See other War, War, War Articles
Title: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran
Source:
Global Research,
URL Source: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9377
Published: Jun 18, 2008
Author: Andrew W Cheetham
Post Date: 2008-06-19 22:26:52 by rack42
Keywords: Iran, blockade
Views: 200
Comments: 12
A US House of Representatives Resolution effectively requiring a naval blockade on Iran seems fast tracked for passage, gaining co-sponsors at a remarkable speed, but experts say the measures called for in the resolutions amount to an act of war. H.CON.RES 362 calls on the president to stop all shipments of refined petroleum products from reaching Iran. It also "demands" that the President impose "stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains and cargo entering or departing Iran." Analysts say that this would require a US naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. Since its introduction three weeks ago, the resolution has attracted 146 cosponsors. Forty-three members added their names to the bill in the past two days. In the Senate, a sister resolution S.RES 580 has gained co-sponsors with similar speed. The Senate measure was introduced by Indiana Democrat Evan Bayh on June 2. In little more than a week’s time, it has accrued 19 co-sponsors. AIPAC's Endorsement Congressional insiders credit America’s powerful pro-Israel lobby for the rapid endorsement of the bills. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) held its annual policy conference June 2-4, in which it sent thousands of members to Capitol Hill to push for tougher measures against Iran. On its website, AIPAC endorses the resolutions as a way to ''Stop Irans Nuclear Proliferation" and tells readers to lobby Congress to pass the bill. AIPAC has been ramping up the rhetoric against Iran over the last 3 years delivering 9 issue memos to Congress in 2006, 17 in 2007 and in the first five months of 2008 has delivered no less than 11 issue memos to the Congress and Senate predominantly warning of Irans nuclear weapons involvement and support for terrorism. The Resolutions put forward in the House and the Senate bear a resounding similarity to AIPAC analysis and Issue Memos in both its analysis and proposals even down to its individual components. Proponents say the resolutions advocate constructive steps toward reducing the threat posed by Iran. "It is my hope that…this Congress will urge this and future administrations to lead the world in economically isolating Iran in real and substantial ways," said Congressman Mike Pence(R-IN), who is the original cosponsor of the House resolution along with Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Chairman of the sub committee on Middle East and South Asia of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Foreign policy analysts worry that such unilateral sanctions make it harder for the US to win the cooperation of the international community on a more effective multilateral effort. In his online blog, Senior Fellow in the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies Ethan Chorin points out that some US allies seek the economic ties to Iran that these resolutions ban. "The Swiss have recently signed an MOU with Iran on gas imports; the Omanis are close to a firm deal (also) on gas imports from Iran; a limited-services joint Iranian-European bank just opened a branch on Kish Island," he writes. These resolutions could severely escalate US-Iran tensions, experts say. Recalling the perception of the naval blockade of Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the international norms classifying a naval blockade an act of war, critics argue endorsement of these bills would signal US intentions of war with Iran. Last week’s sharp rise in the cost of oil following Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz’s threat to attack Iran indicated the impact that global fear of military action against Iran can have on the world petroleum market. It remains unclear if extensive congressional endorsement of these measures could have a similar effect. In late May, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert reportedly urged the United States to impose a blockade on Iran. During a meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in Jersusalem, Olmert said economic sanctions have "exhausted themselves" and called a blockade a "good possibility." Last Action: Jun 2, 2008: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Poster Comment: Yes. Let's do this. Israel is endangered. Oil? Those damn Iranians wont accept US Dollars. So, HELL YA! Let's bomb them ragheads (eventhought they aren't ragheads) TO HELL. Oil supply? WHO NEEDS OIL! Just bomb them! STOP MAKING SENSE!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: rack42 (#0)
Do these morons understand that a Naval Blockade is an act of war?
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
of course they know. the boss has given them their marching orders.
All your Straits of Hormuz are ours.
I guess they want gas to go to $10/gallon.
Don'tcha love bipartisanship. Wonder what the Obamawallahs think of this. On a historical note, the embargo of Japan worked great in 1940 and 41.
Ya think? Really? The Democrat brand lied in '06 and took over. Bush and Snow nearly jizzed themselves when all opposition to Amnesty and the NAU was effectively buried in the now defunct Republican brand. Now, I wonder how the Big O is going to spin this? ;-)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
WWOD?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
WWOlmertDo?
Olmert/Obama/mcCain/Clinton/Bush/Blair: it's all the same. ;-)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
A fair point. Sock-puppets for zion.
#2. To: Horse, rack42 (#1)
but experts say the measures called for in the resolutions amount to an act of war.
#3. To: rack42 (#0)
Analysts say that this would require a US naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz.
#4. To: rack42 (#0)
#5. To: Horse (#1)
Do these morons understand that a Naval Blockade is an act of war?
#6. To: christine (#2)
#7. To: rack42 (#0)
A US House of Representatives Resolution effectively requiring a naval blockade on Iran seems fast tracked for passage, gaining co-sponsors at a remarkable speed, but experts say the measures called for in the resolutions amount to an act of war.
#8. To: Pinguinite (#5)
I guess they want gas to go to $10/gallon.
#9. To: rack42 (#0)
Stop This Insanity bump
#10. To: Rotara. all who are apalled (#8)
#11. To: lodwick (#10)
WWOlmertDo?
#12. To: Rotara (#11)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest