See other World News Articles
Title: The Coming Attacks On America
Source:
judicial-inc.
URL Source: http://judicial-inc.biz/Nuclear_attacks_on_america.htm
Published: Jul 21, 2005
Author: judicial-inc.
Post Date: 2005-07-21 08:49:35 by Grumble Jones
Keywords: Attacks, America, Coming
Views: 287
Comments: 209
What's It All About? This is about a world financial implosion, and the eventual creation of a one-world government along with a universal currency. The Zionists, who control the Federal Reserve, have used fiat credit to create an enormous inflation for the past 40 years. They used this wealth transfer to buy hard assets, especially monetary metals such as gold, as well as oil, knowing the coming financial crisis will demand a new currency, and that currency will be commodity-based. The only reason we are in Iraq is so Israel can control the world's oil, of which Iraq has massive reserves. Their final targets are Iran, and Venezuela, due to those nations also having massive oil reserves. The ensuing world depression will collapse prices, enabling those holding certain commodities to be in a position to buy everything for pennies. The best part for the Zionist elite, is that will all be blamed on the Muslims. Poster Comment: Go to the main page page of the article for a "must see."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Grumble Jones (#0)
WAR ON TERROR Does al-Qaida have 20 suitcase nukes? Author claims bin Laden purchased them in '98 from ex-KGB agents for $30 million -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: October 2, 2002 1:00 a.m. Eastern © 2002 http://WorldNetDaily.com Editor's note: The following story was posted on Oct. 2. For an update, see 'Bush, Blair warned of bin Laden nukes' A new book by an FBI consultant on international terrorism says Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network purchased 20 suitcase nuclear weapons from former KGB agents in 1998 for $30 million. The book,"Al Qaeda: Brotherhood of Terror," by Paul L. Williams, also says this deal was one of at least three in the last decade in which al-Qaida purchased small nuclear weapons or weapons-grade nuclear uranium. Williams says bin Laden's search for nuclear weapons began in 1988 when he hired a team of five nuclear scientists from Turkmenistan. These were former employees at the atomic reactor in Iraq before it was destroyed by Israel, Williams says. The team's project was the development of a nuclear reactor that could be used "to transform a very small amount of material that could be placed in a package smaller than a backpack." "By 1990 bin Laden had hired hundreds of atomic scientists from the former Soviet Union for $2,000 a month – an amount far greater that their wages in the former Soviet republics," Williams writes. "They worked in a highly sophisticated and well-fortified laboratory in Kandahar, Afghanistan." This work continued throughout the 1990s, the author says. In 1993, according to the book, Jamal Ahmed al-Fadl, a bin Laden agent who turned into a Central Intelligence Agency source, purchased for al-Qaida a cylinder of weapons-grade uranium from a former Sudanese government minister who represented businessmen from South Africa. The purchase price was $1.5 million and the uranium was tested in Cyprus and transported to Afghanistan. Al-Fadl reported that, at the time of this transfer, al-Qaida was already working on a deal for suitcase nukes developed for the KGB. Williams says the Russian Mafia made another mysterious deal with "Afghani Arabs" in search of nuclear weapons in 1996. The Russians who sold the material now live in New York. Then again in 1998, Mamdouh Mahmud Salim was arrested in Munich and charged with acting as an al-Qaida agent to purchase highly enriched uranium from a German laboratory. That same year, according to Williams, bin Laden succeeded in buying the 20 suitcase nukes from Chechen Mafia figures, including former KGB agents. The $30 million deal was partly cash and partly heroin with a street value of $700 million. "After the devices were obtained, they were placed in the hands of Arab nuclear scientists who, federal sources say, 'were probably trained at American universities,'" says Williams. Though the devices were designed only to be operated by Soviet SPETZNAZ personnel, or special forces, al-Qaida scientists came up with a way of hot- wiring the bombs to the bodies of would-be martyrs, according to the book. Suitcase nukes are not really suitcases at all, but suitcase-size nuclear devices. The weapons can be fired from grenade or rocket launchers or detonated by timers. A bomb placed in the center of a metropolitan area would be capable of instantly killing hundreds of thousands and exposing millions of others to lethal radiation. Yossef Bodansky, author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America" and the U.S. Congress' top terrorism expert, concurs that bin Laden has already succeeded in purchasing suitcase nukes. Former Russian security chief Alexander Lebed also testified to Congress that 40 nuclear suitcases disappeared from the Russian arsenal after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Williams quotes an anonymous federal official as saying: "The question isn't whether bin Laden has nuclear weapons, it's when he will try to use them." In addition to the suitcase nukes, Williams reports that al-Qaida has also obtained chemical weapons from North Korea and Iraq. Williams says the FBI confirmed to him that Saddam Hussein provided bin Laden with a "gift" of anthrax spores. Williams says al-Qaida also includes in its arsenal plague viruses, including ebola and salmonella, from the former Soviet Union and Iraq, samples of botulism biotoxin from the Czech Republic, and sarin from Iraq and North Korea. The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Oh, nonsense. Just more anti-semitic crap.
I hope you're right.
I wonder why the capture of this sophiticated lab has not been trumpeted by the MSM as proof of al-Qaida plans to use WMDs? Simple, the lab does not exist and never has.
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
On another issue Our new Supreme Ct Nominee: His wife is big in satellite systems; her company is targeting Iraq
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Just once I would like to read about a govt nominee who is not connected five different ways to this regime.
You'll never do that. This is not big government it's BIG BROTHER.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
I hope you're right. Phaedrus can't help it. His entire life has been based on his parasitic existence within the establishment financial apparatus. This is what the Russians commonly refer to as an apparatchik. And, though he may not have been a direct employee of the government or a political party, per se, he is still a functionary of the public banking system. He is also what can be referred to as a "bonehead" since, though highly educated, is unable to function or think in any capacity outside of the very paradigm he has been indoctrinated in. This leads to shilling in defense of that paradigm. It is a sad sickness, otherwise known as robotoid botitis.
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
PING!
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
PING!
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
Can't forget you guys. PING!
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
I am always pleased and honored when the "right people" have a negative opinion of me. Thank you.
No problem. You only
get what you deserve. I hope I can dish out a little more dissing for you
later. EAT MY SHORTS!
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
LOL. You're lack of class speaks for itself. You are indeed a leader of mankind.
"Your" lack of class, Phaedrus. Have a nice day, All.
Hey, wasn't Nick Berg's dad into Satellite Systems???
#2. To: Grumble Jones (#0)
The Zionists, who control the Federal Reserve, have used fiat credit to create an enormous inflation for the past 40 years.
#3. To: Phaedrus (#2)
Oh, nonsense. Just more anti-semitic crap.
#4. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#1)
Paul Williams is a buffoon. He claimed al-Qaida had plans for a nuclear bomb. Turned out the "plans" were from a spoof site called The Journal of Irreproducble Results. Those "plans" included making part of the bomb from PlayDoh.
#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#1)
"They worked in a highly sophisticated and well-fortified laboratory in Kandahar, Afghanistan."
#6. To: BTP Holdings (#5)
#7. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#6)
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#8. To: robin (#7)
#9. To: Grumble Jones, Phaedrus, christine, 1776, Eoghan, Bayonne, Itisa1mosttoolate, robin, noone222, Brian S, justlurking, Zipporah, Jhoffa_, Jethro Tull (#3)
Oh, nonsense. Just more anti-semitic crap.
#10. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut, lodwick, Yertle Turtle, Red Jones, wakeup, CAPPSMADNESS (#9)
#11. To: Dakmar, Flintlock, TommyTheMadArtist, Arete (#9)
#12. To: Esso, crack monkey (#9)
#13. To: BTP Holdings (#9)
Phaedrus can't help it. His entire life has been based on his parasitic existence within the establishment financial apparatus. This is what the Russians commonly refer to as an apparatchik.
#14. To: Phaedrus (#13)
I am always pleased and honored when the "right people" have a
negative opinion of me. Thank you.
#15. To: BTP Holdings (#14)
EAT MY SHORTS!
#16. To: Phaedrus, All (#15)
#17. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#6)
 | So many morons, so few bullets. |
#18. To: Phaedrus (#2)
The US taxpayers give to the federal reserve one billion dollars each and every day. This is 3.5% of our entire gdp. Virtually all of this money we give them ends up as profit because they have virtually no expenses by comparison that they must incur to earn this money. The billion dollars a day we give them direct from the US taxpayers compares to a billion and a half dollars a day the taxpayers actually spend on social security recipients today. The reason we give the federal reserve this money is because the federal reserve is charged with creating new money. THis is a money-creation service fee.
#19. To: Phaedrus (#16)
Has someone left the room? (g)
#20. To: Red Jones (#18)
The money is borrowed by the FedGov and we have the pleasure of being obligated to repay it, which is your reference to taxes I think. Beyond that, we may or may not agree but either way we're going in the wrong direction.
#21. To: Jethro Tull (#19)
I'm WAY too old to tolerate a whole lot of nonsense and when we start to blame the Jews for home-grown problems, I've got issues and I won't stand silently by. The Jews have been important to this country's prosperity.
#22. To: Phaedrus (#21)
"The Jews?" You are embracing the same collectivist error as those who blame "The Jews."
The Jews have been important to this country's prosperity.
- "Let me ask you this: A guy breaks into your house, but you don't have a gun. How are you going to shoot him?" ~~Dale Gribble
#23. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#22)
Oh boy, " collectivist error" -- OK, educate me but I hope your explanation goes beyond semantics. I'm sure others understand me.
"The Jews?" You are embracing the same collectivist error as those who blame "The Jews."
#24. To: Phaedrus (#23)
Individual persons who happen to be jewish have done good things, just like individual persons who happen to be jewish have done bad things. But you, like the anti-semite, lumps all jews together like they are some big homogenous lump so that they all get credit for the good, or bad, that was effected by individuals. The exception, of course, would be if you can show that the organized jewish religion specifically guides its members to do a good or bad thing as a collective endeavor independent of other groups or cultural influences.
- "Let me ask you this: A guy breaks into your house, but you don't have a gun. How are you going to shoot him?" ~~Dale Gribble
#25. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut, Phaedrus (#22)
Don't waste much time on Phaedrus. He is a condescending and arrogant bot from El Pee who slipped in here with the people invited in from TBFs group. He will not listen to you. Hell, he will not listen to me, and I'm his hero and role model. ;^)
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
#26. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#22)
The Jews are a religious and/or ethnic group. No need to guess, they'll tell you who they are. On average, their IQ tests some 15 points above the norm -- they are very bright. Their contributions to society and/or achievements as measured by Nobel Prizes, or any other substantive measure you would care to mention, is out of proporiton, higher, than that of other groups. That is the "collective" I am referring to.
#27. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#24)
I think I've responded to this above.
#28. To: BTP Holdings (#25)
LOL. Indeed you are.
I'm his hero and role model. ;^)
#29. To: Phaedrus (#26)
You confirm my point. You make the same mistake that anti-semites make. You lump them all together and give them blanket credit for the achievements of individuals. The anti-semite does the same but condemns them all based upon the crimes of individuals.
The Jews are a religious and/or ethnic group. No need to guess, they'll tell you who they are. On average, their IQ tests some 15 points above the norm -- they are very bright. Their contributions to society and/or achievements as measured by Nobel Prizes, or any other substantive measure you would care to mention, is out of proporiton, higher, than that of other groups. That is the "collective" I am referring to.
- "Let me ask you this: A guy breaks into your house, but you don't have a gun. How are you going to shoot him?" ~~Dale Gribble
#30. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#29)
Look, Nuke, there ARE groups and there ARE averages and we CAN talk sensibly about them. That's what I'm doing. You are splitting hairs. I'm more interested in truth.
You confirm my point. You make the same mistake that anti-semites make. You lump them all together and give them blanket credit for the achievements of individuals. The anti-semite does the same but condemns them all based upon the crimes of individuals.
#31. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#29)
Come on, Nuke, this thread starts out by blaming the "Zionists". Go argue with those who have used that term.
#32. To: Phaedrus (#31)
You'll note that my position is that you and they are equally guilty of the collectivist mentality.
Come on, Nuke, this thread starts out by blaming the "Zionists". Go argue with those who have used that term.
- "Let me ask you this: A guy breaks into your house, but you don't have a gun. How are you going to shoot him?" ~~Dale Gribble
#33. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut, Phaedrus (#32)
You'll note that my position is that you and they are equally guilty of the collectivist mentality. You are correct, NB. And phaedrus does fail to see that not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jews. That is a part of the bot mentality.
Come on, Nuke, this thread starts out by blaming the "Zionists". Go argue with those who have used that term.
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
#34. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#32)
Whatever ...
You'll note that my position is that you and they are equally guilty of the collectivist mentality.
#35. To: BTP Holdings (#33)
More hair splitting ... my comments stand.
And phaedrus does fail to see that not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jews.
#36. To: BTP Holdings, Nuke Buzzcut (#33)
You two are interested in semantics, not substance. You should be posting exclusively to each other because, frankly, I'm not interested in splitting hairs.
#37. To: Phaedrus (#35)
If a jew wins a nobel prize next year, should I pat my co-worker's wife (who happens to be jewish) on the back and tell her good work?
- "Let me ask you this: A guy breaks into your house, but you don't have a gun. How are you going to shoot him?" ~~Dale Gribble
#38. To: Phaedrus (#36)
Words mean things.
You two are interested in semantics, not substance.
- "Let me ask you this: A guy breaks into your house, but you don't have a gun. How are you going to shoot him?" ~~Dale Gribble
#39. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#37)
Do you expect to win this debate with silly questions?
If a jew wins a nobel prize next year, should I pat my co-worker's wife (who happens to be jewish) on the back and tell her good work?
#40. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#38)
Well, I certainly agree with that but making fine distinctions can be a game.
Words mean things.
#41. To: Phaedrus (#39)
Just helping you to understand that the silliness is inherent in your own words.
- "Let me ask you this: A guy breaks into your house, but you don't have a gun. How are you going to shoot him?" ~~Dale Gribble
.
.
.
Comments (42 - 209) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest