See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Christian Group Launches “Abortion President” Campaign against Barack Obama
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/404789.aspx
Published: Jul 7, 2008
Author: The Brody FIle
Post Date: 2008-07-07 19:46:55 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 1630
Comments: 63
Oh my. The fight against Barack Obama on abortion has officially begun. The Christian Defense Coalition, who are known to shock folks from time to time, have come up with a new campaign called: “Barack Obama: The Abortion President”. They are going to make clear that Obama wants taxpayers to foot the bill on abortions. They are also going to lay bare his record on abortion. They’ll conduct a news conference Tuesday in front of the Hart Senate Office Building where Obama’s Senate office is located. Look at the picture they are unveiling. Pretty shocking. Click here. Read a statement below from Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, Director of the Christian Defense Coalition: "Senator Obama talks about bringing hope, faith and change to American politics. We now see this is all just political 'doublespeak.' One of his top priorities as President would be protecting abortion rights and even expanding them. If elected, Senator Obama would become 'The Abortion President,' with the most extremist policies on abortion of any President in history. "Senator Obama's views on abortion are so radical that he even wants American citizens to pay for them. This would include Catholics, Evangelicals and all people of faith. He would also expand abortion rights through his passionate support of The Freedom of Choice Act. "The Christian Defense Coalition will be working diligently over the next 5 months before the November elections to educate people of faith, especially Catholics, that Barack Obama wants them to pay for abortions. This is not a candidate who is concerned about social justice, hope and equality. Rather, this is candidate who will continue the violence and pain of abortion and refuse to end this tragic war against America's women and children." Obama campaign spokesman Hari Sevugan sent out the following statement: “Barack Obama understands that the best way to reduce the need for abortions is to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies. He is committed to commonsense solutions to achieve that objective and to changing the tone of the discourse which for too long has devolved into false and negative attacks such as this that do nothing to accomplish that goal” Folks, The Brody File has been telling you this sort of effort was coming. Some of these pro-life groups look at the polling and find that many Americans either think Obama is either pro-life or they’re not sure. This campaign is an attempt to set the record straight. Don't think for a minute this is one 'fringe" group. This effort represents the broader feelings with many conservative Evangelical groups. This is Obama’s challenge with Evangelicals. He can talk about the social justice issues all he wants and yes, it resonates to a certain extent but unless he moves on abortion (not likely) he’ll have a problem. If he shows some support for parental notification laws or the annual fetal pain bill that moves through Congress then that will help insulate him to a degree on the extremist abortion tag. The bigger issue here for the Obama campaign is just how widespread and vocal pro-life groups may end up being on this issue. Obama can’t afford the extreme liberal tag and if these groups continue to pound home the abortion theme, it doesn’t fit the narrative that Obama needs to be successful.
Poster Comment: 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 60.
#4. To: christine (#0)
Every President since Nixon has been 'The Abortion President', have they not? The difference with the Opuppet is that he's demonstrated a lust for death. mcCain is no better. A quisling is a quisling. ;-)
No they have not.
No they have not. Lay it on me!
Reagan wasn't an abortion president. He has a consistent pro life record. Even the Bushes deserve a little bit of credit on this issue. A little credit not a lot. A tiny bit.
What has either Bush ever done to help overturn Roe v. Wade? None of their supreme court appointments ever say a word about it.
Roe v. Wade is a joke. Any POTUS that really wanted to protect unborn living Americans could do it and do it lawfully. ;-)
How? What could any President do unilaterally? He first would need a bill passed by Congress, and it would have to pass the SCOTUS where Roe v. Wade is a litmus test. That's why when the Constitution Party claims that they will immediately put an end to all abortions in America if one of theirs is elected President, it's kind of laughable. Let's say Chuck Baldwin actually became POTUS. What could he, or anyone else do legally but unilaterally?
That's why when the Constitution Party claims that they will immediately put an end to all abortions in America if one of theirs is elected President, it's kind of laughable. Let's say Chuck Baldwin actually became POTUS. What could he, or anyone else do legally but unilaterally? How were the rights of Black Americans enforced when they were being murdered?
There was no Supreme Court decision authorizing nationwide murder of blacks.
There is no Supreme Court, hasn't been in a century or more. That's my point! ;-)
There are no replies to Comment # 60. End Trace Mode for Comment # 60.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#29. To: Rotara (#4)
Every President since Nixon has been 'The Abortion President', have they not?
#31. To: Old Friend (#29)
Every President since Nixon has been 'The Abortion President', have they not?
#36. To: Rotara (#31)
#39. To: Old Friend (#36)
(Edited)
Even the Bushes deserve a little bit of credit on this issue. A little credit not a lot. A tiny bit.
#46. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#39)
What has either Bush ever done to help overturn Roe v. Wade? None of their supreme court appointments ever say a word about it.
#51. To: Rotara (#46)
Any POTUS that really wanted to protect unborn living Americans could do it and do it lawfully. ;-)
#56. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#51)
How? What could any President do unilaterally? He first would need a bill passed by Congress, and it would have to pass the SCOTUS where Roe v. Wade is a litmus test.
#58. To: Rotara (#56)
#60. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#58)
There was no Supreme Court decision authorizing nationwide murder of blacks.
Replies to Comment # 60.