See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: What's Happening To Obama?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.opednews.com
Published: Jun 25, 2008
Author: SDrobny
Post Date: 2008-06-25 20:50:31 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 643
Comments: 10
What's Happening To Obama? by SDrobny http://www.opednews.com June 25, 2008 To All Obama Advisors And Insiders: OK. I just wrote the congratulatory article below a month ago and today Obama disagrees with the Supreme Court decision striking down the death penalty in cases not involving murder. A few days ago he decided to decline public financing. I just saw a CNN interview with Senator Feingold in which I learned that Obama is going to support the current FISA legislation that gives retroactive immunity to the telecom companies which Feingold vehemently opposes. I am starting to get worried about this and it is only 1 month. You are going to lose the "base" and make the election closer than it should be. How can a true liberal be for the death penalty especially in cases not involving murder? How can a true liberal vote for corporate immunity for violations of privacy? I understand his position on public financing in these narrow circumstances, but the cumulative effect is devastating and he will start to lose support. You will start to see this in the next series of polls. Furthermore, Obama starts to stutter and stammer with issues and presentations in which he does not truly believe. I saw that clearly today in the press conference he had in Chicago. You guys need to get out of your bubble and look to those of us who are on your side in the real liberal media. Help!!! And don't tell me that this is good general election strategy. You cannot beat Republicans by playing in their "briar patch." If you are thinking about 1988 and Dukakis you do not need to think about the Kity being raped and murdered question posed by Bernard Shaw. Furthermore, the incumbent President at the time was Reagan, not Bush. Reagan had a 50+ % approval rating and Bush is down to 28%. There is no need for this.
Poster Comment: This article comes from the uber left, and even the most overt socialists are scratching their collective heads at Obama's capitulation to more Bush-like government.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
*GASP* - You mean the MONIED ELITES who own this oligarchy are going to end up getting what THEY want at the expense of the rest of us? NO! Say it isn't so! But, but ... I thought we had a representative government, that .... reflected the ... will of the ... people.... and.... and... BWWWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA! HOOO! HO! HA HA! HA HA HOOO HOOO HOOOOOOO HO HO HO HO HO! HAHAHAHAHA HOOOO HOOO HOO HOO *gasp* HO HA HA HOOOO HO HO HO *wheeze* HA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Sorry, sorry, couldn't keep a straight face. My apologies... I'm just lousy at bald-faced lying. Sorry....
 | Gold and silver are REAL money, paper is but a promise. |
#2. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
Soros, Brzezinsky, Kissinger, Bush, Clinton, Obama, mcCain, Man Made Global Climate Change, 911, Amnesty, North American Union, More World War, LOL, HAHA, WTH; changewehope; changethediaper, smelly, FEMACAMPS. ;-)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#3. To: Elliott Jackalope, Rotara, all (#1)
Funny..... Pure WWF wrestling for the Ds v Rs.....and they NEVER fail to buy the act, year in, year out. Obama and McCain exist because THEY empower them, it's that simple.
#4. To: Jethro Tull (#3)
People stare at reality all the time and deny it exists. ;-)
Pure WWF wrestling for the Ds v Rs.....and they NEVER fail to buy the act, year in, year out. Obama and McCain exist because THEY empower them, it's that simple.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#5. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
This is a head-fake. Its the move to the center. Run left to get the nomination, then move to the center to pick up the independents. Its formula. Everyone does it. Why the libs don't comprehend standard strategy is beyond comprehension.
"A leader, for a change." - Jimmy Carter, 1976 campaign slogan. Sound familiar? Here it comes again!
#6. To: mirage (#5)
You smiled when you said that, right? ;-)
Why the libs don't comprehend standard strategy is beyond comprehension.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#7. To: mirage (#5)
The libs miss it for the same reason the Rs miss the "conservative" nomination rhetoric followed by a fade to the middle once it's secured.
Its formula. Everyone does it. Why the libs don't comprehend standard strategy is beyond comprehension
#8. To: Jethro Tull (#7)
In the meantime the globalists keep on keepin on towards their prize. Nothing changes. The flight path stays the same. Would you like some mexican tomato on your sh*t sammich? ;-)
The libs miss it for the same reason the Rs miss the "conservative" nomination rhetoric followed by a fade to the middle once it's secured.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#9. To: mirage (#5)
Ah, but the catch lies in what will they do after elected. As I've noted before, the "R"s went though the exact same song and dance with Dubya. The Far right 'one issuers' (Pro-Gun, Isolationist, small government, states rights) types were told to sit down and shut up and that their views would be championed after they voted Bush Jr. into office. We all saw how that turned out. After the election it went from 'sit down and shut up' to 'we don't need you any more so get lost.' I think the more alert members of the anti-war and anti-police state left are starting to believe that they too will be kicked to the curb by Obama once their usefulness (read: votes) has run out.
Its formula. Everyone does it. Why the libs don't comprehend standard strategy is beyond comprehension.
"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me.
"If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.
#10. To: Pissed Off Janitor (#9)
Speaking of them, I never understood why they wanted to (UNConstitutionally) steal from me and grow Feral Leviathan. Oh, never mind. I totally understand. ;-)
the anti-war and anti-police state left
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest