[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Nepal's Gen Z protest against Govt in Kathmandu Explained In-depth Analysis

13 Major World War III Developments That Have Happened Just Within The Past 48 Hours

France On Fire! Chaos & Anarchy grip Paris as violent protesters clash with police| Macron to quit?

FDA Chief Says No Solid Evidence Supporting Hepatitis B Vaccine At Birth

"Hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles POURING into Chicago"

'I'll say every damn name': Marjorie Taylor Green advocates for Epstein victims during rally

The long-awaited federal crackdown on illegal alien crime in Chicago has finally arrived.

Cash Jordan: ICE BLOCKS 'Cartel Caravan'... HAULS 'Army of Illegals' BACK TO MEXICO

Berenson On Black Violence, Woke Lies, & Right-Wing Rage

What the Professor omitted about the collapse of the American Empire.

Israel Tried to Kill Hamas in Qatar — Here’s What REALLY Happened

Katie Hopkins: Laurence Fox and my beaver. NOT FOR THE WEAK

Government Accidentally Reveals Someone Inside Twitter Fabricated 'Gotcha' Accounts To Frame Conservative Firebrand

The Magna Carta Of 2022 – Worldwide Declaration of Freedom

Hamas Accuses Trump Of A Set-Up In Doha, After 5 Leaders Killed In Israeli Strike

Cash Jordan: Angry Voters Go “Shelter To Shelter”... EMPTYING 13 Migrant Hotels In 2 Hours

Israel targets Hamas leadership in attack on Qatar’s Doha, group says no members killed

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Monday that villages in the Israeli-occupied West Bank should look like cities in Gaza

FBI Arrests 22 Chinese, 4 Pharma Companies, Preventing Disaster That Could Kill 70 Million Americans

911 Make Believe

New CLARITY Act Draft Could Shield Crypto Developers From Past Liability

Chicago Builds a Wall To Protect Illegal ALiens From Ice

Sens. Scott, Johnson Launch Investigation into Palisades Fire; Demand Newsom's Cooperation

"Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

Cash Jordan: Looters EMPTY Chicago Mall... as Mayor's 'No Arrests' Policy BACKFIRES

Caitlin Johnstone: They Just Bombed Greta Thunberg's Boat

Democrats MELTDOWN Over RFK Jr.

Bill Gates, Truth About Vaccines, & Big Pharma’s Plot to Destroy Doctors Who Question ”The Science”

Supreme Court upholds 'roving patrols' for immigration stops in Los Angeles

MN Gunman’s Pot Use Is Further Evidence Against Rescheduling Marijuana


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: The Democrats are the Real Problem
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney07212008.html
Published: Jul 21, 2008
Author: Mike Whitney
Post Date: 2008-07-21 18:37:33 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 598
Comments: 22

Obama's candidacy is over; kaput. He's already stated that he has no intention of stopping the war, so he has disqualified himself. That's his prerogative; no one put a gun to his head. His op-ed in Monday's New York Times just removes any lingering doubt about the matter. What Obama proposes is moving the central theater of operation from Iraq to Afghanistan. Big deal. Why is it more acceptable to kill a man who is fighting for his country in Afghanistan than in Iraq?

It's not; which is why Obama must be defeated and the equivocating Democratic Party must be jettisoned altogether. The Democrats are a party of blood just like the Republicans, they're just more discreet about it. That's why people who are serious about ending the war have to support candidates outside the two-party charade. The Democrat/Republican duopoly will not deliver the goods; it's as simple as that. The point is to stop the killing, not to provide blind support for smooth-talking politicos who try to mask their real intentions. Obama made his choice, now he can suffer the consequences.

Nancy Pelosi is a perfect example of what the Democrats are all about. Just look at the way she brushed aside the people who got her elected. They mean nothing to her. In a matter of months, the "San Francisco liberal" has achieved what former-Speaker of the House Hastert could only dream of; she's driven the Congress' public approval ratings into single digits for the first time in history making her the worst speaker of all time. She rubber-stamped the FISA bill, concealed what she knew about the CIA's global torture programs, and vowed to stop any public effort to hold the administration accountable for its war crimes. (No impeachment) She has betrayed her most ardent supporters and singlehandedly transformed an already-emasculated congress into a purely ceremonial body incapable of doing the people's work.

At least Bush never betrayed any of his supporters. Never. Pelosi is worse than Bush, much worse.

And yet, liberals still insist that we should vote the Democratic ticket. In your dreams!

What leftist or progressive is not totally fed-up with the Democrats cagey "bait-and-switch" hypocrisy? Voting the Democratic ticket is not a sign of "hope"; it's a sign of being a schmuck. The Democrats have done nothing to stop the war and will do nothing to stop the war. The Obama candidacy is merely a way to replace one group of genocidal maniacs with another. Who needs a charismatic, flannel-mouth glamor boy to lead us into battle when a senile fogy with "anger management" issues will do just fine.

Voters of conscience should reject that choice altogether. Just as they should reject the "lesser of two evils" theory which does not apply when ordinance is being dumped daily on innocent civilians. It has to stop.

Obama is not an antiwar candidate, that is merely a fiction maintained by his public relations team. In fact, he wants to beef up the military with 65,000 additional ground forces and 27,000 more marines. He's also stated that he will add “two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan” and encourage NATO to make “greater contributions—with fewer restrictions”. In his op-ed he boasted, "As president, I will make the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win.”

He also added this ominous warning:

“The greatest threat to that security lies in the tribal regions of Pakistan, where terrorists train and insurgents strike into Afghanistan. We cannot tolerate a terrorist sanctuary, and as president, I won’t. We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO to secure the border, to take out terrorist camps and to crack down on cross-border insurgents. We need more troops, more helicopters, more satellites, more Predator drones in the Afghan border region. And we must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights.”

Obama supporters should take their candidate at his word. What he is proposing is a dramatic escalation and expansion of the war into another sovereign country. How is this consistent with the demands of his base or the millions of Americans who believe that Obama represents real change.

It's time for a reality check; the Democrats are the real problem not the Republicans. If the path to peace requires crushing the Democratic Party and its blood-thirsty candidates; so be it. The main thing is to stop the killing. If Obama won't do it; we'll find someone who will.


Poster Comment:

Disclaimer: Please do not interpret my posting of this commentary to mean that I am a supporter of the republicans or McCain. Note the text I bolded and highlighted in red. ;)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#1. To: christine (#0)

Oh, so you like McCain now? :p

Critter  posted on  2008-07-21   18:48:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Critter (#1)

smarta$$ :)

christine  posted on  2008-07-21   18:59:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: all, christine (#4)

So, do you expect a people who polled recently only 19 percent or respondents cared about these wars? Most focus on the economy, and Obama is smart to move toward the center in his stated positions, including that in regards to the current two wars.

It is hard to post in this forum on this, as most of you never really care to listen, unless it is an opinion coming from one of the main cliques here, so I am going to leave this at that for the moment.

What I have seen here has hardened and deeply strengthened my support and respect for Barack Obama, and don't see much point in posting here too much this election season, frankly. And this is too bad.

Most of the posters in here react to disagreement by shunning dialog with those they do not agree with, and this is your loss. Because I am here to tell you, many of you are right about some things, and drop dead wrong on many others, and dialog would be a good thing for you, and those who disagree with you who take time to take part in lively discussion.

I have always supported the Afghanistan War from the start. But it has been mismanaged and handled very badly.

A low intensity conflict like this one is far different from the invasion of Iraq, and there is nothing wrong with it if it fixes what is broken about that country, and has been so for many decades.

I actually came out in support of this war as Bicycle Thug on the Free Republic, before I knew the extent of Bush/Cheney's criminal activities on 9-11. It is a war we need to finish properly, and a withdrawal would hurt that land and it's people in ways that is unacceptable. Quite unlike what a withdrawal in Iraq would do.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-07-21   19:36:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Ferret Mike (#10)

I have always supported the Afghanistan War from the start. But it has been mismanaged and handled very badly.

So the innocents killed in Afghanistan are "children of a lesser god" than those in Iraq? Neither of these wars were justified and neither was based on a declaration of war by Congress. That being the case, both of these conflicts could be considered war crimes and probably would have been treated as such if it had been some smaller, less powerful country doing it. If you look into it--not saying you haven't because I don't know if you know this or not--but we have not followed the Constitution in matters of war since World War II when Congress did in fact declare war and on a known (and knowable) enemy. This "war on terror" bs, or war on a tactic, is insane. Find and kill the perps through letters of marque and reprisal but don't sell the country into untold and unpayable debt so that some jackass can look good to fawning sympathizers who couldn't tell you that "from each according to his ability and to each according to his need" is a Marxist idea and that it is not found in the Bible or the Constitution.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-07-21   20:14:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

        There are no replies to Comment # 16.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]