[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest


Business/Finance
See other Business/Finance Articles

Title: Questions for the Future: Issues that will When the Bills Come Due, Then What?
Source: Online.WSJ.com
URL Source: http://online.wsj.com/public/articl ... day%255Fjournal%255Fprimary%25
Published: Jul 17, 2005
Author: Kelly K. Spors
Post Date: 2005-07-18 17:45:19 by Kamala
Keywords: Questions, Future:, Issues
Views: 50
Comments: 28

Questions for the Future: Issues that will When the Bills Come Due, Then What?

By KELLY K. SPORS

July 17, 2005

Thanks to rock-bottom interest rates and easy ways to borrow, consumers have been on an all-out spending spree for several years. Now, though, there are signs that the bills may be piling up too high.

The portion of Americans' disposable income devoted to paying off debt hit a record high recently, even though interest rates have stayed at record lows. That could put a financial squeeze on many households if and when long-term interest rates finally start to go up.

U.S. consumers are more vulnerable than ever to rate increases because they've taken on more adjustable-rate debt in recent years -- meaning monthly payments fluctuate when interest rates change.

Nearly half of all consumer debt and 26% of all mortgage debt is now adjustable, estimates Joe Abate, senior economist at Lehman Brothers. That's a stark change from the early 1980s when nearly all debt had fixed rates. Other estimates peg adjustable-rate debt at closer to 20% of all consumer debt.

Adjustable-Rate Crunch "When all these [adjustable-rate] mortgages reset soon, some of these people are going to see their monthly payments rise by a few hundred dollars a month," Mr. Abate says. "That's a real significant bump for all those people complaining now that gas prices have risen over $2 a gallon." And recent data suggest the debt burden on households is growing heavier, despite low interest rates. The "debt service ratio," the Federal Reserve's estimate of the ratio of debt payments to after-tax income, hit 13.4% in the first quarter of this year, an all-time high since the Fed began tracking it in 1980. The financial obligations ratio, which adds automobile lease and rent payments, homeowners insurance and property-tax payments to the debt service ratio, was 18.45% last quarter, near the record high of 18.84% in late 2002.

Overall, U.S. consumers now owe roughly $11 trillion, nearly double what they owed a decade ago. The vast majority of that debt growth came from people taking out big mortgages and tapping their escalating home equity. Total household debt grew 11.2% in 2004, the largest year-to-year increase since 1986. "We're still in the midst of this consumer debt binge," says Kathy Bostjancic, U.S. senior economist at Merrill Lynch & Co. As long as the housing boom continues, "it's going to give consumers a false sense of security."

Many economists including Ms. Bostjancic predict that if mortgage rates see a noticeable rise from the 6% of recent months, many housing markets will slow and prices will flatline, or even drop in some especially hot markets. Oddly, long-term rates have stayed low despite the Fed's steady short-term rate increases that started last summer -- a phenomenon that Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan recently dubbed a "conundrum."

Here's the impact rising rates can have on household finances: A family with a 30-year adjustable-rate mortgage with a 5% interest rate would see its monthly payment jump from $1,074 to $1,468 -- a 37% leap -- if mortgage rates rose to 8%. Couple this with rises in other debt payments such as credit cards, home-equity loans and such, and households may struggle to pay all the bills each month. The rise in payments due could be exacerbated if job growth and incomes don't keep pace.

For consumers, this means it's high time to make a serious dent in their debts, especially those with adjustable-rate debts such as many mortgages, home-equity loans and credit cards. While it may not be realistic to pay off some debts entirely (easier said than done), borrowers can at least make more than the minimum payments each month -- and cut back or stop buying on credit.

After all, most analysts still think that long-term rates have nowhere to go but up, and that there will be a modest increase by year end. Once rates rise, all the consumers who have overloaded themselves with adjustable-rate debt on mortgages, home-equity loans and credit cards will probably see their minimum monthly payments climb. And if housing prices stop rising, they'll be less able to tap their home equity to help cover the swelling bills. In severe cases, if consumers can no longer afford their monthly payments, this could mean more defaults and foreclosures in some cases.

Already, affordability concerns are popping up. A recent analysis of jumbo mortgages, those with loans above $359,650, by Bear Stearns showed that the average initial mortgage payment on mortgages rose to $2,338 in the first quarter of this year, up from $2,060 late last year. It suggests home buyers might be struggling to keep the price of their home low.

Consumers who have taken advantage of innovative loan products like interest-only loans also will feel the pinch of rising rates, since those loans require only interest payments early on, no principal, but require heftier payments later on. And that number has risen significantly during the past couple years: About 27% of all new mortgages so far this year (excluding refinancings) were interest-only, according to LoanPerformance, a unit of First American Corp. that tracks 46 million mortgages monthly and provides information to lenders and others in the industry. Only 1.6% of all new mortgages were interest-only in 2001.

Much of the debt spree reflects unusual market trends in recent years, particularly the housing boom. Even as the U.S. economy sputtered and jobs fizzled in 2001 and 2002, consumers continued to borrow and spend as they did during the raging 1990s bull market.

But as home prices surged and interest rates hit record lows, consumers took out bigger mortgages and started tapping their escalating home equity like a credit card. U.S. regulators kept interest rates low to keep the economy chugging. 'We'll Probably Regret It' "It was a good strategy in that we needed something to boost the economy in the economic downturn," says Dean Baker, founder of the Washington think tank Center for Economic and Policy Research. "But it sets us up for an even worse crash when housing" cools. "In the long term, we'll probably regret it."

What's more, consumers' attitude about debt is changing, says Robert D. Manning, a finance professor at Rochester Institute of Technology. While older generations are more debt-averse and cut spending during economic downturns, younger generations rely on debt for spending money. "What we're seeing here is really a deferral of the financial responsibility and consequences," Mr. Manning says. "We may be heading into a very gut-wrenching period."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: Kamala, Arete (#0)

U.S. consumers now owe roughly $11 trillion

I saw a little known fact last year that is vital to understanding what is at the root of the economic malaise this country suffers under.

For the first time ever, interest payments exceeded earned income. That is, earned income which comes from production of raw materials or some other consumable goods.

What this amounts to is for the first time in the history of the Federal Reserve System, unearned income exceeded earned income. And I'm NOT talking about dividend payments or rents. This is exclusively interest payments, or debt service.

When this country embraced the Keynesian hocus pocus and adopted deficit spending and subsidy payments to producers instead of giving those producers fair pay, or parity, they have effectively robbed the nation of income in exactly the same amount that was put out as deficit spending.

And whom are the benficiaries of this deficit spending? That is right, the banksters. It certainly is NOT the hard working producers or any of the workmen out there who earn their keep. Only the biggest parasites in history are the ones who benefit by the plunder of the people's wealth.

WAKE UP AMERICA! TAKE BACK YOUR COUNTRY!

BTP Holdings  posted on  2005-07-18   18:26:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BTP Holdings (#1)

When this country embraced the Keynesian hocus pocus and adopted deficit spending

Keynes did say you needed to pay off the debt.

mirage  posted on  2005-07-19   3:57:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: mirage (#2)

Keynes did say you needed to pay off the debt.

Welcome to 4, mirage.

Could you put this in another context? Also consider that all money is debt. So, how can we pay off debt by using debt? Quite simply, we can't.

The solution is to bring the federal levithon back under its limited scope. I think that you may need to do quite a bit more study on this subject to see where the fraud lies.

A good place to start is to read Sheldon Emry's Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People.

And another good thing to read is Congressman Louis T. McFadden's speech to Congress in 1934.

To see further why this is true, pick up a book from Acres USA, UNFORGIVEN: America's Economic System SOLD for Debt and War.

All the while keep in mind that if the country had not listened to the fascists back in the 1920s and 30s, and had simply given the raw material producers their fair pay, we would have a robust and thriving economy to this day.

John Maynard Keynes was a shill for the banksters and his plan of creating wealth by deficit spending was flawed and has led only to the destruction of this nation. Keynes was a fraud and so are the free traders who have been influencing and setting the economic policies of this country for decades. The banksters are the worst crooks of all. We do not have enough rope to hang all of the rotten, traitorous scum and vermin who inhabit the environs around Wall Street and other nefarious places.

BTP Holdings  posted on  2005-07-19   7:53:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: BTP Holdings (#3)

We were still on the gold-exchange standard when Keynes wrote his General Theory back in the 1930s (or so) - so keep that in mind.

Keynes thought it was a good idea to borrow and go into debt to stimulate the economy, but he also said that you needed to take the increased tax revenue from the recovery and used it to pay off the debt incurred providing the stimulus. Its in his General Theory if you care to read it.

TODAY, yes, money is basically debt being tossed around, but the link severing the dollar from gold was done in the 1970s, not in the 1930s.

I've read much about the conspiracies surrounding the Federal Reserve. Do you also know the histories of the First Bank of The United States as well as the Second Bank of The United States? If not, then those are also suggested reading. The Fed is nothing new. There were central banks here in the US before the Federal Reserve came into existance.

But, quite simply, if one were to actually follow what Keynes recommended INSTEAD of today's Neo-Keynesian economics, there would be no national debt.

mirage  posted on  2005-07-19   13:53:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#7. To: mirage (#4)

I am well aware of the things you state above concerning the history of banking in the U.S.

Keynes was DEAD WRONG about the borrowing routine. And to prove it you should take a look at this http://www.normbook.homestead.com

The information also shown in the book Unforgiven is much ignored. If you were as aware of the history of banking and economics as you claim, you would not have said such things to me as you have up to now. But, then, maybe you have been exposed to the standard thought on these subjects. So, it would not be surprising that you should embrace what has been shown to be folly in the much ignored work that I have shown you.

What I have given you is some vital information that will turn your thinking and beliefs upside down. Now, it is entirely up to you if you choose to use it or even accept it as the truth that it is.

It is all there if you care to look, and it is NOT in the nature of a theory as Keynes has laid out. It is all proven and factual with charts and graphs and other extensive citations over a period covering most of the last century.

Most of all, have some fun at this. And remember Morpheus, "I never said it would be easy, only the truth." The red pill or the blue pill, it is your choice. ;^)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2005-07-19 16:01:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]