See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Suzanna Gratia Hupp: What the Second Amendment is REALLY For
Source:
google video
URL Source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4069761537893819675&hl=en
Published: Sep 11, 2008
Author: Suzanna Gratia Hupp
Post Date: 2008-09-11 08:39:47 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 121
Comments: 6
Suzanna Gratia Hupp: What the Second Amendment is REALLY For
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: James Deffenbach (#0)
Suzanna lays it out for us.
A nation of mullets, ruled by inbred, moronic tyrants.
Obama supports the 2nd amendment right of hunters and sportsmen, so we have that going for us.
Yeah, she didn't pull any punches. I was glad she told them the real purpose of the second amendment. Of course most politicians are all overcome with a bad case of the vapuhs when someone 'splains things to them that way but it is good for them. That way they can't claim they didn't know.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Sure, he claims to, but I bet that isn't the first thing he ever lied about either.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. still can't view video, but wanted to add my two cents worth [ again :} ]. Ezekiel 17:1-10 [ http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Eze/Eze017.html ] tells us a riddle about a power would raise itself up against God's people, "the House of Israel" [ http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/9000/The_Church_Is_Israel_Now.htm ]. That power is described in verses 7-10 as a great eagle that mimics the First : "....Looking just above the eagles head you will see 13 pentagrams within a cloud. The pentagrams are arranged in the shape of a hexagram - or greater Seal of Solomon. The hexagram is a powerful tool used by pagans and sorcerers to invoke Satan. It is also the sign of Anti Christ with 6 points, 6 angles and 6 planes ( 666). ) The 5 pointed pentagrams multiplied by the 13 stars equals 65, the same cabalistic number as mentioned above. This makes one wonder with whom or what, we are to dwell in unity!...." www.gemworld.com/US-Symbol-1dol.html greater Seal of Solomon. also fraudulently known as The Star of David. Ezekiel 17:7-10/Matthew 15:12-13. The government that boasts it was founded on "freedom of religion" [in a country that was founded with a cross and in the name of Jesus Christ and spreading the gospel Ezekiel 17:1-6/ http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Mic/Mic004.html ], has now turned against the people whose freedom it claims to protect: Now the Government Can Legally Kill Christians On March 14, 2008, I, former Congressman Bill Dannemeyer, the author of the ... article entitled “Now the U.S. Government Can Legally Kill Christians,” ... www.takebackourrights.org/docs/noahidelaw.html NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS. Bill Dannemeyer U.S. Congressman , 1979-1992. Your U.S. government can now legally kill Christians for the ... www.takebackourrights.org...ristians-full%20page.html Mossad to kill Americans, and US Government shrugs: http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/001168.html Gog and Magog getting ready to attack America: www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bi...t.cgi?ArtNum=86004&Disp=5 / judicial-inc.biz/87i.srae...s_commandoes_to_ameri.htm God has planned for it. http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Zec/Zec009.html#13 / http://www.blueletterbible.org/tsk_b/Gal/3/29.html They probably hoped they'd have done away with the guns by now. And let's remember, the folks who wrote the original constitution had no intention of putting the Second Amendment in the document. As Cornwallis told George Washington, they would now begin to wage holy war against America. We can thank Patrick Henry and Elbridge Gerry and George Mason for criticizing the document for having no Bill of Rights. We can thank George Mason in particular, and his Virginia Declaration of Rights upon which the Second Amendment and the whole Bill of Rights were based: "...Section 13. That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power....." http://www.nationalcenter.org/VirginiaDeclaration.html Speaking of the Bill of Rights, I was reminded of the fact of the Preamble to it that is usually missing, which might, if it were enforced, possibly stop this government in its tracks [but it's probably gone too far for that now]: "... The Conventions of a number of the States having, at the Time of their Adopting the Constitution, expressed a Desire, in Order to prevent Misconstruction or Abuse of its Powers, that further declaratory and restrictive Clauses should be added: And as exceeding the Ground of public Confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent Ends of its Institution, RESOLVED, by the Senate, and House of Representatives, of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, Two Thirds of both Houses concurring, That the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States: All, or any of, which Articles, when ratified by Three-Fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of the said Constitution, viz. Articles in Addition to, and Amendment of, the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the Fifth Article of the original Constitution. ...." This MOST IMPORTANT PART of the Bill of Rights -- the PREAMBLE which tells SPECIFICALLY that the Bill of Rights was to make sure the government knew it was limited to the powers stated in the Constitution, and if it didn't, the Amendments spell out the Rights of the People the government couldn't change. Our revisionist historians ALWAYS leave this off the Constitution!!! It is imperative that the complete text be included in any study, interpretation or construction of the contents and the Limitations of government imposed by the Constitution for the United States. It has been stated that some scholars don't think this is important. This is a fallacy. It is IMPERATIVE for the following reason: The first ten amendments are "declaratory and restrictive clauses". This means they supersede and restrict all previous parts of the Constitution, and restrict all subsequent amendments to the framework of the Bill of Rights amendments. The Bill of Rights amendments are a declaration in very plain language of the restrictions to the powers of government and "STATE". There are people in this country that do not want us to know that this Preamble ever existed. For many years these words and understanding have been "omitted" from presentations of our Constitution. Public and private schools and colleges alike have based the education of the people and their whole interpretation of the Constitution on this fraudulent omission. (Indeed, when I was searching for it, I was informed by the Dean of the Law School at UC Berkley, that the Bill of Rights amendments had no Preamble.)140 Corrupt judiciary and politicians have, through clever deception, erected interpretations and statutes that fly in the face, in direct contravention of the Bill of Rights amendments. The amendments and their declaratory and restrictive intent can be changed only by due process and the will of the people, as prescribed in the Fifth Article of the Original Constitution. The Bill of Rights amendments, being declaratory and restrictive, are separate from all the other amendments. The Bill of Rights amendments restrict the Constitution. The Constitution restricts the powers of government and "STATE". The deception is that government and "STATE" can interpret all of the Amendments and the Constitution itself, to serve the ends of "STATE". By Omitting and Ignoring the Preamble to the Bill of Rights this has been done, usurping the Rights of the People. As Thomas Cooley has said in "Principles of Constitutional Law": "Legislators have their authority measured by the Constitution, they are chosen to do what it permits, and NOTHING MORE, and they take solemn oath to obey and support it . . . To pass an act when they are in DOUBT, whether it does or does not violate the Constitution, is to treat as of no force the most imperative obligations any person can assume." We the People must end the deception. The ten Amendments adopted make the so-called American Bill of Rights. The plain fact is that these Amendments do not confer any rights on anyone. These RIGHTS are INHERENT to all FREE MEN, bestowed on them by their CREATOR. Amendments I through X were added to the Constitution to safeguard the intent, purpose and restriction upon government in the protection of We the People from the abuse and usurpation of Freedom by the self-serving Tyrannical Despots and Bureaucracies in government and "STATE"......." http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti10.html I hope this agrees with all that Suzanna Hupp said in the video. We are getting SO CLOSE to the fulfillment of all things for "the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel". Ezekiel 34/John 10.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
These RIGHTS are INHERENT to all FREE MEN, bestowed on them by their CREATOR. I couldn't begin to tell you how many times I have made this exact point to people. The founders never claimed they were giving anyone any rights. If people would use their heads and their ability to reason they should be able to figure out that if one group of men can bestow certain rights on you by writing them down on a piece of paper then another group of men can take them away by writing contrary words on another piece of paper.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
#2. To: James Deffenbach (#0)
#3. To: lodwick (#1)
Suzanna lays it out for us.
Lord Acton
#4. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
Obama supports the 2nd amendment right of hunters and sportsmen, so we have that going for us.
Lord Acton
#5. To: lodwick, James Deffenbach (#1)
Suzanna lays it out for us.
#6. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#5)
The ten Amendments adopted make the so-called American Bill of Rights. The plain fact is that these Amendments do not confer any rights on anyone.
Lord Acton
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest