[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Retired NASA SpaceCraft Operator Witnessed Extraterrestrial in Space Shuttle Mission-This time its Clark C. McClelland, former ScO Retired NASA SpaceCraft Operator Witnessed Extraterrestrial in Space Shuttle Mission Michael Salla Dr. Michael Salla is an internationally recognized scholar in international politics, conflict resolution, US foreign policy and the new field of 'exopolitics'. He is author/editor of five books; and held academic appointments in the School of International Service& the Center for Global Peace, American University, Washington DC (1996-2004); the Department of Political Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (1994-96); and the Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, Washington D.C., (2002). He has a Ph.D in Government from the University of Queensland, Australia, and an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, Australia. He has conducted research and fieldwork in the ethnic conflicts in East Timor, Kosovo, Macedonia, and Sri Lanka, and organized peacemaking initiatives involving mid to high level participants from these conflicts. author's email author's web site view author's other articles Join this author's mailing list Your Name: E-mail Address: Michael Salla July 31, 2008 Clark McClelland is a retired Spacecraft Operator with NASA who during a 34 year career was responsible for ensuring the safety of numerous NASA missions including Mercury spaceflights, Apollo missions, the International Space Station and the Space Shuttle. In a statement released on his website on July 29, 2008, McClelland revealed that he witnessed an eight to nine foot tall extraterrestrial in association with a Space Shuttle mission he was monitoring from the Kennedy Space Center. He wrote: "I, Clark C. McClelland, former ScO [Spacecraft Operator], Space Shuttle Fleet, personally observed an 8 to 9 foot tall ET on his 27 inch video monitors while on duty in the Kennedy Space Center, Launch Control Center (LCC). The ET was standing upright in the Space Shuttle Payload Bay having a discussion with TWO tethered US NASA Astronauts! I also observed on my monitors, the spacecraft of the ET as it was in a stabilized, safe orbit to the rear of the Space Shuttle main engine pods. I observed this incident for about one minute and seven seconds. Plenty of time to memorize all that I was observing. IT WAS AN ET and Alien Star Ship!" Furthermore, McClelland wrote that he was not the only NASA official who witnessed the incident: "A friend of mine later contacted me and said that this person had also observed an 8 to 9 foot tall ET INSIDE the SPACE SHUTTLE CREW COMPARTMENT! Yes, inside OUR Shuttle! BOTH missions were DoD (Pentagon) TOP SECRET (TS) encounters!' McClelland's testimony is significant due to his impeccable credentials. His website has a number of documents he has released to the public confirming some among the long list of achievements and testimonials arising out of his long NASA career. His claims of directly having witnessed events involving extraterrestrial life and technology while at NASA are a primary source of testimonial evidence. McClelland's testimony can and should be used to initiate a Congressional investigation of extraterrestrial life. His statement is likely to lead to more serious attention by the scientific community to evidence of extraterrestrial life. What follows are some of the intriguing questions and conclusions arising from McClelland's statement. Some of the immediate questions include: "how did the extraterrestrial communicate with the two tethered NASA astronauts from the Space Shuttle?" "Was the eight to nine foot tall extraterrestrial human looking?" And, "how many other NASA missions did McClelland directly witness evidence of extraterrestrials meeting with astronauts?" Also, "how long was the extraterrestrial inside the spacecraft according to his friend?" A number of conclusions can also be drawn from McClelland's statement given his credibility as a primary witness for events that have occurred at NASA. First, his statement helps confirm the reality of extraterrestrial life and technologies, and that NASA has been secretly suppressing this information on national security grounds due to the Pentagon's involvement. This is consistent with recent analyses pointing to the Pentagon's role in getting NASA to suppress information on extraterrestrial artifacts discovered on the moon, Mars, and elsewhere in the solar system. A second conclusion is that McClelland's testimony reveals that extraterrestrial vehicles and personnel are able to perform highly complex maneuvers in the vicinity of NASA spacecraft, and even perform docking maneuvers. This gives credence to whistleblower claims that NASA regularly sanitizes videos or photographs of any images involving extraterrestrial technologies or artifacts during space missions. Finally, McClelland's testimony suggests that there is a high level of cooperation between at least one extraterrestrial civilization and NASA/Pentagon. It appears that extraterrestrials may even be giving assistance in some space missions where difficulties arise as may have occurred with the tethered astronauts. McClelland's statement helps confirm other whistleblower testimonies of secret agreements concerning extraterrestrial life and technology. These testimonies have led to a civil society initiative to begin the process of nullifying all secret agreements concerning extraterrestrial life and technology. In conclusion, McClelland's statement will be very helpful in exposing NASA's handling of whistleblower and witness testimony of extraterrestrial life and technology associated with NASA missions. Together with the recent disclosure by former astronaut, Dr Edgar Mitchell over a government cover up of extraterrestrial life, there is strong reason to begin a Congressional inquiry into NASA's and the Pentagon's roles in covering up evidence of extraterrestrial life.
Poster Comment: i am going to tend to believe former shuttle operators, astronauts, etc, versus impotent disinfo shills posting status quo horseshit from their mother's basement while wearing their captain kirk pajamas. but, thats just ME.... Looks like disclosure is coming faster and faster. Call your local belief system franchise, all you shiteating useless idiots, and get ready to hear what to be told to do. and, since its not exactly in the bible, well, gee, that sorta makes the ole bible less reliable than the nyc phone book in terms of accurate information. and dang, the government, the vatican, etc, would lie to us? do you find that in all matters that you can handle with your tiny brain, they are liars, and corrupt liars that most of the public knows to be corrupt liars......but with stuff that won't match your cognitive, government/religiously installed map of a sesame street reality system....well, then they're telling the truth.....there are no ufos, those are weather balloons and seagulls...and you can trust them, because they have proven their trustworthiness via a litany of lies with a higher degree of consistency than the coming of the seasons.... oh, btw dumbasses, the fucking pope said its okay to believe in et's now, so you are once again, free to have your very own thoughts the others said you could. please, give all you can, for the children, secret bank accounts, whorish, gaudy pimped out buildings that look like they were designed by elvis' builder, and other important stuff, like victim compensation funds for altar boys who were raped by these super credible, holy men of god... now, go watch some television and enjoy a drum of aspartame riddled goat piss, take your fucking prozac and turn on the View. but...but....but.....how could god let this happen to us? preacher will know....its because youre sinful. actually, its not god.....its just that you're a fucking moron, pretty much. "rotten wood cannot be carved" Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
#7. To: gengis gandhi, christine, Wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, FormerLurker, Peppa, CadetD, all (#0)
It is interesting to watch and read the reactions. The "Brookings Report" from 1960 predicted that many people would not be able to accomodate the reality of non-terrestrial entities because of cultural conditioning and belief systems. It does not fit in their world view and so is discarded because it conflicts with other things they believe to be true. This much like the NeoCons who cannot see evidence of 911 being an inside job because they know it can't be true and therefore it isn't. One can observe similar reactions when people are presented with information which points to a much much earlier existence of anatomically modern man and advanced cultures. Again it conflicts with what they "know" to be true and therefore it is is discarded and derided. Throw in the giggle factor since there has been considerable PsyOps to prevent thinking outside the approved box and you get people deriding things they "know are false" because it disagrees with what they currently believe as they have been conditioned to believe. All in all an interesting subject and exploration. P.S.: Of course we are not alone, and are likely one of the more primitive cultures in the region. Of course that won't compute for many either as it contradicts hard held misbeliefs.
This post kind of explains why Scientology doesn't bother you.
Am I pushing your comfort level? Does thinking outside the box scare you that much? What specifically about my post do you disagree with and why?
Not in the least. Your proclivity to Scientology does make me skeptical about your other faculties of judgment, though. When we dwell on the subject of Alex Jones, for example, I remember that you're "tolerant" of L. Ron Hubbard's suckers. Tolerant in this context brings to mind the ADL, but now that I know that you're an ET believer, I'm more apt to think of you as a Scientologist yourself.
Translation: You are trying to manufacture a point on which to attack and will not address the substance of my post nor what you find objectionable about it. You are relying on Argumentum Ad Hominem and are trying to erect a Strawman Argument . What so disturbs you about the concept that we are not the only intelligent life form in the universe (and very likely, approaching unity, not the most technologically advanced)? What so disturbs you about the probability that anatomically modern man was in existence, possibly millenia based on the evidence, long prior to the current "mainstream" dogma of academic archaeology. Thinking outside the box is a mind expanding experience. I feel sorry for those, such as yourself, who voluntarily wear blinders, feel threatened, and become antagonistic, when confronted with thoughts and concepts which do not agree with their prejudices.
I just knew you'd pull out your rhetorical encyclopedia! But I've got this:
Careful, your psychosis is showing. So, are you going to answer my questions or simply resort to more childish antics? I named your tactic correctly and accurately, it was and is Argumentum Ad Hominem and the attempt to build up a Strawman Argument . That you were/are attempting to do so was absolutely clear to me from the first post. You made an attack upon me, we both know that is what it was intended to be and was and that you were trying to manufacture some kind of issue. It ain't gonna work tovarisch. Whatever twisted suppositions you have are just that - your twisted suppositions. So, are you going to answer the questions or will you actually be honest and simply admit that your intention from the first post was to try to manufacture a Strawman Argument that arises from your fevered imagination? We both know that you are avoiding my legitimate questions that were in response to your attack. We both also know that your continuing to avoid them and divert from them simply demonstrates that your intent from the beginning, for whatever strange reason, was intended as a personal attack. Don't ever take up Chess - you'll lose to any good pautzer.
#45. To: Original_Intent (#44)
Dr. Freud, I presume?
I like this one:
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||