See other Immigration Articles
Title: Illegals' squalid housing transforms cities
Source:
WorldNetDaily.com
URL Source: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45315
Published: Jul 17, 2005
Author: WorldNetDaily.com
Post Date: 2005-07-17 18:53:40 by robin
Keywords: transforms, Illegals, squalid
Views: 135
Comments: 14
Sewage flows in streets as landlords cram up to 64 in single-family homes The impact of uncontrolled immigration is coming home for residents of many Long Island, New York, communities as landlords turn single-family homes into filthy, overcrowded tenements holding as many as 64 renters – causing health and fire dangers and transforming neighborhoods. Illegal rooming houses, serving both documented and undocumented immigrants, are increasingly appearing across Long Island, as landlords fill a niche created by the demand for and availability of cheap foreign labor. "It's definitely spreading," Brookhaven Councilman James Tullo, who heads a task force investigating 300 illegal rentals in his town, told Newsday. "It's popping up in areas where you wouldn't expect them to be." While the closure of a home housing 64 men in Farmingville last month represents the most extreme case, officials in other communities cite their own examples: "They're changing the face of the neighborhood," says Farmingville resident Lisa Marino. "There's this flophouse atmosphere." "I've never seen it this bad," adds Islip Town Councilman Christopher Bodkin, "and it's getting worse all the time." The worst conditions are found at "shift-bed" houses – places where mattresses are rented for limited periods of time. Most such houses offer two shifts per day, notes Nassau County Assessor Harvey Levinson. "Sleeping in closets, sleeping in basements, sleeping in shifts," says former Nassau County Assistant Fire Marshal Steve Wenk. "We've seen it all." Renters say they typically pay from $250 to $350 a month per person. When five or six share a bedroom, rates are usually less. Seasonal workers from South Africa pay their employer, Glen Oaks Country Club, $75 a week to live two or three to a room in a home the club rents from a Queens businessman. Included in the rent is transportation to work in the club's van that honks it's horn during it's early morning pickup – to the chagrin of neighbors. "We're paying our full load for taxes to live here and the person behind me is running a rooming house," complains neighbor Carol Voelger. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of "overcrowded" housing units in Nassau and Suffolk counties grew by 41 percent. Officially, the "overcrowded" label is used to describe housing with more than one person per room. With the influx of immigrants into Long Island, officials say finding 15 people living in a single-family home is not rare. Most cases of overcrowded housing and squalid conditions never come to their attention, authorities admit. Vanessa Tallerico, whose neighborhood has six illegal rooming houses, remembers when her community had "a mixture of people." "When you have 300 to 400 men move in, that's no longer diverse," she says.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#6. To: robin (#0)
Legals/illegals, the result is the same. America is transforming into a third world nation. Credit must be given to those who engineered it. Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish Committee was urging Congress to believe that “Americanism is the spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to people of all races, all religions, all nationalities.” Of course, there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish Congress argued in hearings on immigration that “our national experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in the diversity of our peoples.” This, too, was at a time when U.S. immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white majority. It has often been said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in 1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish groups from the beginning. Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian Jews led the effort to dismantle the “white Australia” policy, one reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish Democrat: “The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.” Like Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of Australia to specifically Jewish interests.
Does he feel that way about Israel becoming more diverse?
#10. To: robin (#8)
Why if he doesn't then there might be a double standard, one for Jews, one for everyone else.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
link
#8. To: 1776 (#6)
“The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.”
Replies to Comment # 8.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.