[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BRCC PRESENTS - The Siege at Khe Sanh

Susan Rice Calls Trump A 'Surrender Monkey' For Trying To Appease Putin On Ukraine

Elon Goes "DARK MAGA" - Joins Trump ON STAGE! Media Melt Down Ensues

The Truth About the Memphis Belle (No Hollywood)

JD Vance ENDS CNN Dana Bash’s Career LIVE on Air

Hell Let Loose - MOATS with George Galloway

Important Message: Our Country Our Choice

Israel is getting SLAUGHTERED in Lebanon, Americans are trapped | Redacted

Warren Buffett has said: “I could end the deficit in five minutes.

FBI seizes Diddy tape showing Hillary Clinton killing a child at a 'Freak Off' party

Numbers of dairy cow deaths from bird flu increasing to alarming rates

Elites Just Told Us How They'll SILENCE US!

Reese Report: The 2024 October Surprise?

Americans United in Crisis: Mules Carry Supplies to Neighbors Trapped by Hurricanes Devastation in NC

NC STATE POLICE WILL START ARRESTING FEDS THAT ARE BLOCKING AIDE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES

France BANS ARMS SALES To Israel & Netanyahu LASHES OUT At Macron | Iran GETS READY

CNN Drops Bomb on Tim Walz, Releases Blistering Segment Over Big Scandals in His Own State

EU concerned it has no influence over Israel FT

How Israels invasion of Lebanon poses risks to Turkiye

Obama's New Home in Dubai?,

Vaccine Skeptics Need To Be Silenced! Bill Gates

Hillary Clinton: We Lose Total Control If Social Media Companies Dont Moderate Content

Cancer Patients Report Miraculous Recoveries from Ivermectin Treatment

Hurricane Aid Stolen By The State Of Tennessee?

The Pentagon requests $1.2bn to continue Red Sea mission

US security officials warn of potential threats within two weeks, ramped-up patrols.

Massive Flooding Coming From Hurricane Milton

How the UK is becoming a ‘third-world’ economy

What Would World War III Really Look Like? It's Already Starting...

The Roots Of The UK Implosion And Why War Is Inevitable


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Anyone who actually BELIEVES that Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron
Source: Me
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 10, 2008
Author: Me
Post Date: 2008-09-10 19:10:11 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 708
Comments: 69

I just heard Obama talking. When he said 'you put lipstick on a pig and it's still a pig, you wrap a fish in a nice wrapper and it still stinks' he was clearly and absolutely talking about McCain's recycling W's policies. It had nothing to do with Sarah 'the pitbull (pig, snake)' Palin.

I dare anyone to post the exact quote of what Obama said and then interpret it in ways that implies that Obama calls Pain (the pig) a pig.

In other news, Ron Paul said if anyone who supported him and is now thinking about voting for McCain, he must be a moron.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

I've seen her Iraq war a task from God remark. Porcine, yes.

buckeye  posted on  2008-09-10   19:12:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0) (Edited)

I think he should just own up to it and admit he was talking about Michelle, the Aunt Esther wannabe (and probably will be in a few more years).

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-09-10   19:13:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: buckeye (#1)

I watched the complete quote. Obama spends one minute comparing W's policies with McCain's, suggesting that McCain's are exactly W's, then stating that what McCain tries to do is to put lipstick on a pig - the 'pig' being W's policies. It's absolutely clear that this is what he's talking about and there is no doubt what he is talking about.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   19:15:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

In other news, Ron Paul said if anyone who supported him and is now thinking about voting for McCain, he must be a moron.

Ron Paul isn't God. He voted for the Afghanistan war. Do you support war in Afghanistan?

Also on your title about Obama not referring to Sarah Palin. That may be true or not. I think he was thinking of her lipstick comment though. I think that triggered his statement. He was off teleprompter.

Old Friend  posted on  2008-09-10   19:17:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: James Deffenbach (#2)


Pig in need of lipstick

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   19:17:29 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#5)

Heres the video your side had removed from youtube.

New lockation

Old Friend  posted on  2008-09-10   19:19:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3)

I watched the complete quote. Obama spends one minute comparing W's policies with McCain's, suggesting that McCain's are exactly W's, then stating that what McCain tries to do is to put lipstick on a pig - the 'pig' being W's policies. It's absolutely clear that this is what he's talking about and there is no doubt what he is talking about.

So we have another out of context quote here, being played up for the Zionist media. Disgusting. But she is definitely a Zionist.

buckeye  posted on  2008-09-10   19:19:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Old Friend (#4)

Obama spoke an absolutely coherent paragraph, comparing W's policies to McCain's. The conclusion being that there was no difference between them, concluding that McCain was attempting to present his policies as something different than W's but all that he was doing was putting lipstick on a pig. It had NOTHING to do with Palin. Palin was not mentioned within that context.

If the McCain people believe it was about Palin maybe it's THEIR dirty minds and this is how THEY see Palin.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   19:20:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: All (#0)

LOL - Harballs has some stupid GOP woman who explains how this is. It's like this:

1 - Palin said 'lipstick' in the context of her being a pitbull.
2 - Obama said 'lipstick on a pig' in the context of McCain's policies compared to W's.
3 - Therefore Obama called Palin a pig.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   19:29:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#9)

I think I can remember Obama using this reference to pigs and lipstick several times over the past year, before Palin was nominated.

buckeye  posted on  2008-09-10   19:30:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: buckeye (#10)

Chris Matthews showed McCain saying that several times in the past year, plus a GOP strategist that actually wrote a book titled 'Lipstick on a Pig'.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   19:31:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

Anyone who actually BELIEVES that Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron

That would be the audience that was present when he said it.

Sonovademocrat  posted on  2008-09-10   20:06:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#11)

Vast, has the Palin choice helped or hurt McCain up to this point?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-09-10   20:08:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

That's the way to get voters to vote for your candidate, call them complete morons. Obama just calls them typical white people. You are not a typical white person are you? Of course not, typical white people would never vote for or support a racist candidate.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-09-10   20:11:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Jethro Tull (#13)

My friend, McCain's fortunes do not concern me one bit.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   20:14:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

In other news, Ron Paul said if anyone who supported him and is now thinking about voting for McCain, he must be a moron.

Source for this? I don't see the good doctor calling people morons no matter how much he disagrees with them.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-09-10   20:14:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Sonovademocrat (#12)

That would be the audience that was present when he said it.

The crowds spontaneous chant "No more pit bulls" -- reported by the ABC reporter -- appears to confirm it.

The U.S. Constitution is no impediment to our form of government.--PJ O'Rourke

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2008-09-10   20:15:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: RickyJ (#14)

My friend, the morons voting for McCain is a given. Morons are McCain's constituency and no normal person should be surprised. They are NOT going to switch and vote for anyone else.

So... what's your point?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   20:16:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#15)

My friend, McCain's fortunes do not concern me one bit.

But Obama's fortunes do concern you?

Funny!

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-09-10   20:16:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#15)

alright, how about just giving your opinion?

Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com

christine  posted on  2008-09-10   20:16:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: DeaconBenjamin (#17)

I don't support McCain, but I do believe fair is fair. Obama's supporters made the connection first.

Sonovademocrat  posted on  2008-09-10   20:16:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: christine (#20) (Edited)

My opinion about what? McCain's picking Palin? I've given it already.

She's his willing prop.

Oh, and to make it clear and balanced. I also expressed the view that Biden is Obama's prop.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   20:18:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#9)

The DNC website had a pig on their website dressed up with lipstick and pearls in direct refernce to Palin.

Obama is the moron. On Sunday he said, "My Muslim faith." The Democrat reporter immediately corrected him and said "Your Christian faith." If you read the transcript the words My Christian faith would make no sense. Obama would have said that John McCain has not criticized my Christian faith. Republicans have never attacked any Democrat as unqualified for public office because they are a Christian,

I personally would be more likely to vote for Obama if he were a Muslim, had a platform that made sense and was not in favor of launching WW III by attacking Iran.

McCain and Obama both want to destroy America by passing Amnesty for Illegal Aliens and starting an unwinnable war on terror against 1.3 billion Muslims for Zion.

Obama has got to get a handle on what he says. He is down in the polls and he has not come up with any reason to vote for him other than he is not Bush and he is not McCain. He needs to regroup and to come up with something convincing to get us motivated to vote for him.

The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie

Horse  posted on  2008-09-10   20:18:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Sonovademocrat (#21)

I have no intention of voting for McCain either -- or Obama.

The U.S. Constitution is no impediment to our form of government.--PJ O'Rourke

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2008-09-10   20:20:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: DeaconBenjamin (#24)

Likewise

Sonovademocrat  posted on  2008-09-10   20:22:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Horse (#23)

And? What does the DNC website have to do with Obama's discussing McCain's policies as compared with W's?

Personally, I see Palin as more reptilian than porcine. The issue here is that the McCains are accusing OBAMA of calling Palin a pig, which he did not and it's therefore a lie.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   20:22:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#26)

The issue here is that the McCains are accusing OBAMA of calling Palin a pig, which he did not and it's therefore a lie.

Obama made the statement being debated, his supporters picked up on the interpretation that McCain is "lying" about and cheered and chanted along with it. Obama did nothing to distance himself from the crowd's interpretation. He only cried foul later when there was negative publicity.

Sorry, he can't have it both ways.

Sonovademocrat  posted on  2008-09-10   20:34:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

I agree. However, pal-in is still a pig with lipstick on.

Ninpo  posted on  2008-09-10   20:39:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#26)

You Obamaers are running scared.

Old Friend  posted on  2008-09-10   20:41:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#15)

My friend, McCain's fortunes do not concern me one bit.

That isn't my question.

Has the Palin choice helped McCain to this point?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-09-10   20:45:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Old Friend (#29) (Edited)

More to the point, I'm afraid of another 8 years of hell. There has not been a more destructive president that I can remember than Bush. McCain promises to be much worse.

buckeye  posted on  2008-09-10   20:47:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Jethro Tull (#30)

And, again, McCain's fortunes are not my concern. Has her choice helped you?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   20:51:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

Anyone who actually BELIEVES that Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron

Anyone who actually CARES whether Obama was talking about Palin when he said 'lipstick on a pig' is a complete moron

"Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its power but the truth is the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the Government of the United States." "Mr. Chairman, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here that the United States was to be lowered to the position of a coolie country. . and was to supply financial power to an international superstate -- a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the World for their own pleasure."

noone222  posted on  2008-09-10   20:51:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#30)

Has the Palin choice helped McCain to this point?

It flipped the election. IMO

Old Friend  posted on  2008-09-10   20:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#32)

And, again, McCain's fortunes are not my concern. Has her choice helped you?

Your afraid to admit what we all know is true. Why is that?

Old Friend  posted on  2008-09-10   20:52:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Old Friend (#34)

It flipped the election. IMO

Yeah, obama is now leading in the polls.

Ninpo  posted on  2008-09-10   20:53:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Sonovademocrat (#27)

Obama made the statement being debated, his supporters picked up on the interpretation

Whatever... I am not concerned with crowds reactions. The FACT is that Obama did NOT call Palin a pig. The other fact is that the McCains are acting outraged at Obama's calling Palin a pig. They are attacking Obama not..., Obama's supporters.

They lie.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   20:54:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Ninpo (#36)

Yeah, obama is now leading in the polls.

Yesterday he was down by as much as 15 points among independents. Down 10 for white women. He had carried both of those groups. Show me a poll that changed since yesterday. I don't believe you.

Old Friend  posted on  2008-09-10   20:55:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Old Friend (#35)

I am afraid of a few things but this is not one of them.

From 'day one' I noted that McCain is using Palin as a prop and that Palin is cooperating. Do you need more explanations?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-09-10   20:56:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#37)

I am not concerned with crowds reactions.

Obviously Obama wasn't concerned with it either. I wonder why.

Sonovademocrat  posted on  2008-09-10   20:57:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 69) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]