See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: An Examination of Obama's Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches
Source:
pennypresslv.com
URL Source: http://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama%2 ... techniques_in_His_Speeches.pdf
Published: Oct 18, 2008
Author: Unsigned
Post Date: 2008-10-18 21:04:19 by PeteCat
Keywords: Obama, Speech
Views: 3514
Comments: 132
A 67 page pdf. The article seems to be a serious-minded effort rather than a hoax. An interesting read at any rate. It is unsigned and not dated - the contents suggest it was finished within past few weeks.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-15) not displayed.
.
.
.
#16. To: bluegrass (#14)
You get nowhere using a diminutive for my first name. Read the Wiki or whatever and get back to me when you are up to speed on his resume.
There is a good answer to that that is a quote from Rhett Butler to Scarlet O'Hara in Gone With the Wind. I think is started with the word "Frankly."
You're still dodging the question. I've read his resume. Obama has no real world experience or accomplishments. He's the ultimate superficial feel-good candidate for a superficial generation. The Money Powers certainly know the shepherds to pick for the flock, eh?
Ahmadinejad in 2008! It was fun and I still love you.
He had done nothing except be a corrupt Chicago politician. If he was white, he would be ignored as utterly unqualified. Since he is black and a Magic Negro, people delude themselves he'll be something besides as utterly terrible President.
Freepers: hearts full of hate and cowardice, and skulls full, to quote a favorite saying of one of their favorite cowards, of mush.
You sure do. You stink like the RAT leftist turd you are.
It's the second mouse that gets the cheese
If he weren't dark you wouldn't grovel. Would you please tell me what Obama initiatives you consider good for America, and why?
Who's grovelling? Which initiatives do I like from Obama? I have looked at both candidate's health plans, and though it still needs some work, I much prefer Obama's. I also appreciate his willingness to prevent the reemergence of the criminal Taliban regime in Afghanistan and to end the illegal war in Iraq started by Bush. One little known aspect to this which has been under reported is the stated intent of the Obama Administration to go after Bush criminally, and others and I plan on a campaign to put the heat to President Obama to do this vigorously. I have absolutely no intent of reducing heat on Bush. Now he will be leaving office, he must face due process for his high crimes and misdemeanors. President Obama will also be a better environmental president too, McCain is a hypocrite and a liar when he claims to be environmentally minded. I am howling angry at what Bush has done to the environment, and I want blood for this. I am also aware too that in a government with checks and balances to power, the thing to look at is how well do I think the man coming in can get everyone on the same page and make things work. I am voting for Barack Obama because he is the new Great Communicator and he will definitely be a good remedy to gridlock. I admire his consistency and skill he has shown to overcome overwhelming odds to sell himself to the American people. He has passed the hiring interview with flying colors. More then anything I just flat acknowledge he has earned the right to be given this job. The process of selecting candidates and electing a president is hardly a perfect one. But sometime in spite of itself, something good happens and a talented and immensely competent man succeeds in running the gauntlet, and that has happened this year, and his name is Barack Obama, Democratic Senator from Illinois, soon to be President Barack Obama, 44th President of the United States.
yeah, that will happen. just like the bush admin was to go after clinton's. all will be swept under the rug. the mantra will be, as always, time to move on. they have the same masters. the democrats and the republicans are equal criminals and traitors against we the people. the plan is and always has been our enslavement for their enrichment and power. at the least, i would have thought that obama's selection of biden for his VP would have made it crystal clear that his claims for change are incredible.
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
Neither Obama nor McCain are half as clever as either their biggest fans or harshest critics think they are. Obummer's not a diabolical genius who hypnotizes the masses, he's just another brand name product being sold through the media. He "controls people's minds" in the same way that ads for WalMart or Burger King control people's minds.
It sure would be pointless to run with that as a campaign pledge, as McCain would make hay with it. Your concerns are noted, and this is why people must always realize that quite often the people must lead and make the leaders follow them. I am convinced Obama will respond to an energetic campaign demanding justice. I am counting on it.
I can give ya 43 (presidential) reasons to quit counting !
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is in prison. Henry David Thoreau
Kosher denial bump
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Exactly how much will Obama's health care plan cost the
average American tax payer? Same w/his environmental program. Is he for
a carbon tax? Will this extend to individual citizens, or be left at the
business level? In either case, what will that cost, and how will it be
implemented? What has the Taliban done to us? Why should Americans
waste one dime, or one life changing the political landscape of Afghanistan?
Isn't this the Bush doctrine of preemption? Please supply the referenced
reasons for Obama's Afghanistan intervention. As you know Obama never,
ever stated all American troops are leaving Iraq, so how will this war end if
we aren't leaving?
One more question, Mike. Do you personally believe some speech raises to the level of hate speech, if yes, can it, or should it, be elevated to the level of a crime?
Great Lt. Columbo routine, I am amused. Some things people say are stupid and malicious to the extreme, but I support the First Amendment. The First Amendment is absolutely beyond the reach of federal power to abridge; it says clearly; "Congress shall make no law..." No federal agencies, including Congress and the Court, have power or authority to subordinate speech and press to what they think are more important interests. Where free speech has been muzzled the muzzle needs to come off, I support the U.S. Constitution, not censorship the FCC and other agencies deal in. The First Amendment works with personal responsibility for one's speech as the primary check making it work. For example, you should have the right to tell your boss he is an ignorant asshole and that you'd love to do his wife, but he should still have the right to fire you on the spot for it. Now as far as racist speech goes, I do not support banning it as hate speech. The military and schools should have the right to restrict it in order to preserve the environment to accomplish what they are there to do. But even then, if students wish to meet to belong to a Nationalist party club, or if soldiers on their own time associate to discuss racist material, this should be their right.
So then you condemn the ADL and folks who 'monitor' hate speech forums. I recall you stating some time back that the ADLs work in this area (hate speech) was noble and you supported it.
More than anything he ain't earned the *right* (since when the fvck is a job a 'right'?) to "this job", or anything else. As a smokey voiced orator, he might be a contender for VO work in crime dramas and disaster films.
Barry Obama -- In your heart, you know he's wrong.
Mikey ping
You know, there are those among us who can be beaten over and over with the obvious stick and none of it ever sinks in. Never.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Well, you are mistaken, because my beliefs concerning the First Amendment are very old ones. I Was Hugo Black when my 400 level Political Science Supreme Court course at the University of Oregon did a mock-up of the court listing to arguments then working out and writing a Supreme Court decision. I chose Hugo Black because he and William Orville Douglas' opinions on free speech are inspiring. I like allot about Hugo Black, but this one area of constitutional law he is largely the epicenter of what I believe free speech should be. Interestingly enough, he did not consider say the burning of the flag to be free speech but conduct that the several states could regulate or ban. I can see his point, but that is one area I might go even farther then Justice Black did to preserve free speech rights. Now I don't know much at all about ADL monitoring of hate speech, but they should have the right to monitor it in open meetings where it is featured, but never should have standing to want to have it banned. That would be unconstitutional, pure and simple.
That was weird. BWAHAHAHA!!! Did you know that "Corn Flake" got $#it canned from LP for threatening the posters there with the secret service goons? Tickled me "BUT GOOD" as the Toddler would say.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. So you've never said the ADL does good work, or something to that effect. Gotcha.
The standards are 270 electoral votes in a presidential election held every four years, and individuals are legally obliged the job twice for two terms if they can run the gauntlet and get elected. Now what part of the obvious do you truly not understand here?
He even supports Secret Service goons "paying visits" to folks who don't worship his hero. Or so it appears.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Show me a quote where the account 'Corn Flake Girl' stated that he was going to call the Secret Service? I bet you can't. And I know why. Nothing like that occurred. And honestly, I don't necessarily believe Murron intended to lie when she started her thread about the Secret Service, she just lacks the cognitive ability to analyze what is being said to her without short circuiting in her worst fears as she jumps to conclusions. I don't care the account was close, I am not surprised at Murron's behavior, as I've known her online since at least 2002. She actually writes better with allot less mis-spelling and syntax errors. I used to post here in Eugene with RaidedEyeBrows and she was always a source of high amusement for us. I am glad she is doing well and glad she likes posting. It would be nice to get her to admit what she already knows is true, that nobody threatened to call the Secret Service. And this is for her benefit, not mine. But don't think I am holding my breath for her to have a light bulb illuminate over hear noggin. Thanks for an amusing post by the way. ;-D
I support the Secret Service doing their job, and one mission of this job is to protect people they are assigned to protect. They are not there to deal with free speech, unless of course you were one to use free speech and personal expression as a defense in a counterfeiting situation.
Just to let you know, this is also talked about on A K A Stone's forum, Libertysflame.com. Please, by all means, read the material posted by me as CFG on LP and LF and show me where I ever remotely indicated I was going to call the SS. It never happened.
A lovely crew.....you know IATL, I'm not convinced the obamabots don't get this. I actually think they've willingly chosen to hop to the dark side. I have no respect for them.
I'm thinking someone can come up with something. We need to know what we're dealing with.
I can sorta understand young people--and when I say young I am talking about folks in the 18-22 or maybe 23 year old group--supporting Obama. It is hard to understand people who have been around for a while, if they have paid any attention at all, who say they support Obama. He is establishment whore through and through and I can't think why any sane person who has been around a while would ever vote for him. And the same goes for McCain.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Exactly. I'm talking about people w/access to the net, are capable of reading and research and have been doing what we do for a number of years. Nothing can explain their sudden bolt to the left, except for the color of the candidate. This guy is the most liberal (sorry if that term bothers people, but it still works for me) Senator in congress. Biden comes in third. Pure socialism and those who support him, enemies of freedom.
So you want to criminalize supporting presidential candidates of choice? Enemies of freedom, oh my, they must be imprisoned in right wing prison camps, perhaps even clandestine ones like they had in Argentina when the right was rampaging there. Thematically you all sound like the mainland Chinese, "liberalism is mental illness," "enemies of freedom," what next? That liberals are building a wayback time machine to go back and kill Reagan as a baby? You people are unraveling hemp rope and smoking it.
Han, that's just the shadow if your own racial bigotry scaring the common sense out of that brain housing group of yours'. People who are drowning don't care what color the person throwing a life ring on a rope to them is. Same thing with Obama, he is the best man of the two to handle the presidency and people know this. To many, the racial thing is old and doesn't play in their decision. To you definitely, but not to the vast majority of people voting Democrat this time around.
I understand that he hasn't *earned* a goddamned thing. He will likely get the nod, but he nevertheless will not have earned the position. He is the greatest political fraud catapulted to the highest position of power in my lifetime.
Barry Obama -- In your heart, you know he's wrong.
I have on very good authority that many political aspiriants use Hitlers videos to see how the master did it. Notice the "baton blow" in many speech theatrics.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" One bullet from a sole gunman.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
Comments (56 - 132) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#17. To: bluegrass (#15)
"Watch it or I'll break witty, smarmy and vicious on you."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#18. To: Ferret Mike (#16)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#19. To: Ferret Mike (#8)
"It is like a trance. So what can break a trance? The only thing that can break the trance is the light of truth."
~ Canadian Philosopher John McMurtry as he comments on the psychological warfare that has afflicted us all
#20. To: bluegrass (#14)
What has he done in the real world that makes him qualified?
#21. To: Ferret Mike (#5)
As usual, I smell
#22. To: Ferret Mike (#5)
He's convinced me to an enthusiastic degree.
#23. To: Jethro Tull (#22)
"If he weren't dark you wouldn't grovel."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#24. To: Ferret Mike (#23)
One little known aspect to this which has been under reported is the stated intent of the Obama Administration to go after Bush criminally,
#25. To: PeteCat (#0)
#26. To: christine (#24)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#27. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
I am counting on it.
#28. To: christine (#24)
at the least, i would have thought that obama's selection of biden for his VP would have made it crystal clear that his claims for change are incredible.
#29. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
I am convinced Obama will respond to an energetic campaign demanding justice. I am counting on it.
#30. To: Ferret Mike (#23)
I have looked at both candidate's health plans, and though it
still needs some work, I much prefer Obama's. I also appreciate his
willingness to prevent the reemergence of the criminal Taliban regime in
Afghanistan and to end the illegal war in Iraq started by Bush.
#31. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
#32. To: Jethro Tull (#31)
"Do you personally believe some speech raises to the level of hate speech, if yes, can it, or should it, be elevated to the level of a crime?"
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#33. To: Ferret Mike (#32)
(Edited)
Where free speech has been muzzled the muzzle needs to come off, I support the U.S. Constitution, not censorship the FCC and other agencies deal in.
#34. To: Ferret Mike (#23)
More then anything I just flat acknowledge he has earned the right to be given this job.
#35. To: All (#30)
#36. To: christine (#24)
yeah, that will happen. just like the bush admin was to go after clinton's. all will be swept under the rug. the mantra will be, as always, time to move on. they have the same masters. the democrats and the republicans are equal criminals and traitors against we the people. the plan is and always has been our enslavement for their enrichment and power. at the least, i would have thought that obama's selection of biden for his VP would have made it crystal clear that his claims for change are incredible.
Lord Acton
#37. To: Jethro Tull (#33)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#38. To: wudidiz (#7)
I was falling in love with Corn Flake Girl 'til I found out she was a dude.
Lord Acton
#39. To: Ferret Mike (#37)
#40. To: Old Fud (#34)
"More than anything he ain't earned the *right* (since when the fvck is a job a 'right'?) to "this job", or anything else."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#41. To: Jethro Tull (#33)
So then you condemn the ADL and folks who 'monitor' hate speech forums. I recall you stating some time back that the ADLs work in this area (hate speech) was noble and you supported it.
Lord Acton
#42. To: James Deffenbach (#38)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#43. To: James Deffenbach (#41)
"He even supports Secret Service goons "paying visits" to folks who don't worship his hero. Or so it appears."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#44. To: Jethro Tull (#39)
#45. To: James Deffenbach (#41)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#46. To: Ferret Mike (#39)
ping to #30 and #39
#47. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#44)
#48. To: James Deffenbach, bluegrass (#41)
#49. To: Jethro Tull (#48)
We need to know what we're dealing with.
Lord Acton
#50. To: James Deffenbach (#49)
It is hard to understand people who have been around for a while, if they have paid any attention at all, who say they support Obama
#51. To: Jethro Tull (#50)
"...those who support him, enemies of freedom."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#52. To: Jethro Tull (#50)
"Nothing can explain their sudden bolt to the left, except for the color of the candidate."
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#53. To: Ferret Mike (#40)
Now what part of the obvious do you truly not understand here?
#54. To: bluegrass (#1)
(Edited)
Every "Great Leader" uses these techniques.
#55. To: Ferret Mike (#12)
ou see, there is little reason at this point to believe he is not going to be the 44th President of the United States.
.
.
.
