In case you're wondering why I posted the info on Barbara Olson's supposed phone call, I was implying that her call could ALSO have been made from the ground, as suggested here in regards to the CeeCee Lyles call.
It is VERY interesting, to me at least, that her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, changed his story from her calling on a cell phone to a sky phone and then back to cell phone call, yet the FBI says that there were NO calls at all.
It would mean that either Olson is lying, or the FBI is. Either case PROVES that there is complicity here on the part of the government.
Anybody familiar with getting a name changed on a driver's license? Do you get a new issue date with a new license or do you keep the original issue date?
I believe you just found another smoking gun in the 9/11 case!
I think it's a bit subjective, I can't see anything conclusive in this, but here we are, back to talking about the "hijackers", which I've noted before can be a distraction.
Maybe the most interesting thing to me is he asks his wife twice, one time each in two different calls, "Do you know who is involved?" Strange question. "They" had no accents? "They" never spoke to the passengers? Yet he also said "Theyre talking about crashing this plane into the ground." It suggests "they" had no accents. Why would "they" be goading the passengers into action with talk "about crashing this plane into the ground" anyway, if "they" already claimed "they" had a bomb? Talk about sending mixed messages with opposite effects.
Why would "they" be goading the passengers into action with talk "about crashing this plane into the ground" anyway, if "they" already claimed "they" had a bomb? Talk about sending mixed messages with opposite effects.
The Jews don't have to make sense. Nobody in the MSM would dare question them.