[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams

FEMA whistleblowers revealed a treasonous misuse of taxpayer funds.

Exposing how useless FEMA is in Asheville, NC.

Kamala Harris Admin ARRESTED a man for bringing a helicopter full of supplies to Hurricane Helene victims.

MSNBC brings on an anti-Trump impeachment witness, only to be stunned when he announces he's voting for Trump.

She escaped the religious sect she grew up in. Now she says Trump’s MAGA movement is eerily similar

Federal Law REQUIRES Car Makers to MONITOR You

Candace Owens: When are you going to address this, KAMALA?

Democrats Celebrate a Seemingly Impressive September Jobs Report – What They are Not Telling You

The Boiling Point – America Have You Had ‘Enough,’ Yet?

Shopping Malls Implementing Curfews And Teen "Waiting Zones" To Try And Curb Chaos, Theft And Fights

US Public Debt Grew $115 Billion A Day For the Past 3 Days Totaling $345 Billion.

Dramatic Footage Shows Tanker Blown Up In Critical Maritime Chokepoint As Disasters Mount For Biden-Harris

The Remdesivir Papers: Did Service Members Deserve to Die?

“My Blood is Boiling”: Furious Elon Musk Goes Off on FEMA for Blocking SpaceX Engineers from Assisting

“The Stench is Unbearable”: Dead Bodies Piling Up, FEMA Abandons NC Residents Amid Hurricane Helene

Cash and the Constitution

Disaster Relief (INSIDER) Tells Why FEMA Won't Let Citizens Help.

The $212 Billion Dollar Food ingredient poisoning your Brain

"Last Election EVER" - Elon Musk vs Mark Cuban: Billionaires BATTLE Over Dangers If Trump Loses 2024


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: The Democrats are the Real Problem
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney07212008.html
Published: Jul 21, 2008
Author: Mike Whitney
Post Date: 2008-07-21 18:37:33 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 150
Comments: 22

Obama's candidacy is over; kaput. He's already stated that he has no intention of stopping the war, so he has disqualified himself. That's his prerogative; no one put a gun to his head. His op-ed in Monday's New York Times just removes any lingering doubt about the matter. What Obama proposes is moving the central theater of operation from Iraq to Afghanistan. Big deal. Why is it more acceptable to kill a man who is fighting for his country in Afghanistan than in Iraq?

It's not; which is why Obama must be defeated and the equivocating Democratic Party must be jettisoned altogether. The Democrats are a party of blood just like the Republicans, they're just more discreet about it. That's why people who are serious about ending the war have to support candidates outside the two-party charade. The Democrat/Republican duopoly will not deliver the goods; it's as simple as that. The point is to stop the killing, not to provide blind support for smooth-talking politicos who try to mask their real intentions. Obama made his choice, now he can suffer the consequences.

Nancy Pelosi is a perfect example of what the Democrats are all about. Just look at the way she brushed aside the people who got her elected. They mean nothing to her. In a matter of months, the "San Francisco liberal" has achieved what former-Speaker of the House Hastert could only dream of; she's driven the Congress' public approval ratings into single digits for the first time in history making her the worst speaker of all time. She rubber-stamped the FISA bill, concealed what she knew about the CIA's global torture programs, and vowed to stop any public effort to hold the administration accountable for its war crimes. (No impeachment) She has betrayed her most ardent supporters and singlehandedly transformed an already-emasculated congress into a purely ceremonial body incapable of doing the people's work.

At least Bush never betrayed any of his supporters. Never. Pelosi is worse than Bush, much worse.

And yet, liberals still insist that we should vote the Democratic ticket. In your dreams!

What leftist or progressive is not totally fed-up with the Democrats cagey "bait-and-switch" hypocrisy? Voting the Democratic ticket is not a sign of "hope"; it's a sign of being a schmuck. The Democrats have done nothing to stop the war and will do nothing to stop the war. The Obama candidacy is merely a way to replace one group of genocidal maniacs with another. Who needs a charismatic, flannel-mouth glamor boy to lead us into battle when a senile fogy with "anger management" issues will do just fine.

Voters of conscience should reject that choice altogether. Just as they should reject the "lesser of two evils" theory which does not apply when ordinance is being dumped daily on innocent civilians. It has to stop.

Obama is not an antiwar candidate, that is merely a fiction maintained by his public relations team. In fact, he wants to beef up the military with 65,000 additional ground forces and 27,000 more marines. He's also stated that he will add “two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan” and encourage NATO to make “greater contributions—with fewer restrictions”. In his op-ed he boasted, "As president, I will make the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win.”

He also added this ominous warning:

“The greatest threat to that security lies in the tribal regions of Pakistan, where terrorists train and insurgents strike into Afghanistan. We cannot tolerate a terrorist sanctuary, and as president, I won’t. We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO to secure the border, to take out terrorist camps and to crack down on cross-border insurgents. We need more troops, more helicopters, more satellites, more Predator drones in the Afghan border region. And we must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights.”

Obama supporters should take their candidate at his word. What he is proposing is a dramatic escalation and expansion of the war into another sovereign country. How is this consistent with the demands of his base or the millions of Americans who believe that Obama represents real change.

It's time for a reality check; the Democrats are the real problem not the Republicans. If the path to peace requires crushing the Democratic Party and its blood-thirsty candidates; so be it. The main thing is to stop the killing. If Obama won't do it; we'll find someone who will.


Poster Comment:

Disclaimer: Please do not interpret my posting of this commentary to mean that I am a supporter of the republicans or McCain. Note the text I bolded and highlighted in red. ;)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#3. To: christine (#0)

Nothing worse than a progressive, especially a new convert.

Socialism in progressive clothing


University Wire

10-11-2005

(Badger Herald) (U-WIRE) MADISON, Wis. -- Some call it progressivism. I prefer to identify it as socialism. Whatever the label, its seemingly apparent progressives are far more left than Jerry Falwell is right.

I recently attended an academic conference in Milwaukee where the panels discussed the role of government in society. The meeting, unsurprisingly, exposed one of the glaring weaknesses of the progressive movement -- an overly intrusive government.

Given this finding, it's easy to view Madison as the poster child for this faction.

Though the days of "Fighting Bob" La Follette and New Deal paternalism have long past, progressivism is indeed alive and well in our state capitol. But history demonstrates that ideas are never permanent. And there is a solution to the problem facing this city: the creation of an ownership society.

President Bush has described on numerous occasions his desire to return this nation to the principles established by the American founders and encompassed in an ownership society -- a society that stresses, in the Lockean tradition, individual responsibility, liberty, and private property. Bush has spoken of privatizing social security, school vouchers, and health care savings accounts, among others. These issues have one thing in common: non-morally reprehensible choice.

But perhaps in addition to Mr. Bush's increasing interest in an "ownership society," the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Kelo v. New London has brought the values of individual liberty and property back into the political spotlight.

Discourse on this subject is unfortunately absent in this city. I'm not surprised, given one of this city's rags, The Capital Times, proclaims itself as "Wisconsin's progressive newspaper." Nonetheless, there's hope. As Justice Louis Brandeis aptly wrote, "Sunlight is the best disinfectant."

Recent actions taken by the Madison Common Council confirm this city is far from an ownership society. Progressives are responsible for the city's exceedingly broad smoking ban, an increase in the city's minimum wage -- which forced the state legislature to raise the state's wage, and the adoption of mandatory inclusionary zoning, requiring affordable housing in almost all new housing developments in the city.

Government handouts and entitlement programs have always been the progressive's steadfast answer to our society's problems. With the recent tragedy of Hurricane Katrina, though, it became outwardly apparent such responses don't work. Those who suffered most were not necessarily the economically disadvantaged, but those who relied on the government for their basic necessities -- housing, food and health care to name a few.

Given this reliance, it should have been anticipated many would have cried foul when the federal government did not immediately provide the handouts and assistance they were accustomed to in the days after the hurricane made landfall.

The progressive actions of the federal government before the disaster only precipitated the mayhem present in New Orleans. The government decided to partake in the insurance business by providing subsidized flood insurance to those living in the Big Easy -- a flood prone area. Many of these homes and businesses would not have been built in the flood plain without this assistance.

Nonetheless, why should we be concerned with creating an ownership society in Madison? Individual responsibility is a good starting point. During grade school, we were often taught that we must own up to our own actions and subsequently accept the consequences -- whether good or bad. Shouldn't this principle apply to adults, too? When people take responsibility for their persons and property, they take better care of that they have control over.

Wisconsin's welfare system provides an opportunity for citizens to take individual responsibility for their income. The program has the objective that everyone is capable of doing something, and if you can work, you must. Therefore, people become less reliant on government and are able to return to society as productive citizens individually responsible for their subsistence.

Madison's progressive tradition goes against the grain of this successful program.

An ownership society promotes liberty. A free society is necessary for citizens to have control of their lives and property. Regrettably, the city's smoking ban does nothing more than stifle the principle of individual property rights by preventing a legal activity from occurring on private property. In keeping with the ownership society's promotion of choice, Madisonians should have a choice -- an individual choice to enter an establishment where smoking is allowed or prohibited.

In a column posted on the progressive website FightingBob.com, Mayor Dave Cieslewicz remarked, "I want Madison to be the most progressive city in America." He continued, "Cities are becoming the factories of progressive policies and Madison is becoming one of the leading producers of those policies in the Midwest."

Instead of worrying about the machinery needed to garner the "Most Progressive City" title he so desperately desires, Mr. Cieslewicz should be concerned with the problems both within and beyond this city's 76 square miles of unreality. If he did, he would see many of the troubles caused by a progressive society.

Though Progressive Dane and its ideas continue to maintain a strong hold on this city, an ownership society can and should eventually come to fruition. All that's needed is a little bit of sunlight to begin.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-07-21   18:56:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

        There are no replies to Comment # 3.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]