See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Anyone who actually BELIEVES that Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron
Source:
Me
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 10, 2008
Author: Me
Post Date: 2008-09-10 19:10:11 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 618
Comments: 69
I just heard Obama talking. When he said 'you put lipstick on a pig and it's still a pig, you wrap a fish in a nice wrapper and it still stinks' he was clearly and absolutely talking about McCain's recycling W's policies. It had nothing to do with Sarah 'the pitbull (pig, snake)' Palin. I dare anyone to post the exact quote of what Obama said and then interpret it in ways that implies that Obama calls Pain (the pig) a pig. In other news, Ron Paul said if anyone who supported him and is now thinking about voting for McCain, he must be a moron.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
I've seen her Iraq war a task from God remark. Porcine, yes.
I think he should just own up to it and admit he was talking about Michelle, the Aunt Esther wannabe (and probably will be in a few more years).
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I watched the complete quote. Obama spends one minute comparing W's policies with McCain's, suggesting that McCain's are exactly W's, then stating that what McCain tries to do is to put lipstick on a pig - the 'pig' being W's policies. It's absolutely clear that this is what he's talking about and there is no doubt what he is talking about.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Ron Paul isn't God. He voted for the Afghanistan war. Do you support war in Afghanistan? Also on your title about Obama not referring to Sarah Palin. That may be true or not. I think he was thinking of her lipstick comment though. I think that triggered his statement. He was off teleprompter.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Heres the video your side had removed from youtube. New lockation
So we have another out of context quote here, being played up for the Zionist media. Disgusting. But she is definitely a Zionist.
Obama spoke an absolutely coherent paragraph, comparing W's policies to McCain's. The conclusion being that there was no difference between them, concluding that McCain was attempting to present his policies as something different than W's but all that he was doing was putting lipstick on a pig. It had NOTHING to do with Palin. Palin was not mentioned within that context. If the McCain people believe it was about Palin maybe it's THEIR dirty minds and this is how THEY see Palin.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
LOL - Harballs has some stupid GOP woman who explains how this is. It's like this: 1 - Palin said 'lipstick' in the context of her being a pitbull. Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I think I can remember Obama using this reference to pigs and lipstick several times over the past year, before Palin was nominated.
Chris Matthews showed McCain saying that several times in the past year, plus a GOP strategist that actually wrote a book titled 'Lipstick on a Pig'.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
That would be the audience that was present when he said it.
Vast, has the Palin choice helped or hurt McCain up to this point?
That's the way to get voters to vote for your candidate, call them complete morons. Obama just calls them typical white people. You are not a typical white person are you? Of course not, typical white people would never vote for or support a racist candidate.
God is always good!
My friend, McCain's fortunes do not concern me one bit.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Source for this? I don't see the good doctor calling people morons no matter how much he disagrees with them.
God is always good!
The crowds spontaneous chant "No more pit bulls" -- reported by the ABC reporter -- appears to confirm it.
The U.S. Constitution is no impediment to our form of government.--PJ O'Rourke
My friend, the morons voting for McCain is a given. Morons are McCain's constituency and no normal person should be surprised. They are NOT going to switch and vote for anyone else. So... what's your point?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
But Obama's fortunes do concern you? Funny!
God is always good!
alright, how about just giving your opinion?
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
I don't support McCain, but I do believe fair is fair. Obama's supporters made the connection first.
My opinion about what? McCain's picking Palin? I've given it already. She's his willing prop. Oh, and to make it clear and balanced. I also expressed the view that Biden is Obama's prop.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
The DNC website had a pig on their website dressed up with lipstick and pearls in direct refernce to Palin. Obama is the moron. On Sunday he said, "My Muslim faith." The Democrat reporter immediately corrected him and said "Your Christian faith." If you read the transcript the words My Christian faith would make no sense. Obama would have said that John McCain has not criticized my Christian faith. Republicans have never attacked any Democrat as unqualified for public office because they are a Christian, I personally would be more likely to vote for Obama if he were a Muslim, had a platform that made sense and was not in favor of launching WW III by attacking Iran. McCain and Obama both want to destroy America by passing Amnesty for Illegal Aliens and starting an unwinnable war on terror against 1.3 billion Muslims for Zion. Obama has got to get a handle on what he says. He is down in the polls and he has not come up with any reason to vote for him other than he is not Bush and he is not McCain. He needs to regroup and to come up with something convincing to get us motivated to vote for him.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
I have no intention of voting for McCain either -- or Obama.
The U.S. Constitution is no impediment to our form of government.--PJ O'Rourke
Likewise
And? What does the DNC website have to do with Obama's discussing McCain's policies as compared with W's? Personally, I see Palin as more reptilian than porcine. The issue here is that the McCains are accusing OBAMA of calling Palin a pig, which he did not and it's therefore a lie.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Obama made the statement being debated, his supporters picked up on the interpretation that McCain is "lying" about and cheered and chanted along with it. Obama did nothing to distance himself from the crowd's interpretation. He only cried foul later when there was negative publicity. Sorry, he can't have it both ways.
I agree. However, pal-in is still a pig with lipstick on.
You Obamaers are running scared.
That isn't my question. Has the Palin choice helped McCain to this point?
More to the point, I'm afraid of another 8 years of hell. There has not been a more destructive president that I can remember than Bush. McCain promises to be much worse.
And, again, McCain's fortunes are not my concern. Has her choice helped you?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Anyone who actually CARES whether Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron
"Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its power but the truth is the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the Government of the United States." "Mr. Chairman, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here that the United States was to be lowered to the position of a coolie country. . and was to supply financial power to an international superstate -- a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the World for their own pleasure."
It flipped the election. IMO
Your afraid to admit what we all know is true. Why is that?
Yeah, obama is now leading in the polls.
Whatever... I am not concerned with crowds reactions. The FACT is that Obama did NOT call Palin a pig. The other fact is that the McCains are acting outraged at Obama's calling Palin a pig. They are attacking Obama not..., Obama's supporters. They lie.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Yesterday he was down by as much as 15 points among independents. Down 10 for white women. He had carried both of those groups. Show me a poll that changed since yesterday. I don't believe you.
I am afraid of a few things but this is not one of them. From 'day one' I noted that McCain is using Palin as a prop and that Palin is cooperating. Do you need more explanations?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Obviously Obama wasn't concerned with it either. I wonder why.
Anyone would have to admit that his choosing her has been a huge help. How long it stands up, who knows, and for me at least the larger story is the socialization of FMae and FMac. Neither McCain nor Obama have bothered to talk about the real problems the nation faces, but choose to discuss lip stick instead. We're very screwed regardless who wins.
Polls are polls. It doesn't matter what they say. This was a faux news poll, I heard it on the radio.
Hmmmm yeah.... you must have a point here. Obviously, unlike Obama, Palin is ALWAYS concerned with 'world peace' and 'ending hunger'. She used to do beauty shows. Remember?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Good point that we aren't talking about serious issues. On another point. I have a good reason to vote for mccain/PALIN. She drives the libs absolutely batty. Watching them crack up is quite entertaining. Maybe it isn't a good reason, but it would be very entertaining. Also it would at least screw up what was known as feminism. It would redefine it to something better.
Beauty pageant pap has nothing to do with the fact that, whether intentional or not, Obama led his audience to a conclusion and when they took it he didn't do anything to dissuade them. Either that was where he wanted them to go or he didn't know how since it wasn't on his teleprompter.
And what Obama didn't do has nothing to do with what the GOPs are accusing him on doing - which is calling Palin a pig.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
You are correct. Dr. Paul did not call anyone 'morons'. That was my interpretation and I stand corrected. I regret making a false claim.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
If Obama had any real guts. He would say I didn't call palin a pig. I called John McCain a war mongering mass murderer. Oh but he can't do that he votes to fund the war. Oh well.
Doesn't matter whether it is McCain or Obama--either of them will be worse and that is hard to believe. But just look at how much worse Bush has been than Clinton and most of us never thought we would ever live long enough to see anything worse than Clinton in the White House. Gets worse every election and has for a long time if people would just be honest about it. edited for typo
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. yes, what you said
Thank you. It was hard for me to believe but one of the guys I went to school with--and I mean from first grade all the way through high school--has a huge Obama sign up on his deck. I know his dad is probably spinning in his grave and I thought my friend was smart enough to know that there wasn't any difference in them.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Bush's presidency was a major setback for limited government. As was the intent.
Same here. I've had to ask myself "Now, what the hell did Bubba do to piss me off so much??" several times since 2001. Bush is that bad.
You know, X-15, I don't think people realize what this means when people like us say such things. Kosovo, Waco, OKC, the AWB, and Ruby Ridge (Bush senior) and GHW's Iraq war I all included: Bush II is 10x worse.
I agree with you. I feel the use of the commonly used phrase "...lipstick on a pig" was linked to SP because of the word "lipstick" being a feminine word, unless you consider someone like Rudy Guilliani.
Hmmm... Rudy with lipstick... grrrrrr!!!
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
And NAFTA and selling our missiles to the Chinee
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
How could I forget.
Could have done without that recurring image, thank you very much. :)
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
Thanks for the trip down memory lane This * has got to stop.
Bush's old man was terrible and I don't think you would get much argument about that even from a lot of hard core R's. Clinton was about as bad, maybe a little worse. Bush Jr. has been a nightmare, even worse than Clinton. And it looks like no matter what happens the next one will be even worse than Dumbya. Who woulda thunk it? Well, I guess I would since it finally broke through to my consciousness that it gets worse every election and I have been knowing that for quite a while.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. If it weren't for Clinton's unconstitutional actions involving making war without congressional approval or declaration and his bbq at Waco he wasn't too bad (if you overlook his personal life and think of his administration compared to "Dubya's." I thought Clinton was terrible and I still do but he wasn't as bad as Bush has been).
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. If every one of those guys were ground up all you could do with them would be to make a $#it sandwich.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Yep. Two peas in a Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. ROFLMAO!!!!! The joke's on us!!
Obama's mantra: "The only reason not to like me is racism." Palin's mantra (didn't it used to be Hillary's) : "The only reason not to like me is sexism." Anyone can play the identity politics game and the victim card when there's nothing substantial to say.
I never heard Obama saying that, ever. He did say that he had a funny name and a funny face but he didn't mention racism. Same for Palin. She never said anything about sexism. She called herself a bitch with lipstick, I believe, but that was all she did.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
(Edited)
Lord Acton
#3. To: buckeye (#1)
#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
In other news, Ron Paul said if anyone who supported him and is now thinking about voting for McCain, he must be a moron.
#5. To: James Deffenbach (#2)
Pig in need of lipstick
#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#5)
#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3)
I watched the complete quote. Obama spends one minute comparing W's policies with McCain's, suggesting that McCain's are exactly W's, then stating that what McCain tries to do is to put lipstick on a pig - the 'pig' being W's policies. It's absolutely clear that this is what he's talking about and there is no doubt what he is talking about.
#8. To: Old Friend (#4)
#9. To: All (#0)
2 - Obama said 'lipstick on a pig' in the context of McCain's policies compared to W's.
3 - Therefore Obama called Palin a pig.
#10. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#9)
#11. To: buckeye (#10)
#12. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
Anyone who actually BELIEVES that Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron
#13. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#11)
#14. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#15. To: Jethro Tull (#13)
#16. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
In other news, Ron Paul said if anyone who supported him and is now thinking about voting for McCain, he must be a moron.
#17. To: Sonovademocrat (#12)
That would be the audience that was present when he said it.
#18. To: RickyJ (#14)
#19. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#15)
My friend, McCain's fortunes do not concern me one bit.
#20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#15)
#21. To: DeaconBenjamin (#17)
#22. To: christine (#20)
(Edited)
#23. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#9)
#24. To: Sonovademocrat (#21)
#25. To: DeaconBenjamin (#24)
#26. To: Horse (#23)
#27. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#26)
The issue here is that the McCains are accusing OBAMA of calling Palin a pig, which he did not and it's therefore a lie.
#28. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#29. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#26)
#30. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#15)
My friend, McCain's fortunes do not concern me one bit.
#31. To: Old Friend (#29)
(Edited)
#32. To: Jethro Tull (#30)
#33. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
Anyone who actually BELIEVES that Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron
#34. To: Jethro Tull (#30)
Has the Palin choice helped McCain to this point?
#35. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#32)
And, again, McCain's fortunes are not my concern. Has her choice helped you?
#36. To: Old Friend (#34)
It flipped the election. IMO
#37. To: Sonovademocrat (#27)
Obama made the statement being debated, his supporters picked up on the interpretation
#38. To: Ninpo (#36)
Yeah, obama is now leading in the polls.
#39. To: Old Friend (#35)
#40. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#37)
I am not concerned with crowds reactions.
#41. To: Old Friend (#34)
(Edited)
#42. To: Old Friend (#38)
#43. To: Sonovademocrat (#40)
#44. To: Jethro Tull (#41)
Anyone would have to admit that his choosing her has been a huge help. How long it stands up, who knows, and for me at least the larger story is the socialization of FMae and FMac. Neither McCain nor Obama have bothered to talk about the real problems the nation faces, but choose to discuss lip stick instead. We're very screwed regardless who wins.
#45. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#43)
#46. To: Sonovademocrat (#45)
#47. To: RickyJ (#16)
Source for this? I don't see the good doctor calling people morons no matter how much he disagrees with them.
#48. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#46)
#49. To: buckeye (#31)
(Edited)
More to the point, I'm afraid of another 8 years of hell. There has not been a more destructive president that I can remember than Bush. McCain promises to be much worse.
Lord Acton
#50. To: James Deffenbach (#49)
(Edited)
#51. To: buckeye (#50)
Lord Acton
#52. To: James Deffenbach (#51)
#53. To: James Deffenbach (#49)
But just look at how much worse Bush has been than Clinton and most of us never thought we would ever live long enough to see anything worse than Clinton in the White House.
-Schweizerische Schutzenseitunt (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#54. To: X-15, James Deffenbach (#53)
(Edited)
#55. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#56. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#55)
(Edited)
#57. To: buckeye (#54)
Kosovo, Waco, OKC, the AWB,
#58. To: Dakmar (#57)
#59. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#55)
word "lipstick" being a feminine word, unless you consider someone like Rudy Guilliani
#60. To: Dakmar, buckeye (#57)
. As bad as all those things were, Bush has been burning up ink pens signing REALLY bad shit into law that's going to be around for years to come. At least Republicans made a pretense of opposing Clinton, now both parties are shamelessly giving away our nation and our freedom.
-Schweizerische Schutzenseitunt (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#61. To: X-15 (#60)
#62. To: buckeye (#52)
Bush's presidency was a major setback for limited government. As was the intent.
Lord Acton
#63. To: X-15 (#53)
(Edited)
Same here. I've had to ask myself "Now, what the hell did Bubba do to piss me off so much??" several times since 2001. Bush is that bad.
Lord Acton
#64. To: buckeye, X-15 (#54)
You know, X-15, I don't think people realize what this means when people like us say such things. Kosovo, Waco, OKC, the AWB, and Ruby Ridge (Bush senior) and GHW's Iraq war I all included: Bush II is 10x worse.
Lord Acton
#65. To: James Deffenbach, X-15 (#63)
I thought Clinton was terrible and I still do but he wasn't as bad as Bush has been).
#66. To: TwentyTwelve (#65)
$#it sandwich pod.
Lord Acton
#67. To: TwentyTwelve (#65)
-Schweizerische Schutzenseitunt (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#68. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#69. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#68)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest