Title: Jack Cafferty Tells Us How He Really Feels About Sarah Palin Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8__aXxXPVc Published:Sep 27, 2008 Author:You Tube Post Date:2008-09-27 07:30:43 by angle Keywords:None Views:726 Comments:43
Cafferty's question was, "Is she qualified to be President?" And the answer is that she probably isn't but then there is no one on either ticket who would be worth a bucket of warm spit as President and they are all "owned" by the same people. All the national elections, especially the election of the President, comes down to a choice between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber, neither of which is a good choice for America. 'Cause when one of the twins win, America loses.
For anyone to attempt to "qualify or disqualify" anyone is futile and arrogant.
Obama is just as well suited for the presidency as McCain and any other person that happens by.
For instance if a written requirement was "honesty", the pool would be limited to very few, and who is the person that determines such? So to me all this BS about this one or that one being qualified, is just that, BS.
I disagree. That's like saying there are no qualifications for one to be an accountant. You have to have an understanding of what accounting is, be trained how to do it, apply proper ethics and have an analytical mind. In additon, integrity is of utmost importance.
There are sheep and there are leaders. That much is clear. The "leaders" we have today are not leaders, but criminals holding the system and the people hostage, with or without their knowledge and consent.
I disagree. That's like saying there are no qualifications for one to be an accountant
I will say this...
I defy any person to tell this people that they are going to determine what "qualifies" anyone to run for president. Once that door is opened you will have never seen as much hate, scorn, bias and class warfare in your life.
Dont go near that, you notice the founding Fathers did not.
Yes, I agree with that point, however, can we agree at least that Sarah Palin does not have what it takes.
Sorry, I cannot agree because there is no litmus test nor any qualifications for president.
I voted Carter, military, governor, college, well spoken, knowledgeable and we saw the result.
Odds indeed favor your position.
Truman was a hat salesman turned politician, never heard of him but he did ok. Ike never held a public office in his life, he did good. One never knows until after the fact.
LBJ certainly disproved any idea that he was totally qualified.
It comes down to the persons own behavior in office. It does not take a genius to make right and wrong decisions. Nixon was highly qualified, he was a thief.
Clinton qualified for sure, turned out to be the scum of the earth.
I think history shows clearly there were traitors at work there named bush and reagan.
How is Reagan a traitor. That is such a stupid comment. More stupidity just like your lie earlier on this thread that I called you on and you were to much of a coward to respond to.
I wasn't thinking about Nancy Reagan and her astrology. I assume that is what the link is about. But that doesn't make him a traitor. Not as defined by the constitution. Even if I don't agree with her on that and think it is witchcraft. I remember when I first heard that I was disappointed. I kind of gave Reagan a pass on it I guess. Since from what I know it was his wife arranging he schedule according to what some psycoh err. psychic said would be beneficial. I think he just went along with it and was just doing it as a favor to his wife. It was disappointing though.
I don't know if you are aware of the Satanic Noahide Laws. They call for unconstitutional courts of 'justice', one for the Jews and one for the beast/goyim. They declare Christians idolators to be condemned by their courts to death by decapitation.