See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Love is blind for fish in murky waters
Source:
New Scientist
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 1, 2008
Author: Ewen Callaway
Post Date: 2008-10-02 11:20:21 by Tauzero
Ping List: *Race Realism* Subscribe to *Race Realism*
Keywords: None
Views: 232
Comments: 8
Love is blind for fish in murky waters 18:03 01 October 2008 Some female fish have eyes for their man only. Colourful African cichlids have evolved into new species because females are partially blind to others. But even as that discovery is made, the species are under threat because the polluted waters they live in are causing them to interbreed. Among several closely related species of cichlids living in Lake Victoria, males come in either red or blue. Brighter males tend to get the girls, but new research suggests that both sexes have evolved to preferentially see only one colour, creating new species of fish in the process. "Reds and blues live in the exact same spot," says Ole Seehausen, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Bern in Switzerland and the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology in Kastanienbaum. "Colour is very important in mate choice." That is especially true in the water, where blue pigments shine brightest in shallow waters and red pigments further down. Cichlids usually heed this direction, with blue species living at shallower depths than red species. Murky waters To determine what happens to fish in the transition between red and blue zones, Seehausen's team studied cichlids living off the shores of five Lake Victoria islands. Because of sediment, the waters near some lakes are cloudier than others. In clear waters, the colour that appears brighter shifts from red to blue gradually with depth, and red and blue fish stick to their zones, cementing their genetic differences. In murky waters, however, the transition from red to blue happens much quicker and blue and red fish sometimes interbreed, destroying species differences. Mutations in the genes for light-detecting proteins called opsins explain why, Seehausen says. His team found that these genes had changed faster than the rest of the fish's genes, a sign of evolution in action. Red fish evolved red-sensing opsins, while blue fish developed blue-sensing proteins. Tests in laboratory tanks confirmed that females with red-sensing eyes went for red males, while blue-eyed females followed suit. Hybrid females, just like those in the murky waters, showed no preference at all. Mass extinction Evolution by vision could explain why Lake Victoria is home to hundreds of species of cichlids, which are popular aquarium fish. However, as urban growth pumps more sediment and algae-feeding fertilisers into Lake Victoria unchecked, many species are vanishing. "Species diversity in this lake has imploded in the last 30 years," Seehausen says. "It is the largest human-witnessed mass extinction of vertebrates." Rather than die out, species facing radically changed optical environments interbreed out of existence, he says. Cichlids might not be the only animals that evolve new species by adjusting their vision, says Mark Kirkpatrick, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Texas in Austin. Guppies and perch might be branching off because of who they see. "It's not just restricted to fishes," he says. Some species of primates see in full colour, while others only in black and white. Perhaps our ancestors split off from other monkeys because they saw the light.
NewScientist.com news service
Ewen Callaway
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tauzero (#0)
Thank goodness they got the Talapia out before it turns into a mud puddle.
it seems fishy to me ping :-D
http://s5.gladiatus.us/game/c.php?uid=77290 Or pollution. Could scientists be more stupid?
Could scientists be more stupid? If we lived in the dark for a few hundred years, what need would we have for our eyes? There's all sorts of critters that live in the depths of the ocean with no eyes.
I don't believe in "evolution". Nor do I believe in "creation".
How about 'adaptation'? 'Use it, or lose it'?
They need beer goggles.
The stupider people are, the more surprised they are when you kill them.
'Use it, or lose it'? Sure, I can agree to that. The DNA is the living organism that creates it's shell of cells. It can do whatever it wants to. This is not half as interesting when you look at the funding people get for bullshit.
#2. To: Tauzero, *Agriculture-Environment* (#0)
click the pic
#3. To: lodwick (#1)
Mutations in the genes for light-detecting proteins called opsins explain why, Seehausen says. His team found that these genes had changed faster than the rest of the fish's genes, a sign of evolution in action. Red fish evolved red-sensing opsins, while blue fish developed blue-sensing proteins.
#4. To: Ninpo (#3)
Or pollution.
#5. To: lodwick (#4)
#6. To: Ninpo (#5)
#7. To: Tauzero (#0)
#8. To: lodwick (#6)
How about 'adaptation'?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest