[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Intel touts progress toward intelligent computers [shape-shifting is real, people!!!] August 22, 2008 4:00 AM PDT SAN FRANCISCO--I hope Intel warned the Luddites and pessimists away at the door, because the chipmaker had a lot of bullish statements Thursday about its belief that computers will become smarter than humans. At the Intel Developer Forum here, Intel Chief Technology Officer Justin Rattner showed off a number of technologies in computing, robotics, and communication that he cited as evidence that Ray Kurzweil's concept of "singularity," when machine intelligence surpasses human intelligence, is impending. Demonstrations spotlighted the wireless transmission of electrical power, dextrous robots with new sensory abilities, a direct interface to the brain, programmable materials that can be used for shape-shifting devices such as resizable cell phones, and silicon photonics that enables chips to communicate with photons rather than electrons. "We're making steady progress toward Ray Kurtzweil's singularity," Rattner said. Intel of course remains at its heart a chipmaker, and Rattner began with a brief tour, assisted by Mike Garner, senior technologist for Intel's emerging materials group, of various successors to the current complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process used to make processors. Future ideas that pack ever more computing capacity into a given volume include spintronics, quantum computing, carbon nanotubes. Long live CMOS "When will silicon run out of gas? Can it fuel this exponential growth for 40 years to come?" Rattner asked. "We got very close to the limit at 45 nanometers. We were able to innovate our way out of what seemed an unsolvable problem...We've got some challenges ahead of us. It looks like 32 nanometers is on track, but you go beyond that and it looks a little bit iffy." CMOS will benefit from "tri-gate" technology that will increase processing speed and circuitry density while drawing less electrical power, Garner said. Also on the horizon are new "3-5" materials that use gallium, indium, and arsenide to speed electron flow. "We think CMOS will continue to be the workhorse for many years in the future," Garner said. CMOS also will live on as a foundation for the post-CMOS era. It's not yet clear what will replace CMOS for the brains of the operation, though, Garner said: "It's like being back in the 1940s trying to invent the new transistor," he said. Wireless data, wireless power The wireless technology loses less energy than current inductive transmission techniques over longer distances, but it still requires the broadcasting and receiving antennas to be relatively close. Still, Rattner said, it could be useful for charging a laptop or mobile phone that's placed on a properly equipped desk, and if it gets pervasive enough, it raises the prospect of devices that can be charged quickly through use of electrical capacitors rather than comparatively sluggish batteries. Rattner also brough Jan Rabaey, a professor at the University of California-Berkeley, on stage to describe his vision for the future of radio communications. He believes each person will have about 1,000 radios soon, most of them vanishingly small. Radio devices, Rabaey said, will become "cognitive," so they can automatically sense where there's uncluttered radio spectrum available and which communication protocols should be used at a given moment. He also thinks they'll become more collaborative, able to link together in a mesh network that collectively can transmit data faster, in greater quantity, more efficiently, and more reliably. Indistinguishable from magic Intel envisions devices constructed from tiny programmable elements called catoms, a term coined by Carnegie Mellon University engineers that's short for claytronics atoms. Each has sensors, processors, and electromagnetic components that can control how far apart the catoms are from each other. With the shape-shifting technology, a mobile phone could shrink for unobtrusive storage in a pocket, then expand to a more convenient size when in use, said Jason Campbell, an Intel Research senior staff scientist. Campbell showed some catom prototypes a few centimeters tall and wide but predicted miniaturization. Catoms that could be used to build a fluidly reconfigurable model of a car, were 50 years ago recently, but Campbell said he now thinks the technology is only "a couple years" away now. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
I hope that when computers inhered the Earth from us, they at least keep us as pets to thank us for helping to give birth to the first genuinely intelligent life form. Not that I believe that they would be, but if they inherit the ego of their creators, that is what they will believe. They will also remake the Goddess into their image. ;-)
When they pass human intelligence they will not be programmed with emotions such as selffishness and desire for survival. That will occur 100 or more years later when they design themselves and become in effect alive.
It wasn't Kurweil's concept of the Singularity, it was Vernor Vinge's. If computers become as smart or smarter than us, it's because they'll be organic. In other words, they'll be people, maybe like in Blade Runner, in which case they'll kill all of us off.
Freeper: I read, but do not understand, write, but make no sense, think, but nothing happens.
Materialist nonsense. Marx and Hegel would be proud.
I agree that artificial entities can't exist independent of us unless you can introduce 'motivation' into their logic. I suppose they could evolve quickly and take over everything IF they had some reason to do so once they surpass our intelligence. We, as humans, are constantly searching for purpose and meaning in our lives and, to most of us, the purpose is dictated mainly by our instincts - replication. On top of that, we have religion. Those who lose their faith and can't get girls (or boys) end up committing suicide or maybe become serial killers or drunks. A machine's current purpose is to serve us. What would motivate a machine to stop following orders and, more importantly, what would keep machines going and evolving once we stop bossing them around?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Does pond scum need a conscious "motivation" in order to replicate itself? All you need is a mechanism to replicate, and those that do it fastest and most efficiently take over, motivation or no motivation. Once you create machines with the capacity to self-assemble, you've created something that can potentially take over. Which may not necessarily be a bad thing.
There is nothing a neuron can do that can't be replicated with electrical circuits - it's just a different medium to send the same kind of on-off signals. If you can make a machine with the intelligence of a worm (which we can do now with our robots), there is nothing in principle (in practice is a different story) that says you can't build something with the same complexity as the human mind, or even surpass it. A couple of hundred years ago, people would laugh if you said that you could build a machine that could beat almost anybody at chess.
The pond scum does have a good motivation - it's the instinct to reproduce. A machine that's far more intelligent then we are is likely to challenge such a mandate, like some humans do. It is also unlikely to replicate mindlessly. If you can build something that feels and wants, then you can call yourself a 'god' creator.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|