See other Resistance Articles
Title: Speech That Killed John F. Kennedy he eludes NEW WORLD ORDER
Source:
You Tube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA&feature=email
Published: Jun 14, 2008
Author: You Tube
Post Date: 2008-06-14 13:05:41 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: JFK, Speech, John F. Kennedy
Views: 925
Comments: 69
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA&feature=email Speech That Killed John F. Kennedy he eludes NEW WORLD ORDER
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-12) not displayed.
.
.
.
#13. To: christine (#12)
Not saying he was squeaky clean.. just saying its a good plausible way to stage a political downfall. John Dean summed it up when he said to Richard Nixon as recorded on the White House tapes in 1973: "If Teddy knew the bear trap he was walking into at Chappaquiddick." In the Watergate tapes of March 13, 1973, between 12:42 and 2pm, John Dean made a cryptic half -comment about Ted Kennedy's involvement in the accident at Chappaquidick.
Nixon wanted to exploit Massachusetts Sen. Edward Kennedy's fatal car accident at Chappaquiddick in 1969 by making an advertisement showing a picture of Kennedy with the caption, "Would you ride in a car with this man?"
Too bad that guy didn't knock his dumb ass out for that. Just for saying it.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Another perfect example of why the Ted was so useless, and harmless, that his worthless carcass is still drawing oxygen. At least Jack and Bobbie were able to do Marilyn, Angie, et al.
That's why I love 4um...you can always get an honest opinion 'round here. The way the people in New England fawn over this alleged 'man' is enough to make you puke right across the room. Worse than the Russert coverage...way worse.
bump
Nixon wanted to exploit Massachusetts Sen. Edward Kennedy's fatal car accident at Chappaquiddick in 1969 by making an advertisement showing a picture of Kennedy with the caption, "Would you ride in a car with this man?" Chappaquiddick may have been fortuitous for Nixon. But, was that proof of a conspiracy? The only way that could be true is if there is some proof that Nixon wouldn't have exploited the negligent manslaughter if he hadn't been involved in some way. How could that ever be proven? Is it your position that Ted would never have driven off a bridge on his own because he was sober, responsible and cautious in all things? You obviously want to believe that Mary Jo's death was the result of some scheme to discredit Kennedy. What I don't see is why you lean that way. If you have some compelling evidence or argument then why not share it?
There was no autopsy, she was almost immediately cremated, and the family was paid; was how that story went. I have no knowledge of its veracity. Mary Jo was not cremated. She's buried in St. Vincent's Cemetery. The attempt to autopsy her remains was opposed by her family, who were supportive of the good senator, especially so after he bought them a house.... Mary Jo's mother always insisted that "Mary Jo was a maiden lady..." and we can't discount that her mom didn't want to learn otherwise about her dead daughter's purity. This compelling fact alone was strongly in Ted's favor, and (once the autopsy was opposed by the medical examiner which of course it was) the family had the second strongest case to oppose an autopsy under MA law.
John Dean summed it up when he said to Richard Nixon as recorded on the White House tapes in 1973: "If Teddy knew the bear trap he was walking into at Chappaquiddick." In the Watergate tapes of March 13, 1973, between 12:42 and 2pm, John Dean made a cryptic half -comment about Ted Kennedy's involvement in the accident at Chappaquidick. The "bear trap" metaphor could mean the circumstances in which Nixon took no part, or it could mean a setup by others. To drunken, lecherous politicians exposure with dead girls or live boys is a constant occupational hazard and could be referred to as a bear trap. Just as bears defecate in the woods and step in traps politicians diddle aides and pages and risk exposure and require full time plumbers (like Nixon's own) and trouble shooters to help bury the bodies. (like Chandra Levy, Mary Mahoney and Lori Klausutis and The DC Madam)
ahhh, i didn't know that.
Local rags mentioned $100,000 in cash but I never recall MSM printing such. Also there were rumors she was pregnant.
"...Joe Scarborough has run a ragged course. A few months after Klausutis' death, responding to a question by Chris Matthews about what would happen to an aide left his employ and wrote about him, Scarborough blurted out "I think they'd be in danger." Abandoning his congressional seat, his role in publishing the Florida Sun and an active legal career with the Levin Law Firm, Joe Scarborough eventually re-married, left northwest Florida and moved to New York, to join the stable of sideshows at MSNBC. Recently Don Imus slagged Scarborough with a question from left field: "You said you had sex with that intern and then you had to kill her." Scarborough, laughing, replied, "Yeah, well what are you gonna do?"
I swear, chris, the more I studied the case the more disgusted I became with that drunken tub of shit senator. I really need to believe in divine retribution or karma or something, and it would disturb me greatly to believe that he will never have to pay for what he did. The next morning he was showered and dressed and strolling casually outside his hotel, (after swimming across at the ferry crossing in the dark to distance himself from the scene) probably believing that his lawyers had either reported that Mary Jo drove away alone in Ted's car the night before, or reporting the accident and saying that one of them was in the car with her. But, THEY were under the impression that BRAVE SIR TED was going to call the police, and the resulting confusion meant that no one did anything in the remaining time there was to rescue Mary Jo before she exhausted the air pocket in Ted's "constituent service buggy ". I really hate him for that. And, if not for that then certainly because he insists on rubbing our noses in his specialness. He insisted on remaining the Senator from Massachusetts for the next 38 years, and no amount of public outcry could shake his apparent sense of entitlement by virtue of the family's wealth and influence and/or his brothers' accomplishments and sacrifice. (Remember that the eldest, Joe Jr. died a war hero) He absolutely refuses to bear any apparent shame despite the fact that the appearance of possible impropriety alone should have forced his resignation. (Imagine the horror if she had been driving and he had died, and then she accepted an offer to work for another US Senator!" GASP! That shameless goldbricking hussy!) I have no doubt that he is in good standing with the Church that allows dead souls to be liberated from Purgatory (if enough cash is dedicated to the search for the door) and the people of MASS are a solid machine that guarantees his job as "senator for life". So, that leaves only his conscience. Well, that would be enough for me. His despicable ability to quickly forgive himself and his unshakable sense of entitlement make him truly unique (like a pair of horns) in my eyes. (He no doubt basked in the fawners' support as they said "We need you down in Washington, Senator!! Please, don't even think about resigning!" "Okay, I won't. Let me see how my staff and the Kopechnes feel about it...are the cameras gone? This neck brace is starting to irritate me....") He is truly one of America's most unsavory public figures, and if he found the cure for AIDS and cancer it still wouldn't be enough (in my view) to displace the number one footnote to his career, the negligent and needless death (but to save his career) of someone he could have saved, someone waiting, terrified in the dark who was no doubt praying that he'd be back with help, Mary Jo Kopechne.
Recently Don Imus slagged Scarborough with a question from left field: "You said you had sex with that intern and then you had to kill her." Scarborough, laughing, replied, "Yeah, well what are you gonna do?" G_D help us all. That is ghastly beyond belief. As a meathead FLA Pub he was probably CIA, anti Castro or part of the Colombian Mule Train Express once the flights landed, or possibly all three. The CIA has openly boasted about their solid control of the media. How could he not be an asset? "Hey, Joe, you're a great patriot, congressman and media shining star, but, we just don't have any openings right now. But you're a top prospective at Langley and we really appreciate your support...."
A friend who referred me here sent me a document from 1947 written for a bunch of world socialists that really hit home for me. That JFK was onto them and willing to speak out says a lot. It explains why Hebert Walker Bush was involved in blowing his brains out too.
The NWO had to silence him.
The NWO had to silence him. The same as they would do to Obama or mcCain or any of their other puppets should they deviate from the Master Plan.
If that was the speech, I think this was the letter. ---------------------------------------- www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/isr...ments/exchange/index.html The Kennedy/Ben Gurion/Eshkol Nuclear Exchange Documents Document 1. On 5 July (1963), less than ten days after Levi Eshkol became prime minister, Ambassador Barbour delivered a 3-page letter to him from President John Kennedy. Not since President Eisenhower's message to Ben Gurion, in the midst of the Suez crisis in November 1956, had an American president been so blunt with an Israeli prime minister. Kennedy told Eshkol that the American commitment and support of Israel 'could be seriously jeopardized' if Israel did not let the United States obtain 'reliable information' about Israel's efforts in the nuclear field. In the letter Kennedy presented specific demands on how the American inspection visits to Dimona should be executed. Since the United States had not been involved in the building of Dimona and no international law or agreement had been violated, Kennedy demands were indeed unprecedented. They amounted, in effect, to American ultimatum. Source: Israel State Archive, Jerusalem For more information: Israel and the Bomb, 153-162.
I agree.
I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option_(book) the revelation that U.S. President John F. Kennedy attempted to persuade Israel to abandon its nuclear program, and angry notes were exchanged between Kennedy and Israeli Premier David Ben-Gurion in 1963. # The White House under Kennedy was “fixated” upon what to do about Israel’s nuclear weapons. However, none of the prominent Kennedy biographers, including Arthur Schlesinger and Theodore C. Sorensen mentioned the fact.[9] President Johnson suppressed the January, 1965 Gilpatric report which called for tough anti-nuclear proliferation efforts, including against Israel, because he feared backlash from American Jews. In June 1965 Senator Robert F. Kennedy publicly called for many of the report’s recommendations, invoking his assassinated brother’s name, thus provoking Johnson to further bury the report.[11]
Thanks.
An example of revisionist history. Fact: The Kennedy Administration was “fixated” upon preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons. Fact: After the Kennedy assassination, Johnson assisted Israel in their nuclear weapons program. Cui bono?
The NWO had to silence him. The same as they would do to Obama or mcCain or any of their other puppets should they deviate from the Master Plan. Word!
Gilpatric Report
Any relation to the traitorous James Schlesinger clan?
Greetings. Thanks for joining in with us.
The NWO had to silence him. The same as they would do to Obama or mcCain or any of their other puppets should they deviate from the Master Plan. Word! I love Freedom4um! You people get it!!
All I did was give reasons why I am willing to consider it. They had already shot 2 kennedys, the third was going to run. I would expect the NWO to come up with something creative, why not this? My arguments don't have to be compelling to you, i like em, that's enough for me.
Thanks for joining in with us. Thank you guys for being so intuitive and accepting! I hope this isn't a dream where I wake up back in NEOCONland where I lurked before I heard of Freedom4um!
Well, your post to me (14) seemed like a modest attempt to support your belief in a conspiracy. I invested quite a bit of energy in my post (8) in the attempt to explain my views to you. Had I known that asking you to elaborate and to engage in honest to goodness dialog would result in a flip response I wouldn't have posted to you. Sorry for any trouble I may have caused. I won't make that mistake again.
Yeth we dew!!
Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!
I never heard that hypothesis before. The most compelling reason I can think of would be that killing all 3 Kennedys might have raised more than a few eyebrows.
I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.
Any relation to the traitorous James Schlesinger clan? Other than the fact they are/were both Jewish, I am unaware of any relation. Thanks for the question. It does appear interesting that a Jewish biographer of JFK would leave out the important fact that the Kennedy Administration was fixed on preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons. Another example of revisionist history is the treatment of the The Khazar Empire and its Heritage.
I have no desire to elaborate, no facts to offer, because I'm not out to convince. That's my point. I just think its an interesting theory that does not need to be dismissed out of hand as impossible. If there is compelling proof, I don't think i'll find here from bed. No offense was intended.
...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.
Sometimes you would think that's all it takes. ;-)
I don't think it is corrosive effect as much as it is an indicator of the type of people who would volunteer to serve in a military engaged in such a war. Anyone with any sense would steer well clear of service at this point in time.
I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.
Why would they want to kill the stupid one who embraced world socialism the minute he knew the Plan?
...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones. Of course had it been an Iraqi infant they would have gotten promotions. -end sarcasm-
Which probably explains why Mike Reagan put out a hit on Dice for starting a campaign to wake up our soldiers. The really sad thing is that these ass hats come back to the police state and join the local goon squad.
Comments (54 - 69) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latesthe's always been an alcoholic womanizing letch
#14. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8)
As it turned out there was no need for a conspiracy to keep Ted out of The White House
#15. To: christine (#12)
Green had his back to the door of the room. kennedy suddenly eyeballed someone and said, "I'm going to f**k that." Green turned around to see that it was his own 14 yr old daughter, who had accompanied him on the trip, and had just entered the room. he said to kennedy, "oh, no you're not. that's my daughter," to which kennedy replied, "i don't care."
Lord Acton
#16. To: christine. the thread (#12)
Green turned around to see that it was his own 14 yr old daughter, who had accompanied him on the trip, and had just entered the room. he said to kennedy, "oh, no you're not. that's my daughter," to which kennedy replied, "i don't care."
#17. To: lodwick (#16)
Another perfect example of why the Ted was so useless, and harmless, that his worthless carcass is still drawing oxygen.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#18. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8)
He was driving, drinking, leching, partying with a girl from the office on an expired driver's license and no conspiracy could have possibly been more effective than his own arrogant expectation of illicit pleasure with no accountability to his family, his constituents, his staff or the police.
#19. To: castletrash (#14)
As it turned out there was no need for a conspiracy to keep Ted out of The White House
#20. To: lodwick (#11)
It's also out there that MaryJo was carrying Ted's child.
#21. To: castletrash (#13)
Not saying he was squeaky clean.. just saying its a good plausible way to stage a political downfall.
#22. To: HOUNDDAWG (#20)
The attempt to autopsy her remains was opposed by her family, who were supportive of the good senator, especially so after he bought them a house....
#23. To: christine (#22)
(Edited)
#24. To: HOUNDDAWG (#21)
trouble shooters to help bury the bodies. (like Chandra Levy, Mary Mahoney and Lori Klausutis ...
#25. To: christine (#22)
#26. To: angle (#24)
"...Joe Scarborough has run a ragged course. A few months after Klausutis' death, responding to a question by Chris Matthews about what would happen to an aide left his employ and wrote about him, Scarborough blurted out "I think they'd be in danger." Abandoning his congressional seat, his role in publishing the Florida Sun and an active legal career with the Levin Law Firm, Joe Scarborough eventually re-married, left northwest Florida and moved to New York, to join the stable of sideshows at MSNBC.
#27. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
What the heck is that on Poppy's lap?
#28. To: Rotara (#27)
That JFK was onto them..
#29. To: TwentyTwelve (#28)
That JFK was onto them..
#30. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
(Edited)
Speech That Killed John F. Kennedy he eludes NEW WORLD ORDER
#31. To: honway (#30)
I think this was the letter
#32. To: All (#30)
#33. To: honway (#30)
#34. To: All (#32)
The White House under Kennedy was “fixated” upon what to do about Israel’s nuclear weapons. However, none of the prominent Kennedy biographers, including Arthur Schlesinger and Theodore C. Sorensen mentioned the fact.[9]
#35. To: Rotara, TwentyTwelve (#29)
That JFK was onto them..
#36. To: All (#32)
President Johnson suppressed the January, 1965 Gilpatric report which called for tough anti-nuclear proliferation efforts, including against Israel, because he feared backlash from American Jews. In June 1965 Senator Robert F. Kennedy publicly called for many of the report’s recommendations, invoking his assassinated brother’s name, thus provoking Johnson to further bury the report.
#37. To: honway (#34)
Arthur Schlesinger
#38. To: Rotara (#29)
#39. To: HOUNDDAWG, TwentyTwelve, Christine (#35)
That JFK was onto them..
#40. To: HOUNDDAWG, (#19)
You obviously want to believe that Mary Jo's death was the result of some scheme to discredit Kennedy. What I don't see is why you lean that way. If you have some compelling evidence or argument then why not share it?
#41. To: lodwick (#38)
Greetings.
#42. To: castletrash (#40)
#43. To: Rotara (#39)
#44. To: HOUNDDAWG (#43)
Yeth we dew!!
#45. To: castletrash (#40)
Mary Jo's death was the result of some scheme to discredit Kennedy
#46. To: Rotara (#37)
(Edited)
Arthur Schlesinger
#47. To: HOUNDDAWG (#42)
asking you to elaborate and to engage in honest to goodness dialog
#48. To: Rotara (#44)
Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!
#49. To: honway (#46)
Other than the fact they are/were both Jewish, I am unaware of any relation. Thanks for the question. It does appear interesting that a Jewish biographer of JFK would leave out the important fact that the Kennedy Administration was fixed on preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons.
#50. To: HOUNDDAWG (#48)
...A low point for the corps, and a textbook example of the corrosive effect a pointless slaughter has on the morals of young men serving the evil ones.
#51. To: Critter, castletrash (#45)
I never heard that hypothesis before. The most compelling reason I can think of would be that killing all 3 Kennedys might have raised more than a few eyebrows.
#52. To: HOUNDDAWG (#48)
Cute dawg! Don't let certain Marines get their hands on it. Oops!
#53. To: Critter (#50)
I don't think it is corrosive effect as much as it is an indicator of the type of people who would volunteer to serve in a military engaged in such a war. Anyone with any sense would steer well clear of service at this point in time.
.
.
.