Title: Future U.S. Congressman Tom McClintock (R CA): "I'm Not Sure If Ron Paul Is Presidential Timbre" (vid) Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jul 24, 2008 Author:, Post Date:2008-07-24 17:14:09 by Artisan Ping List:*California list*Subscribe to *California list* Keywords:None Views:209 Comments:13
A bit dated, but I finally uploaded this clip to youtube. 3 minutes. Mcclintock will most likely enter US Congress this january after he wins the empty seat in northern CA.
[Some examples of McClintock's ideology: The CA legislature recently outlawed the 'photoblocker' spray which blocks license plates from being photographed by red light cameras. McClintock was the only one to have voted against that bill. In 2003, McClintock tried to get a constitutional ammendment passed that would have forever abolished the car registration fee, because , he argued, people should not have to pay a tax on something they already own and use as a necessity of life. The people of CA rejected his measure. (!!)] I had always been an ardent supporter of Mcclintock until he endorsed turned tail and endorsed arnold for governor in 2006.
CA State Senator Tom McClintock: "Im Not Sure If Ron Paul Is Presidential Timbre" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BggZShx0-VU
Tom McClintock had previously stated that Ron Paul is the closest candidate to the founding fathers. (link to this audio is below.) Then McClintock, who had ran against Schwarzenegger for governor, changed his tune and endorsed neocon scum Fred Thompson. I called Tom and asked him if he'd endorse Ron Paul.
I sent AN OPEN LETTER TO TOM MCCLINTOCK regarding Ron Paul, available here
I later sent a letter to McClintock regarding 9/11/01, here
McClintock, who I campaigned for in 2003 when he ran against degenerate scum gun-grabber Arnold Schwarzenegger, is currently running for U.S. Congress in northern CA. He is a shoe-in for this position and will most likely win a congressional seat. McClintock, to the dismay of many of his former supporters, endorsed Schwarzenegger for governor in 2006, endorsed pro-war neocon republican hack John Campbell for congress, and then embraced CFRed Thompson. Despite McClintock's abysmal trail of endorsements, his voting record is that of strict constitutionalist and supporter of freedom and limited government. Read his speech FREEDOM AND FIREARMS and you will see what I mean. I conclude that McClintock is a very weak man, easily subject to GOP party pressure.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All, Axenolith, angle, noone222, uncle bill, rotara, lodwick, christine, farmfriend (#0)
ping
MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist." "I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him" George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
CA State Senator Tom McClintock: "Im Not Sure If Ron Paul Is Presidential Timbre" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BggZShx0-VU
And I let some lady who called me from the RNC know today that I didn't think their current candidate was presidential timbre either. She started in her spiel about supporting the party and McCain and I told her I could save her a lot of time and told her I wouldn't support McCain or Obama for dog catcher. That I would have voted for Ron Paul but as things stood I would probably vote for Chuck Baldwin if I even went to vote.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
#6. To: Artisan, buckeye, Cynicom, *California list* (#0)
McClintock disappointed me when he went back to toeing the party line. He is, however, one of the few I would still vote for as the lesser of two evils. That reminds me I still need to mail my new voter registration form. I give up on the Republicans.
I told her I could save her a lot of time and told her I wouldn't support McCain or Obama for dog catcher. That I would have voted for Ron Paul but as things stood I would probably vote for Chuck Baldwin if I even went to vote.
Your analytical skills are perfect within the accepted structure of things ... like if one still believes in VOTING.
If this election cycle doesn't awaken folks to the irrelevance of their vote ... maybe nothing will.
If I were a voting man, I would have drawn the same conclusions.
Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.
He is, however, one of the few I would still vote for as the lesser of two evils.
Amerika, founded upon the principle of the lesser of two evils. Ya gotta be shittin me !
Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.
Just a reminder, folks, this IS what the Second Amendment was, and is, all about.
I truly hate the idea and the consequent trauma ... but "they" are forcing the issue.
Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.
Your analytical skills are perfect within the accepted structure of things ... like if one still believes in VOTING.
If this election cycle doesn't awaken folks to the irrelevance of their vote ... maybe nothing will.
If I were a voting man, I would have drawn the same conclusions.
Actually, I think the game is rigged too. What other conclusion could you come to when you know that in a nation of something like 300 MILLION people the only ones who have any chance of "winning" are two hand-picked establishment lackeys? And this time we get to choose from a certifiable nutcase in McCain and a racist who hates whitey with Obama. Isn't that special?!?!
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
Actually, I think the game is rigged too. What other conclusion could you come to when you know that in a nation of something like 300 MILLION people the only ones who have any chance of "winning" are two hand-picked establishment lackeys? And this time we get to choose from a certifiable nutcase in McCain and a racist who hates whitey with Obama. Isn't that special?!?!
OH yes, this election has proven beyond a shadow to me of things being rigged. The Ron Paul votes showed that. He is consistently getting 3% until McCain has it sewn up then the numbers jump to 25%? And the vote totals in his own district were just weird.
OH yes, this election has proven beyond a shadow to me of things being rigged. The Ron Paul votes showed that. He is consistently getting 3% until McCain has it sewn up then the numbers jump to 25%? And the vote totals in his own district were just weird.
I don't even think they are trying to hide the fact anymore that it is just a "con the mug" racket. They know that people have been so brainwashed, or enough of them have, to vote for who they are told to vote for, one bunch voting for a D and the other bunch for the letter R, that it doesn't matter if a few of us here and there know what's going on. And you are right, that whole farce was weird and might have been comical except for the fact that they cheated a good man out of the nomination and cheated America out of a real leader.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton