[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

What REALLY brought down Building 7? Firefighters expose the truth of 9/11

Locusts Descending on Ukraine

Seven Reasons Why PBS And NPR Deserve To Be Defunded

Why the U.S. Buys So Much Nuclear Fuel From Russia | WSJ

Another No News Day

Surveillance Video Shows Illegal Alien Kidnapping Elderly Woman

Tucker's Epstein comments trigger official Israeli backlash

Houthis Launch Mach 16 Ballistic Missiles At Israel

“Treasonous Conspiracy” – Tulsi Gabbard Calls for Prosecution of Barack Obama, Jim Comey, John Brennan and Others

TOO MANY CRACKS ! ERUPTION LIKELY IN ITALY ! Volcanology Conference in Geneva !

"I Tried To Warn Everyone!" - Elon Musk (Joe Rogan not in this video)

They Are Gambling the National Security of the U.S. on a Single Point of Failure

Cloud Seeding and Chem Trails across America (EPA Word Games)

Israeli settlers killed 117 sheep and stole hundreds more during an overnight

CBS to cancel Late Show with Stephen Colbert just days after host blasted company's settlement with Trump as 'big fat bribe'

Joe Concha: Stephen Colbert's show was 'no longer entertainment at this point'

California bill SB549 lets state seize fire-damaged land.

Israel's DARK SECRET Genocide Economy EXPOSED | Francesca Albanese

TORNADO + WILDFIRE = FIRENADO ! UTAH

"False, Malicious, Defamatory" - Trump Demands Unsealing Of Epstein Files, Threatens Lawsuit After WSJ Hit Piece

Russia After Russia || Peter Zeihan

EUROPE IS COLLAPSING: €2 TRILLION MEGABUDGET Will Bankrupt the Entire Continent

Extending Microsoft 10

Trump Says Coca-Cola Agreed On Major Reformulation To Use Real Cane Sugar

Garland Favorito and VoterGA Appeal Inexplicable Dismissal of Curling vs. Raffensperger Election Ruling

Born to Revolution: The “Red Diaper Baby” Roots of Zohran Mamdani and Today’s Democrats

These Are Richest People In Every US State

Education Department Investigates Foreign Funding At University Of Michigan After Arrests of Chinese Scholars

Israel editing WIkipedia, Former Israeli Prime Minister Debunks Epstein

Paul Joseph Watson:


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Intel touts progress toward intelligent computers [shape-shifting is real, people!!!]
Source: C-Net
URL Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10023055-1.html
Published: Aug 22, 2008
Author: Stephen Shankland
Post Date: 2008-08-22 08:29:14 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 305
Comments: 8

August 22, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

Intel touts progress toward intelligent computers

Posted by Stephen Shankland

SAN FRANCISCO--I hope Intel warned the Luddites and pessimists away at the door, because the chipmaker had a lot of bullish statements Thursday about its belief that computers will become smarter than humans.

At the Intel Developer Forum here, Intel Chief Technology Officer Justin Rattner showed off a number of technologies in computing, robotics, and communication that he cited as evidence that Ray Kurzweil's concept of "singularity," when machine intelligence surpasses human intelligence, is impending. Demonstrations spotlighted the wireless transmission of electrical power, dextrous robots with new sensory abilities, a direct interface to the brain, programmable materials that can be used for shape-shifting devices such as resizable cell phones, and silicon photonics that enables chips to communicate with photons rather than electrons.

Click for gallery

"We're making steady progress toward Ray Kurtzweil's singularity," Rattner said.

Intel of course remains at its heart a chipmaker, and Rattner began with a brief tour, assisted by Mike Garner, senior technologist for Intel's emerging materials group, of various successors to the current complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process used to make processors. Future ideas that pack ever more computing capacity into a given volume include spintronics, quantum computing, carbon nanotubes.

Long live CMOS
And CMOS itself still has some legs, Rattner said, with recent progress shrinking the size of circuitry elements to their current size of 45 nanometers, or billionths of a meter.

Intel CTO Justin Rattner speaks at the Intel Developer Forum.

Intel CTO Justin Rattner speaks at the Intel Developer Forum.(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)

"When will silicon run out of gas? Can it fuel this exponential growth for 40 years to come?" Rattner asked. "We got very close to the limit at 45 nanometers. We were able to innovate our way out of what seemed an unsolvable problem...We've got some challenges ahead of us. It looks like 32 nanometers is on track, but you go beyond that and it looks a little bit iffy."

CMOS will benefit from "tri-gate" technology that will increase processing speed and circuitry density while drawing less electrical power, Garner said. Also on the horizon are new "3-5" materials that use gallium, indium, and arsenide to speed electron flow.

"We think CMOS will continue to be the workhorse for many years in the future," Garner said.

CMOS also will live on as a foundation for the post-CMOS era. It's not yet clear what will replace CMOS for the brains of the operation, though, Garner said: "It's like being back in the 1940s trying to invent the new transistor," he said.

Wireless data, wireless power
Wi-Fi has freed computing to some extent from pesky cables, and Rattner believes the power cord could be next to go. Intel showed wireless power transmission technology that used resonant properties of magnetic fields to transfer power from one antenna to another. The apparatus lost about 25 percent of the energy in transmission, but retained enough to light a 60-watt bulb.

Zachary Drake of <a href=Emotiv Systems demonstrates an interface that monitors external signals of brain activity with a special headset, then translates the data into actions in a basic video game. Here, he makes a lifting motion to lift objects in a video game." width="350" height="315">

Zachary Drake of Emotiv Systems demonstrates an interface that monitors external signals of brain activity with a special headset, then translates the data into actions in a basic video game. Here, he makes a lifting motion to lift objects in a video game.(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)

The wireless technology loses less energy than current inductive transmission techniques over longer distances, but it still requires the broadcasting and receiving antennas to be relatively close. Still, Rattner said, it could be useful for charging a laptop or mobile phone that's placed on a properly equipped desk, and if it gets pervasive enough, it raises the prospect of devices that can be charged quickly through use of electrical capacitors rather than comparatively sluggish batteries.

Rattner also brough Jan Rabaey, a professor at the University of California-Berkeley, on stage to describe his vision for the future of radio communications. He believes each person will have about 1,000 radios soon, most of them vanishingly small.

Radio devices, Rabaey said, will become "cognitive," so they can automatically sense where there's uncluttered radio spectrum available and which communication protocols should be used at a given moment. He also thinks they'll become more collaborative, able to link together in a mesh network that collectively can transmit data faster, in greater quantity, more efficiently, and more reliably.

Indistinguishable from magic
Rattner wasn't afraid to trot out the oft-quoted observation from sci-fi author and space travel fan Arthur C. Clarke: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Rattner's case in point was what he called programmable matter.

Rattner eyes an apple grasped by a robot that senses nearby objects through changes in the surrounding electromagnetic field.

Rattner eyes an apple grasped by an Intel robot that senses nearby objects through changes in the surrounding electromagnetic field.(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)

Intel envisions devices constructed from tiny programmable elements called catoms, a term coined by Carnegie Mellon University engineers that's short for claytronics atoms. Each has sensors, processors, and electromagnetic components that can control how far apart the catoms are from each other.

With the shape-shifting technology, a mobile phone could shrink for unobtrusive storage in a pocket, then expand to a more convenient size when in use, said Jason Campbell, an Intel Research senior staff scientist. Campbell showed some catom prototypes a few centimeters tall and wide but predicted miniaturization.

Catoms that could be used to build a fluidly reconfigurable model of a car, were 50 years ago recently, but Campbell said he now thinks the technology is only "a couple years" away now.

(4 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

I hope that when computers inhered the Earth from us, they at least keep us as pets to thank us for helping to give birth to the first genuinely intelligent life form.

Not that I believe that they would be, but if they inherit the ego of their creators, that is what they will believe. They will also remake the Goddess into their image. ;-)


"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-08-22   9:14:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

When they pass human intelligence they will not be programmed with emotions such as selffishness and desire for survival. That will occur 100 or more years later when they design themselves and become in effect alive.

DWornock  posted on  2008-08-23   12:50:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

It wasn't Kurweil's concept of the Singularity, it was Vernor Vinge's.

If computers become as smart or smarter than us, it's because they'll be organic. In other words, they'll be people, maybe like in Blade Runner, in which case they'll kill all of us off.

Freeper: I read, but do not understand, write, but make no sense, think, but nothing happens.

Turtle  posted on  2008-08-23   13:11:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, bush_is_a_moonie, Ferret Mike (#0)

"We're making steady progress toward Ray Kurtzweil's singularity," Rattner said.

Materialist nonsense. Marx and Hegel would be proud.

buckeye  posted on  2008-08-23   13:31:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Turtle (#3)

I agree that artificial entities can't exist independent of us unless you can introduce 'motivation' into their logic. I suppose they could evolve quickly and take over everything IF they had some reason to do so once they surpass our intelligence. We, as humans, are constantly searching for purpose and meaning in our lives and, to most of us, the purpose is dictated mainly by our instincts - replication. On top of that, we have religion. Those who lose their faith and can't get girls (or boys) end up committing suicide or maybe become serial killers or drunks.

A machine's current purpose is to serve us. What would motivate a machine to stop following orders and, more importantly, what would keep machines going and evolving once we stop bossing them around?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-08-23   14:17:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#5) (Edited)

I agree that artificial entities can't exist independent of us unless you can introduce 'motivation' into their logic. I suppose they could evolve quickly and take over everything IF they had some reason to do so once they surpass our intelligence.

Does pond scum need a conscious "motivation" in order to replicate itself?

All you need is a mechanism to replicate, and those that do it fastest and most efficiently take over, motivation or no motivation. Once you create machines with the capacity to self-assemble, you've created something that can potentially take over. Which may not necessarily be a bad thing.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-08-23   15:42:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

There is nothing a neuron can do that can't be replicated with electrical circuits - it's just a different medium to send the same kind of on-off signals. If you can make a machine with the intelligence of a worm (which we can do now with our robots), there is nothing in principle (in practice is a different story) that says you can't build something with the same complexity as the human mind, or even surpass it.

A couple of hundred years ago, people would laugh if you said that you could build a machine that could beat almost anybody at chess.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-08-23   15:47:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#7) (Edited)

The pond scum does have a good motivation - it's the instinct to reproduce. A machine that's far more intelligent then we are is likely to challenge such a mandate, like some humans do. It is also unlikely to replicate mindlessly.

If you can build something that feels and wants, then you can call yourself a 'god' creator.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-08-23   16:34:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]