[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Market WrapUp (7-25-2008)
Source: FSO
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 25, 2008
Author: Tim
Post Date: 2008-07-25 18:35:45 by orangedog
Ping List: *unUsual Suspects*     Subscribe to *unUsual Suspects*
Keywords: None
Views: 747
Comments: 43

Financial Sense Online Market WrapUp with Tim W. Wood 07/25/2008

topmargin="0" leftmargin="0">

Financial Sense ® Home l Market Monitor l Market WrapUp l Storm Watch l About Us l Contact Us

Today's Market WrapUp 07.25.2008 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Wood Archive

Another Look at Crude Oil, the Dow Theory Double Non-Confirmation and Gold
BY TIM W. WOOD

In the June 27th WrapUp I explained that Crude Oil was in an unsustainable parabolic spike. Then, on July 15th I had a short-term sell signal that immediately evolved into a sell signal of intermediate degree. The question now is whether or not this intermediate-term sell signal further evolves into marking an even longer-term top, or if it is a mere correction in the path of an even longer-term advance. Monitoring the Cycle Turn Indicator at the various levels will be key at answering this question.

Below is a long-term chart of crude oil showing the 1,322 percent advance that occurred from the 1998 low at 10.35, into the recent high at 147.27. Since the July 11th high, crude oil dropped 23.77 into the most recent low. This decline in and of itself does not necessarily mean that crude oil has also made a longer-term top. But, given the nature of the recent parabolic spike along with some of the other statistical factors that I’m watching, this is indeed a window of opportunity. The key item for me at this point is whether or not this intermediate-term decline is successful enough to also turn my monthly Cycle Turn Indicator negative. Also, the other key element is whether or not this occurs within the statistical window surrounding the entire commodity complex that I have been watching and telling my subscribers about for months now.

0725.1

Since we are on commodities, I next want to briefly discuss gold. In doing so I am also going to show you how my Trend and Cycle Turn Indicators can be used to help identify primary and counter-trend moves. The chart below is a weekly chart of gold, which I use for my intermediate-term work. I have also included both my intermediate-term Trend Indicator as well as my Cycle Turn Indicator. If we begin at the low last August, note that both the Trend and the Cycle Turn Indicator were negative as that low was made. Then, the first week in September both indicators turned up as gold began to climb out of the cycle low that was associated with that price low. With the Trend Indicator positive, this told us that the longer-term trend had turned back up. As price continued to move up, note that the Trend Indicator remained positive all the way up into the March high capturing that entire advance. When the Cycle Turn Indicator turned down at various points along the way it was signaling counter-trend cyclical moves within the context of the longer-term up trend. Then, when the Cycle Turn Indicator turned back up, another buying opportunity was confirmed. To say this another way, the fact that the Tend Indicator remained positive during the downturns, seen by the Cycle Turn Indicator, told us that these dips were buying opportunities.

0725.2

But, once the Trend Indicator rolled over below its trigger line in late March, it told us that the trend at this level had turned down. This also told us that as long as the Trend Indicator remained negative that any rally was to be considered a counter-trend move. The week of July 18th the Trend Indicator came within a hair of crossing back above its trigger line. However, this crossover never quite materialized and this past week the weekly Cycle Turn Indicator turned negative. As a result, the current picture suggests that the May to July rally was a counter-trend affair at this level. Until the Trend Indicator turns back up, the trend at this level remains negative and any bounce must still be considered a counter-trend move.

As for equities, from a Dow theory perspective we still have a mixed bag. The longer-term primary bearish trend change that was confirmed on November 21, 2007 remains intact. This confirmation occurred when the blue horizontal line on the chart below was jointly violated by both averages. Since that violation, both an upside and a downside Dow theory non-confirmation has evolved. The upside non-confirmation occurred when the Transports moved above their previous secondary high point and ultimately into all time new highs in June, but with the Industrials failing to better their previous secondary high point this upside non-confirmation was born. To clarify, this upside non-confirmation is marked in red and has a bearish bias that until corrected will remain intact.

0725.3

At the same time, we also still have a downside non-confirmation, which is noted in green. This downside non-confirmation occurred when the Industrials moved below their previous secondary low point, while the Transports held above their corresponding secondary low. Downside non-confirmations are indicative of an upside reversal, which is now underway.

To date, the November 21st bearish primary trend change remains intact and takes precedence over everything else. The upside non-confirmation is also bearish. But the downside non-confirmation was last to occur, and given the fact that non-confirmations tend to indicate trend reversals, we must also respect this fact as well. At present, price is advancing out of what I believe to be a secondary low point. From a Dow theory perspective, the key is whether or not this advance is sufficient enough to invalidate the existing primary bearish trend. From a cyclical perspective, which has nothing to do with Dow theory, the key is the cyclical structure of the market and the Cycle Turn Indicator at the intermediate and longer-term levels.

Tim W. Wood

Copyright © 2008 All rights reserved.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Tim W. Wood, CPA
Email l Bio | Market WrapUp Archive

Financial Sense ® Home l Market Monitor l Market WrapUp l Storm Watch l About Us l Contact Us

Send this site to a friend! (click here)
Copyright
© James J. Puplava Financial Sense® is a Registered Trademark
P. O. Box 503147 San Diego, CA 92150-3147 USA 858.487.3939
Disclaimer

> (6 images)

Subscribe to *unUsual Suspects*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#6. To: orangedog, Arete (#0)

I'm not too sure technical anaylisis of crude oil charts is effective, especially now. There's too much government manipulation of the markets.

If you look at the crude oil chart, you'll see a big rundown prior to the 2006 election, smaller ones before the 2004, 2002 and 2000 pretend elections.

Also you have geopolitical events, seasonality issues and the inevitable Xmas drops to lure the sheepsters out to the stores for their annual shearing.

I think we're entering an era where essential commodities, such as energy, food and other consumer staples will continue to rise without end, with temporary drops to quell the flock when it suits the government's agenda.

Esso  posted on  2008-07-25   19:20:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Esso (#6)

I think we're entering an era where essential commodities, such as energy, food and other consumer staples will continue to rise without end

speaking of which..our last month's utility bill was $461...the highest it's ever been. well, just got this month's and it's $589!! water alone was $288. now, i know that we've not used that much more water, if any, than last month. that's how much they've increased the cost.

christine  posted on  2008-07-25   21:47:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: christine (#11)

water alone was $288.

Criminy! Do you know what the consumption was? My normal consumption is about 3,000 gallons/month. Yours might be listed in gallons, cubic feet (7.48 gal), units (100 cuft or 748 gal) or something else.

Water cost here including sewage, taxes, etc. is 1.1 cents/gal. A $288 water bill here would be for over 26,000 gallons or almost 1,000 gal/day.

Esso  posted on  2008-07-26   10:22:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

#17. To: Esso (#15)

Water cost here including sewage, taxes, etc. is 1.1 cents/gal. A $288 water bill here would be for over 26,000 gallons or almost 1,000 gal/day.

That's what I was thinking. My water bill has never been more than $30 or $40 for a family of 4.

duckhunter  posted on  2008-07-26 10:27:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Esso (#15)

i take that back that we didn't use more water this month than last. i just compared the consumption. hubby informed me that we've had 38 days at 100 degrees with very little rain, so he's been running the sprinkler system more. (and the summer's only half over)

we need a rain dancer.

christine  posted on  2008-07-26 10:42:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]