See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Sarah Palin's pastor exorcises witches, condemns Jew Bankers
Source:
YT/MSNBC
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esSAVnn2ye0
Published: Oct 4, 2008
Author: AntiConformist911/Olberman
Post Date: 2008-10-04 16:06:49 by buckeye
Keywords: None
Views: 1027
Comments: 74
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-23) not displayed.
.
.
.
#24. To: buckeye (#0)
What terrorist attacks? When you fight back against an oppressor and murderer of your people you are a terrorist? The only terrorist attacks over there are by the state of Israel. God's judgment on unbelievers has NOT occurred yet, if it had they would know it.
God is always good!
Damn James you are right on two counts. It is the bible that says the love of money is the root of all evil. A person of lesser intelligence than you probably wouldn't have caught my errors. It is good that we have someone with a little gray matter between the ears on here to keep us straight.
I think my goals are reasonable. Realistically, I'm not pushing to restore America's non-political traditions. I'm optimistic about restoring liberty, at least to one degree or another. Much of it has been lost since Bush I (41) entered the White house. Senate intelligence reform during the Ford and Carter administrations, and the reduction in military spending we experienced during the Carter and Clinton administrations were both massive improvements to our personal liberty and national economy. Similar actions today are within our grasp. Limiting immigration is an ideal way to reduce the perceived need for intense "reich" security measures like Homeland Security. Limiting immigration would also give us the ability to transmit our traditions to newcomers already here, who have scarcely had any pressure to adopt our way of life. This is a fairly popular solution, and has already been implemented to a small degree under Bush II as a token of insincere goodwill. Ron Paul's four step agenda would be achievable if moderate liberals and conservatives would look further than their selected TV news sources for information. It will take more than a few people striving to accomplish these things. I suspect that disappointment over an Obama or McCain administration's failed promises may be the catalyst that is required. I think we need to think on the four-step agenda over the long haul. It's really just getting started, and momentum could take decades to achieve. Your mother's lament over newfangled AV technologies, for us, could become a lament over the bad old days when tyrants had taken our rights on paper, and how we had to restore them with great sacrifice and effort.
Of course it doesn't allow for foreign aid to any country but since when do our pols follow the Constitution and govern by it. Regardless, they keep greasing the palms of the joos in Israel and that doesn't sit well with the rest of the countries in the middle east. By the way james, if you keep nitpicking what I write, I'm gonna have christine make you thechecker,exchecker or something on this forum.
I am always happy to help out the less fortunate. You're welcome.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. You can make all the changes you wish....but until the heart/conscience of mankind is changed, it will be only superficial and last but moments in time. What you would change to suit your way of thinking, the next guy will come along and change it to something else --I'm sure you're aware that simply because a law is written this year does not guarantee it will last forever (nor a constitution, for that matter)--the next congress can change that law, or any other law at their whim. As I noted, what good is a 'no central bank' system if people are killing each other right and left over any reason, every reason, or simply no reason? Ya wanna say, hey, we've got a great no central banking system and when the people quit killing each other, they'll realize thats a good thing? Makes no sense to me. I can understand well your desire to have a nation that is even half- based on the Constitution upon which it is supposed to operate. I'd love that, too.........but you know what they say about that damned barn door and the horse! I'm not going to let it get to me, to let it eat me alive, to make me hateful and bitter. The nation has made its bed (sold its soul seemingly), so now it has to lie in it (suffer the consequences)........that it goes under is not the end of the world, though it could be IF God decides it is. BUt I ain't gonna worry about that, either. Que sera, sera.
Bless your heart, buckeye.........I'm glad someone has all those decades in which they want to work at changing government. How old are you.....17? 18? I can't say that.......I'm at the other end of the spectrum, and I don't plan to spend whatever 'decades' I have left trying to get sheeple to wake up--at least not in any sort of activist role. Those days are behind me. I no longer consider putting important value on 'man made'......
God punished unblieving Israelites all the time in the O/T. I think Brickner's statement is a bit of a stretch as it regards 'because they didn't convert to chr5istianity, because the Bible indicates they will when Messiah returns. They were unbelieving and disobeying God's instructions--that is why they went thru so many diasporas. And from my reading of Scripture and other materials, they still owned the land, but God refused to let them possess it.
Usury at a federal level leverages the ability to kill to a massive level. Individuals may deviate from the norm, and you may read about it in the papers or see it on TV. But when the Federal Reserve funds a war, millions can die. Hundreds of thousands can be raped, and scores of thousands of children can suffer terribly. This is on our conscience. I know you're getting tired, but thankfully you're not too tired to stop in and advise us when we get too anxious.
Punishment and judgment are two different things. The present state of Israel has experienced neither. Dead Jews can't convert to Christianity and I see nowhere in the Bible where it says all the live ones will convert to Christianity when Jesus returns. Also the Bible is referring to real Jews, not the pretenders in Israel today.
God is always good!
So without the federal reserve, we wouldn't be killing in other countries........yet it would continue nonstop here, just as others in other countries would continiue the killing there. Changing a banking system is not going to change the heart of mankind.......where there is a chance to grab power, there are many waiting for the chance. And power is, in the hands of man, generally not good--might be for a few, but by and large not. Money is nto the only way to obtain power.......but it is a powerful aphrodesiac.
The point of our constitutional government was to limit the excesses of men, and it indeed worked for a time. We have a system for magnifying them in the Fed. These things have consequences. Men will be men, but when we give them fractional reserve banking and unlimited access to credit, all hell breaks loose. It's a worthy fight, even if it's only going to result in small reforms.
Building the military necessary to (attempt) world dominance requires currency that can be created instantly, and lots of it. I think you're right that it (killing in general) could (and in most cases would) continue on a much more local level. Only a change in the people's thinking will stop wars.
I don't presume to know what blood flows through each and every Jew in Israel....nor do I presume to know their heart. To be punished, God would have judged that they did not do as they were supposed to do.......otherwise it would be an odd God that would punish first, doncha think? Of course, this is not the final judgement. "Real Jews".........was Jesus a real Jew? I ask because he came along long after the diaspora to Babylon, and certainly the Assyrian diaspora. Furthermore, there were jewish communities in many cities all over the place before the Khazar storyline. So exactly how do you determine who has the right 'blood'.......and are you speaking religiously or ethnically/racially? And lets see your proof that each and every one of them are not 'jews'.
Do you truly believe you can recapture the early days of the Constitution? Truly? Because if you do, I'll sell you the London Bridge pretty cheap-- special deal cause you're a friend and all that..........
I would imagine a corp of private contractors would work nicely...... :)
I believe we can improve our situation if we try. I believe that not trying is not an option.
Private contractors would rely upon "ready" funds ... the inter-connected central banks ability to create and issue currency out of thin air and "choose" who gets funded are directly responsible for global bullying.
Imagine the critics the founding fathers faced. The British Empire had never been defeated, not really. It was a Leviathan, and functioned like a well-oiled machine when it encountered resistance. Only a small percentage of the colonists wanted to separate from it. They were ridiculed, taunted, and punished at first. But they persisted.
The relevant point would be whether they were ISRAELITES/HEBREWS ... most "jews" today are actually gentiles (ashkenazi descendants of Japeth) that have converted to Judaism, have no ethnic relationship to Abraham (who was not a Jew) or Jacob/Israel (who was not a Jew) ... and are not entitled to claim the inheritance belonging to Israelites.
There are some that might say the Brits weren't defeated here either. That they simply employed a different strategy.
Superstition. I don't know of any valid genetic proof. In fact, Kevin MacDonald says that there is proof to the contrary. All groups making generally accepted claims to a Jewish heritage have common Jewish genetic markers.
If this theory is true, then I'd say it was ineffectual, despite their meddling in our civil war, until the Fed was created.
We had a different breed of men--and women--back then, buckeye. I can't fault you, for wanting to try. We've all been through or will go through the 'fire', so to speak, as we try to plot/change the course of rightness/wrongness--at least those who care will. Stay with your dreams, and hopes.
I've not closed the book on this assertion, as I continue to read and study. There is much confusion and bs because of how the words have been intermingled all these years, i.e., Israelite/Hebrew/Jew. And stick in there ashkenazi and sephardic and khazar and yiddish and all other sorts of 'stuff', like diasporas of both the northern and southern kingdoms--and more than one. And there's a lot to sort through. In the meantime, I'll refrain from hating and despising, nor will I gush with pride and wishful desire to be a part of the mess.....thats been my position all along. I'm on a quest for truth, as far as I can determine it.
I find this fascinating. Clearly any investigation of the subject matter implictates zionist jewry as having a despicable hand in the thievery of this nation and other nations in this world and in the advancement of its ills. Read about the Rothschilds or Trotsky. Without understanding why and how events transpired, action toward fixing things is futile as it doesn't address the core of the problem. That's why the internet is so valuable to the people and so dangerous to the criminals.
There has certainly been lots of time for inter-breeding between sephardic and ashkenazic people.
Genesis 10 2The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. 3And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah. 4And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Ezekiel 38 (doesn't mention ashkenaz directly, but mentions the rest of the Japethetic lineage, Gomer and Togarmah) 1 The word of the LORD came to me: 2 "Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the chief prince of [a] Meshech and Tubal; prophesy against him 3 and say: 'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: I am against you, O Gog, chief prince of [b] Meshech and Tubal. 4 I will turn you around, put hooks in your jaws and bring you out with your whole army—your horses, your horsemen fully armed, and a great horde with large and small shields, all of them brandishing their swords. 5 Persia, Cush [c] and Put will be with them, all with shields and helmets, 6 also Gomer with all its troops, and Beth Togarmah from the far north with all its troops—the many nations with you. Genesis simply describes the descendants of Japeth, while Ezekiel describes THE ENEMIES OF ISRAEL in the last times !
Oh puleeze............I have read til my eyes have gotten tired. And please note I said 'everything' in this world, not just financial. I have not written the concept off--either way. I have said I'm sick to death of it, and I maintain that I am sick of it, and will continue to be sick of it. I daresay most do not know whereof they speak, and at best many just utter words they've seen elsewhere, without having done their homework. This no way implies that you have or haven't......I'm merely stating my opinion--based on observations I've made over time.
noone, I've read this............I believe it. And Genesis also says, in 9:27 that God would enlarge Japeth and he would live in the tents of Shem--this was after Shem and Japeth clothed Noah's nakedness. Thus a familial relationship developed between these two tribes. That said, I've also read where when the kingdoms split that NOT ALL the northern tribes went into exile via Assyria==they went elsewhere, and they went southward, like as towards Judea. Furthermore, as trade developed, one saw Israelites, including Judeans, forming communities all over the known world..and that was before Christ was born. Do you have information that none of the Judeans went into Europe? Do you have information showing there was no intermarriage between 'shirttail relatives'. Can you prove that everyone in Israel is NOT of the tribe of Judah? Recall that Abraham, as well as Isaac sent for wives for their son(s) or sent the son(s) themselves to marry relatives in PadanAram. Scriptures talk often about 'remnants'....and that God will not forget the remnants. EVen when Nebuchadnezzar took the Judeans away into Babylon, not all Judeans were taken......some escaped into the desert, and some were left behind, and some were out of the area at the time of Jerusalem being taken.
That's assuming that the vote was an honest one.
it was as honest as bush's declaration of born again christianity.
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
LOL! Well enough of them brought him close enough anyway. I was stunned to see people in the community have McPalin signs on their front yard, today. Wow, what a mindset.
Can you add a propeller to the Bush beanie??? He was a pilot you know during Vietnam war.
In my part of the country, the cities nearby are Obama territory with the occasional McCain sign but all of the rural areas sport 100% McCain/Palin signs.
Bush thinks they're wearing Mouseketeer hats.
This has absolutely nothing to do with Abraham or promises made to his descendants. [Older Bibles used to have a map that showed Ham locating in Africa, Shem in the Middle-East and Japeth in Eastern Europe/Asia]. Ezekiel 38 is end times prophecy, and this book names the enemies of (true) Israel and it's not likely that the enemy of Israel would be Israel itself, is it ??? You ask for proof that inter-marriages didn't occur. We can assume that they did occur. The better question regarding "proof" should be asked of those that have invaded and have committed genocide against the Palestinians for the sake of installing some Eastern European/Russian people calling themselves Jews there. These People should have had PROOF that they descended from Abraham if they were to be given land Biblically promised to his descendants. [However, you're mentioning the tribe of Judah indicates that you're thinking that the State of Israel should have been instituted for the benefit of one tribe (maybe 2 if you count Benjamin) of 12 that were to share the promise doesn't it ]? Can you name one other nation founded by international force in support of a biblical claim ??? International Law has never upheld scriptural claims by force. The UN (God's enemy) has never supported scripture, but mandated this Jew fraud. Yes, Japeth does reside in the tents of Shem. That's why the Ashkenazi Jews (Japethites) are all over our government. No one can definitively say that inter-marriages didn't occur. It is pretty common knowledge that they were frowned upon clear up until this generation in America. Marriage licenses were instituted in America to LEGALIZE inter- marriage between blacks and whites, even though there were marriages between Indians and American settlers that weren't LICENSED. The establishment of the State of Israel should have required definitive proof of the claim made that these people were RETURNING to a land they or their ancestors once occupied. This proof was never required and has never been demonstrated even though millions have died. The Ashkenazi branch weren't converted to Judaism until 750 AD. Lastly, to institute/impose a SECULAR NATION STATE by invasion and warfare against an indigenous population that can prove they have lived there for well over a thousand years, based upon a religious determination contained in the Torah/Bible, a RELIGIOUS belief system NOT SHARED UNIVERSALLY, based upon an UNWITNESSED PROMISE, made by an INVISIBLE GOD, to a man 4000 years ago IS BEYOND LUDICROUS and most certainly an international CRIME committed by an international bully called the U.S. and Britain. However, to be completely truthful, Britain had a legitimate claim as the British (Brit-Ish means covenant man in Hebrew) are descendants of Abraham through Isaac, Israel, Judah. I believe they lost their claim based upon promises made to Abraham just like any other nation would if they departed the area for whatever reason.
He was a pilot you know during Vietnam war. ROTFLMAO!
Believe as YOU wish, noone........ And a lot of good it does to sit here some 60 odd years later and debate what should/shouldn't/could/couldn't/would/wouldn't be done is what is ludricous. They didn't as you nor I what should have been done, did they? YOu should recall that Doc said so many times that God has his own way of doing things, and that they are not mans ways. As vehemently as you fight it, there is the chance that this is, indeed, God's will being worked in one of those 'mysterious' ways. He certainly won't be asking you or I for our approval or agreement. Why, we might evene have gotten that damnable Dubya because God was trying to get a point across, or something...........geeze.......imagine that.
Bernhardt would get a kick out of this. I wasn't going to vote for McCain anyway, but... I simply can't imagine having a funny-talking African pastor.
...Both methods yielded similar results, which support the previous findings; that is, of all modern human samples, sub-Saharan Africans again exhibit the closest phenetic similarity to various African Plio-Pleistocene hominins...
Comments (65 - 74) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestBrickner described terrorist attacks on Israelis as Gods judgment of unbelief on Jews who have not converted to Christianity.
#25. To: James Deffenbach (#22)
They say money is the root of all evil
#26. To: rowdee (#20)
(Edited)
There won't be any going back; unfortunately life doesn't operate that way.
These are significant, and much of what we lament in terms of lost values and tradition could blossom naturally under such conditions.
#27. To: James Deffenbach (#21)
What if the politicians could get it through their head that the Constitution esn't authorize them to dole out foreign aid TO ANYONE?
#28. To: LACUMO (#25)
(Edited)
A person of lesser intelligence than you probably wouldn't have caught my errors. It is good that we have someone with a little gray matter between the ears on here to keep us straight.
Lord Acton
#29. To: buckeye (#26)
#30. To: buckeye (#26)
I think we need to think on the four-step agenda over the long haul. It's really just getting started, and momentum could take decades to achieve.
#31. To: RickyJ (#24)
God's judgment on unbelievers has NOT occurred yet, if it had they would know it.
#32. To: rowdee (#29)
As I noted, what good is a 'no central bank' system if people are killing each other right and left over any reason, every reason, or simply no reason?
#33. To: rowdee (#31)
God punished unblieving Israelites all the time in the O/T
#34. To: buckeye (#32)
#35. To: rowdee (#34)
Changing a banking system is not going to change the heart of mankind...
#36. To: rowdee (#34)
(Edited)
#37. To: RickyJ (#33)
#38. To: buckeye (#35)
#39. To: noone222 (#36)
#40. To: rowdee (#38)
#41. To: rowdee (#39)
#42. To: rowdee (#38)
Do you truly believe you can recapture the early days of the Constitution?
#43. To: rowdee (#37)
And lets see your proof that each and every one of them are not 'jews'.
#44. To: buckeye (#42)
The British Empire had never been defeated, not really. It was a Leviathan, and functioned like a well-oiled machine when it encountered resistance.
#45. To: noone222 (#43)
#46. To: noone222 (#44)
That they simply employed a different strategy.
#47. To: buckeye (#42)
#48. To: noone222 (#43)
#49. To: rowdee (#16)
I'm sickened to death ...all...who lay every friggin thing that ever went wrong in this old world on the shoulders of Jews...or Israelites.
#50. To: buckeye (#45)
#51. To: rowdee (#48)
(Edited)
#52. To: angle (#49)
#53. To: noone222 (#51)
#54. To: buckeye (#10)
Evangelical Christians put George W. Bush in the White house twice.
#55. To: bluegrass (#54)
#56. To: christine (#55)
#57. To: bluegrass (#54)
Evangelical Christians put George W. Bush in the White house twice. That's assuming that the vote was an honest one.
#58. To: bluegrass (#56)
#59. To: angle, christine, Cynicom, Tauzero, Lady X (#57)
I was stunned to see people in the community have McPalin signs on their front yard, today.
#60. To: Cynicom (#58)
#61. To: rowdee (#53)
(Edited)
And Genesis also says, in 9:27 that God would enlarge Japeth and he would live in the tents of Shem--this was after Shem and Japeth clothed Noah's nakedness. Thus a familial relationship developed between these two tribes.
#62. To: Cynicom (#58)
Can you add a propeller to the Bush beanie???
#63. To: noone222 (#61)
#64. To: buckeye, blugrass (#0)
Ancient teeth and modern human origins: An expanded comparison of African Plio-Pleistocene and recent world dental samples, Journal of Human Evolution Volume 45, Issue 2, August 2003, Pages 113-144
.
.
.
