See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Could Michelle O Become the Sexiest First Spouse of All Times if Hubby Gets Elected?
Source:
CNN
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 25, 2008
Author: Me, Me, Me
Post Date: 2008-08-25 22:59:53 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 1261
Comments: 80
Just watched her at the teevee. Also noticed that, every time they are together, Barack can't seem to be able to keep his hands off her butt. Come on, let's watch the venom flow.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
That's just how he lets blacks know "I'm one of you." Like Sacha Cohen did.
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
First Lady becomes First Centerfold? The country is going downhill fast....
"A leader, for a change." - Jimmy Carter, 1976 campaign slogan. Sound familiar? Here it comes again!
No.
Michelle Obama, sexy? What have you been smoking/drinking? She will be an "Aunt Esther" look alike in a few more years.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. um..if he does that in public, that shows a lack of class and gentility!
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
For her age, she is very good looking. Those that would complain about a husband touching his wife are rather uptight and sexual prudes.
Jackie O was the loveliest first lady. And, how can we forget the babe with the fat ankles?
That's exactly how I see it. For a 44 yr. old woman with 2 children, she looks sensational. And I agree, it must be very reASSuring for a woman at that age to note how her hubby can't seem to get enough of her. Jackie O's... not exactly my cup of tea. Oh, I just learned last night from the TV (Dead Like Me) that Marilyn Monroe suffered from the irritable bowel syndrome - it means she farted a lot. She could have dated Robert Redford who had the unbelievably stinky bad breath syndrome.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
As first lady Jackie Kennedy was considered special by most people. Later she appeared to go downhill.
Ever wonder where Laura's hand is here? ;-)
That's what Fred Reed I like about Mexican women. They are amorous without being tramps. It's nuttin' but the dogs in the Obamas.
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
Dragging Miss Teresa, onto the turnpike that is a Red Sox game. You can see this very private woman hate where she is here. John;"I'm only trying to drive you Miss Teresa!" Men always think they are "Driving Miss Daisy" when they push, pull and prod their wifes to where they thing they should be to serve their purpose best. We as a highly intelligent primate like to put on the airs of 'class and gentility,' but no matter what, the chimp in is always manages to shine through when you deal with how men generally deal with getting their spouses where they want them. ;-) (It can work both ways too. )
Amazing you even think this opinion means squat when you live by the dogma of hate and bait racism where nobody is good or acceptable if they are part of an ethnic or racial group you hate. So much for the KKK peanut gallery that lives in the cheap seats of this forum.
LOL! Lighten up, Francis. The only people I hate are white liberals. The dog isn't to blame for his dogginess, and I think it will be FANTASTIC for whites to see 4 years of doggie behavior on the teevee -- not to mention attendant exuberant behavior from the dogs in their neighborhood.
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
I live in Oregon. The Spring rains left at the end of June and the Autumn rains started back up a couple of days ago. 'Fraid I am as pasty white as they get and can't lighten up much more then I am. Here you go again, even your metaphors are about how light or darkly colored things in the world can physically be. Your metaphor of the Negro as a feral dog is a thin one. You would really have to be mud dumb not to see it. I have no use or patience for the ignorance and maliciousness of race baiting. You stereotype to act as an agent provocateur to create wedge issues that divide people to get their minds off of important issues and constructive endeavors. I see critters like you all the time in the forest. But usually you have to look under rocks to find them. You fool nobody here.
You never fooled me, Mike. At this point, blacks are going to behave worse no matter what happens. Obama should never have gotten this far. That drives you bonkers, so I can understand why you feel you have to lash out.
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
I don't have to worry about 'lashing out' and this is a projection of yours' that this pet wedge issue of racism really is. Racism is discredited, and has been deinstitutionalized in the U.S. because of that and it drives you nuts. It is you who is the old dog barking from the porch at what you fear and don't understand, not me. I don't usually spend time dealing with harebrained nonsense like yours' but this is an election year, and perhaps as good a time as any to indulge in doing this again. I have posted a long time and have seen allot of people in various forums with your racist hate and bait outlook on things. You use the term "lash out" to project the inference I react out of fear. I do not. I do not fear nor hate racists, that is something I leave to them as it is their realm in life; the market in spreading fear and hate.
Come on, let's watch the venom flow. Why do you troll this board?
God is always good!
Okay, what about racism by blacks towards whites?? Or is that only whites can be racist??
(I had nothing to do with Atomic Dog.) Blacks have multiple excuses for their behavior: higher testosterone, lower intelligence, high time preference, and higher incidence of psychopathy, all of which are probably somewhere between 60% and 80% genetic. What's your excuse, Mike? I think you're just shameless. :)
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
Yes, this has been discussed in some detail. Since whites have more power than blacks, only whites can be racists.
Bullsh^t!!! Day by day, moment by moment we inch towards the inevitable showdown..
Who cares whether blacks are racist? I mean, would you rather be knifed by an anti-racist? (Don't answer that.) What matters to me, and I think to most, is that the lower tail is especially loud and violent.
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
Explain 'preferences' in that case. Racism cuts both ways and is not always a "put them down" thing. More often it is a "we want you, not them" thing, which is what the lawsuits always say when claiming discrimination based on race. Affirmative Action is simply racism coded into law. It is being re-institutionalized by liberals and taken down state-by-state by Ward Connerly. To say that racism has been "de-institutionalized" in the US is a lie.
"A leader, for a change." - Jimmy Carter, 1976 campaign slogan. Sound familiar? Here it comes again!
Works for me.
We do have more power. We just use it against ourselves as much as we use it for ourselves. We're fair like that.
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
The hilarious part of AA for me is, when given the option, I'd NEVER choose a black Dr, lawyer, contractor or check out person. I'll take the best and brightest and I can't be sure with any of the above. (seriously, do my checkout test sometime. THEY are perpetually confused and have lines twice as long as white kids. Sorry if this offends some of the more PC folks on board, but it's true 99.9% of the time)
What does that mean?
That is the real problem with so-called "preferences". You don't know if someone got something because they are talented or because they were given something because of the color of their skin or their gender or both. "Preferences" also take talented people and tar them with the stigma of "You only got it because you are X" and leads to "Token" people. "We need a black" Current law cares NOT about talent ... Government demands that ability to DO the job not be looked at ... and this is not institutionalized racism, sexism, and discrimination how?
"A leader, for a change." - Jimmy Carter, 1976 campaign slogan. Sound familiar? Here it comes again!
It children, it means than when you are given a choice between a small candy bar today and a large candy bar a week from today, you take the small one today. In adults it means less savings, which means lower long-term net worth when you control for income. (The Seattle public school system BTW says it is unfair to attach a value judgement to that. In principle I agree, but it is just as unfair to call the long-term outcome "unjust.")
They say they are for "diversity". What they really are for is slavery.
Yepper.....like I'm really going to do my investing with Mr DeVine Johnson, when a Benington Fensworty III is available.
Ignore the sheeted peanut gallery, Mike, just as they are ignoring Michelle's address of last evening. Threads like this silly one and another on speculation that MO may be pregnant should be a major embarrassment to the forum. Her speech was terrific both in content and presentation as was her energy and ice melting smile.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
What about the Polar icecaps? She better cut that out.
In a few more years she will look pretty much like Aunt Esther on Sanford and Son--maybe. Maybe won't even look as "good" as she did. And I don't believe people have to be "uptight, sexual prudes" who don't especially want to see a middle-aged couple (or anyone else for that matter) playing "grab @$$." I don't want to see the "gays" doing that and don't especially want to see straights doing it either. Nothing wrong with people loving each other but some things should be kept private.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Think it might be 'cause that's how he "rolls"? If you think you may be in a place where there might be one or more Obummer supporters don't forget your protection. Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Not until we get rid of affirmative action completely.
Why shouldn't Obama have gotten this far? Are you claiming he cheated?
Give your brain a chance. I know exactly what she and her non-American-negro husband have in mind if they ascend to the Oval Office: an ANC-lite administration that targets European-Americans for constant harassment and oppression. MO is a black devil full of rage and she means to exact some sort of "revenge" against the ancient practice of slavery in America in the form of reparations. I say "ancient" because nobody alive can claim any connection to that distant time. A pox on her and her marxist-lite husband.
Yeah he cheated. He is not even really black. :) Blacks will be pissed when they find that out.
God is always good!
Exactly. And why people can't see what they are, and from their own statements, is beyond me.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Comments (41 - 80) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAlso noticed that, every time they are together, Barack can't seem to be able to keep his hands off her butt.
#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#3. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
-Schweizerische Schutzenseitunt (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
Lord Acton
#5. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
Barack can't seem to be able to keep his hands off her butt.
#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
Barack can't seem to be able to keep his hands off her butt.
#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#8. To: DWornock (#6)
For her age, she is very good looking. Those that would complain about a husband touching his wife are rather uptight and sexual prudes.
#9. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#8)
#10. To: christine (#5)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#11. To: DWornock (#6)
Those that would complain about a husband touching his wife are rather uptight and sexual prudes.
#12. To: christine (#5)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#13. To: Tauzero (#11)
"It's nuttin' but the dogs in the Obamas."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#14. To: Ferret Mike (#13)
#15. To: Tau zero (#14)
"Lighten up, Francis."
"The only people I hate are white liberals. The dog isn't to blame for his dogginess, and I think it will be FANTASTIC for whites to see 4 years of doggie behavior on the teevee -- not to mention attendant exuberant behavior from the dogs in their neighborhood."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#16. To: Ferret Mike (#15)
You fool nobody here.
#17. To: Tauzero (#16)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#18. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#19. To: Ferret Mike, robnoel (#17)
#20. To: Ferret Mike (#15)
(Edited)
Your metaphor of the Negro as a feral dog is a thin one.
#21. To: Lady X (#19)
Or is that only whites can be racist??
#22. To: Jethro Tull (#21)
Since whites have more power than blacks
#23. To: Lady X (#19)
Or is that only whites can be racist??
#24. To: Ferret Mike (#17)
Racism is discredited, and has been deinstitutionalized in the U.S.
#25. To: Lady X (#22)
Day by day, moment by moment we inch towards the inevitable showdown..
#26. To: Lady X (#22)
Bullsh^t!!!
#27. To: mirage (#24)
Affirmative Action is simply racism coded into law.
#28. To: Tauzero (#20)
high time preference
#29. To: Jethro Tull (#27)
(Edited)
I'll take the best and brightest and I can't be sure with any of the above.
"We need a woman"
#30. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#28)
What does that mean?
#31. To: mirage (#29)
You don't know if someone got something because they are talented or because they were given something because of the color of their skin or their gender or both.
#32. To: Ferret Mike (#15)
You stereotype to act as an agent provocateur to create wedge issues that divide people to get their minds off of important issues and constructive endeavors.
#33. To: iconoclast (#32)
ice melting smile.
#34. To: DWornock (#6)
For her age, she is very good looking. Those that would complain about a husband touching his wife are rather uptight and sexual prudes.
Lord Acton
#35. To: RickyJ, a vast rightwing conspirator (#18)
Why do you troll this board?
Lord Acton
#36. To: Ferret Mike (#17)
and has been deinstitutionalized in the U.S.
#37. To: Tauzero (#16)
At this point, blacks are going to behave worse no matter what happens. Obama should never have gotten this far.
#38. To: iconoclast (#32)
Her speech was terrific both in content and presentation as was her energy and ice melting smile.
-Schweizerische Schutzenseitunt (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#39. To: Old Friend (#37)
Why shouldn't Obama have gotten this far? Are you claiming he cheated?
#40. To: X-15 (#38)
MO is a black devil full of rage and she means to exact some sort of "revenge" against the ancient practice of slavery in America in the form of reparations. I say "ancient" because nobody alive can claim any connection to that distant time. A pox on her and her marxist-lite husband.
Lord Acton
.
.
.