[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: CERN Rap (Particle Collider Mix)
Source: Vimeo
URL Source: http://www.vimeo.com/1431471
Published: Jul 30, 2008
Author: Will Barras
Post Date: 2008-08-03 22:24:57 by buckeye
Keywords: None
Views: 752
Comments: 41


CERN Rap from Will Barras on Vimeo.


Poster Comment:

Word.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#5. To: buckeye (#0)

People ask "Where's all the antimatter?"

For one thing, the universe has been around forever.

This means if any antimattter out there hasn't collided with matter yet, it's probably not going to collide with it tomorrow either.

Some of it got away, it was no big thing, same ole same ole.

It doesn't all come at once in one universal energy decay event, the universe is too big for that, there's no limit to the universe, it's infinite with infinite energy. Energy is always conserved that way.

nobody  posted on  2008-08-07   20:43:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: nobody (#5)

This means if any antimattter out there hasn't collided with matter yet, it's probably not going to collide with it tomorrow either.

How long has the universe existed? How long, to the best of your knowledge, has plutonium existed? See a pattern here? Of course not, that was a leading question. I seen on TV show some of top nucular science wizards in manhattan were worried that a a u-bomb might actually set fire to the atmosphere. Boy that would suck, eh?

Dakmar  posted on  2008-08-07   21:08:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Dakmar (#10) (Edited)

How long has the universe existed? How long, to the best of your knowledge, has plutonium existed? See a pattern here? Of course not, that was a leading question.

LOL.

I 'figured' all this out once I decided gravity has a static or standing wavelength relative to its source and the waves have both negative (antigravity) and positive phases. I'll call it 'bipolar' quantum gravity. Seems there could be different wavelengths of gravity too. The basic bipolar gravity wave idea could explain at least some dark energy and dark matter, I suppose.

Anti-matter has much to do with the Dirac sea, where the surface is empty space. If the sea is regular I suppose the probed surface must have some of the event qualities of a space lattice made of particles and their anti-particle twins. Maybe space is like a matter-antimatter checkerboard, and matter is like a white-square bishop. If so, maybe dark matter and energy come from anti- matter. This further suggests that maybe gravity from antimatter starts out in opposite phase relative to matter's gravity, which for example would cause gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter when both gravities predominate and are positioned within the relevant gravitational wavelengths, as with sufficiently large paired masses of the two forms.

nobody  posted on  2008-08-07   21:52:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: nobody (#12)

I've always thought of matter/antimatter as almost godlike magnets, fiercely quarrelsome and unwilling to meet. It's no wonder most people prefer to worship the relatively weak magnet.

Dakmar  posted on  2008-08-07   21:58:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Dakmar (#13) (Edited)

The idea lends itself to that sort of visualization where bodies of both type interact gravitationally in a bipolar way, just like with magnetic N and S. There's also a slight suggestion within the idea, along that vein, to suppose the cutoff of minimum gravity wavelength is the maximum electromagnetic wavelength, where the force particle energy is large enough to have its own significant gravitational interaction with space, as a separate gravitational entity. Perhaps thus electromagnetic force particle phase is not of the static or standing variety except for gravitationally, relative to the particle. The electromagnetic particle is I suppose skating over the Dirac sea, not pushing (probing) into it, up to a further energy threshold, where it begins to behave as a spinning charged matter-antimatter pair, apparently by the way it interacts with the Dirac sea.

nobody  posted on  2008-08-07   22:06:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: nobody (#14)

But I still get to visualize Earth as an electron in a giant helium atom, right?

Dakmar  posted on  2008-08-07   22:11:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Dakmar (#16)

Right, a tiny universe.

www.youtube.com/watch? v=DZ1YUHrJc54

nobody  posted on  2008-08-07   22:19:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: nobody (#17)

Right, a tiny universe.

One love, broah.

buckeye  posted on  2008-08-09   11:32:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: buckeye (#20)

Penrose claims the mind is non-algorithmic. Brain damage is non-algorithmic. The processes of novelty filtering and logical investigation ... I don't know if they're fairly describable as non-algorithmic, although that which fate permits such processes to consider is another thing.

nobody  posted on  2008-08-09   12:26:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: nobody (#21)

Then Penrose's view would tend to dispute Kurzweil's materialist singularity.

buckeye  posted on  2008-08-09   12:34:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: buckeye (#22)

Penrose's view would tend to dispute Kurzweil's materialist singularity

I'm not following, but I've been focusing more on global paradigm shifts than on the singularity lately. I think I'm developing an anti-singularity reflex.

Anyway, I think the brain exploits quantum randomness and classical randomness and it ends up being significantly controlled by unpredictable circumstances, but meeting goals and satisfying needs is generally algorithmic.

nobody  posted on  2008-08-16   22:13:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#40. To: nobody (#39)

Anyway, I think the brain exploits quantum randomness and classical randomness and it ends up being significantly controlled by unpredictable circumstances, but meeting goals and satisfying needs is generally algorithmic.

whatever you say, hoss:

Dakmar  posted on  2008-08-16 22:23:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]