See other Religion Articles
Title: The Politics of Tribulation -- Sarah Palin and the Rapture
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20821.htm
Published: Sep 21, 2008
Author: RAYMOND J. LAWRENCE
Post Date: 2008-09-21 17:32:02 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 196
Comments: 6
The Politics of Tribulation Sarah Palin and the Rapture By RAYMOND J. LAWRENCE 21/09/08 "Counterpunch" -- Is this country ready for a president who is excited about and eagerly looking forward to the Rapture? The Rapture, as it is called, is the imaginary day when Jesus will come down from the sky and lift up into heaven all those who are saved, leaving behind all unbelievers to destruction and death? Anyone who believes in the Rapture scenario will likely interpret a catastrophic nuclear exchange as the opening scene of the Rapture. Thus an American president who believes in the Rapture would arguably have at least some ambivalence toward a nuclear holocaust. A believer in the Rapture with his or her fingers on the nuclear trigger might even be tempted to bring on the Rapture. The Rapture, for those who believe in it, is hardly a negative event. Rather it is culmination of everything they hope for, deliverance into the heavenly arms of Jesus. Presumably Sarah Palin believes in the Rapture. It is one of the doctrines of her religion, and she has nowhere disavowed it. Are Americans ready to sleep at night with a President who longs for the Rapture? The doctrine of the Rapture is a very recent invention within some of the radical fringe churches of Christianity. The Rapture doctrine is first cousin to millennialism, the belief promoted by various groups who have predicted that “the end is near.” Millennialist groups have popped up and burnt out from time to time throughout Christian history. The Rapture doctrine has no support in the historic Christianity of any of the main traditions - Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or Protestant. The doctrine of the Rapture is cobbled together from several obscure, unrelated comments drawn from the epistles of Paul the Apostle. No credible biblical scholar in two thousand years of Christian history has taken seriously the Rapture doctrine, millennialism, or anything similar to it. The American people ought to be concerned about the religious beliefs of its political leaders as those beliefs may determine the life of the nation as a whole. It would be foolish of the American people not to be deeply concerned about the religious beliefs of Sara Palin, who may be elected Vice President for the oldest President ever inaugurated into the office. When John F. Kennedy campaigned for the presidency in 1960, many Americans were concerned about his commitment to the Roman Catholic Chruch. The fear was that he might be subject to directions from Catholic priests, or from the Pope, since he was a practicing Catholic, and Catholic leaders are typically quite directive and authoritarian. Kennedy answered that concern in speaking to the Houston Ministerial Association during the campaign. He declared boldly and correctly that no political leader should take directives from religious authorities whatsoever. He claimed a commitment to the strict separation of church and state. Kennedy’s assurances were widely accepted by the public. The Sarah Palin problem is somewhat different. The concern is not whether she would take orders from her pastor. That is unlikely. Her church does not typically exercise that sort of authority. The problem is both more simple and more worrisome. The public must presume that Palin believes in the Rapture, since it is one of the central doctrines of her church. Furthermore, the American people should assume that Palin’s personal religious beliefs will have consequences in her decision-making as a President. Both Palin and McCain have already made clear that their religious views about abortion will determine presidential appointments to the courts. The press and much of the public seem reluctant to engage Palin on her religious views, considering them to be a personal matter. In certain respects that is admirable restraint. We do not want candidates for office grilled on their private religious views as long as those views do not impinge upon the public welfare. Whether an individual believes in the bodily assumption of the Virgin Mary, predestination, or other such religious views should not be subject to political scrutiny. Such beliefs have no inherent impact on public policy. However, a belief in the Rapture as an historic event toward which history is rapidly moving, is a belief with potentially catastrophic political implications. Do the American people want a believer in such a fantasy to hold in her hands the nuclear power to destroy civilization? Raymond J. Lawrence is an Episcopal cleric, recently retired Director of Pastoral Care, New York Presbyterian Hospital, and author of numerous opinion pieces in newspapers in the U.S., and author of the recently published, Sexual Liberation: The Scandal of Christendom (Praeger). He can be reached at: raymondlawrence@mac.com
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: richard9151, Christine, Diana, All (#0)
Sarah Palin can't even correctly pronounce "nuclear." Her version of the truth is on par with Bush's variances. The good news is that she steps on her tits on a regular basis. Still, if Bush can win two rigged elections, Palin can be elected. With McCain showing all the signs of dementia, I'd expect her to push for his impeachment. In Alaska, her type is referred to as a "Tundra Queen," referring to the shortage/ power of women in the Last Frontier.
Perfect summation. I like the "Caribou Barbie" title.
If there is a Rapture, just more stuff for me to pick up off the ground. I figure there'll be a lot of gold fillings and stuff like that just lying around.
Freeper: I read, but do not understand, write, but make no sense, think, but nothing happens.
We'll give you the job of rounding up suddenly master/mistress-less Pugs orphaned by the rapture.
ROTFLMAO! The media has 'respect' for a person's religious views cause its a personal matter, but doesn't seem to have a problem spreading every lie, smear, innuendo, etc., against a 17 year old kid, as well as a developmentally disadvantaged baby boy, and the father........none of whom are running for any office! Oh, puleeze.............spare me all the concern!!! Holy bat shit! Spare us all your concern, mr. lawrence!!!! I don't give a damned about 'her' religion, whatever the non-denominational one it is is.
All pugs go to Heaven.
Freeper: I read, but do not understand, write, but make no sense, think, but nothing happens.
#2. To: SKYDRIFTER (#1)
I'd expect her to push for his impeachment.
#3. To: richard9151 (#0)
#4. To: Turtle (#3)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#5. To: richard9151 (#0)
The press and much of the public seem reluctant to engage Palin on her religious views, considering them to be a personal matter. In certain respects that is admirable restraint. We do not want candidates for office grilled on their private religious views as long as those views do not impinge upon the public welfare. Whether an individual believes in the bodily assumption of the Virgin Mary, predestination, or other such religious views should not be subject to political scrutiny. Such beliefs have no inherent impact on public policy.
#6. To: Ferret Mike (#4)
We'll give you the job of rounding up suddenly master/mistress-less Pugs orphaned by the rapture.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest