[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
4play See other 4play Articles Title: Read Freaker's completely stupid/absurd reactions when I confronted them with reality, back in 2002. It's hillarious bgcolor="white"> Most Baghdad's Residents Are Armed Fox News Channel Posted on 12/27/2002 10:44:42 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator A USA Today reporter who has been in and out of Baghdad 4 times in the past 4 months was interviewed last night. She stated that most of Baghdad's residents were armed and, while they may not be worshipping Saddam, they seemed likely to actively oppose any foreign attempt to take over the city - simple patriotism. She also stated that many attended some form of military training in the recent past. After she stated all of the above the totally stupid Fox host (no, it wasn't Greta) thought it was appropriate to announce (paraphrase): "you seem to be saying that our soldiers would have no problem whatsoever to take over Saddam's capital" Her reply: "I'm not so sure I meant to imply that" TOPICS: Foreign Affairs Yeah, right. There is no friggin way Saddam would arm the general populace. That is counter to every dictatorial regime in history. Oh, and I love the word play here. If the citizens of Iraq are armed, they are patriots. But us gun owners here in the United States are just garden-variety gun nuts. This article is bogus. The "reporter" wrote what she was told by her minders. I saw the report and thought the same thing, dirtboy. I would suspect that this "training" the lady reporter (who appeared on FOX News last night) has seen involved lots of marching, chanting, running, and fake "bang, bang" shooting. AK-47's make lousy baseball bats and without several dozen or hundred rounds for each gun that is all they would be any good for. Besides, the Iraqis aren't German, Baghdad ain't Berlin, and what they will be facing isn't the Red Army of 1945. How about Afghanistan?... No one has ever beat the people of Afghanistan--Russia couldn't do it, Britain couldn't do it. It's going to be a quagmire. Another Vietnam. The liberal media do this all the time--try to discourage the American populace and downplay our abilities and talk up the opposition. They do it because they hate any Republican president, love "peace" at any cost, and love portraying America as the evil aggressor. I'm just going to wait and see what happens like all the other prognosticators will have to do and pray that things go well for the United States and the soldiers that will do the fighting. It's at http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-10-01-iraq-war-1acover_x.htm In Baghdad, residents prepare for new travails as battle looms By Vivienne Walt, USA TODAY BAGHDAD, Iraq Iraqi officials expect U.S. forces to bring war to the streets of this sprawling capital. The country is slowly getting ready. Thousands of civilians have undergone combat training in the wilting sun. Officials are issuing extra food rations so residents can begin stockpiling. The already familiar anti-American propaganda has intensified on television broadcasts and in newspapers. And the capital has seen a deluge of new consumer goods, apparently aimed at winning over ordinary citizens to the defense of Saddam Hussein. He is using a new strategy to overcome what could be his greatest weakness: battling the world's biggest military force with an Iraqi army crippled by the 1991 Gulf War and years of international sanctions. This time, the Iraqi leader is calling on civilians to protect the regime that President Bush has vowed to change. There are signs that the tactic is finding some acceptance here. "If American soldiers come onto our streets, I really believe there will be civil resistance," says Hamman Shamaa, 49, an economics professor at Baghdad University. The gray-haired chain-smoker hardly seems ready for combat. But he says he'll dust off the Kalashnikov rifle and three boxes of ammunition that he keeps at home and take to the streets at the first sight of Western soldiers in Baghdad. "People won't accept foreigners coming in here," he says. It is unclear, of course, if ordinary Iraqis are candid in interviews with the foreign media. Under Iraqi censorship laws, reporters are accompanied by government translators. It is against the law to criticize Saddam or the government. What the citizens of Baghdad do under attack could be critical. Street fighting 52; if it occurs 52; could entangle U.S. and allied soldiers in an ugly urban conflict in a city that is Saddam's power base. U.S. forces could easily capture other parts of Iraq, where the government's control is weaker. But achieving "regime change" in Baghdad could be difficult and costly, especially if armed civilians join the fray. The push to take this bustling city could bog down Washington in a political and military quagmire, dragging out the war longer than the week or two Pentagon officials say would be ideal. Iraqi officials admit privately that they cannot win a full-fledged war against the U.S. military. Asked whether they can defeat the enemy, an Iraqi diplomat in Europe said recently: "Of course not; we have to be logical about this." They say they hope that if civilians and soldiers hold out long enough, American casualties might quickly erode support for the war back home. Iraqis point to the Somalia conflict in 1993, when television footage of a U.S. soldier being dragged through the capital led President Clinton to withdraw troops. "We believe Americans want a war without casualties," says a Foreign Ministry official who asked not to be named. "There is a feeling that they will not come and fight us man to man." For anyone arriving in Baghdad from the West, it is striking how relaxed the city seems. Residents say they have not been issued gas masks. Most believe a war will not erupt before the end of the year, when the blistering heat subsides. Daytime temperatures this week have reached 110 degrees. Surprisingly, streets aren't sandbagged or barricaded. Soldiers and Saddam's elite force, the Republican Guard, are not evident. However, more discreet security measures already are being taken: Government officials blocked USA TODAY from bringing a mobile satellite telephone into the country, apparently concerned that its global-positioning system could be used to identify targets for military airstrikes. Families with weapons at home In dozens of interviews across Baghdad during the past week, the talk has been tough. Residents say they'll reach for the nearest kitchen knife or firewood ax if U.S. soldiers appear on their block. In fact, many Iraqi families have weapons at home, often government-issue Kalashnikovs kept by former soldiers. Iraq's regular forces number around 400,000. About 6 million Iraqis have completed military training and could be drafted. The country's military industries 52; headquartered in central Baghdad 52; are believed to already have produced missiles and anti-aircraft weaponry. Military analysts say Iraq still has some weapons stored from before the Gulf War. Other weaponry also has entered the country illegally over the years. A U.N. embargo imposed after the war prohibits sales to Iraq of equipment that could be used to rebuild its military. In addition to the millions who already have been through military training, thousands more civilians spent their summer break taking intensive military courses. Shamaa's 45-year-old wife, a high school principal, and his 20-year-old son, a literature student, spent all of August at a neighborhood sports center learning how to fire weapons and conduct basic urban warfare. "Military training is going on in stadiums, schools 52; just about every open space there is," says a senior Arab diplomat here. Officials will not discuss how many Baghdad residents have been trained. On Monday, a group of men crowded around the office of Saddam's ruling Baath Party in Baghdad's Bab Sheikh neighborhood. They said they had come to sign up for the military if there's going to be a war. The other piece of Saddam's strategy is a plan to win Iraqis' allegiance by easing their deprivation and allowing them a little more freedom 52; perhaps to avoid mass defections during a war. Hungry and demoralized, thousands of Iraqi troops surrendered to U.S. forces in Iraq's southern desert during the 1991 war. This time, even if Saddam falls, the Iraqi leader seems to hope U.S. troops will not be seen as liberators, as they were in the Afghan capital of Kabul after the Taliban government collapsed last year. "Saddam knows how to appeal to the masses," says Wamidh Nadhmi, a senior political science professor at Baghdad University. "Remember, he was trained not as a military dictator, but as a politician." DVD players and the Internet Six years ago, the U.N. eased the postwar embargoes and allowed Iraq to trade oil for a wider range of goods. In addition, Iraq earns about $2 billion a year from oil traded outside the constraints of the U.N. sanctions system 52; much of it smuggled through back-door deals with Syria, Jordan and Turkey. Communities only recently began to benefit from the increased flow of money and goods. Iraqis still rely on Saddam's government for food rations, medicine and all social services. In addition to providing more benefits to citizens, in recent months Iraqi officials have: "The government wants to buy the contentment of Iraqis," says the Arab diplomat, who asked not to be identified. The tactic appears to have worked. "People aren't in the mood to criticize Saddam these days," he says. "People are much happier now than they were five years ago," says Shamaa, the economics professor. "Things have improved an awful lot for the middle class." Changes in Baghdad are evident since a visit two years ago. Roads have been repaved. The telephone system 52; barely functional for years after the U.S. bombing attacks in the Gulf War 52; works well enough to dial direct across the world. Little more than a year ago, Baghdad's Saddam International Airport was still dark. It had been mothballed after an international air embargo was imposed after the war. The embargo on commercial flights was never officially lifted. But that began to crumble in 2000. Now the brightly lit terminal is buzzing with travelers flying in from Jordan, Syria and Russia. "Welcome!" a cheery passport official says. In Baghdad, major roads are jammed with vehicles, among them new Mercedes-Benzes and Peugeots. They have been imported by the Iraqi Trade Ministry during the past few months and sold to residents at cut-rate prices. In a middle-class Baghdad neighborhood, a jazz trio serenades diners in an Italian restaurant with Beatles and Frank Sinatra tunes on a weekend night. Shoppers buy computers shipped from Dubai and snap up bootleg videodiscs for their new DVD players "I bought my video-disc player for 120,000 Iraqi dinars (about $60)," says Ayad Mujbil, 22, who sells digital video-discs in Baghdad's outdoor Shorja market. "Many people have players now." He adds that the biggest sellers at his market stall are movies featuring Mel Gibson. Even so, most Iraqis outside Baghdad, and many in the capital, are still reeling from two decades of war. U.N. officials here say unemployment is high and children suffer from malnutrition. There are no official figures. Despite some improvement since 2000, Iraq has never recovered from its wars. During the 1980s, the country had sophisticated hospitals and schools. The entire country had electricity and telephone lines. Iraq's currency, the dinar, is worth about one-six-thousandth of its 1990 value. In the Bab Sheikh neighborhood, Ismail Rahem Zengena, 29, lives in one room with his parents and four siblings. Their sleeping quarters are off a courtyard with crumbling balconies. Eight families share the decrepit building. Cooking is done in unoccupied corners of the yard. The family's only appliances are a television and refrigerator left over from before the Gulf War. Until then, the Zengenas lived in their own apartment nearby. Ismail's father, Rahem Mahmoud, supported the family by baking bread. The bakery closed during the war and never reopened. "We moved from our apartment after the war, because there was no money at all for the rent," Ismail says. "Now I earn 3,000 dinars a day (about $1.50) making tea in a cafe." Ismail says he would help defend the neighborhood if the United States attacks. He went to the local Baath Party office to volunteer. "I gave my address to them in case there is a war," he says. Many here blame U.S. hostilities rather than Saddam for their problems. It's a message driven home in almost every television broadcast and newspaper report. "It would be hard to convince some people that things would be better under a different government now," says Rebecca Arias Flores, deputy resident representative of the U.N. Development Program in Baghdad. "When people think about things being bad, the first thing they think about is the economic sanctions. Now they're asking: 'What kind of regime are we going to get? One that's better than this?' They have their doubts," says Flores, who is from El Salvador. Siege mentality Baghdad's residents also are preparing for a possible long siege. That could happen if American-led forces surround the city while U.S. jets bomb palaces, military sites and electricity and water plants. "I've begun stockpiling all the food we need because we are 18 of us," says Hussein Abdullah, 50, who has seven children and nine grandchildren. "We have enough to keep us at home for months." Last month, government officials issued ration coupons for three months' worth of flour, rice and other basic foods, rather than the normal one-month supply. This month, U.N. relief workers began drawing up plans for offering emergency aid to Baghdad if it has no electricity or drinking water. "We have to plan also for a lot of dead and wounded people," says Flores of the U.N. Development Program. "Health centers have stocks of food and medicines, but we don't know how long they'll last," she says. "A war in Baghdad could be a disaster." In a small storefront downtown that serves as an unofficial foreign-currency exchange, Kadhim Mutlak, 42, this month began noticing familiar signs of an impending war. After years working as a moneychanger, Mutlak says he knows how Baghdad's residents behave when a battle is about to erupt. "People are hoarding their money," Mutlak says. "They are not frightened because they have been through this many times. But there is a feeling that this time, it is much more serious." I seem to recall reading that even Sadaam's bodyguards are not issued ammo, to avoid 'accidents' to Sadaam. I don't believe the article mentions anything about Tehran. So collateral damage shouldn't be a factor with armed combatants. - tom IF this is what was said, the implication is that if everyone owned guns, and we start attacking, that the Iraqis would take their guns, rise up and throw Saddamn out. I agree with the above posters that Hussein wouldn't allow the citizens to be armed and would certainly never promote it. The guy's so scared that he's constantly in hiding and has a dozen body doubles. That said, it is interesting that liberal journalists get the idea of arming the populace when it has nothing to do with the U.S. They can run their collective mouth all they want. We have superior firepower, so we don't have to fight them man to man. I didn't realize the French had sent military advisors. No clips. That was 12 year old Wild Turkey I just had to spit out! Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. _uacct = "UA-2288668-1"; urchinTracker(); >
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
(Edited)
McCarthyism isn't always a bad thing. [Ferret Mike] - 09:27pm Mar 26, 2001 EST (#237 of 257) Eat yer hearts out boys and girls. There is a thread in FReeperland: Nomination: Most obnoxious FReeper poster And I made the cut. Heh, heh. "To: [handle deleted] ferret 125 Posted on 12/29/2000 16:26:07 PST by [deleted] [ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ] To: [deleted] "ferret" Ferret was real and not the sort of poseur that some of our other nominations have been and actually from time to time attempted to use logic and rationality. Arguing with him was more like actual debate. That is a quality very rare in leftists and should not be denigrated. 137 Posted on 12/29/2000 16:45:00 PST by [deleted] [ Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | Top | Last ] To: [deleted] That is not what I have seen in ferret. I have seen impetuous delight in the power to harm property owners and industry. I have seen twisted truths and half logic in support of property damage with flippant disregard for the technical arguments that the ecological consequences of his actions are destructive. I have yet to see a technical reference from him either. We disagree. 153 Posted on 12/29/2000 18:08:44 PST by [deleted] [ Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | Top | Last ] http://www.duhspot.net/politics/lastaskdave.html Nice thread, I see that you get the blue banned screen of honor when clicking on your nick. Most references to me as ferret at FR (My sign-up was in 1997 originally) are long nuked because of my constant reappearance there at FR as a returning bannee. This is a part of a "most obnoxious poster thread I posted on the old time.com/Politics forum after someone alerted me I was still loved there. I believe the moderator of Time.Com/Politics did the honors and deleted the handles of the guilty in this post of mine. I do know who wrote the last damning post though, it was Lurker, my old buddy.
There are no replies to Comment # 4. End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||||||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|