See other World News Articles
Title: The Coming Attacks On America
Source:
judicial-inc.
URL Source: http://judicial-inc.biz/Nuclear_attacks_on_america.htm
Published: Jul 21, 2005
Author: judicial-inc.
Post Date: 2005-07-21 08:49:35 by Grumble Jones
Keywords: Attacks, America, Coming
Views: 253
Comments: 209
What's It All About? This is about a world financial implosion, and the eventual creation of a one-world government along with a universal currency. The Zionists, who control the Federal Reserve, have used fiat credit to create an enormous inflation for the past 40 years. They used this wealth transfer to buy hard assets, especially monetary metals such as gold, as well as oil, knowing the coming financial crisis will demand a new currency, and that currency will be commodity-based. The only reason we are in Iraq is so Israel can control the world's oil, of which Iraq has massive reserves. Their final targets are Iran, and Venezuela, due to those nations also having massive oil reserves. The ensuing world depression will collapse prices, enabling those holding certain commodities to be in a position to buy everything for pennies. The best part for the Zionist elite, is that will all be blamed on the Muslims. Poster Comment: Go to the main page page of the article for a "must see."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-17) not displayed.
.
.
.
#18. To: Phaedrus (#2)
The US taxpayers give to the federal reserve one billion dollars each and every day. This is 3.5% of our entire gdp. Virtually all of this money we give them ends up as profit because they have virtually no expenses by comparison that they must incur to earn this money. The billion dollars a day we give them direct from the US taxpayers compares to a billion and a half dollars a day the taxpayers actually spend on social security recipients today. The reason we give the federal reserve this money is because the federal reserve is charged with creating new money. THis is a money-creation service fee.
Has someone left the room? (g)
The money is borrowed by the FedGov and we have the pleasure of being obligated to repay it, which is your reference to taxes I think. Beyond that, we may or may not agree but either way we're going in the wrong direction.
I'm WAY too old to tolerate a whole lot of nonsense and when we start to blame the Jews for home-grown problems, I've got issues and I won't stand silently by. The Jews have been important to this country's prosperity.
"The Jews?" You are embracing the same collectivist error as those who blame "The Jews."
Oh boy, " collectivist error" -- OK, educate me but I hope your explanation goes beyond semantics. I'm sure others understand me.
Individual persons who happen to be jewish have done good things, just like individual persons who happen to be jewish have done bad things. But you, like the anti-semite, lumps all jews together like they are some big homogenous lump so that they all get credit for the good, or bad, that was effected by individuals. The exception, of course, would be if you can show that the organized jewish religion specifically guides its members to do a good or bad thing as a collective endeavor independent of other groups or cultural influences.
Don't waste much time on Phaedrus. He is a condescending and arrogant bot from El Pee who slipped in here with the people invited in from TBFs group. He will not listen to you. Hell, he will not listen to me, and I'm his hero and role model. ;^)
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
The Jews are a religious and/or ethnic group. No need to guess, they'll tell you who they are. On average, their IQ tests some 15 points above the norm -- they are very bright. Their contributions to society and/or achievements as measured by Nobel Prizes, or any other substantive measure you would care to mention, is out of proporiton, higher, than that of other groups. That is the "collective" I am referring to.
I think I've responded to this above.
LOL. Indeed you are.
You confirm my point. You make the same mistake that anti-semites make. You lump them all together and give them blanket credit for the achievements of individuals. The anti-semite does the same but condemns them all based upon the crimes of individuals.
Look, Nuke, there ARE groups and there ARE averages and we CAN talk sensibly about them. That's what I'm doing. You are splitting hairs. I'm more interested in truth.
Come on, Nuke, this thread starts out by blaming the "Zionists". Go argue with those who have used that term.
You'll note that my position is that you and they are equally guilty of the collectivist mentality.
You'll note that my position is that you and they are equally guilty of the collectivist mentality. You are correct, NB. And phaedrus does fail to see that not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jews. That is a part of the bot mentality.
"But what is Hope? Nothing but the paint on the face of Existence; the least touch of truth rubs it off, and then we see what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of." Lord Byron
Whatever ...
More hair splitting ... my comments stand.
You two are interested in semantics, not substance. You should be posting exclusively to each other because, frankly, I'm not interested in splitting hairs.
If a jew wins a nobel prize next year, should I pat my co-worker's wife (who happens to be jewish) on the back and tell her good work?
Words mean things.
Do you expect to win this debate with silly questions?
Well, I certainly agree with that but making fine distinctions can be a game.
Just helping you to understand that the silliness is inherent in your own words.
Collectivism based upon race is neither a fine distinction, nor a game.
Once again, whatever ...
Who said anything about race?
Are you confused, Mr. Nuke?
Are we having fun yet?
I notice you failed to answer the question about my co-worker's wife.
Ask your silly question of someone who wishes to play your silly games.
But it's not silly. It's just uncomfortable for you because it exposes the fallacy of your position.
Oh but it is.
Nuke, if you want to debate me, you must stay relevant. Right now, you're not there. You have shown you can type but that is all.
The money that they 'lend' to the federal government is created by the act of lending it. It is not as though they actually had the money to lend. They did not even have 1% of the money at the time when they lent it. they created the money from thin air when they lent it. Therefore, the money they get paid for this service is a money creation service fee. We should do what we did when the nation was young. We should create this money as a government and simply use the money to cover government expenses. This is how it was done in the early days of America. This is how we should do it again. This is what Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy both started to do before they were murdered. The money creation system we've had since 1913 has been a disaster. It has meant massive increase in money supply way beyond what we need. The government system of doing the money creation was much better, it worked for us. This new system only causes financial disaster. Constant debt. And huge enrichment of a very few rich spoiled people who did nothing to earn this money. And it is true that the large majority of the individuals who own the federal reserve are jews. and it is true that about half of them are foreigners. Bush and bush-bots talk negatively about france. But they send huge amounts of taxpayers' dollars to individuals in france, germany & england just for this money creation fee I'm talking about. Every day hundreds of millions of dollars goes from the taxpayer to european individuals for this. When the federal reserve was founded it was founded with an investment of 4.5 million dollars. It is not as though they had money when they lent it. The money was created by the act of lending it. The king of england took less than 1% of our entire economy from us each year in the form of taxes. The federal reserve takes 3.5%, and a large portion of that goes to Europe.
I don't want to debate a person who uses language as sloppily as you do and when shown his error just sloughs it off as irrelevant semantics or fine distinctions.
If they had a nuclear weapon Wash. D.C. would have been destroyed a long time ago. All the top Federal Govt. is located there.
And least we forget Ethel and Julius Rosenberg.
Don't forget the poor, downtrodden "prisoner of Zion" Jonathan Pollard.
[Did you really mean cunning?] As for Nobel Prizes, largely consists of Jews awarding prizes to other Jews...
So, we have learned the Jews are a monolithic bloc when one is saying good things about them.. However, individual bad acts are aberrations and must not be attributed to the people as a whole? That’s pretty much it, isn’t it?
"Working Three Jobs is: Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic... Get any sleep?" (Laughs) ~ George W Bush
Comments (59 - 209) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#19. To: Phaedrus (#16)
#20. To: Red Jones (#18)
#21. To: Jethro Tull (#19)
#22. To: Phaedrus (#21)
The Jews have been important to this country's prosperity.
#23. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#22)
"The Jews?" You are embracing the same collectivist error as those who blame "The Jews."
#24. To: Phaedrus (#23)
#25. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut, Phaedrus (#22)
#26. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#22)
#27. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#24)
#28. To: BTP Holdings (#25)
I'm his hero and role model. ;^)
#29. To: Phaedrus (#26)
The Jews are a religious and/or ethnic group. No need to guess, they'll tell you who they are. On average, their IQ tests some 15 points above the norm -- they are very bright. Their contributions to society and/or achievements as measured by Nobel Prizes, or any other substantive measure you would care to mention, is out of proporiton, higher, than that of other groups. That is the "collective" I am referring to.
#30. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#29)
You confirm my point. You make the same mistake that anti-semites make. You lump them all together and give them blanket credit for the achievements of individuals. The anti-semite does the same but condemns them all based upon the crimes of individuals.
#31. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#29)
#32. To: Phaedrus (#31)
Come on, Nuke, this thread starts out by blaming the "Zionists". Go argue with those who have used that term.
#33. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut, Phaedrus (#32)
Come on, Nuke, this thread starts out by blaming the "Zionists". Go argue with those who have used that term.
#34. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#32)
You'll note that my position is that you and they are equally guilty of the collectivist mentality.
#35. To: BTP Holdings (#33)
And phaedrus does fail to see that not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jews.
#36. To: BTP Holdings, Nuke Buzzcut (#33)
#37. To: Phaedrus (#35)
#38. To: Phaedrus (#36)
You two are interested in semantics, not substance.
#39. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#37)
If a jew wins a nobel prize next year, should I pat my co-worker's wife (who happens to be jewish) on the back and tell her good work?
#40. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#38)
Words mean things.
#41. To: Phaedrus (#39)
#42. To: Phaedrus (#40)
Well, I certainly agree with that but making fine distinctions can be a game.
#43. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#41)
Just helping you to understand that the silliness is inherent in your own words.
#44. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#42)
Collectivism based upon race is neither a fine distinction, nor a game.
#45. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#42)
Collectivism based upon race is neither a fine distinction, nor a game.
#46. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#42)
#47. To: Phaedrus (#46)
#48. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#47)
I notice you failed to answer the question about my co-worker's wife.
#49. To: Phaedrus (#48)
#50. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#49)
But it's not silly.
#51. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#49)
#52. To: Phaedrus (#20)
#53. To: Phaedrus (#51)
Nuke, if you want to debate me, you must stay relevant.
#54. To: Grumble Jones (#3)
#55. To: Phaedrus (#21)
The Jews have been important to this country's prosperity.
#56. To: Jethro Tull (#55)
#57. To: Phaedrus, Jethro Tull (#26)
On average, their IQ tests some 15 points above the norm -- they are very bright.
“Under this roof are the heads of the family of Rothschild, a name famous in every capital of Europe, and every division of the globe." -Benjamin Disraeli
#58. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#32)
.
.
.