this discussion. If not, I have no problem moving this message to a new thread. I'll leave that to John and/or the admins......" "...Re: Letter to Alex Jones « Reply #6 on Apr 24, 2008, 11:02pm » Apr 24, 2008, 9:32pm, knallie wrote: I have the utmost respect for John, and enjoy reading his articles and watching his interviews immensely. I also think that having him as an active member is a huge asset to this forum. While I certainly believe that there were no planes involved in the Pentagon attack and Shanksville crash, I have trouble believing that there were no planes involved in the WTC crashes. The doctoring of images on the news networks is one thing, but what about the 'live' witnesses in Manhattan? Surely they can't all be lying? I have seen so-called 'proof' of the no-planes theory, where there's one witness who, during all kinds of confusion on the streets of Manhattan says something along the lines of "there was no plane, it was a bomb!" (paraphrasing here). There are 100s of witness interviews where they all say they saw a plane go into the building. There are 1000s of witnesses, 100s of photos and god knows how many hours of amateur footage. I find it hard to believe that all these images/videos have been doctored and that all witnesses are lying or have been brainwashed about having seen airplanes hit the WTC towers. Thanks for your input knallie, your questions are welcome. First there were not thousands of witnesses to the actual flight of UAL 175. There might have been a few hundred at the most. Maybe. There were maybe 40 video tapes, most of them suspect. There were many interviews, many of them suspect. But there was not one absolutely clear video of UAL 175 crashing into the World Trade Center showing the fuselage and wings bending the walls inward and pieces falling of the plane on impact and crashing down into the street. What you saw was a Wile E. Coyote cartoon of a Boeing 767 disappearing into the WTC and the controlled demolition making it look like a plane crashed into it. But what most saw was the CGI image on TV. Those that did witness an actual airplane were looking at a hologram. The general public is not well-informed on hologram technology. They tend to think of holograms in terms of fairies dancing on a lighted pedestal in a dark room at Disneyland. But holography, invented in 1948 has come a very long way. Unless you were part of a classified government research project on holography you would not be able to even conceive of what can be done these days. And what can be done...was done on 911. A Boeing 767 was projected onto thin air in color with sound, light and heat. But it was only a projected image. Nothing was there. It was a scam to make people believe think that Arab hijackers flew into the World Trade Center. The World Trade Center was control demoed coinciding with the fake crash and then dropped with a direct energy weapon about an hour later. But there was no airplane that crashed into the WTC. And as proof of that statement there was not one, single, identifiable aircraft part, the serial number of which could be or was traced to the maintenance records of either Boeing 767 which allegedly hit the WTC Now remember, an empty 767 weight about 165,000 pounds so that’s 330,000 pounds of huge castings, bulkheads, wing planks, spars, retract cylinders, keel beams, formers, stringers, oxygen tanks, ribs, millions of serial numbered parts of which not one, not one single part was found, identified and traced to the maintenance records of either airplane. Not to mention 4 giant 3 ton engine cores which would have been totally impossible to burn up. Impossible. Never before in the history of aviation has a destruction of this large an airplane been so complete. Not to mention the destruction of the skyscraper that it allegedly hit which turned to dust about 80 microns in size. Whoever ran the 911 psyop and I believe it was the Military Industrial Nazi's who took over our country in the late 1950's were willing to kill 3000 Americans to prove the evil intent of Arab/Muslims. And they might have gotten away with it were it not for their total, complete arrogance and gross underestimation of the technical evaluation skills of a lot of us Americans. And those of us with those skills are going to help those without those skills get their country back. Here is a look at what the military claims to be on their 'wish list' for 2025. Guess what? [5.6 Airborne Holographic Projector]...." [ATKHWDI Note: just read recently, when the military says it "wants" something, or is "working toward" something, it usually means they have already ACED it.] "....Food for thought, for sure. I have no doubt the official story of 9/11 is a complete fabrication. Since I believe the government is sitting on so many new technologies that we as 'normal' people can still only dream of, it wouldn't be a stretch to believe that this hologram technology is one of them. We all heard from many sources about free energy devices and antigravity technology and so on. I guess the problem I have believing it was hologram technology is because I haven't heard or read about anything like it before. The first time I heard about any of these new technologies I didn't believe them at first, while know I certainly do. I'm still skeptical about the no planes theory. (atleast he TWC ones, I'm convinced there was no plane at the Pentagon, and no plane at Shanksville.) Smersh asks a question that many of us have asked before: What happened to all the passengers? Thanks for educating us John. One more thing: Is there anything that we can't do yet? What is on the 'REAL' wishlist?....." Open Minds Forum - Letter to Alex Jones lucianarchy.proboards21.c...ction=display&thread=2567 What happened to all the passengers? see" Flight of the Bumble Planes ".....* What did the radar show of the planes' flight paths? We'll never see the real records, for sure. But in the spy movies, when the spy wants to lose a tail, he gets a double to lead the tail one way while the spy goes the other. If I were designing Operation 911, I'd do that: As each of the original jets is flying, another jet is sent to fly just above or below it, at the same latitude and longitude. The blips of the two planes merge on the radar scopes. Alternately, a plane is sent to cross the flight path of the original plane. Again, the blips merge, just like the little bees you're watching outside the hive. The original planes proceed to the military airfield and air traffic control is thoroughly confused, watching the wrong blips ... That's probably close to the way it was managed. Like I say, we'll never see the radar records so we won't know exactly. [For the alleged flight paths of the four jets, see http://www.Public-Action.com/911/4flights.html For names and locations of military airfields in the US, try www.globemaster.de/bases.html You can search for a listing of bases in 9-11 related states by using the search engine.]..." "....* Meanwhile, the passengers from Flights 11, 175, and 77, now at the military airfield, are loaded onto Flight 93. If you've put some of your own agents aboard [ATKHWDI Note: Stew Webb or Tom Flocco reported Barbara Olson, reported to have made a telephone call to her husband (see Carol Valentine's When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing http://www.public-action.com/911/voice-simulation/index.html ) was arrested in Europe with a satchel holding about a million $$$ of Vatican money after 911], they stay on the ground, of course. * Flight is taken aloft. * Flight 93 is shot down or bombed -- makes no difference which. Main deal is to destroy that human meat without questions. Easiest way to dispose of 15,000 lbs. of human flesh, and nobody gets a headline if they find a foot in their front garden. [ATKHWDI Note: There were reports, not widely disseminated, that body parts were found in peoples' yards miles from the "crash" site] No mass graves will ever be discovered, either. ......" http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html Flight 77 makes strange blip in its flight path in Rockefeller-controlled West Virginia, not too far from the MILITARY-COMMERCIAL AIRPORT at Charleston: [PDF] Functional Annex A00 File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML C. Yeager Airport handles scheduled commercial, military and aviation air traffic. It. is located just north of the city limits of Charleston. ... https://www.kpepc.org/shared/content/Page_objects/ahp_docs/HA_B13_Transportation.pdf "5/19/2005 May 19, 2005 Secretary Anthony Principi Chairman Base Realignment and Closure Commission Washington, D.C. Dear Secretary Principi: The Department of Defense has recommended that the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) commission realign the 130th Airlift Wing of the West Virginia Air National Guard by moving its entire fleet of eight C-130 aircraft from Yeager Airport Air Guard Station in Charleston, WV to Pope Air Force Base in North Carolina. I am writing in strong opposition to this recommendation and to invite the BRAC commission to visit the men and women of the 130th Airlift Wing, one of our nation's top rated guard units, to see first hand the important role the fleet of C-130 aircraft plays in defending our freedom and serving the citizens of West Virginia. The 130th Airlift Wing is one of the most successful and experienced units in our nation's National Guard. The unit has the eighth best unit strength and the fifth best retention rate in the entire National Guard, and is consistently rated one of the top performing National Guard units in our military. The Air Guard personnel based at Yeager are among the best at using C-130 aircraft to transport soldiers, supplies, and critical cargo into the war zone they have been doing it for the past twenty years. In fact, members of the 130th Airlift Wing were the first Guard unit to do a night vision goggle landing when they delivered U.S. Commandos to the front line of the War on Terror during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Keeping the fleet of C-130 aircraft stationed at Yeager makes sense because the aircraft play a critical role in transporting West Virginia based soldiers to and from critical training venues. Without swift access to air transportation these soldiers lose critical training time they need to be ready when their country calls on them. I urge members of the commission to pay close attention to the role the West Virginia Air Guard's fleet of C-130 aircraft plays during state emergencies such as floods, which annually ravage local communities. The commission should know that the Air Guard Station at Yeager Airport is ripe for expansion and is capable of supporting eighteen additional C-130 aircraft. Local officials have taken steps to expand space at the airfield controlled by the Air Guard to allow for up to twenty-six C-130 aircraft. Local officials are eager to work with the military to expand and fortify the 130th Airlift Wing rather than abandon a critical outpost. The proposed realignment impacts at least 246 fulltime and part time jobs dealing a tremendous blow to the region's economy. Additionally, the removal of the C-130 aircraft would end a partnership between the Air Guard and Yeager Airport's commercial and general aviation, causing Yeager to incur significant extra cost, for fire and emergency services, and making Yeager a likely candidate to lose its 24 hour air traffic control center. The citizens of West Virginia expect the BRAC commission to give a thorough evaluation of the Department of Defense's recommendations before affirming the recommendation. The commission's visit will show how the Secretary of Defense deviated from the established military and economic criteria when recommending the realignment of the 130th Airlift Wing. The unit has served with honor in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kosovo, and other wars and humanitarian missions around the globe. To close this unit in the midst of the War on Terror would be a mistake that would hurt our nation's military readiness. I eagerly await your response. Sincerely, S:/ Shelley Moore Capito, M.C."
There are no replies to Comment # 5. End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestOkay, now I get it. I knew about Project Blue Beam as far as projecting Armageddon/'End Times' deception, and had heard about the possibility of hologram images at the Pentagon, but wasn't sure about what they were referring to. Y'all probably know all about this, but it was news to me. Actually, I think I have seen this page in the past, but didn't make the connection. Makes more sense to me now. The C130 I read, can deliver multiple precision-guided payloads. [see: www.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123026339 / New study from Pilots for 9 11 Truth - No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...?ArtNum=72457&Disp=86#C86 ] People saw two planes. One was real, one was a mirage. The real one shot off the missile, took out the lamposts, and dropped an engine and a few spare plane parts as it passed over the Pentagon, and provided the jet noise.
Replies to Comment # 5.