See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Obama shifts, says he may back offshore drilling
Source:
Yahoo - AP
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080801/ap_on_el_pr/obama
Published: Aug 1, 2008
Author: MIKE GLOVER
Post Date: 2008-08-01 19:43:54 by Rotara
Keywords: Against it, Before I was, For it
Views: 244
Comments: 14
33 minutes ago ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources. Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy. Republican rival John McCain, who earlier dropped his opposition to offshore drilling, has been criticizing Obama on the stump and in broadcast ads for clinging to his opposition as gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon. Polls indicate these attacks have helped McCain gain ground on Obama. "My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post. "If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage — I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done." Asked about Obama's comment, McCain said, "We need oil drilling and we need it now offshore. He has consistently opposed it. He has opposed nuclear power. He has opposed reprocessing. He has opposed storage." The GOP candidate said Obama doesn't have a plan equal to the nation's energy challenges. In Congress, both parties have fought bitterly over energy policy for weeks, with Republicans pressing for more domestic oil drilling and Democrats railing about oil company profits. Despite hundreds of hours of House and Senate floor debate, lawmakers will leave Washington for their five-week summer hiatus this week with an empty tank. "The Republicans and the oil companies have been really beating the drums on drilling," Obama said in the Post interview. "And so we don't want gridlock. We want to get something done." Later, Obama issued a written statement warmly welcoming a proposal sent to Senate leaders Friday by 10 senators — five from each party. Their proposal seeks to break the impasse over offshore oil development and is expected to be examined more closely in September after Congress returns from its summer recess. The so-called Gang of 10 plan would lift drilling bans in the eastern Gulf of Mexico within 50 miles of Florida's beaches and in the South Atlantic off Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, but only if a state agrees to the oil and gas development along its coast. The states would share in revenues from oil and gas development. Drilling bans along the Pacific coast and the Northeast would remain in place under this compromise. The plan also includes energy initiatives Obama has endorsed. "It would repeal tax breaks for oil companies so that we can invest billions in fuel-efficient cars, help our automakers re-tool, and make a genuine commitment to renewable sources of energy like wind power, solar power, and the next generation of clean, affordable biofuels," Obama noted. "Like all compromises, it also includes steps that I haven't always supported," Obama conceded. "I remain skeptical that new offshore drilling will bring down gas prices in the short-term or significantly reduce our oil dependence in the long-term, though I do welcome the establishment of a process that will allow us to make future drilling decisions based on science and fact." Nevertheless, Obama said the plan, put forward by mostly moderates and conservatives led by Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., "represents a good faith effort at a new bipartisan beginning." Earlier in the day, Obama pushed for a windfall profits tax to fund $1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy costs, a counter to McCain's call for more offshore drilling. The pitch for putting some of the economic burden of $4-a-gallon gasoline on the oil industry served a dual purpose for Obama: It allowed him to talk up an economic issue, seen by many as a strength for Democrats and a weakness for Republicans, and at the same time respond to criticism from McCain that Obama's opposition to offshore drilling leads to higher prices at the pump. In linking McCain to the unpopular President Bush, Obama struck a theme from Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 campaign against President Jimmy Carter by asking a town-hall audience in St. Petersburg: "Do you think you are better off than you were four years ago or eight years ago? If you aren't better off, can you afford another four years?" Obama primed the crowd by noting new government figures showing 51,000 jobs lost last month and citing 460,000 jobs lost over the last seven months. He tied other bad economic news from the Bush administration to McCain and offered his energy program as one route to relief. "This rebate will be enough to offset the increased cost of gas for a working family over the next four months," Obama said during a two-day campaign swing in Florida. "It will be enough to cover the entire increase in your heating bills. Or you could use the rebate for any of your other bills, or even to pay down your own debt."
Poster Comment:
if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['JCavA9j8Ym8-']='&U=13f203iu5%2fN%3dJCavA9j8Ym8-%2fC%3d674272.12808316.13086308.1442997%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d5406809%2fV%3d1'; ADVERTISEMENT 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Rotara (#0)
Do we still have to keep our tires filled up?
I'm nauseated by these candidates.
And the system that sheeple buy in to. It has to be rejected. There is no hope of changing this mess via voting. I know how that rubs lots of great 3rd party people the wrong way, but they can't be elected only to be a threat to the power.
I'm wondering if Obama is starting to ring false even to his supporters on 4um? Everyone knew McCain was useless from the get-go. However I think some people were oblivious to Obama's same flaws. Are they still blind now?
I think we should declare a virtual secession.
They fled for a more pleasant posting experience (read, Obama propaganda 24x7x365).
Good idea. This Internet thing we do isn't as useless as some suggest. If O gets in we'll need it more than ever given his love of hate speech laws.
With Joe Lieberman as McCain's running mate, which the rumors suggest could actually happen, we'll be living under unabashed Kosher rule.
Doonesbury, in his comics, used to portray Clinton as a large floating waffle due to his flip flopping on some issues. I'm starting to think Obama deserves the same representation.
"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me. "If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Only on your bicycle. If you are found to be driving a combustion vehicle you will be sent to die in the Middle East protecting America. ;-)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
I think we should declare a virtual secession. Just make the necessary adjustments to drop out of their system. ;-)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Look at the bright side. At least Obama can be rolled.
FOFLOL!!
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#2. To: Jethro Tull (#1)
#3. To: buckeye (#2)
I'm nauseated by these candidates.
#4. To: buckeye, Obama supporters (#2)
I'm nauseated by these candidates.
#5. To: Jethro Tull, christine, scrapper2, Cynicom (#3)
There is no hope of changing this mess via voting. I know how that rubs lots of great 3rd party people the wrong way, but they can't be elected only to be a threat to the power.
#6. To: scrapper2 (#4)
I'm wondering if Obama is starting to ring false even to his supporters on 4um?
#7. To: buckeye (#5)
I think we should declare a virtual secession.
#8. To: Jethro Tull (#7)
#9. To: Rotara (#0)
#10. To: Pissed Off Janitor (#9)
#11. To: Jethro Tull (#1)
Do we still have to keep our tires filled up?
#12. To: buckeye (#5)
There is no hope of changing this mess via voting. I know how that rubs lots of great 3rd party people the wrong way, but they can't be elected only to be a threat to the power.
#13. To: Rotara (#0)
#14. To: Old Friend (#13)
Look at the bright side. At least Obama can be rolled.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest