[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Obama's Years at Columbia Are a Mystery - He Graduated Without Honors
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obama ... -columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/
Published: Sep 8, 2008
Author: ROSS GOLDBERG,
Post Date: 2008-09-08 21:26:36 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 1457
Comments: 93

Obama's Years at Columbia Are a Mystery

He Graduated Without Honors

By ROSS GOLDBERG, Special to the Sun | September 2, 2008

//new Dialog.Box('feedback'); new Dialog.Box('article_email');

Senator Obama's life story, from his humble roots, to his rise to Harvard Law School, to his passion as a community organizer in Chicago, has been at the center of his presidential campaign. But one chapter of the tale remains a blank — his education at Columbia College, a place he rarely speaks about and where few people seem to remember him.

Contributing to the mystery is the fact that nobody knows just how well Mr. Obama, unlike Senator McCain and most other major candidates for the past two elections, performed as a student.

The Obama campaign has refused to release his college transcript, despite an academic career that led him to Harvard Law School and, later, to a lecturing position at the University of Chicago. The shroud surrounding his experience at Columbia contrasts with that of other major party nominees since 2000, all whom have eventually released information about their college performance or seen it leaked to the public.

For better or worse, voters have taken an interest in candidates' grades since 1999, when the New Yorker published President Bush's transcript at Yale and disclosed that he was a C student. Mr. Bush had never portrayed himself as a brain, but many were surprised to learn the next year that his opponent, Vice President Gore, did not do much better at Harvard despite his intellectual image. When Senator Kerry's transcript surfaced, reporters found that he actually had a slightly lower average at Yale than Mr. Bush did.

Some political observers cite such disclosures as proof that candidates' intelligence cannot be judged solely by their political careers or the schools they attended. Grades provide a rare measure of intellect that is immune to political spin, proponents say.

"We like to pretend IQ doesn't matter, but it really does with a lot of jobs, including the presidency," a professor at Smith College who studies the effects of human intelligence on the economy, James Miller, said. "We can't trust the information that candidates give us, so it's important to look for objective data that they can't falsify or distort."

Mr. Miller acknowledged that Mr. Obama displayed academic achievement at Harvard, where he graduated magna cum laude and led the Harvard Law Review. Still, Mr. Miller said, he would like to see information about how Mr. Obama performed in various subjects at Columbia.

That view is not shared by other election observers, including some who have themselves indulged the public's interest in candidates' academic records. One of them is Geoffrey Kabaservice, a political historian who in 2000 published Senator Bradley's relatively low score of 485 on the verbal SAT. Mr. Bradley, a Rhodes Scholar who was a star basketball player at Princeton, was running for the Democratic presidential nomination.

"It's awfully hard to correlate anything, really, about a person on the basis of their grades," Mr. Kabaservice said, explaining that he published Mr. Bradley's score to highlight limitations in intelligence testing. He said he doubted that candidates' grades have affected the outcome of any recent presidential elections.

"For people who didn't like George W. Bush, for example, the grade aspect only confirmed what they thought about him," Mr. Kabaservice said. "And for everybody else, it made him more of a regular guy."

The Obama campaign declined to comment for this article and did not offer an explanation for why his transcript has not been released. But observers speculated that one reason might be the racially charged nature of the election. Mr. Obama has acknowledged benefiting from affirmative action in the past, and details about his academic performance might open him up to critics eager to accuse him, probably unfairly, of receiving a free ride, Mr. Kabaservice said.

"Anyone who is a minority and who's come up partially through the meritocracy — getting into good colleges, and subsequently good law schools — is going to come under suspicion that there was some kind of affirmative action boost," he said. "I suspect this is an area of discomfort for Obama."

In contrast with the rest of Mr. Obama's life story, little is known about his college experience. He attended Occidental College in Los Angeles for two years before transferring to Columbia in 1981. The move receives only a mention in Mr. Obama's 1995 memoir, "Dreams from My Father," which instead devotes that chapter to his impressions of race and class struggles in New York.

An article in a Columbia University publication, Columbia College Today, reported that Mr. Obama has portrayed Columbia as a period of buckling down following a troubled adolescence. He did not socialize much, he has said, instead spending a lot of time in the library, "like a monk." He has also stated that he was involved to some extent with the Black Students Organization.

Federal law limits the information that Columbia can release about Mr. Obama's time there. A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors, Mr. Connolly said, though specific information on his grades is sealed. A program from the 1983 graduation ceremony lists him as a graduate.

More is known about Mr. McCain's experience at the United States Naval Academy, where he was a self-described troublemaker and graduated in the bottom 1% of his class. The McCain campaign has declined to release his transcript, saying that his performance at the academy can only be viewed in the context of his larger military career.

"His record stands on its own," a McCain spokesman, Peter Feldman, said. "His time spent in college was part of the transformative years that made him who he was."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Okay, let's compare 'Obama graduated without honors' with 'McCain graduated at the very bottom of his class'.

But the headline is 'Obama did not graduate at the top of his class?' How stupid is that?

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-08   21:43:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#1)

It's not about class rank, it's about more unanswered questions.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-09-08   21:58:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#3)

All you need to know is this?

Obama displayed academic achievement at Harvard, where he graduated magna cum laude and led the Harvard Law Review. That puts him in the top 10% of his law class at one of the top 2 law schools in the U.S.

My UGPA was 3.83 (Computer Science/minors in math, economics polysci -yes it took me 5 years to get thru all the hours) and I scored at the 90% percentile on the LSAT. I applied to Harvard as my "dream school" and I wasn't even considered. I did get accepted to the Univ of Mich, AZ State U, Texas but was denied by Harvard, Stanford and Berkeley.

Since I was already married and had 2 children at that time and you were not allowed to work while attending L.S. I opted to go the Masters route.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-09-08   22:06:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#5)

My UGPA was 3.83 (Computer Science/minors in math, economics polysci -yes it took me 5 years to get thru all the hours) and I scored at the 90% percentile on the LSAT. I applied to Harvard as my "dream school" and I wasn't even considered.

I take it you aren't black.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-09-08   22:08:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Jethro Tull (#6)

What does that have to do with it? He went to one of the two top schools and graduated with honors and in the top 10% GPA. If you don't like his politics then say so and discuss issues and his positions you disagree with. Stop falling into the "distract the voter" trap of the commie neocons. And being black doesn't guarantee you admission. A black associate at my undergrad university (we were on the Student Supreme Court together there) had a 3.78 and scored in the 88th%tile and he didn't get accepted to Mich, Stanford or Yale which were his dream schools.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-09-08   22:13:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#7) (Edited)

And being black doesn't guarantee you admission

Black goes a long way (sounds to me you got fucked, but suck it up) and his politics were belched from Marx.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-09-08   22:16:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Jethro Tull (#10)

politics were belched from Marx

I can't believe I'm having to defend somebody I will not vote for. Give examples - specific examples to substantiate the ignorant comment above.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-09-08   22:18:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#13)

He believes in a large central government and a redistribution of wealth for starts.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-09-08   22:24:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#18)

He believes in a large central government and a redistribution of wealth for starts.

Can you name a politican besides Paul and one or two others who don't? And bush was responsible for the largest redistribution of wealth upward from the working class to the upper 2%. The only other president that came close to accomplishing that type fascist crap was Reagan and because of his administration's supply-side economics the deficit went through the roof and Americans ended up with the largest peacetime tax increase in the 20th century.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-09-08   22:30:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#21)

And bush was responsible for the largest redistribution of wealth upward from the working class to the upper 2%.

Cites?

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2008-09-08   22:46:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 26.

#36. To: DeaconBenjamin (#26)

Today the top 1% of households receives more pretax income than the bottom 40%. And the distribution of wealth is even more lopsided. The top 1% of households owns nearly 40% of total household wealth -- more than the bottom 90% of households combined -- and earns half of all capital income. Income and wealth are more unevenly distributed among Americans than at any time since the Jazz Age of the 1920s. On measures of income and wealth inequality, the U.S. tops the charts among the advanced industrial nations.

RATHER THAN fashion economic policy to ameliorate the trends of growing income and wealth inequality, President Bush has championed policies that have exacerbated them. And if he is elected to a second term, he has put voters on notice that they should expect more of the same. A recent study by the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office confirms that the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts have disproportionately benefited the wealthiest households. The tax cuts have boosted the aftertax incomes of the top 1% of households, with average incomes in excess of $1,000,000, by 10% -- compared with a 2.3% increase for middle-income families with average incomes of $57,000 and a 1.6% increase for the bottom 20% of families, with average incomes of less than $17,000. The tax cuts for millionaires alone have reduced government revenues by $90 billion a year, more than the lost revenues from tax cuts for the 80% of families making less than $100,000. Ninety billion dollars a year is more than enough to pay for the comprehensive health-care plan proposed by John Kerry and for the promises President Bush himself made but has not funded in his No Child Left Behind education bill.

As an intended consequence of the Bush tax cuts, the share of federal taxes paid by the bottom 80% of taxpayers has increased, while the share paid by the top 1% has dropped. And that's before the elimination of the estate tax scheduled to take effect at the end of the decade, which will further reduce taxes on the wealthiest households. President Bush has repeatedly announced that the main economic priority of his second term will be making his tax cuts permanent. If he realizes this goal, he will have succeeded in passing the most regressive tax program in U.S. history. He will also have chosen tax relief for the rich over strengthening the Social Security system on which low-income workers, disabled workers, widows, and surviving children depend to avoid poverty. The tax code already favors those at the top. High-income households can afford to buy or build larger homes to take advantage of the tax deduction for mortgage interest payments. The top 20% of earners receives more than two-thirds of the benefits from tax deductions for private retirement savings. Most Americans are deeply in debt, and 95% can't afford to take advantage of such deductions. Yet President Bush wants to make them even more generous.

Employer-provided health-insurance plans also receive generous tax breaks, but less than half of low-wage workers enjoy such coverage, compared with 90% of high-wage workers. President Bush proposes a refundable tax credit for low-income individuals and families to help them buy health insurance. But according to the Kaiser Foundation, the credit is too small to enable most Americans to purchase coverage on their own. President Bush also proposes tax breaks for people who buy high-deductible health-insurance plans and who establish private health savings accounts to cover the bulk of their health-care costs. Under his plan, all contributions, earnings, and withdrawals from heath-savings accounts would be tax-free. This would be extremely attractive to high-income individuals but would raise the cost of traditional health-insurance coverage for lower-income and higher-risk populations. The inevitable result would be an increase in the number of uninsured and even greater inequality in access to health care.

If Bush is reelected, America will continue down the path of increasing inequality in income, wealth, and health, with dangerous implications for U.S. democracy.

www.businessweek.com/@@*7.../04_44/b3906038_mz007.htm

www.ombwatch.org/article/...view/3344/1/180?TopicID=1

www.emayzine.com/lectures/1980s.htm

zfacts.com/p/59.html

seattlepi.nwsource.com/bu...s/334745_wagestudy09.html

neweconomist.blogs.com/ne...06/11/middle_america.html

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-09-08 23:41:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]