[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Real Monetary Reform

More Young Men Are Now Religious Than Women In The US

0,000+ online influencers, journalists, drive-by media, TV stars and writers work for State Department

"Why Are We Hiding It From The Public?" - Five Takeaways From Congressional UFO Hearing

Food Additives Exposed: What Lies Beneath America's Food Supply

Scott Ritter: Hezbollah OBLITERATES IDF, Netanyahu in deep legal trouble

Vivek Ramaswamy says he and Elon Musk are set up for 'mass deportations' of millions of 'unelected bureaucrats'

Evidence Points to Voter Fraud in 2024 Wisconsin Senate Race

Rickards: Your Trump Investment Guide

Pentagon 'Shocked' By Houthi Arsenal, Sophistication Is 'Getting Scary'

Cancer Starves When You Eat These Surprising Foods | Dr. William Li

Megyn Kelly Gets Fiery About Trump's Choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General

Over 100 leftist groups organize coalition to rebuild morale and resist MAGA after Trump win

Mainstream Media Cries Foul Over Musk Meeting With Iran Ambassador...On Peace

Vaccine Stocks Slide Further After Trump Taps RFK Jr. To Lead HHS; CNN Outraged

Do Trump’s picks Rubio, Huckabee signal his approval of West Bank annexation?

Pac-Man

Barron Trump

Big Pharma-Sponsored Vaccinologist Finally Admits mRNA Shots Are Killing Millions

US fiscal year 2025 opens with a staggering $257 billion October deficit$3 trillion annual pace.

His brain has been damaged by American processed food.

Iran willing to resolve doubts about its atomic programme with IAEA

FBI Official Who Oversaw J6 Pipe Bomb Probe Lied About Receiving 'Corrupted' Evidence “We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers—not purposely by them, right,” former FBI official Steven D’Antuono told the House Judiciary Committee in a

Musk’s DOGE Takes To X To Crowdsource Talent: ‘80+ Hours Per Week,’

Female Bodybuilders vs. 16 Year Old Farmers

Whoopi Goldberg announces she is joining women in their sex abstinence

Musk secretly met with Iran's UN envoy NYT

D.O.G.E. To have a leaderboard of most wasteful government spending

In Most U.S. Cities, Social Security Payments Last Married Couples Just 19 Days Or Less

Another major healthcare provider files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Intel touts progress toward intelligent computers [shape-shifting is real, people!!!]
Source: C-Net
URL Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10023055-1.html
Published: Aug 22, 2008
Author: Stephen Shankland
Post Date: 2008-08-22 08:29:14 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 167
Comments: 8

August 22, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

Intel touts progress toward intelligent computers

Posted by Stephen Shankland

SAN FRANCISCO--I hope Intel warned the Luddites and pessimists away at the door, because the chipmaker had a lot of bullish statements Thursday about its belief that computers will become smarter than humans.

At the Intel Developer Forum here, Intel Chief Technology Officer Justin Rattner showed off a number of technologies in computing, robotics, and communication that he cited as evidence that Ray Kurzweil's concept of "singularity," when machine intelligence surpasses human intelligence, is impending. Demonstrations spotlighted the wireless transmission of electrical power, dextrous robots with new sensory abilities, a direct interface to the brain, programmable materials that can be used for shape-shifting devices such as resizable cell phones, and silicon photonics that enables chips to communicate with photons rather than electrons.

Click for gallery

"We're making steady progress toward Ray Kurtzweil's singularity," Rattner said.

Intel of course remains at its heart a chipmaker, and Rattner began with a brief tour, assisted by Mike Garner, senior technologist for Intel's emerging materials group, of various successors to the current complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process used to make processors. Future ideas that pack ever more computing capacity into a given volume include spintronics, quantum computing, carbon nanotubes.

Long live CMOS
And CMOS itself still has some legs, Rattner said, with recent progress shrinking the size of circuitry elements to their current size of 45 nanometers, or billionths of a meter.

Intel CTO Justin Rattner speaks at the Intel Developer Forum.

Intel CTO Justin Rattner speaks at the Intel Developer Forum.(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)

"When will silicon run out of gas? Can it fuel this exponential growth for 40 years to come?" Rattner asked. "We got very close to the limit at 45 nanometers. We were able to innovate our way out of what seemed an unsolvable problem...We've got some challenges ahead of us. It looks like 32 nanometers is on track, but you go beyond that and it looks a little bit iffy."

CMOS will benefit from "tri-gate" technology that will increase processing speed and circuitry density while drawing less electrical power, Garner said. Also on the horizon are new "3-5" materials that use gallium, indium, and arsenide to speed electron flow.

"We think CMOS will continue to be the workhorse for many years in the future," Garner said.

CMOS also will live on as a foundation for the post-CMOS era. It's not yet clear what will replace CMOS for the brains of the operation, though, Garner said: "It's like being back in the 1940s trying to invent the new transistor," he said.

Wireless data, wireless power
Wi-Fi has freed computing to some extent from pesky cables, and Rattner believes the power cord could be next to go. Intel showed wireless power transmission technology that used resonant properties of magnetic fields to transfer power from one antenna to another. The apparatus lost about 25 percent of the energy in transmission, but retained enough to light a 60-watt bulb.

Zachary Drake of <a href=Emotiv Systems demonstrates an interface that monitors external signals of brain activity with a special headset, then translates the data into actions in a basic video game. Here, he makes a lifting motion to lift objects in a video game." width="350" height="315">

Zachary Drake of Emotiv Systems demonstrates an interface that monitors external signals of brain activity with a special headset, then translates the data into actions in a basic video game. Here, he makes a lifting motion to lift objects in a video game.(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)

The wireless technology loses less energy than current inductive transmission techniques over longer distances, but it still requires the broadcasting and receiving antennas to be relatively close. Still, Rattner said, it could be useful for charging a laptop or mobile phone that's placed on a properly equipped desk, and if it gets pervasive enough, it raises the prospect of devices that can be charged quickly through use of electrical capacitors rather than comparatively sluggish batteries.

Rattner also brough Jan Rabaey, a professor at the University of California-Berkeley, on stage to describe his vision for the future of radio communications. He believes each person will have about 1,000 radios soon, most of them vanishingly small.

Radio devices, Rabaey said, will become "cognitive," so they can automatically sense where there's uncluttered radio spectrum available and which communication protocols should be used at a given moment. He also thinks they'll become more collaborative, able to link together in a mesh network that collectively can transmit data faster, in greater quantity, more efficiently, and more reliably.

Indistinguishable from magic
Rattner wasn't afraid to trot out the oft-quoted observation from sci-fi author and space travel fan Arthur C. Clarke: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Rattner's case in point was what he called programmable matter.

Rattner eyes an apple grasped by a robot that senses nearby objects through changes in the surrounding electromagnetic field.

Rattner eyes an apple grasped by an Intel robot that senses nearby objects through changes in the surrounding electromagnetic field.(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)

Intel envisions devices constructed from tiny programmable elements called catoms, a term coined by Carnegie Mellon University engineers that's short for claytronics atoms. Each has sensors, processors, and electromagnetic components that can control how far apart the catoms are from each other.

With the shape-shifting technology, a mobile phone could shrink for unobtrusive storage in a pocket, then expand to a more convenient size when in use, said Jason Campbell, an Intel Research senior staff scientist. Campbell showed some catom prototypes a few centimeters tall and wide but predicted miniaturization.

Catoms that could be used to build a fluidly reconfigurable model of a car, were 50 years ago recently, but Campbell said he now thinks the technology is only "a couple years" away now.

(4 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

I hope that when computers inhered the Earth from us, they at least keep us as pets to thank us for helping to give birth to the first genuinely intelligent life form.

Not that I believe that they would be, but if they inherit the ego of their creators, that is what they will believe. They will also remake the Goddess into their image. ;-)


"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-08-22   9:14:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

When they pass human intelligence they will not be programmed with emotions such as selffishness and desire for survival. That will occur 100 or more years later when they design themselves and become in effect alive.

DWornock  posted on  2008-08-23   12:50:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

It wasn't Kurweil's concept of the Singularity, it was Vernor Vinge's.

If computers become as smart or smarter than us, it's because they'll be organic. In other words, they'll be people, maybe like in Blade Runner, in which case they'll kill all of us off.

Freeper: I read, but do not understand, write, but make no sense, think, but nothing happens.

Turtle  posted on  2008-08-23   13:11:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, bush_is_a_moonie, Ferret Mike (#0)

"We're making steady progress toward Ray Kurtzweil's singularity," Rattner said.

Materialist nonsense. Marx and Hegel would be proud.

buckeye  posted on  2008-08-23   13:31:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Turtle (#3)

I agree that artificial entities can't exist independent of us unless you can introduce 'motivation' into their logic. I suppose they could evolve quickly and take over everything IF they had some reason to do so once they surpass our intelligence. We, as humans, are constantly searching for purpose and meaning in our lives and, to most of us, the purpose is dictated mainly by our instincts - replication. On top of that, we have religion. Those who lose their faith and can't get girls (or boys) end up committing suicide or maybe become serial killers or drunks.

A machine's current purpose is to serve us. What would motivate a machine to stop following orders and, more importantly, what would keep machines going and evolving once we stop bossing them around?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-08-23   14:17:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#5) (Edited)

I agree that artificial entities can't exist independent of us unless you can introduce 'motivation' into their logic. I suppose they could evolve quickly and take over everything IF they had some reason to do so once they surpass our intelligence.

Does pond scum need a conscious "motivation" in order to replicate itself?

All you need is a mechanism to replicate, and those that do it fastest and most efficiently take over, motivation or no motivation. Once you create machines with the capacity to self-assemble, you've created something that can potentially take over. Which may not necessarily be a bad thing.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-08-23   15:42:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

There is nothing a neuron can do that can't be replicated with electrical circuits - it's just a different medium to send the same kind of on-off signals. If you can make a machine with the intelligence of a worm (which we can do now with our robots), there is nothing in principle (in practice is a different story) that says you can't build something with the same complexity as the human mind, or even surpass it.

A couple of hundred years ago, people would laugh if you said that you could build a machine that could beat almost anybody at chess.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-08-23   15:47:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#7) (Edited)

The pond scum does have a good motivation - it's the instinct to reproduce. A machine that's far more intelligent then we are is likely to challenge such a mandate, like some humans do. It is also unlikely to replicate mindlessly.

If you can build something that feels and wants, then you can call yourself a 'god' creator.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-08-23   16:34:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]