See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Ferret Mike's friend Videotaped While educating police dumb enough to stop him
Source:
You Tube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KHd6eAUjGM
Published: Sep 27, 2008
Author: Tim Lewis
Post Date: 2008-09-27 18:23:18 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 993
Comments: 89
-- 5 EPD vehicles pull over a car in the Whiteaker neighborhood and the cops handcuff the wrong person while they get a ear full.
Poster Comment: Henry and I go back a long way. He is a hard working woods worker who owns his own home and has spent many years planting trees, doing pre-commercial thinning of tree stands, fire bossing twenty man single resource wild land fire crews, and has been a political activist for many years. He won a large settlement when railroad dicks slammed him to the ground on tracks near his home accusing him of trespassing the right of way while retrieving his dog so he could go to work. He also had a memorable moment in Salem with a fellow activist who had hung a dummy of the Children's Service Department director in effigy on the State Capital grounds protesting heavy handed interference in people's lives when they pulled kids, usually because they objected to the parent's political and social outlook on life. The legislature was in session and the Republicans then and they heard about the dummy, so they came out directly from the House chamber to scream at him and "how dare him" because the then director was an African American woman. That made the papers at that time, and Henry and I go a long long way back having worked and run together for decades. His parents were college professors before retiring, and Henry is very politically informed. Tim Lewis has been the Cop Watch organizer for a long time and has restarted the organization. One I have been arrested doing work observing and videotaping for. The police were very much irritated and intimidated by the camera and this helped convince them to take the cuffs off as you see them do. Shine On, the woman with the pulled back dreads is a very close friend of mine as well. This is also my neighborhood. We will be producing and posting more Cop Watch videos as we get the organization back up to speed.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-20) not displayed.
.
.
.
#21. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
I saw your video. They released your buddy. So at least they came around on what was apparently a mistake. The video doesn't show him originally being arrested and what led to it. The people in the video said there was a robbery. So the police were responding to a legitimate crime, and apparently got the wrong guy. They released him when they apparently found that out. They probably shouldn't have cuffed him and just questioned him first. My bet is that he got loud and mouthy and then they put the cuffs on him. He seems like that type that wants to take on authority. I'm not saying that it is wrong or your friend was wrong to "get loud". (which is my hunch of what happened.) I like people who fight authority. Thanks for the video.
People such yourself seem to be part of the problem. Any group that trains police to act like the Gestapo would be considered an enemy in my book, yet you support them.
I disagree. FM's a unique individual. I think he misunderstands us to some extent, but he really tries to bridge the gaps, which is better than we do.
I wish that I could concur. I have no desire at this stage of the game to attempt to understand someone that supports groups, like the ADL, that have an active hand in setting up the police state even after all of the proof of that group's complicity has been handed to them. While we've been busy trying to understand, they've been undermining. I don't participate in that vicious cycle anymore.
I'll let FM answer that, but I'm interested in finding common ground with others who feel their liberty has been curtailed in America. I know FM is a collectivist. Right now on Wall Street, we're looking at what happens when collectivism poses as conservatism, and that's 10 times more dangerous. With FM what you see is what you get. A forum like this is for trading ideas and facts. He's very strong in both regards.
As am I. I have Jewish friends that hate the ADL more than I do. I have no more patience for stupid Jews or stupid goyim that think the ADL and other branches of the NWO do 'good works'. All they're good for is rhetorical target practice on net forums.
You're saying FM is an ADL member, or that he advocates the ADL? Did I miss something?
He supports the ADL. Edited to add: He also once told me that he "monitors" web sites for hate speech. Draw your own conclusions.
Quote?
Hold, please. I'll do some digging.
Sick, sick, shiite, Mike, I don't even know what to say, or do, on this one. Stay safe, stay armed.
A nation of mullets, ruled by inbred, moronic traitors.
Here's one. FM posted an article from the ADL as though it as gospel and then stated on the thread: "I monitor hate sites and one would have to be blind not to see how they focus into the possibilities with laser precision." FM, 2006-06-22 More in a minute.
"As far as the ADL goes, I support Good work they have done just as I support Israel's right to exist." FM, 2006-06-05
On both posts: FM is sensitive to racism because he is biracial. I cut him some slack because of this. I think no less of him because of it, and in fact, he's a credit to his people for being such a strong defender of liberty and the environment. Even our good Rob Noel indicates Israel has a right to exist. And somewhere, someday, somehow, the ADL has probably done something right. Once, maybe. I'm assuming this is what FM means :) I had a sense that he was holding similar opinions, and I still give him the benefit of the doubt while reserving the right to disagree with him anywhere, anytime, on any issue. We're here to exchange views, and I'm glad he's here. I try to convince him to see things my way sometimes. And likewise. That's a forum.
----- "As for their [ADL] good work, that is obvious as they have researched and documented people places and organizations who promote religious, racial and other bigotry quite well and I have found them to be a useful source of material when I have needed such data. " FM, 2006-06-05 ----- More?
See my remarks above to FM on ethnicity. I'm hoping he responds.
Horse-hockey. My grandmother's Jewish and I'm not 'sensitive' to those that are less than fond of Jews. Even our good Rob Noel indicates Israel has a right to exist. No state has a right to exist. Only individuals are born with that right. States exist through the exercise of power, not by right. And somewhere, someday, somehow, the ADL has probably done something right. I'm still waiting for someone to name ONE thing the ADL has done that's good or right. The examples that Mike used above of researching and documenting 'bigotry' is horribly flawed due to all of the outright fabrications and cover-ups contained in their research. It's like saying the Cheka did 'good works'. We're here to exchange views Agreed. My view is that anyone that supports the ADL while claiming opposition to the police state is full of shit.
You make some great points. Thanks for digging up those quotes. I'll be looking forward to hearing the responses. (I agree with your comment about states, and I may have misquoted Rob, who probably agrees more with what you said, as well.)
You are bringing shit up from way back when I joined 4UM. Some of my views have changed, some have not. I didn't know much about this virtual community then, now I do. As I inferred, play your try to bait the ferret games all you want to do here. This is what you do, entertain yourself by trying to make others squirm. I am not impressed, and I don't give a shit about your game here. It is your problem, not mine. Later alligator.
Fair enough. So what's your view of the ADL now?
I'm always amazed by people that make statements such as this. They may claim they are against hate and discrimination, in principle. Yet, they support the "right to exist" of a state that has an official national policy that condones hate and discrimination against all gentiles. Israel has no public laws prohibiting hate speech, hate crime, or hate discrimination perpetrated by jews against gentiles. By design, gentiles are an enforced minority inside Israel, and many gentiles living inside Israel cannot even vote. The ADL is doubtlessly aware of this fact, and know that jews are double-dealing hypocrites. The real mystery is why non-jews who claim to oppose hate and discrimination still support Israeli hypocrisy. The word "Israel" literally means "jewish people", so it is reasonable to assume that the state of Israel is the embodiment of mainstream jewish law. Some US politicians go so far as to claim that Israel is an ideal. I can understand why professional politicians might say such things, as they naturally tend toward tyranny.
FM is sensitive to racism because he is biracial. The other shoe drops. The highly organized and tax-exempt Anti-Defamation League of Bad Breath (ADL) is the enemy of White resistance. Those who align themselves with the ADL, the SPLC, Simon Wiesenthal Center and other "hate group" watchdogs are like our resident biracial polecat, Mike. They will ally with all the various protected minorities in coalition with sick liberals, law enforcement, court officers and the news and entertainment industry to fight "right-wing extremist hate groups/domestic terrorists" (read: Eurocentric separatist activists). Polecat Mike won't be happy until everyone else is a mongrel like him. It ain't about the right-wing and the left-wing uniting to fight White "haters." It's about dispossessing the White majority; about putting the bottom rail on the top and the top rail on the bottom, just like in the egalitarian Bible story and with the egalitarian snivil rights movement.
It's Great to be White!
This has tended to work against us, and it presents an indifferent and "intolerant" face to the world. The definition of tolerance is to disapprove but not punish. Today, whites lock up blacks and hispanics for crimes they commit, but do not generally disapprove of blacks and hispanics per se. This is indeed "intolerance", as in the complete opposite of tolerance. But when most white people say the word intolerance, what they have in mind is disapproval and punishment. Thus, whites maintain that they are not intolerant, while darkie maintains that they are. Whites are talking about the disapproval of darkie; darkie is talking about the punishment of crimes. Whites are generally retarded about that. As it happens, I do disapprove of blacks and hispanics in the aggregate. As long as they live among us I will be intolerant, by practically anybody's definition, including my own. And I don't think that's a bad thing. There is much to unite us, but the issue of abolishing our ethnic concerns is not one of them. You're right -- white genocide is not negotiable for the Kossacks, either. Everything else is. But I'm not worried about them. Like homos, they don't usually reproduce, and there will always be a few around. Most will soon die of old age, or remove themselves from the white gene pool by miscegenation, leaving fewer race traitors for my children to contend with. We are now part of the diversity quilt, as an inevitable minority group. This is retarded. It's a good appeal from darkie to whitey, but doesn't work in the reverse. They ain't that dumb. Whites have always been a global minority. That's not what's different. What's different is white surrender of their lands and institutions. That, too, is non-negotiable for the Kossacks. Whites have always been a minority. So have Jews. Neither will ever be just another minority.
“It seems fair to regard negroes as on the average inferior to white men.” -- Bertrand Russell “Race! It is a feeling, not a reality: ninety-five percent, at least, is a feeling." -- Benito Mussolini I'm still waiting for FM's reply.
People that claim support for Israel and its various organs (ADL, AJC, etc) and then wear the cloak of tolerance, anti-hate and all of the other meaningless PC terms are either willing or unwilling idiots for the Zionist hydra. At this stage in the game when the various heads of the hydra (Bernanke, Mukasey, Chertoff, et. al.) are financing and building the police state in America, such willing and unwilling idiots are of no more use except for rhetorical target practice. Those idiots either need to change their perceptions of reality or get lost in the coming backlash.
You came into hijack this thread with your own agenda. You bother me with your one note Charley acting very arrogant and demanding. I don't need that crap the last weeks before an important election, or is that a factor in your timing here? We are done, period, no more exchanges on the topic. I will be happy to post back to you on any issue but your pet one. There is more to life then your ADL hamster exercise wheel you like to run yourself ragged on. Post in regard to the thread header. Anything else I won't even bother wasting time on.
What's so important about it? It's two tools dancing to the tune of their paymasters. Many of those paymasters are the same entity. buckeye: He won't answer. He's still down with the ADL and its police state fetish.
FM and I find common ground regardless of those things. He knows I don't agree with him on a lot, but it's enough to communicate.
Communication is fine and dandy, but I have a very difficult time finding common ground with people that wittingly or unwittingly advocate the incipient police state.
That quote shows what a poor communicator you are. I have found you generally impossible to talk to. You are still hijacking the thread, and how you expect me to be receptive you your arcane interrogatories when you piss and shit on anything you don't like and refuse to budge from your one issue side show is beyond me. The passive aggressive insults are noted. Their inaccuracy is noted. That's all I see I can do for you here, is note that.
Don't taze me bro.
The ADL trains more police in America than any other private group. Unless one is an apologist for the ADL or for the police state, that's far from a side show. The passive aggressive insults are noted. There's nothing passive aggressive about it. You're either an idiot or a supporter of the ADL...but I repeat myself.
our mutual defense against whom, Mike? we can't even
agree on who and what is [our] common enemy. i believe your heart's in the
right place, but i also believe your ideal of unification (i view it as
collectivism) causes you to be closedminded at times.
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
Au contraire ma amie. It is not I that is closeminded, but think what you want. I never ask permission for my viewpoints, and I don't give a shit if they offend or others don't like then. They are mine, I know why I have them, and they are well thought out. I also have a right to them, just as you have a right to yours'.
Yet you insist upon others refraining from speaking their minds, to wit: Why don't you conduct yourself in an ethical manner in here and be objective when doing posting functions that need objectivity? There are many good reasons to do this, one is to protect reposting for discussion under the auspices of fair use from legal attacks from news outlets, and another is to create a product that a thread is that people of different opinions can post to without feeling it is useless to because even management seems to sanction the oppressively -- I don't give a crap of how opinionated I am -- behavior you exhibit here. Personally I like Barney Frank and would have commented on this topic had you made the tread user friendly. You obviously would prefer to not see the other side argued on your thread here, or you would of posted this in a mature, reasoned fashion. That sounds dangerously close to calling for suppression of speech to me, Mike.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
Bottom line right there.
absolutely..and i never said or intimated otherwise. in thinking about it further, i think i erred using the word closedminded. maybe biased is better, but then aren't we all. we all see things through our own prisms and life's experiences. in any event, it wasn't meant to be a criticism, just an observation...and you certainly have the right to disagree or dispute it. what do you think of my assertion that we can't even agree on who is our common enemy so how is it possible that we can unite and fight whoever that is together?
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
As long as Mike or anyone supports any person or part of this government we cannot have one iota of common agreement. There is NO room for compromise with people that sanction the government, its owners nor its minions...
You need to put a link to the thread in with the quote if you want a comment on it.
This is a forum where ideas and opinions are exchanged. It is allegedly a free speech forum, yet I am always getting stupid FReeper tricks like your stonewalling here Cyni. And you don't have to buy their current dogma to know and use the Free Republic forum doctrine and tactics. Thanks for sharing, John McCyni.
Tricks Mike???? am too olde for that, and so are you too olde to go personal rather than discuss the merits of what is at stake. This is what I said... "As long as Mike or anyone supports any person or part of this government we cannot have one iota of common agreement. There is NO room for compromise with people that sanction the government, its owners nor its minions." This government is a repressive one Mike, has been for many years and is getting worse. This has occurred, under stewardship of both "parties" and several presidents etc etc. I cannot support any part or person of this ongoing system, and to my mind anyone that does is adding to our decline as a people and a country. No tricks Mike, personal view. I do not support any portion of this system, you do, that is your choice, however in doing so, you become a part of the problem as you are merely doing what you are programmed to do. Free speech forum question???? I note you openly support a candidate, try that on the other forums. Very basic premise Mike, you support any candidate, you thereby are supporting the government that will destroy us. To my knowledge, I have not seen nor heard anyone here even hint that Mike should be muted by any means. I have known you for too long for any such childishness. One either supports the government or they do not. I do not.
Comments (62 - 89) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#22. To: Ferret Mike (#10)
We must learn to protect each other against common enemies..
#23. To: bluegrass, Ferret Mike (#22)
#24. To: buckeye, Ferret Mike (#23)
#25. To: bluegrass (#24)
#26. To: buckeye (#25)
I'm interested in finding common ground with others who feel their liberty has been curtailed in America.
#27. To: bluegrass (#26)
#28. To: buckeye (#27)
(Edited)
#29. To: bluegrass (#28)
#30. To: buckeye (#29)
#31. To: Ferret Mike (#5)
The FBI consider it one of their 'happy hunting grounds' and sends new agents in to do their final field training before becoming agents.
#32. To: buckeye, Ferret Mike (#29)
#33. To: buckeye, Ferret Mike (#29)
#34. To: bluegrass, Ferret Mike, robnoel (#32)
#35. To: buckeye, Ferret Mike, Tauzero, Cynicom, christine, Lady X, angle (#29)
#36. To: bluegrass (#35)
#37. To: buckeye, Ferret Mike, robnoel (#34)
FM is sensitive to racism because he is biracial
#38. To: bluegrass (#37)
#39. To: bluegrass (#37)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#40. To: Ferret Mike, buckeye (#39)
Some of my views have changed, some have not.
#41. To: bluegrass (#33)
(Edited)
As far as the ADL goes, I support Good work they have done just as I support Israel's right to exist
#42. To: All (#34)
(Edited)
On 2008-09-27 22:17:20, buckeye wrote:
#43. To: buckeye (#13)
#44. To: Tauzero, Ferret Mike (#43)
It's a good appeal from darkie to whitey, but doesn't work in the reverse.
#45. To: Googolplex, Ferret Mike, buckeye (#41)
They may claim they are against hate and discrimination, in principle. Yet, they support the "right to exist" of a state that has an official national policy that condones hate and discrimination against all gentiles.
#46. To: bluegrass (#45)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#47. To: Ferret Mike, Googolplex, buckeye, Tauzero, Cynicom (#46)
an important election
#48. To: bluegrass, Ferrert Mike (#47)
#49. To: buckeye, Ferrert Mike (#48)
#50. To: bluegrass (#49)
"Communication is fine and dandy, but I have a very difficult time finding common ground with people that wittingly or unwittingly advocate the incipient police state."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#51. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#52. To: Ferret Mike (#50)
side show
#53. To: Ferret Mike (#10)
but this is one of many dynamics about points of view we need
to understand if people of different perspectives are ever going to ever be
able to unite when it is important to do so to ensure mutual defense.
#54. To: christine (#53)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#55. To: Ferret Mike (#54)
It is not I that is closeminded, but think what you want. I never ask permission for my viewpoints, and I don't give a shit if they offend or others don't like then
#14. To: Jethro Tull (#12)
#56. To: Ferret Mike (#54)
I also have a right to them, just as you have a right to yours'.
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#57. To: Ferret Mike (#54)
They are mine, I know why I have them, and they are well thought out. I also have a right to them, just as you have a right to yours'.
#58. To: christine, Ferret Mike, all (#57)
#59. To: Dakmar (#55)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#60. To: Cynicom (#58)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#61. To: Ferret Mike, christine, all (#60)
This is a forum where ideas and opinions are exchanged. It is allegedly a free speech forum, yet I am always getting stupid FReeper tricks like your stonewalling here Cyni.
.
.
.