See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Federal judge slaps voters in face, energizes patriots
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd407.htm
Published: Oct 27, 2008
Author: Devvy Kidd
Post Date: 2008-10-27 19:52:17 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 349
Comments: 21
Excerpt: Phil Berg's lawsuit to force production of Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate is not a political game, it's a constitutional issue. The most cogent narrative, including excerpts from Judge Surrick's decision is found here. To say millions of us are outraged is putting it mildly. Enraged is more appropriate. If one reads the dishonorable Surrick's words, it becomes apparent this judge, if he is the one who actually wrote the decision, thinks we the people are too stupid to understand his outrageous remarks: "…regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate's ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election." According to this bench warmer, a candidates INELIGIBILITY to run for office doesn't present an injury to voters! We just accept fraud as eligibility! "Theoretical constitutional harm" experienced by we the people doesn't change as the fraud passes from one phase of the election cycle to another! Surrick is lost in purple haze. Typical of these weenie federal judges, when they can't find the guts to do the right thing, they take the cheap way out and try to pass the buck to the other incompetents, Congress: "So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that's completely up to Congress to decide. "If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution's eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint." In other words, we the people are supposed to sit back and allow a candidate who doesn't meet constitutional requirements for eligibility go ahead, run, get elected via massive vote fraud and hope that down the line Congress might decide to pass some law giving we the people some say in OUR government and election process? Surrick's words must have given Arnold Schwarzenegger a nocturnal emission.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
#1. To: All (#0)
(Edited)
Devvy, baby, our Constitution hasn't meant squat for more that a hundred years. It's time to think of some new tactics.
A truly wonderful movie.
Very inspiring. I'm surprised they allowed it to see the light of day. The Liberty Dollars didn't fare so well. BTW, nice road win on your way to the BCS. Funny watching the starting QB on the sideline during the final drive or two. ;-)
Clark had a mild concussion, but the kid Devlin looked real poised when he came in. I was concerned Joe would roll up the O and play Big 10 football, and that's just what he did. Thank goodness it worked. Three more Ws and we're in Miami on 1/8/09 against TX (I assume). Getting the sunscreen ready :P
I doubt Texass gets through the B12+CG without losing. I do believe the B12 is the strongest/deepest conference in CFB this year, but will hose themselves / get hosed by the Coastal media. IMO, the Pac-10 and B10+1 should be ineligible for the BCS title game until they man up and play a Conference CG. Or else every other Major Conference needs to reformat to reclaim what's lost in the CG concept.
I'm with you on the conference title game issue. In fact I think it kills the B- 11. Our last game is 11/22 so we won't play again until, the 8th, assuming all goes well. The long layoff is a killer, and partially explains why tOSU has laid eggs the past few years (altho we have won our last 3). How is Nebraska doing?
#14. To: Jethro Tull (#13)
They're rebuilding. They had TTech beat in Lubbock 3 games ago and choked in OT. New QB next year, too. Either Frosh or RSFrosh will likely be the starter. 1 more year and the Corn should be challenging for the Division and maybe the Championship the way I see it. I wonder if there will even be CFB in 2 years. Next up a trip to Norman Saturday. Should be fun.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: Jethro Tull, noone222, Christine, TwentyTwelve (#1)
#9. To: Rotara (#8)
#10. To: Jethro Tull (#9)
#11. To: Rotara (#10)
#12. To: Jethro Tull (#11)
#13. To: Rotara (#12)
Replies to Comment # 13. How is Nebraska doing?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.