See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: None of the Above
Source:
LibertyUnbound.com
URL Source: http://libertyunbound.com/article.php?id=26
Published: Oct 15, 2008
Author: Doug Casey
Post Date: 2008-10-15 00:36:18 by Peter Carswell
Keywords: None
Views: 136
Comments: 8
Voters' Guide None of the Above Doug Casey Choosing among those who seek the presidency is not necessarily an easy task for the intelligent libertarian. Liberty's editors do their best to help. Once again we find ourselves in the midst of the quadrennial American circus, when shameless powermongers come out to blather moronic and vacuous platitudes in hopes of getting Boobus Americanus to “get out and vote,” granting them the power of life and death for the next four years. Regrettably, they won’t be disappointed. But one can hope they will be. I think back to the ’60s, when the wistful saying “Suppose they gave a war, and nobody came” was current. It was a noble sentiment. In that vein, I also like “Suppose they gave a tax, and nobody paid,” around April 15. And “Suppose they gave an election, and nobody voted,” now. You’ve heard all the reasons why you should vote. Most of them are humbug at best, and some — such as “It doesn’t matter how you vote. Just vote” — are simply idiotic. Voting today has nothing to do with the “civic duties” you learned about in grade school. Your fellow citizens aren’t Jimmy Stewart and Gary Cooper lookalikes earnestly trying to do the right thing. Well over 50% of U.S. citizens are now net tax recipients, and they’ve trundled down to the polls in their tank tops and shower slippers only to help ensure that they stay on the gravy train. It’s sickening to hear thoughtful nonvoters, who can sense in their gut that something is terminally wrong with the process, make lame excuses because they feel guilty for not participating. I would, therefore, like to give you five reasons why you shouldn’t vote. 1. Voting in a political election is unethical. The political process is one of institutionalized coercion and force; if you disapprove of these things, then you shouldn’t participate in them, even indirectly. As Mao, a leading expert on the subject, famously said: The power of government grows out of the barrel of a gun.” Sure, if government limited itself to defending its subjects from domestic and foreign aggression and adjudicating disputes, you could argue that there was nothing unethical in voting for who plays the night watchman. But the fact is that elections have long been, as Mencken observed, nothing but advance auctions on stolen goods. If you want something, vote with the dollars you’ve earned, in the marketplace. 2. Voting compromises your privacy. It just gets your name in another government computer bank, one they can use to call you up for jury duty and other forms of involuntary servitude. The less the government knows about you, even in small ways, the better off you are. 3. Voting is a degrading experience. Voting (as well as registering) involves spending possibly considerable time standing in line, hanging around government offices, filling out forms, and dealing with petty bureaucrats. Most people can find more enjoyable or productive things to do with their time. 4. Voting just encourages them. I’m convinced that most people don’t actually vote for a candidate; they vote against the other candidate. But that’s not how the guy who gets the vote sees it; he thinks it’s a mandate for him to rule. It’s ridiculous to justify voting by endorsing the lesser of two evils. Incidentally, I got as far as this point in 1980 when, as luck would have it, I did an hour alone on the Phil Donahue Show on the very day before the election. The audience had been very much on my side up to the point at which Phil accused me of voting for Mr. Reagan, and I had to explain why I wasn’t. Unfortunately, telling them they shouldn’t vote was just more than they could handle. The prospect of their stoning me precluded my explaining the fifth and possibly most practical point. 5. Your vote doesn’t count. Politicians and political hacks like to say that every vote counts because it gets everybody into busybody mode. But statistically, one vote in scores of millions makes no more difference than a single grain of sand on the beach. That’s completely apart from the fact that, as voters in Chicago in 1960 and Florida in 2000 can tell you, when it actually is close, things can be rigged. And anyway, officials manifestly do what they want — not what you want — once they’re in office. The only way your vote counts is to make you complicit in the crimes that will inevitably be committed by its recipient. My sentiments on the topic have little, incidentally, to do with the fact that both candidates in this presidential election are certifiable liars, lifelong ne’er-do-wells, and borderline sociopaths. But when has that not been the case? It’s rare that someone of quality goes in for politics. My arguments are based on principle. How much principle is involved in a popularity contest between a slick, highly socialistic young black man and a tired, mildly demented old white man? There are certainly romantics among you who, despite your better judgment, will go out and vote anyway, perhaps for the Libertarian Party candidate, despite the fact that there are few indications that Barr is a libertarian. But, I suppose, since there’s zero chance he’ll be elected, it’s a good way to register a protest vote, for what that’s worth. Of course if you really want to treat the elections with the respect they deserve, and insist on voting, you might consider a write-in for, say, “Donald Duck.” Doug Casey is a contributing editor of Liberty. © Copyright 2008 Liberty Foundation
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
If legislation worked better than free market law, we wouldn't have to be forced to accept it.
Ever notice how every bit of government correspondence we receive contains a threat?
I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.
That's why I call them goons. It's not that I want to be mean, but those gorillas are dangerous. And their licensed tv, radio and newspapers are full of threats too.
I have to admit that I'm on the horns of a dilemma. Daffy Duck? Or Bugs Bunny? Daffy suits our current political milieu better but Bugs has brains. Decisions, decisions.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
One of the things that pisses me off the most is they way they use our tax dollars to threaten us on the air ways that we better buckle up or else. Its almost enough to make a lesser man go postal.
I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise. Taxation is really war, and we should be trying to minimize it for that reason. Any good that it does would always get done voluntarily anyway, so taxation always nets out to be a bad thing.
"Suppose they gave an election, and nobody voted"
#2. To: Peter Carswell (#1)
we wouldn't have to be forced to accept it.
#3. To: Peter Carswell (#0)
#4. To: Critter (#2)
"Ever notice how every bit of government correspondence we receive contains a threat?"
#5. To: TwentyTwelve (#3)
(Edited)
None of the Above
#6. To: Peter Carswell (#0)
Of course if you really want to treat the elections with the respect they deserve, and insist on voting, you might consider a write-in for, say, “Donald Duck.”
#7. To: Peter Carswell (#4)
And their licensed tv, radio and newspapers are full of threats too.
Tattoos Middleburgh, NY
#8. To: Critter (#7)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest