See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Flight 93: Cell Call Exposed 9/11:"You did great"
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjNB ... com/ceecee-lyles-t17044p2.html
Published: Jul 26, 2008
Author: CanadianVandal
Post Date: 2008-07-26 17:48:52 by honway
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 5209
Comments: 113
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 90.
#66. To: honway (#0)
In case you're wondering why I posted the info on Barbara Olson's supposed phone call, I was implying that her call could ALSO have been made from the ground, as suggested here in regards to the CeeCee Lyles call. It is VERY interesting, to me at least, that her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, changed his story from her calling on a cell phone to a sky phone and then back to cell phone call, yet the FBI says that there were NO calls at all. It would mean that either Olson is lying, or the FBI is. Either case PROVES that there is complicity here on the part of the government.
Thanks for the information filled post. The information in the article and links is very significant,imo. Thanks again.
www.vaed.uscourts.gov/not...tion/flights/P200055.html
Original source: Prosecution Trial exhibit
Sounds like another woman says "sorry" in a high-pitched voice at the very end, with a very strong NYC- type accent.
I didn't notice that before. Yes, someone says sorry.
Anybody familiar with getting a name changed on a driver's license? Do you get a new issue date with a new license or do you keep the original issue date? Any newlyweds out there?
I believe you just found another smoking gun in the 9/11 case! Good work. I still think WTC7 is the ultimate smoking gun, but this now qualifies as one too IMO.
I think it's a bit subjective, I can't see anything conclusive in this, but here we are, back to talking about the "hijackers", which I've noted before can be a distraction. Maybe the most interesting thing to me is he asks his wife twice, one time each in two different calls, "Do you know who is involved?" Strange question. "They" had no accents? "They" never spoke to the passengers? Yet he also said "They’re talking about crashing this plane into the ground." It suggests "they" had no accents. Why would "they" be goading the passengers into action with talk "about crashing this plane into the ground" anyway, if "they" already claimed "they" had a bomb? Talk about sending mixed messages with opposite effects.
#94. To: nobody (#90)
The Jews don't have to make sense. Nobody in the MSM would dare question them.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#68. To: FormerLurker (#66)
#70. To: All (#68)
#71. To: All (#70)
(Edited)
U.S. v. Moussaoui trial
#77. To: honway (#71)
#78. To: nobody (#77)
Sounds like another woman says "sorry" in a high-pitched voice at the very end, with a very strong NYC- type accent.
#79. To: RickyJ, all, *9-11* (#78)
#84. To: honway, *9-11* (#79)
#90. To: RickyJ (#84)
(Edited)
I believe you just found another smoking gun in the 9/11 case!
Replies to Comment # 90. Why would "they" be goading the passengers into action with talk "about crashing this plane into the ground" anyway, if "they" already claimed "they" had a bomb? Talk about sending mixed messages with opposite effects.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 90.