[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Media Flips Over Tulsi & Matt Gaetz, Biden & Trump Take A Pic, & Famous People Leave Twitter!

4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit'

Silk Road Founder Trusts Trump To 'Honor His Pledge' For Commutation

"You DESERVED to LOSE the Senate, the House, and the Presidency!" - Jordan Peterson

"Grand Political Theatre"; FBI Raids Home Of Polymarket CEO; Seize Phone, Electronics

Schoolhouse Limbo: How Low Will Educators Go To Better Grades?

BREAKING: U.S. Army Officers Made a Desperate Attempt To Break Out of The Encirclement in KURSK

Trumps team drawing up list of Pentagon officers to fire, sources say

Israeli Military Planning To Stay in Gaza Through 2025

Hezbollah attacks Israeli army's Tel Aviv HQ twice in one day

People Can't Stop Talking About Elon's Secret Plan For MSNBC And CNN Is Totally Panicking

Tucker Carlson UNLOADS on Diddy, Kamala, Walz, Kimmel, Rich Girls, Conspiracy Theories, and the CIA!

"We have UFO technology that enables FREE ENERGY" Govt. Whistleblowers

They arrested this woman because her son did WHAT?

Parody Ad Features Company That Offers to Cryogenically Freeze Liberals for Duration of TrumpÂ’s Presidency

Elon and Vivek BEGIN Reforming Government, Media LOSES IT

Dear Border Czar: This Nonprofit Boasts A List Of 400 Companies That Employ Migrants

US Deficit Explodes: Blowout October Deficit Means 2nd Worst Start To US Fiscal Year On Record

Gaetz Resigns 'Effective Immediately' After Trump AG Pick; DC In Full Blown Panic

MAHA MEME

noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G

Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple?

"The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy

Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards

Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence

DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General

Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’

Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does

Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here.

Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Israel Must Remain Jewish, Says Government Committee
Source: American Renaissance
URL Source: http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2005/07/min_pinespaz_fo.php
Published: Jul 15, 2005
Author: Relly Sa'ar, Haaretz
Post Date: 2005-07-15 11:56:56 by Zoroaster
Keywords: Government, Committee, Jewish,
Views: 55
Comments: 10

Interior Minister Ophir Pines-Paz yesterday appointed an advisory committee to examine Israel’s immigration laws.

The committee’s task is “to propose an immigration policy for the State of Israel, to examine the relevant legislation including the Law of Return, the Citizenship Law and the Israel Entry Law, and to look into the procedures used by the Population Administration,” which implements immigration policy.

The committee, headed by Prof. Amnon Rubinstein, dean of the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya law school, will make its recommendations to a ministerial team led by Pines-Paz. The team, which includes Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, National Security adviser Giora Eiland and the prime minister’s legal adviser, will in turn present its position to the government.

The advisory committee is expected to recommend legal methods by which Israel can tighten its immigration laws, since three members of the advisory committee—including Eiland and Rubinstein—already served on a National Security Council (NSC) panel that suggested principles under which immigration restrictions could be made more strict. The panel, which presented its findings to the government about two months ago, sought to maintain a distinct Jewish majority to preserve Israel’s status as a Jewish and democratic state.

The NSC committee suggested limiting the ability of illegal residents to become legal residents by requiring a certain level of financial standing and connection with Israel, as well as legislating an age limit.

Eiland—who presided over the panel and presented its conclusions—also suggested the state prevent Bedouin men in the Negev from marrying more than one Palestinian woman in a bid to get them citizenship, and said Israel should reassess its policy of granting Israeli citizenship to children who have only one Israeli parent.

Several weeks after Eiland presented his group’s findings, the government approved a law submitted by Pines-Paz that bans the interior minister from granting permanent residency permits to illegal residents. According to the law, illegal aliens who want to live in Israel legally must first leave the country and stay away for an extensive “cooling-off” period. In addition, foreign spouses of Israelis can no longer become permanent residents as a result of their marriage.

In addition to Eiland and Rubinstein, the dean of the Bar-Ilan University law school, Prof. Yaffa Zilbershats, was also a member of the NSC committee and is serving on the advisory committee appointed yesterday. Other academics on the advisory committee include: Prof. Ariel Porat, dean of the Tel Aviv University law school; Prof. Ariel Bendor, dean of the University of Haifa law school; and Prof. Shlomo Avineri, who teaches political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.


Poster Comment:

What if a panel of US judges issued an immigration policy paper to ensure America maintains a distinct European-Caucasian majority to preserve her status as a “White” democratic state? The one-eyed Jew would howl in outrage and brand the judges as Nazi white supremacists.

Why hasn’t this story appeared in US news? Apparently the Zionist/corporate MSM has an interest in suppressing news that would put the Zionist entity in the Mideast in a bad light. When Europeans did this in South Africa, it was all over the news. Why the double standard?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Why the double standard?

You tell me. Our nation was founded by Christians. Try limiting American immigration laws to Christians. A Christian cannot become a citizen of Israel. Try limiting American citizenship to just one religion.

No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. – James Madison

robin  posted on  2005-07-15   12:09:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Zoroaster (#0)

WOW... It's a fact that the Jews have been mistreated and discriminated against unfairly throughout history but it sure appears that they don't mind doing the same thing to OTHERS in return. Kinda, sorta puts a huge hole in their current claim for VICTIM/special consideration status. Also points at a REASON for the unrest and hatred in the middle east that AMERICANS would do well to understand. Americans on average are CLUELESS as to what's really going on over there.

I'm not a terrorist just because I think GWB may very well be the greatest threat to America right now.

siagiah  posted on  2005-07-15   12:11:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Apparently the Zionist/corporate MSM has an interest in suppressing news that would put the Zionist entity in the Mideast in a bad light.

It's outrageous that Americans have to read Israeli media like Haaretz to learn any facts about Israel. I saw some articles from the Jewish publication The Forward recently, and when compared to what we are fed by the corp MSM media, the tone of the article seemed almost outrageous. That is how bad the outright suppression in our media is.

Bayonne  posted on  2005-07-15   12:17:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: robin (#1)

Why the double standard?

The simplest answer is that the MSM and the Federal government are in the hands of Jewish supremacists.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2005-07-15   12:19:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: siagiah (#2)

It's sad that citizens of the US are actively deceived by a corrupt media. And 99% of the population either doesn't know or doesn't care. Americans should be outraged. Have we always been sheep like this? Is the corruption in the media at a high point, or did I simply not see it for years?

The Jews' claim for victim/special consideration status has nothing to do with self defense- it's purely an offensive weapon used to gain group power.

Bayonne  posted on  2005-07-15   12:27:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: All (#5)

The panel, which presented its findings to the government about two months ago, sought to maintain a distinct Jewish majority to preserve Israel’s status as a Jewish and democratic state.

The NSC committee suggested limiting the ability of illegal residents to become legal residents by requiring a certain level of financial standing and connection with Israel, as well as legislating an age limit.

Eiland—who presided over the panel and presented its conclusions—also suggested the state prevent Bedouin men in the Negev from marrying more than one Palestinian woman in a bid to get them citizenship, and said Israel should reassess its policy of granting Israeli citizenship to children who have only one Israeli parent.

How does maintaining a distinct Jewish majority preserve Israel’s status as a democratic state?

Bayonne  posted on  2005-07-15   12:33:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Zoroaster, Dakmar, TommyTheMadArtist (#0)

Why the double standard?

Any disinterested observer will not there are two standards:
One for Jews and another for gentiles.

The extent of the assault upon European heritage peoples has got to be read to be understood. Or just look around you how our beloved nations of the West have changed. All thanks to one gang of ethno-terrorists.

Read and learn:

a review of Kevin MacDonald, CalState Long Beach, The Culture of Critique

the Preface to the first paperback edition of CoC

MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Jewish involvement in influencing United States immigration policy, 1881-1965: A historical review.

Institute for Historical Review

1776  posted on  2005-07-15   13:05:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Bayonne (#5)

The Jews' claim for victim/special consideration status has nothing to do with self defense- it's purely an offensive weapon used to gain group power.

THAT is my only problem with them or their actions. AMERICA is being used as their "big brother" who will beat up all their enemies. Israel has entertained no fear of major retaliation for its actions (ie: wiping them off the planet) because their big brother will fight their battles for them and if we don't do it satisfactorily, they will do whatever they feel is necessary, PISS ON OUR OPINION of it.

WE ARE TARGETS OF MUSLIM HATE NOW BECAUSE OF THEM (and equally for our outrageously imperialistic interference in Muslim countries throughout the last century). BS on the claim that "they hate our freedom". They hate us because of our actions.

I'm not a terrorist just because I think GWB may very well be the greatest threat to America right now.

siagiah  posted on  2005-07-15   13:07:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: siagiah (#8)

AMERICA is being used as their "big brother" who will beat up all their enemies. Israel has entertained no fear of major retaliation for its actions

There is no doubt that the US is being used as a proxy for Israel. In 1997, when the neocons prepared their infamous strategy and presented it to Netanyahu, it openly called for Israel to use the US as a proxy. Bush even appointed the neocons to all the key positions to make Iraq possible. It was all done in the open, with the neocons even flaunting their plans on websites as they were on 'the mission.'

With the US military in Iraq and the ME, Israel has hegemony over the area. There is no need for them to act in good faith when dealing with their neighbors or the Palistinians.

Bayonne  posted on  2005-07-15   13:25:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Bayonne (#3)

MacDonald, op.cit.

The 1965 law is having the effect that it seems reasonable to suppose had been intended by its Jewish advocates all along: the Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America.

The defeats of 1924 and 1952 did not prevent the ultimate victory of the Jewish interest in combating the cultural, political, and demographic dominance of the European-derived peoples of the United States. What is truly remarkable is the tenacity with which Jewish ethnic interests were pursued for a period of close to 100 years.

Contrary to policies they advocate for the United States, American Jews have had no interest at all in proposing that immigration to Israel should be similarly multi-ethnic or that Israel should have an immigration policy that would threaten the hegemony of Jews in Israel. Indeed, the very deep ethnic conflict within Israel is an excellent example of the failure of multi-culturalism. Similarly, while Jews have been on the forefront of movements to separate church and state in the United States and often protested lack of religious freedom in the Soviet Union, the control of religious affairs by the Orthodox in Israel has received only belated and half-hearted opposition by American Jewish organizations (Cohen, 1972, 317) and has not prevented the all-out support of Israel by American Jews, despite the fact that Israel's policy regarding immigration is quite the opposite of that of Western democracies.

At present the interests of non-European-derived peoples to expand demographically and politically in the United States are widely perceived as a moral imperative, while the attempts of the European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control are represented as 'racist' and patently immoral. From the perspective of these European-derived peoples, the prescribed morality entails altruism and self-sacrifice, and it is unlikely to be viable in the long run. And, as we have seen, the viability of such a morality of self-sacrifice is especially problematic in the context of a multicultural society in which everyone is highly conscious of group membership and there is between-group competition for resources.

I am morally certain that Jewish involvement in the radical left in the early to middle part of the last century was a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for many of the horrific events in the Soviet Union and elsewhere. (About this, of course, one can disagree. I am simply saying that I find the evidence compelling.) But the main point is that I came to see Jewish groups as competitors with the European majority of the U.S., as powerful facilitators of the enormous changes that have been unleashed in this country, particularly via the successful advocacy of massive non-European immigration into the U.S. I found that I was being transformed in this process from a semi-conservative academic who had little or no identification with his own people into an ethnically conscious person -- exactly as predicted by the theory of social identity processes that forms the basis of my theory of anti-Semitism (see MacDonald 1998a). In fact, if one wants to date when I dared cross the line into what some see as proof that I am an 'anti-Semite,' the best guess would probably be when I started reading on the involvement of all the powerful Jewish organizations in advocating massive non-European immigration. My awareness began with my reading a short section in a standard history of American Jews well after the first book was published. The other influences that I attributed to Jewish activities were either benign (psychoanalysis?) or reversible -- even radical leftism, so they didn't much bother me. I could perhaps even ignore the towering hypocrisy of Jewish ethnocentrism coinciding as it does with Jewish activism against the ethnocentrism of non-Jewish Europeans. But the long-term effects of immigration will be essentially irreversible barring some enormous cataclysm.

I started to realize that my interests are quite different from prototypical Jewish interests. There need to be legitimate ways of talking about people who oppose policies recommended by the various Jewish establishments without simply being tarred as 'anti-Semites'. Immigration is only one example where there are legitimate conflicts of interest. As I write this (November, 2001), we are bogged down in a war with no realizable endgame largely because of influence of the Jewish community over one area of our foreign policy and because of how effectively any mention of the role of Israel in creating friction between the U.S. and the Arab world -- indeed the entire Muslim world -- is muzzled simply by the cry of anti-Semitism. And at home we have entered into an incalculably dangerous experiment in creating a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural society in which the intellectual elite has developed the idea that the formerly dominant European majority has a moral obligation to allow itself to be eclipsed demographically and culturally -- the result, at least at its inception and to a considerable degree thereafter, of the influence of Jewish interest groups on immigration policy and the influence of Jewish intellectual movements on our intellectual and cultural life generally. As noted above, the rise of Jewish power and the disestablishment of the specifically European nature of the U.S. are the real topics of CofC.

Institute for Historical Review

1776  posted on  2005-07-15   13:31:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]