[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence


4play
See other 4play Articles

Title: Read Freaker's completely stupid/absurd reactions when I confronted them with reality, back in 2002. It's hillarious
Source: Freak Republic
URL Source: http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/813018/posts
Published: Aug 21, 2008
Author: Me, Me, Me
Post Date: 2008-08-21 21:29:18 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 108
Comments: 4

Most Baghdad's Residents Are Armed

bgcolor="white">

Free Republic
Browse

· Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


Skip to comments.

Most Baghdad's Residents Are Armed

Fox News Channel

Posted on 12/27/2002 10:44:42 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

A USA Today reporter who has been in and out of Baghdad 4 times in the past 4 months was interviewed last night. She stated that most of Baghdad's residents were armed and, while they may not be worshipping Saddam, they seemed likely to actively oppose any foreign attempt to take over the city - simple patriotism. She also stated that many attended some form of military training in the recent past.

After she stated all of the above the totally stupid Fox host (no, it wasn't Greta) thought it was appropriate to announce (paraphrase): "you seem to be saying that our soldiers would have no problem whatsoever to take over Saddam's capital"

Her reply: "I'm not so sure I meant to imply that"


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: greta


1 posted on 12/27/2002 10:44:43 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

[ Post Reply

| Private Reply | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Let the Iraqi Opposition and the Kurds do the urban house-to-house combat. We can provide logistic support, as necessary.


2 posted on 12/27/2002 11:03:20 AM PST by Consort

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
A USA Today reporter who has been in and out of Baghdad 4 times in the past 4 months was interviewed last night. She stated that most of Baghdad's residents were armed and, while they may not be worshipping Saddam, they seemed likely to actively oppose any foreign attempt to take over the city - simple patriotism.

Yeah, right. There is no friggin way Saddam would arm the general populace. That is counter to every dictatorial regime in history. Oh, and I love the word play here. If the citizens of Iraq are armed, they are patriots. But us gun owners here in the United States are just garden-variety gun nuts.


3 posted on 12/27/2002 11:05:45 AM PST by dirtboy

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: dirtboy
I agree - the last thing Saddam would do is arm the 90% of the population that hate his guts.

This article is bogus. The "reporter" wrote what she was told by her minders.


4 posted on 12/27/2002 11:15:54 AM PST by spectre

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 3 | View Replies]


To: dirtboy
If the citizens of Iraq are armed, they are patriots. But us gun owners here in the United States are just garden-variety gun nuts.

I saw the report and thought the same thing, dirtboy.


5 posted on 12/27/2002 11:18:57 AM PST by Principled

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 3 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
The chances that the general population of Baghdad is armed with ammunition is practically zero. The Baath Socialist Party, as in Syria, is controlled by a tribal minority. Actually arming the people of Baghdad would be suicide for the regime and wouldn't have a huge effect against the kind of war we are likely to wage.

I would suspect that this "training" the lady reporter (who appeared on FOX News last night) has seen involved lots of marching, chanting, running, and fake "bang, bang" shooting. AK-47's make lousy baseball bats and without several dozen or hundred rounds for each gun that is all they would be any good for.

Besides, the Iraqis aren't German, Baghdad ain't Berlin, and what they will be facing isn't the Red Army of 1945.


6 posted on 12/27/2002 11:30:01 AM PST by katana

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Whoop dee doo...after the U.S. military meanders through Bagdad...its streets will be filled with the same thing they found in Italy when the Allies stormed the country during WWII - thousands of unused weapons.


7 posted on 12/27/2002 11:30:13 AM PST by harpu

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator

I'm no fortuneteller, but I think that most Iraqis will be kissing the Americans feet. What did we hear during the gulf war... Saddam has got a million man army. We are going to need 50,000 body bags for our soldiers. It's going to be the mother of all battles.

How about Afghanistan?... No one has ever beat the people of Afghanistan--Russia couldn't do it, Britain couldn't do it. It's going to be a quagmire. Another Vietnam.

The liberal media do this all the time--try to discourage the American populace and downplay our abilities and talk up the opposition. They do it because they hate any Republican president, love "peace" at any cost, and love portraying America as the evil aggressor.

I'm just going to wait and see what happens like all the other prognosticators will have to do and pray that things go well for the United States and the soldiers that will do the fighting.

9 posted on 12/27/2002 11:37:20 AM PST by beaversmom

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Bring a few sack lunches to pass out in Baghdad, and you'll be seeing so many white flags that for a minute you'll think you're in France.
10 posted on 12/27/2002 11:39:05 AM PST by Equality 7-2521

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


To: Equality 7-2521
Maybe we can send Patty Murray over there. She can organize a few makeshift daycare centers and they will be like putty in our hands.
11 posted on 12/27/2002 11:42:19 AM PST by beaversmom

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


To: Democracy1154
Here's her USA Today piece:

It's at http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-10-01-iraq-war-1acover_x.htm

In Baghdad, residents prepare for new travails as battle looms

By Vivienne Walt, USA TODAY

BAGHDAD, Iraq — Iraqi officials expect U.S. forces to bring war to the streets of this sprawling capital. The country is slowly getting ready.

Thousands of civilians have undergone combat training in the wilting sun. Officials are issuing extra food rations so residents can begin stockpiling. The already familiar anti-American propaganda has intensified on television broadcasts and in newspapers. And the capital has seen a deluge of new consumer goods, apparently aimed at winning over ordinary citizens to the defense of Saddam Hussein.

He is using a new strategy to overcome what could be his greatest weakness: battling the world's biggest military force with an Iraqi army crippled by the 1991 Gulf War and years of international sanctions. This time, the Iraqi leader is calling on civilians to protect the regime that President Bush has vowed to change. There are signs that the tactic is finding some acceptance here.

"If American soldiers come onto our streets, I really believe there will be civil resistance," says Hamman Shamaa, 49, an economics professor at Baghdad University. The gray-haired chain-smoker hardly seems ready for combat. But he says he'll dust off the Kalashnikov rifle and three boxes of ammunition that he keeps at home and take to the streets at the first sight of Western soldiers in Baghdad. "People won't accept foreigners coming in here," he says.

It is unclear, of course, if ordinary Iraqis are candid in interviews with the foreign media. Under Iraqi censorship laws, reporters are accompanied by government translators. It is against the law to criticize Saddam or the government.

What the citizens of Baghdad do under attack could be critical. Street fighting 52; if it occurs 52; could entangle U.S. and allied soldiers in an ugly urban conflict in a city that is Saddam's power base. U.S. forces could easily capture other parts of Iraq, where the government's control is weaker. But achieving "regime change" in Baghdad could be difficult and costly, especially if armed civilians join the fray.

The push to take this bustling city could bog down Washington in a political and military quagmire, dragging out the war longer than the week or two Pentagon officials say would be ideal.

Iraqi officials admit privately that they cannot win a full-fledged war against the U.S. military. Asked whether they can defeat the enemy, an Iraqi diplomat in Europe said recently: "Of course not; we have to be logical about this."

They say they hope that if civilians and soldiers hold out long enough, American casualties might quickly erode support for the war back home. Iraqis point to the Somalia conflict in 1993, when television footage of a U.S. soldier being dragged through the capital led President Clinton to withdraw troops.

"We believe Americans want a war without casualties," says a Foreign Ministry official who asked not to be named. "There is a feeling that they will not come and fight us man to man."

For anyone arriving in Baghdad from the West, it is striking how relaxed the city seems. Residents say they have not been issued gas masks. Most believe a war will not erupt before the end of the year, when the blistering heat subsides. Daytime temperatures this week have reached 110 degrees.

Surprisingly, streets aren't sandbagged or barricaded. Soldiers and Saddam's elite force, the Republican Guard, are not evident.

However, more discreet security measures already are being taken: Government officials blocked USA TODAY from bringing a mobile satellite telephone into the country, apparently concerned that its global-positioning system could be used to identify targets for military airstrikes.

Families with weapons at home

In dozens of interviews across Baghdad during the past week, the talk has been tough. Residents say they'll reach for the nearest kitchen knife or firewood ax if U.S. soldiers appear on their block. In fact, many Iraqi families have weapons at home, often government-issue Kalashnikovs kept by former soldiers.

Iraq's regular forces number around 400,000. About 6 million Iraqis have completed military training and could be drafted. The country's military industries 52; headquartered in central Baghdad 52; are believed to already have produced missiles and anti-aircraft weaponry. Military analysts say Iraq still has some weapons stored from before the Gulf War. Other weaponry also has entered the country illegally over the years. A U.N. embargo imposed after the war prohibits sales to Iraq of equipment that could be used to rebuild its military.

In addition to the millions who already have been through military training, thousands more civilians spent their summer break taking intensive military courses.

Shamaa's 45-year-old wife, a high school principal, and his 20-year-old son, a literature student, spent all of August at a neighborhood sports center learning how to fire weapons and conduct basic urban warfare.

"Military training is going on in stadiums, schools 52; just about every open space there is," says a senior Arab diplomat here.

Officials will not discuss how many Baghdad residents have been trained. On Monday, a group of men crowded around the office of Saddam's ruling Baath Party in Baghdad's Bab Sheikh neighborhood. They said they had come to sign up for the military if there's going to be a war.

The other piece of Saddam's strategy is a plan to win Iraqis' allegiance by easing their deprivation and allowing them a little more freedom 52; perhaps to avoid mass defections during a war. Hungry and demoralized, thousands of Iraqi troops surrendered to U.S. forces in Iraq's southern desert during the 1991 war.

This time, even if Saddam falls, the Iraqi leader seems to hope U.S. troops will not be seen as liberators, as they were in the Afghan capital of Kabul after the Taliban government collapsed last year.

"Saddam knows how to appeal to the masses," says Wamidh Nadhmi, a senior political science professor at Baghdad University. "Remember, he was trained not as a military dictator, but as a politician."

DVD players and the Internet

Six years ago, the U.N. eased the postwar embargoes and allowed Iraq to trade oil for a wider range of goods. In addition, Iraq earns about $2 billion a year from oil traded outside the constraints of the U.N. sanctions system 52; much of it smuggled through back-door deals with Syria, Jordan and Turkey. Communities only recently began to benefit from the increased flow of money and goods. Iraqis still rely on Saddam's government for food rations, medicine and all social services.

In addition to providing more benefits to citizens, in recent months Iraqi officials have:

"The government wants to buy the contentment of Iraqis," says the Arab diplomat, who asked not to be identified. The tactic appears to have worked. "People aren't in the mood to criticize Saddam these days," he says.

"People are much happier now than they were five years ago," says Shamaa, the economics professor. "Things have improved an awful lot for the middle class."

Changes in Baghdad are evident since a visit two years ago. Roads have been repaved. The telephone system 52; barely functional for years after the U.S. bombing attacks in the Gulf War 52; works well enough to dial direct across the world.

Little more than a year ago, Baghdad's Saddam International Airport was still dark. It had been mothballed after an international air embargo was imposed after the war. The embargo on commercial flights was never officially lifted. But that began to crumble in 2000. Now the brightly lit terminal is buzzing with travelers flying in from Jordan, Syria and Russia. "Welcome!" a cheery passport official says.

In Baghdad, major roads are jammed with vehicles, among them new Mercedes-Benzes and Peugeots. They have been imported by the Iraqi Trade Ministry during the past few months and sold to residents at cut-rate prices.

In a middle-class Baghdad neighborhood, a jazz trio serenades diners in an Italian restaurant with Beatles and Frank Sinatra tunes on a weekend night. Shoppers buy computers shipped from Dubai and snap up bootleg videodiscs for their new DVD players

"I bought my video-disc player for 120,000 Iraqi dinars (about $60)," says Ayad Mujbil, 22, who sells digital video-discs in Baghdad's outdoor Shorja market. "Many people have players now." He adds that the biggest sellers at his market stall are movies featuring Mel Gibson.

Even so, most Iraqis outside Baghdad, and many in the capital, are still reeling from two decades of war.

U.N. officials here say unemployment is high and children suffer from malnutrition. There are no official figures. Despite some improvement since 2000, Iraq has never recovered from its wars. During the 1980s, the country had sophisticated hospitals and schools. The entire country had electricity and telephone lines. Iraq's currency, the dinar, is worth about one-six-thousandth of its 1990 value.

In the Bab Sheikh neighborhood, Ismail Rahem Zengena, 29, lives in one room with his parents and four siblings. Their sleeping quarters are off a courtyard with crumbling balconies. Eight families share the decrepit building. Cooking is done in unoccupied corners of the yard. The family's only appliances are a television and refrigerator left over from before the Gulf War.

Until then, the Zengenas lived in their own apartment nearby. Ismail's father, Rahem Mahmoud, supported the family by baking bread. The bakery closed during the war and never reopened. "We moved from our apartment after the war, because there was no money at all for the rent," Ismail says. "Now I earn 3,000 dinars a day (about $1.50) making tea in a cafe."

Ismail says he would help defend the neighborhood if the United States attacks. He went to the local Baath Party office to volunteer. "I gave my address to them in case there is a war," he says.

Many here blame U.S. hostilities rather than Saddam for their problems. It's a message driven home in almost every television broadcast and newspaper report.

"It would be hard to convince some people that things would be better under a different government now," says Rebecca Arias Flores, deputy resident representative of the U.N. Development Program in Baghdad.

"When people think about things being bad, the first thing they think about is the economic sanctions. Now they're asking: 'What kind of regime are we going to get? One that's better than this?' They have their doubts," says Flores, who is from El Salvador.

Siege mentality

Baghdad's residents also are preparing for a possible long siege. That could happen if American-led forces surround the city while U.S. jets bomb palaces, military sites and electricity and water plants.

"I've begun stockpiling all the food we need because we are 18 of us," says Hussein Abdullah, 50, who has seven children and nine grandchildren. "We have enough to keep us at home for months."

Last month, government officials issued ration coupons for three months' worth of flour, rice and other basic foods, rather than the normal one-month supply.

This month, U.N. relief workers began drawing up plans for offering emergency aid to Baghdad if it has no electricity or drinking water.

"We have to plan also for a lot of dead and wounded people," says Flores of the U.N. Development Program. "Health centers have stocks of food and medicines, but we don't know how long they'll last," she says. "A war in Baghdad could be a disaster."

In a small storefront downtown that serves as an unofficial foreign-currency exchange, Kadhim Mutlak, 42, this month began noticing familiar signs of an impending war. After years working as a moneychanger, Mutlak says he knows how Baghdad's residents behave when a battle is about to erupt.

"People are hoarding their money," Mutlak says. "They are not frightened because they have been through this many times. But there is a feeling that this time, it is much more serious."



12 posted on 12/27/2002 11:46:44 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 8 | View Replies]


To: Principled
Read #12. She may be right or not but that's what she believes she saw in Baghdad. That article has a lot more substance that 7 days of non-stop nonsense from 'former this or that' on the cable newsies.


13 posted on 12/27/2002 11:50:37 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 5 | View Replies]


To: Equality 7-2521
And IF there is any serious resistance - shutting off the electricity, then the food and then the water will soon settle the issue.


14 posted on 12/27/2002 11:55:10 AM PST by Let's Roll

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 10 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
A million women and children with pointed sticks are no match for the U.S. military.


15 posted on 12/27/2002 11:57:46 AM PST by brewcrew

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: brewcrew
"We believe Americans want a war without casualties," says a Foreign Ministry official who asked not to be named. "There is a feeling that they will not come and fight us man to man."


16 posted on 12/27/2002 12:03:16 PM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 15 | View Replies]


To: beaversmom
Having visited the Mideast many years ago, I agree that any Americans arriving in the Arab world will get lots of attention, and will be kissed if they do not forcibly resist, but it wasn't the FEET that were the target IIRC.


17 posted on 12/27/2002 12:07:34 PM PST by crystalk

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 9 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
All guns come complete with a white flag tied to the end of the barrel


18 posted on 12/27/2002 1:02:40 PM PST by goose1

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: katana
The chances that the general population of Baghdad is armed with ammunition is practically zero.

I seem to recall reading that even Sadaam's bodyguards are not issued ammo, to avoid 'accidents' to Sadaam.


19 posted on 12/27/2002 1:29:58 PM PST by expatpat

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 6 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Don't you find it amazing that the residents of the capital city of Iran have more 2nd Amendment rights than do the residents of our capital city, Washington, DC?


20 posted on 12/27/2002 1:34:17 PM PST by Flint

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: dirtboy
If the citizens of Iraq are armed, they are patriots. But us gun owners here in the United States are just garden-variety gun nuts.


Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

21 posted on 12/27/2002 1:38:56 PM PST by Tailback

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 3 | View Replies]


To: Flint
Don't you find it amazing that the residents of the capital city of Iran have more 2nd Amendment rights than do the residents of our capital city, Washington, DC?

I don't believe the article mentions anything about Tehran.


22 posted on 12/27/2002 2:10:08 PM PST by Notforprophet

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 20 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
"If American soldiers come onto our streets, I really believe there will be civil resistance," says Hamman Shamaa, 49, an economics professor at Baghdad University. The gray-haired chain-smoker hardly seems ready for combat. But he says he'll dust off the Kalashnikov rifle and three boxes of ammunition that he keeps at home and take to the streets at the first sight of Western soldiers in Baghdad. "People won't accept foreigners coming in here," he says.

So collateral damage shouldn't be a factor with armed combatants. - tom


23 posted on 12/27/2002 2:29:26 PM PST by Capt. Tom

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 12 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
After she stated all of the above the totally stupid Fox host (no, it wasn't Greta) thought it was appropriate to announce (paraphrase): "you seem to be saying that our soldiers would have no problem whatsoever to take over Saddam's capital"

IF this is what was said, the implication is that if everyone owned guns, and we start attacking, that the Iraqis would take their guns, rise up and throw Saddamn out.


24 posted on 12/27/2002 3:03:46 PM PST by LadyDoc

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: LadyDoc
This article has all the appearances of Iraqi propaganda designed to dupe the American press. And, I guess, it's worked.

I agree with the above posters that Hussein wouldn't allow the citizens to be armed and would certainly never promote it.

The guy's so scared that he's constantly in hiding and has a dozen body doubles.

That said, it is interesting that liberal journalists get the idea of arming the populace when it has nothing to do with the U.S.


25 posted on 12/27/2002 3:40:43 PM PST by BfloGuy

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 24 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
IIRC, possessing arms is a capital offense in Iraq.


26 posted on 12/27/2002 3:47:07 PM PST by Redcloak

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 1 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
"There is a feeling that they will not come and fight us man to man."

They can run their collective mouth all they want. We have superior firepower, so we don't have to fight them man to man.


27 posted on 12/27/2002 4:03:00 PM PST by Mark17

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 16 | View Replies]


To: goose1
All guns come complete with a white flag tied to the end of the barrel

I didn't realize the French had sent military advisors.


28 posted on 12/27/2002 4:06:49 PM PST by Focault's Pendulum

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 18 | View Replies]


To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator

No clips.


29 posted on 12/27/2002 4:59:33 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 12 | View Replies]


To: PeaceBeWithYou
Of course not, it's a military parade. More honest than empty clips.


30 posted on 12/27/2002 7:21:39 PM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 29 | View Replies]


To: Focault's Pendulum
"I didn't realize the French had sent military advisors.

That was 12 year old Wild Turkey I just had to spit out!
Semper Fi


31 posted on 12/27/2002 7:28:50 PM PST by river rat

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 28 | View Replies]


To: spectre
Agree....Stay Safe !


32 posted on 12/27/2002 7:31:38 PM PST by Squantos

[ Post Reply | Private Reply

| To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer:

Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

_uacct = "UA-2288668-1"; urchinTracker(); > (4 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

FreeRepublic.com is powered by Prozac copyright 2000-2008 Rim Jobistan

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-08-21   21:42:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Original_Intent (#1)

It's so easy and so much fun to see their loser moronicism, 6 years later.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-08-21   21:50:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#2)

It's so easy and so much fun to see their loser moronicism, 6 years later.

Sad too. They are the kind of Morons who will fasten on their Slave Collars and call it "Patriotic".

Calling them pathetic somehow seems so inadequate.

Besides, they slobber all over the carpet.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-08-21   23:49:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0) (Edited)

McCarthyism isn't always a bad thing. [Ferret Mike] - 09:27pm Mar 26, 2001 EST (#237 of 257)

Eat yer hearts out boys and girls. There is a thread in FReeperland: Nomination: Most obnoxious FReeper poster

And I made the cut.

Heh, heh.

"To: [handle deleted]

ferret

125 Posted on 12/29/2000 16:26:07 PST by [deleted]

[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]

To: [deleted]

"ferret"

Ferret was real and not the sort of poseur that some of our other nominations have been and actually from time to time attempted to use logic and rationality. Arguing with him was more like actual debate. That is a quality very rare in leftists and should not be denigrated.

137 Posted on 12/29/2000 16:45:00 PST by [deleted]

[ Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | Top | Last ]

To: [deleted]

That is not what I have seen in ferret. I have seen impetuous delight in the power to harm property owners and industry. I have seen twisted truths and half logic in support of property damage with flippant disregard for the technical arguments that the ecological consequences of his actions are destructive. I have yet to see a technical reference from him either. We disagree.

153 Posted on 12/29/2000 18:08:44 PST by [deleted]

[ Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | Top | Last ]

http://www.duhspot.net/politics/lastaskdave.html

Nice thread, I see that you get the blue banned screen of honor when clicking on your nick.

Most references to me as ferret at FR (My sign-up was in 1997 originally) are long nuked because of my constant reappearance there at FR as a returning bannee. This is a part of a "most obnoxious poster thread I posted on the old time.com/Politics forum after someone alerted me I was still loved there.

I believe the moderator of Time.Com/Politics did the honors and deleted the handles of the guilty in this post of mine. I do know who wrote the last damning post though, it was Lurker, my old buddy.


"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-08-22   2:32:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]