See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: The Science of Air Pharmacology or Chemtrails
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Author: Jim Phelps
Post Date: 2008-07-10 04:28:30 by wudidiz
Keywords: None
Views: 312
Comments: 8
The Science of Air Pharmacology or Chemtrails
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
WTF?
Please, what do you think of this?
The same names keep coming up, Rockefeller and Bush
I suspect this is a "limited hang-out" i.e., partial information which lies by omission. In my reading I have run into analyses of chemtrail residue that suggest that there are other compounds in the chemtrails formula - Barium and Aluminum along with bioactive molecules. At this point too many people are aware and asking questions and so the government has to give some kind of answer. So, the classical tactic, when you don't want to be truthful, is to use a plausible cover story and do a limited admission. Twenty Five Ways to Suppress The Truth: The Rules of Disinformation Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation 1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil So far we have been through 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 14 on the chemtrails - and possibly a couple others. We are now at: 11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues. 20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. 22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively. This would seem to be part of the disinformation campaign. I cannot yet say that with certainty, but I smell a rat.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
Yes.
...This would seem to be part of the disinformation campaign. I cannot yet say that with certainty, but I smell a rat. That's basically what I was thinking too. Oh yeah, it's for our own good. But all the aluminum... Thank you.
I am glad you have seen the light citizen. Just remember: Aluminum is good for you (regardless of what those nasty health quacks say about alzheimers and toxicity). Fluoride is good for you. Just because the Nazis used it to pacify Prison Camp inmates (and causes Brain lesions) is no reason to give up a perfectly good, but ineffective, cavity fighter. Just because it reduces your I.Q. by damaging brain tissue is no reason to get alarmed. And forget that Prozac, and most other anti-depressants are fluoride compounds. And never mind that there is mercury in your vaccines along with viruses (and aspartame?). The Go back to sleep. War is Peace Freedom is Slavery Ignorance is Strength
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
Thank you now I'm 'cured'.
"When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS." ~ Mahatma Ghandi
#2. To: Original_Intent, TwentyTwelve, FormerLurker, christine, Itisa1mosttoolate, All (#0)
"An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind." ~ Mahatma Ghandi
#3. To: wudidiz (#2)
#4. To: wudidiz (#2)
2. Become incredulous and indignant
3. Create rumor mongers
4. Use a straw man
5. Sidetrack opponents w name calling, ridicule
6. Hit and Run
7. Question motives
8. Invoke authority
9. Play Dumb
10. Associate opponent charges with old news
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions
12. Enigmas have no solution
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic
14. Demand complete solutions
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses
17. Change the subject
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad
19. Ignore facts, demand impossible proofs
20. False evidence
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor
22. Manufacture a new truth
23. Create bigger distractions
24. Silence critics
25. Vanish
#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#3)
The same names keep coming up, Rockefeller and Bush
"An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind." ~ Mahatma Ghandi
#6. To: Original_Intent (#4)
...the classical tactic, when you don't want to be truthful, is to use a plausible cover story and do a limited admission...
"An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind." ~ Mahatma Ghandi
#7. To: wudidiz (#6)
Oh yeah, it's for our own good.
government Big Brother loves you and isn't really trying to kill you to help reduce the world population by 80%.
#8. To: Original_Intent (#7)
"An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind." ~ Mahatma Ghandi
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest