[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon

Newmont Pulls Out of Canada, Delists TSX

Eva Vlaardingerbroek's Warning: Elites Plan to Make Humans Immortal in the Cloud

The $7.9 Trillion Company You've Never Heard Of

CCP's motivation for (the Korean) war was to grow its military: US-China-Russia relations


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Paul: Reject the major parties, go for a third
Source: AP
URL Source: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5 ... SnR4V9L_yGzr2USAwY4BQD933IPV02
Published: Sep 9, 2008
Author: SUZANNE GAMBOA and SAM HANANEL
Post Date: 2008-09-09 22:41:13 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 311
Comments: 10

Paul: Reject the major parties, go for a third

By SUZANNE GAMBOA and SAM HANANEL – 31 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Libertarian-leaning congressman Ron Paul is urging voters to reject John McCain and Barack Obama and support one of the third-party candidates for president.

Paul, a Republican who abandoned his White House bid earlier this year, is gathering some of the candidates, independent Ralph Nader among them, on Wednesday to make his plea.

"The strongest message can be sent by rejecting the two party system," Paul said in prepared remarks obtained by The Associated Press. "This can be accomplished by voting for one of the non-establishment, principled candidates."

He recommended Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party, former Georgia Republican Rep. Bob Barr of the Libertarian Party, former Georgia Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney of the Green Party and possibly others. He invited them to his news conference Wednesday.

Paul won no primaries in the Republican nomination contest but developed a strong following on the Internet and set a single-day record for raising money online. Thousands attended his protest last week near the GOP convention in St. Paul, Minn.

Some Republicans have been concerned Paul could siphon votes from the party in the same way Democrats accused Nader of doing in 2000 when he ran under the Green Party banner.

But when Nader ran in 2004 as an independent, he garnered just 0.3 percent of the vote from 34 states. The Constitution, Green and Libertarian candidates received even fewer votes. Nader claims he has enough signatures to get on the ballot in 45 states this year.

Nader predicted the gathering of third-party candidates would "raise the eyebrows" of pundits who are skeptical of the viability of independent presidential campaigns. The candidates will agree on several common issues they believe are being ignored by the major parties.

"This is the beginning of the realignment of American politics," Nader said.

Paul espouses limited government and individual responsibility. He is a critic of election laws that he says are designed to prevent third-party candidates from getting on ballots and participating in debates.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

*sigh* - Here we go again. Support a third party that has ZERO chance of being elected. Arrrrgh. Look, folks, the game is rigged, OK? Let me put that even more clearly: THE GAME IS RIGGED. You can vote for a Republican or a Democrat of your choice, that's it. Third parties are SO disadvantaged that it's not even funny. It's like a swimming match where two guys get rocket powered flippers, and everyone else gets a 200 pound anchor hung around their necks. It's like a road race where two drivers get the latest in Indy car technology, and everyone else gets a tricycle. It's like a hurdles race where two lanes have hurdles that are six inches tall, and everyone else has a series of 20 foot high brick walls with broken bottles set in the tops. The game is RIGGED. Third parties have NO chance whatsoever.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2008-09-09   22:47:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Elliott Jackalope (#2)

Support a third party that has ZERO chance of being elected

The alternatives are:

1) Don't vote at all

2) Vote for Republicrat or Demipublican Clones.

Truth is, if enough people weren't convinced that their third party protest vote was a "waste," Third Parties would be getting double digit support rather than fractions of one percent. Not enough to win an election, but enough to make their agendas impossible to ignore.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-09-10   0:28:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#4)

There is one option that at least has some appeal to it: Vote ONLY against incumbents, regardless of party. VTBO / DRIP (Vote The Bastards Out / Don't Return Incumbent Politicians). Out of all of the options we have available to us, that would seem to me to be the one that has the best chance of producing at least some positive results.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2008-09-10   0:31:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Elliott Jackalope, YertleTurtle (#5)

On another thread, Turtle said that the best strategy is to have one party in the Executive and the other in the Legislative Branch, because it guarantees partison gridlock (keeping up the two party charade) and as little harm as possible. That's probably the best voting strategy.

The best of our bad options is to hope for a GOP Congress with Obummer as President. McKeating with a Democratic Congress would be the next best thing, if it weren't for all of Mad Mac's good friends in the Democratic Party.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-09-10   0:35:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#7. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#6)

Actually, given current polls and trends, I'd say it's more likely that the GOP is going to lose badly in the Congressional races, but eke out a victory in the Presidential contest. So, Democratic Congress, Republican Executive. Then we can just sit back and count the days until McInsane loses his temper and starts the next World War. Fun times for everyone.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2008-09-10 00:38:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]