See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: What Will Obama’s “International Crisis” Be?
Source:
Prison Planet
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/?p=5465
Published: Oct 22, 2008
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2008-10-22 10:56:03 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: Obama, False Terrorism, Crises
Views: 540
Comments: 18
What Will Obama’s “International Crisis” Be? Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Wednesday, October 22, 2008 Joe Biden’s “guarantee” that an “international crisis” will unfold shortly after President Obama takes office conjures up several different possibilities, but it seems the likely outcome will revolve around an announcement that Iran has developed a nuclear bomb, prompting a potential military attack. “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy,” Biden told an audience in Seattle this past weekend. “Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.” The assured tone with which Biden delivered his forecast was staggeringly convincing, and left the observer in no doubt that there will be a major world crisis shortly after Obama takes office. “Mark my words, mark my words,” Biden stressed, adding that “tough” and “unpopular” foreign policy decisions will have to be made. “I promise you it will occur,” Biden added, “As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it is going to happen.” Biden’s use of the word “generated” is even more startling. One of the dictionary definitions we find for the word “generated” is “to bring into existence; cause to be; produce,” which begs the question, will this be another staged and manufactured crisis like the 9/11 attacks, which occurred less than 8 months after Bush took office? Or will it be something even more serious, a nuclear conflagration involving Russia or Iran? John McCain raised the specter of nuclear war yesterday when he warned that the United States faces “many challenges here at home, and many enemies abroad in this dangerous world,” before mentioning the 1962 Cuban Missile crisis. Echoing Biden’s comments, McCain said the next president “won’t have time to get used to the office” and “I know how close we came to a nuclear war and I will not be a president that needs to be tested. I have been tested. Senator Obama has not.” What is the test to which McCain and Biden refer, and how can they be so sure that it will arrive shortly after Obama takes office should he win the election as expected? What was Colin Powell referring to on Meet The Press when he said, “There’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now.” The most likely scenario seems to revolve around Iran announcing, or the U.S. government claiming, that they are ready to build their first nuclear bomb. Indeed, the Mossad front news outlet Debka File reported yesterday that “Iran will be ready to build its first bomb just one month after the next US president is sworn in.” The very next sentence of the report ties this in with Biden’s promise of an international crisis immediately after Obama takes office. “DEBKAfile’s military sources cite the new US timeline: By late January, 2009, Iran will have accumulated enough low-grade enriched uranium (up to 5%) for its “break-out” to weapons grade (90%) material within a short time. For this, the Iranians have achieved the necessary technology. In February, they can move on to start building their first nuclear bomb,” according to the report. Of course, the legitimacy of these claims are likely to be completely fabricated - the official U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded in December that Iran had suspended its nuclear weapons campaign in late 2003 - but the Israelis may be laying the groundwork for a propaganda offensive similar to the “weapons of mass destruction” scam that preceded the invasion of Iraq. Will the military assault on Iran occur not under the highly unpopular Bush administration, as many had predicted, but under an Obama presidency? Riding into office on a wave of popular approval and support, Obama will have the political capital to get the country behind the attack if the threat of imminent danger is cited - or at least stand by and allow Israel to do the dirty work. Will a nuclear flash point on the scale of the Cuban Missile Crisis turn out to be the “international crisis” that Biden so vehemently promised? Or will the event take on a different characteristic. Bush exploited 9/11 to realize the pre-set agenda of his Neo-Con masters months after he was inaugurated and Bill Clinton seized upon the Oklahoma City Bombing shortly into his second term to expand federal power. What will Obama’s crisis be that enables him to offer his contribution to building the American police state? - A terror attack, or a series of attacks, on major American cities, possibly involving crudely designed nuclear bombs or dirty bombs? - A complete economic collapse and a new great depression leading to food riots and the imposition of martial law? - A military showdown with Russia should Russia attempt to invade Georgia or another pro-U.S. Russian satellite country? - A nuclear showdown with Russia should Russia start a nuclear war with Ukraine, as has been threatened? - The necessity for another military attack on Afghanistan should the Taliban continue to regain control of the country? - A confrontation with Venezuela should it be revealed that Hugo Chavez is receiving nuclear bomb technology from Russia or Iran? - A new escalation in the Middle East should Israel deploy its nuclear arsenal to attack Iran, Syria Lebanon, or even Egypt? Whatever the new “international crisis” that we have been guaranteed turns out to be, you can bet your bottom dollar that the response to it will ultimately lead to more carnage and a further assault on the fast-disappearing freedoms that we still enjoy - and in that sense under an Obama presidency, the more things “change,” the more they will stay the same.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
Ahh what's the big deal? it's not like we use them or anything. Kind of like the Constitution.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
I guess the Bush administration doesn't really care if McCain or Obama wins. If they did, they'd facilitate another terrorist attack to get the "Security Moms" shaking in their boots and questioning the readiness of BHO to "protect" them.
Mandela dies.
He pecks a few holes in a tree to see ElBaradei: Iran incapable of developing bomb now "earth to elbaradei... earth to elbaradei... you're about to be blixed."
Claim: Iran will be able to build first nuclear bomb by February Debka File Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Comment: As many observers have pointed out, the accuracy of Debka File’s reports on Iran is questionable because they are little more than a Mossad front, but we reprint part of the article for the sake of debate. It is worth noting that the official U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iran suspended its nuclear weapons campaign in late 2003.
it's worth noting, also, that nobody's got any proof that iran ever had a nuclear weapons program to suspend in the first place.
-- Benjamin Franklin I was being sarcastic. I guess I should have put a /sarcasm designation at the end of my sentence. I thought I'd been around long enough that everyone knew my stance on this issue. I guess not.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
2012 knows you. that quote wasn't for you specifically. it's a generic like his gifs. ;)
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
Obama may be a Marxist, but he ain't stupid. He saw the advantages of dictatorial rule enjoyed by the fuhrer Bush and apparently has plans of his own along the same line.
There is no honor in bending one's knee to the banking elites that are robbing the children you claim to love of their future. Soon they'll convince those very same children that you deserve to be eliminated ... and they may be right. Doug Scheidt 10-21-08
Even if they do, no one has convinced me as to what gives the United States the right or moral authority to tell other countries what 60+ year old technology they can and cannot have.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
Oh.....Ahhhh.....nevermind then. LOL!
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
ever since vietnam, i've been thinking america is too sick to survive. i guess there's just a horrific amount of momentum saved up in the system.
I'm betting on a Spanish flu epidemic. Our wonderful JIZ government spent millions of dollars several years ago digging up frozen, diseased corpses on the remote Svalbard Islands that died of the flu. They should have had time to reconstitute and weaponize it by now. Just mix in one vial of live bugs with every batch of useless flu vaccines, and VOILA! Epidemic. Don't forget to get your flu shots this year, you useless eaters, you.
Obama's just hoping that a disaster (or a phony excuse for one) happens on his watch and not before Nov. 4th. Otherwise Pepsi (R) gets elected instead of Coke (D).
and I had been hopin for a Dr. Pepper (Paul).
There is no honor in bending one's knee to the banking elites that are robbing the children you claim to love of their future. Soon they'll convince those very same children that you deserve to be eliminated ... and they may be right. Doug Scheidt 10-21-08
No flu shot for me.
I'd say these people know too much. They should be arrested imemdiately by the FBI, questioned and held until they say what they know and how they came to know it.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition "Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx a further assault on the fast-disappearing freedoms that we still enjoy
#2. To: Hayek Fan (#1)
a further assault on the fast-disappearing freedoms that we still enjoy
#3. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
(Edited)
- A terror attack, or a series of attacks, on major American cities, possibly involving crudely designed nuclear bombs or dirty bombs?
#4. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
If a redwood's really red
#5. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
“DEBKAfile’s military sources cite the new US timeline: By late January, 2009, Iran will have accumulated enough low-grade enriched uranium (up to 5%) for its “break-out” to weapons grade (90%) material within a short time. For this, the Iranians have achieved the necessary technology. In February, they can move on to start building their first nuclear bomb,” according to the report.
#6. To: wadosy (#5)
“DEBKAfile’s military sources cite the new US timeline: By late January, 2009, Iran will have accumulated enough low-grade enriched uranium (up to 5%) for its “break-out” to weapons grade (90%) material within a short time. For this, the Iranians have achieved the necessary technology. In February, they can move on to start building their first nuclear bomb,” according to the report
#7. To: TwentyTwelve (#6)
It is worth noting that the official U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iran suspended its nuclear weapons campaign in late 2003.
#8. To: TwentyTwelve (#2)
a further assault on the fast-disappearing freedoms that we still enjoy They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
#9. To: Hayek Fan (#8)
#10. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
#11. To: wadosy (#7)
it's worth noting, also, that nobody's got any proof that iran ever had a nuclear weapons program to suspend in the first place.
#12. To: christine (#9)
2012 knows you. that quote wasn't for you specifically. it's a generic like his gifs. ;)
#13. To: Hayek Fan (#11)
Even if they do, no one has convinced me as to what gives the United States the right or moral authority to tell other countries what 60+ year old technology they can and cannot have.
#14. To: TwentyTwelve, christine (#0)
What Will Obama’s “International Crisis” Be?
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#15. To: noone222 (#10)
Obama may be a Marxist, but he ain't stupid. He saw the advantages of dictatorial rule enjoyed by the fuhrer Bush and apparently has plans of his own along the same line.
#16. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#15)
Otherwise Pepsi (R) gets elected instead of Coke (D).
#17. To: Esso (#14)
Don't forget to get your flu shots this year, you useless eaters, you.
#18. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of its very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest