[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Vote Chuck Baldwin John McCain Is a Liberal Gun Grabber By Chuck Baldwin The last thing we need is another liberal neocon in the White House. If the presidency of George W. Bush proved anything, it proved the hazard of electing phony Republican conservatives. At least one is able to clearly see a liberal for what he or she is when they have a "D" behind their name. But put an "R" behind the name and suddenly their liberal, Big-Government, anti-freedom agenda is barely recognized, which makes a liberal Republican much more dangerous than a liberal Democrat. Let me say it straight out: a John McCain presidency would be far worse than a Barack Obama presidency. With a Democrat in the White House, conservatives and Christians suddenly find their principles and are able to offer resistance. Put a Republican in the Oval Office, however, and those same people become blind, deaf, and dumb to most any principle they profess. Nowhere is McCain's chicanery and duplicity more jeopardous than in the area of the right to keep and bear arms. On issues relating to the Second Amendment, John McCain is a disaster! For example, the highly respected Gun Owners of America (GOA) rates McCain with a grade of F-. McCain's failing grade is well deserved. John McCain sponsored an amendment to S. 1805 on March 2, 2004 that would outlaw the private sale of firearms at gun shows. According to GOA, the provision would effectively eliminate gun shows, because every member of an organization sponsoring a gun show could be imprisoned if the organization fails to notify each and every "person who attends the special firearms event of the requirements [under the Brady Law]." John McCain also sponsored an Incumbent Protection provision to the so-called "Campaign Finance Reform" bill, which severely curtails the ability of outside groups (such as GOA) to communicate the actions of incumbent politicians to members and supporters prior to an election. The GOA report of the 106th Congress reveals that out of 15 votes relating to the right to keep and bear arms, Senator John McCain voted favorably only 4 times. Put that into a percentage and McCain's pro-Second Amendment voting record is a pathetic 27%. In addition, GOA warns that John McCain supported legislation that would force federal agents to increase efforts in arresting and convicting honest gun owners who may inadvertently violate one of the many federal anti-gun laws, which punish mere technicalities, such as gun possession. For example, if John McCain's proposed legislation were to become law, a gun owner who travels with a gun through a school zone or who uses one of the family handguns to go target shooting with a 15-year old could be sent to prison. And a person who uses a gun for self-defense could be sent to prison for a mandatory minimum of five years. But there is so much more to the McCain madness. Former California State Senator H.L. "Bill" Richardson wrote this about John McCain, "He's [McCain's] proven his dislike for conservatives and would gut us at every opportunity. "Why do I say that? Because of three decades of experience as a Republican California Senator and a fifty year activist in the conservative movement. I have first hand, in-their-face experience with elitist RINO's (Republican in Name Only) office holders. They are biblically ignorant, power hungry, status seeking egotists who have no difficulty aiding their liberal Democrat colleagues whenever their arms are politely twisted. The one thing they have in common with liberal Democrats is their dislike for all conservatives, especially those who are Bible-believing. McCain, as president, would stifle the voices of elected Republican leaders and try to legislate the conservative movement out of existence." Senator Richardson went on to say that he would in no way vote for John McCain, if indeed McCain is the Republican nominee (which he obviously will be). I wonder how many gun owners and other professing pro-freedom Americans have already fallen victim to McCain's phony conservative campaign? Do they not realize that they are giving a rope to the hangman? And that they--conservatives and gun owners--are the ones who McCain will send to the gallows? What is wrong with the American people these days? Have they not been betrayed enough by these phony conservative Republicans? For example, President George W. Bush nominated Michael Sullivan to be Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Sullivan is one of the nation's most rabid anti-gunners. GOA's Larry Pratt describes Sullivan as being "as anti-gun as Ted Kennedy." Honest gun owners, lawful firearms dealers, and law-abiding gun show operators could have no worse enemy within the federal government than Michael Sullivan. We could expect no worse from Hillary Clinton. And a John McCain Presidency would doubtless give us more of the same. Gun owners (along with conservatives and Christians of all sorts) should be ashamed of themselves for allowing an angry, gun-grabbing liberal such as John McCain to become the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee, while rejecting the candidacy of one of America's most principled pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, pro-Constitution, and pro-freedom legislators of this generation: Congressman Ron Paul. I say again, the last thing we need is another liberal neocon in the White House. John McCain may have an "R" behind his name, but he is just another establishment liberal: one America cannot afford. Chuck Baldwin is a candidate for president of the United States on the Constitution Party ticket. Click here for his official campaign web site. AFP (Issue # 41, October 13, 2008) http://www.americanfreepress.net/htm...er_101308.html J">Click for Full Text! http://www.americanfreepress.net/htm...er_101308.html J">Click for Full Text! www.americanfreepress.net/htm...er_101308.html J">Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment: I vote in Tennessee, a state that will go for McCain in the upcoming quadrennial ruse called the presidential election. Therefore, when I voted early this week I felt no pang to vote for the less evil of two Shabbos goyim, each of whom would heap further disaster on my race and nation. Ron Paul endorsed Chuck Baldwin and, for what it's worth, that's good enough for me. I put aside things like Pastor Baldwin's completely gratuitous remark (to his flock of supportive christlings) about the "Biblically Ignorant," skipped over Obama's and McCain's name to cast my vote for Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party. I didn't even have to hold my nose. Baldwin's writings have never offended me. I hope others on this discussion board will also vote for Baldwin and get others you network with to follow suit. Spread the word. Maybe 'boobus americanus' will see this time around that he still has an alternative to evil Shabbos goy collaborators that are served up as two best candidates to lead the nation. Ron Paul woke up a lot of folks this election cycle. I never thought I'd see a serious presidential candidate advocate doing away with the Jew's central bank, the so-called Federal Reserve Bank (which is neither federal nor a bank). The Fed is a branch of the financial arm of the powerful International Jewish crime syndicate -- with nothing in "reserve," either, except the unconstitutional capacity to print boundless numbers of fiat notes, or shrinking U.S. dollars. Ron Paul always rightly put deficit spending and the resulting shaky economy as the most important national issue, ahead of illegal immigration or abortion or the Iraqi invasion/occupation, as every presidential rival was campaigning either for or against. Dr. Paul accurately predicted the current depressive economic downturn, in spades, always the sober adult in a field of ignorant, highly suggestible children. It's not over 'til it's over. If you vote, consider voting for Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Hypocrisy Cop (#0)
He's not on the ballot in Texas. I'm not voting anyhow for ANYONE. I've finally added "voting" to the list of bad habits I've kicked, along with alcohol and smokeless tobacco. The fact he is a Baptist pastor ipso facto should disqualify him. I've seen enough Baptist pastor charlatans (even if he isn't one of them) to steer clear of them. I would not even want one on the city council.
#2. To: Sam Houston (#1)
The fact he is a Baptist pastor ipso facto should disqualify him. I've seen enough Baptist pastor charlatans (even if he isn't one of them) to steer clear of them. Baldwin is also a supporter of the War on Drugs, which I believe to be incompatible with small government and the federal government as envisioned by the founding fathers. So, for a long time I felt the same way as you. I believe I even had arguments with people over it on F4um. However, Dr. Paul now supports him, and that's good enough for me. I am hoping that he knows something about him that I do not. Besides that, I am convinced that Bob Barr is a Republican plant meant to split-up the Paul vote in order to keep our voices from being heard. I'll never be convinced that a lifelong conservative authoritarian like Bob Barr all of a sudden woke up one day and decided to change his government supremist beliefs and become an advocate for individual liberty. So for all the good it will do me, I'll now cast a vote for Baldwin.
I didn't know that Baldwin was not an option for we Texans...even though she's 'not right' on the 2A, McKinney will get my vote. Side note: the nearest early voting both to me is the Masonic Lodge...
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||