© 2008 - Alan Stang - All Rights Reserved
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: YOUR NEW PRESIDENT, ZBIG BROTHER (Marxist Alert)
Source:
News With Views
URL Source: http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan170.htm
Published: Oct 29, 2008
Author: Alan Stang
Post Date: 2008-10-30 02:50:18 by Rotara
Keywords: None
Views: 1036
Comments: 54
by Alan Stang [Announcement: Did you know Alan Stang has a new radio show? Click here for details.] As I write, little more than a week remains before E-Day, on which most Americans will vote. Nerves are being fearfully wracked. Even people who are usually somnolent say they can’t take the stress. There is a real danger that, unaddressed, the frustration of choosing between a Communist illegal alien raised by a Communist sex pervert and a POW traitor who is a Soviet front man could lead to an epidemic of Acid Reflux Disease or even an outbreak of Restless Leg Syndrome. The purpose of this modest piece is to reassure you. Stop tormenting yourself. Further self-flagellation is pointless. Your next President has already been selected. Didn’t you know? Sure, go ahead and vote if you like, if you have nothing else to do, if you don’t mind standing in long lines between Obamatron morons and McCrud zombies, but enjoy the reassurance of knowing that the powers above Ponzi Paulson and Helicopter Ben Bernanke and Co. have already made their choice. He is Zbigniew Brzezinski. What? Who? Is this some kind of Polish joke? Sadly, it is not. The lustiest enjoyer of Polish jokes in my experience was a remarkably gorgeous Polish lady I knew many years ago in the Bay Area. Every couple of years, I would come through on a speaking tour and she would press me for the latest Polish jokes I had heard. Again Zbigniew Brzezinski is not one of them. He is not just a victim of partial vowel deprivation. In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote a book entitled Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (New York, Viking Press). Let’s browse through it to find out what Zbigniew is. Zbig dedicates the book to Ian, Mark and Mika, his kids. A nice touch, don’t you think? He’s a family man. Starting on page 72 of my Penguin edition, he explains “why Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision.” Marxism is “a victory of reason over belief. . . . To a greater extent than any previous mode of political thinking, Marxism puts a premium on the systematic and rigorous examination of material reality and on guides to action derived from that examination.” In other words, Marxism is a better system than our own. Marxism examines material reality and recommends action better than does the U.S. Constitution. Page 83: Marxism “represented a major advance in man’s ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world.” It carried “an essentially ethical message.” It “was derived from a totally rational method of inquiry.” P. 123: Marxism “provided a unique intellectual tool for understanding and harnessing the fundamental forces of our time. . . . [I]t supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality; it infused political action with strong ethical elements . . . .” By the way, as you see, I am making it easy for you. I am digging out the juicy nuggets. They are embedded in a prose the pompous turgidity of which recalls Isabel Paterson’s comment that the writing of John Foster Dulles compels the eyeball to rebound from the page. Subjecting the normal mind to such an aberration should be punished as a war crime or at least a species of torture. I honestly believe that were we to strap your eyeballs to Zbigniew’s prose, you would run screaming from the premises, unless we had prudently tied you to a chair. The next time you feel like complaining about something you see in my columns, about my language or some joke, please remember that I am providing this onerous service at no extra charge. Zbig Brother even excuses Stalin’s purges and mass murders. Page 134ff: “Yet though Stalinism may have been a needless tragedy for both the Russian people and communism as an ideal, there is the intellectually tantalizing possibility that for the world at large it was, as we shall see, a blessing in disguise. . . .” What? Yes. You see, “the internal violence employed by Stalin . . . had a restraining effect on unbridled nationalism.” But isn’t Zbig today fanatically opposed to the continuing Soviet Union? Yes, he is, but not because he opposes Marxism. As we have seen, he is a lifelong Marxist. He opposes the Soviets precisely because he loves Marxism so much. He believes the Communists have misused it. He believes that he, Zbigniew Brzezinski, could impose it correctly, the way old Karl himself would have done it. Enter David Rockefeller. David is a confessed traitor, a conspirator who is working in a secret cabal to destroy the United States. What? David Rockefeller? How do we know that? In 2002, Random House, in New York, published his Memoirs. Remember, this is not someone accusing him of something. This is David Rockefeller himself talking on page 405: For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. Because this sleazy extrusion of an unmarried female canine is a traitor – because he loves totalitarianism – he was naturally attracted to lifelong Marxist Zbigniew Brzezinski. Zbig became David’s prime minister. In 1973, under David’s direction, Zbig formed the Trilateral Commission, which is the foreign ministry of the Council on Foreign Relations, a preeminent founder of which was Marxist Edward M. House. Both these groups work tirelessly to promote world government, which would mean the abolition of our own. Remember, the United States government and world government are mutually exclusive. You can’t have them both at the same time. If you are working for the latter, you are trying to destroy the former. In 1976, Zbig and David literally interviewed dour peanut farmer Jimmy Carter at David’s Tarrytown estate. They liked what they heard and installed Democrat Jimmy as President of the United States. From the beginning, Jimmy was a Rockefeller factotum. Zbig Brother was his National Security Adviser. Jimmy came close to wrecking our economy. Okay, but what does all this have to do with the 2008 campaign? In the 2000 campaign, Zbigniew Brzezinski, lifelong Marxist, was foreign policy adviser to Senator John McCain, who said this: “I am honored that Zbigniew Brzezinski will join my foreign policy team. As a former national security adviser and a highly respected foreign policy expert, his broad experience makes him an invaluable asset to my team.” So Zbig went from Democrat Jimmy to Republican John. Remember that at the top – above the candidates – you have one party with two branches. What about this year? This year, Zbig is back, running foreign policy for Hussein. Indeed, remember Mark, son of Zbig? Mark was one of the sons to whom Zbig dedicated Between Two Ages in 1970. Mark is all grown up now and shaving. Can you imagine? Mark is foreign policy adviser to Senator Hussein. So who is foreign policy adviser to Senator McCain this year? The envelope please! El Senador Juan McCain’s foreign policy adviser this year is Ian Brzezinski, the other Zbigniew son. That is correct. Lifelong Marxist Zbigniew Brzezinski – David Rockefeller’s Prime Minister - controls both sides of the forthcoming charade through his sons. Again, you can relax. It really makes no difference who wins. The only difference will be a difference in style, a difference in personality, natural differences peculiar to us all. Remember, David Rockefeller admits, boasts, that he and his family exercise inordinate influence over the United States. This is how he does it. Do you need to know anything more to understand that a literal conspiracy controls both main political parties, and that at the top – above the candidates – both parties are the same? What was that you said about “change?” Remember, Zbig ran foreign policy for McCain in the 2000 campaign. This year, Hussein is just as much a factotum of Goldman Sachs and other instrumentalities of world government as McCain. Notice that our Communist media say nothing about this. They understand perfectly well that if they sass David Rockefeller they could lose their jobs. So they specialize in arguing about lesser fry. So, sure, vote next week, but do so with the assurance that it makes no difference; that the conspiracy for world government has already chosen our next President. He is Rockefeller prime minister and Marxist Zbigniew Brzezinski. Long live Zbig Brother! [Announcement: Alan Stang's new radio show, The Sting of Stang, will debut on Monday, July 14th, 7 to 8 a.m., Central, M-F, via Republic Broadcasting Network. To listen, go to republicbroadcasting.org and click on Listen Live. Call in is 800 313-9443. If you can't listen at that time, do so via the archives, which are free. I'll be talking about the various manifestations of the conspiracy for world government, its tactics, such as the illegal alien invasion, its purposes and its players, from Jorge W. Boosh on down.] Alan Stang was one of Mike Wallace’s original writers at Channel 13 in New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books, for which he has won many awards, including a citation from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives for journalistic excellence. One of Stang’s exposés stopped a criminal attempt to seize control of New Mexico, where a gang seized a court house, held a judge hostage and killed a deputy. The scheme was close to success before Stang intervened. Another Stang exposé inspired major reforms in federal labor legislation. His first book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights, was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest Virtue, set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars, top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books, which gave five stars in only one per cent of its reviews. Stang has lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many top shows, including CNN’s Cross Fire. Because he and his wife had the most kids in Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, where they lived at the time, the entire family was chosen to be actors in “Havana,” directed by Sydney Pollack and starring Robert Redford, the most expensive movie ever made (at the time). Alan Stang is the man in the ridiculous Harry Truman shirt with the pasted-down hair. He says they made him do it. Website: AlanStang.com E-Mail: stangfeedback@gmail.com Poster Comment: Those that claimed to support Ron Paul and now support Che o'bama el Diablo never supported Ron Paul to begin with. Effing Traitors.
October 29, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-13) not displayed.
.
.
.
#14. To: OliviaFNewton (#12)
No joke. "If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
What does the original text say? Have you used a concordance with which to study the original text?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
It's the Hebrew verse also: "For the LORD thy God will bless thee, as He promised thee; and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt rule over many nations, but they shall not rule over thee." www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0515.htm
Ahmadinejad in 2008! It's also Deut 28:12-13: "12 The LORD shall open unto thee his good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in his season, and to bless all the work of thine hand: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow. And the LORD shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of the LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do them: 14 And thou shalt not go aside from any of the words which I command thee this day, to the right hand, or to the left, to go after other gods to serve them."
Ahmadinejad in 2008! Did he reply to your email?
So that answers it??
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
There it is right there! God said he would do all those things, IF they follow his word, and hearken to his commandments. Deuteronomy is stuffed with these if=then statements by God. I think we can safely assume that the Israelites did not hearken to the word of God, therefore they don't receive the promises God laid out to them in those verses.
Yes.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! It's in Deuteronomy, the source of the Shema. If the conversation is about the source of the concept of ruling by One World Govt., that about answers it, imo. But I'm always open to reason.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! Interesting
It takes great faith imo.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
God is the Greatest Coder. ; ) I think we can safely assume that the Israelites did not hearken to the word of God, therefore they don't receive the promises God laid out to them in those verses. That's beside the point. The issue was what is the source of the concept of the NWO/OWG.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! You lost me. Not hard to do. Clarify, please?
Ahmadinejad in 2008! Interesting The moment I completely cut the tether I'm going into some heavy duty bible study with a solid old Armstrong's Concordance.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Doesn't Revelation clearly show there will be one?
You lost me. Not hard to do. Clarify, please? It takes great faith to understand Jews and love them in a world of deceit that they love so seemingly much. ;-)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Doesn't Revelation clearly show there will be one? I always viewed that as the revived Roman Empire, i.e. the EU and / or Vatican.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
When I was in my early twenties/late teens I had a client who saved a bunch of religious books, many translations of the Bible and a Strong's Exhaustive concordance. She was going to spend her retirement years in study. She went blind before she got there. Don't wait.
I think it is open to interpretation. I've seen many different views on Revelation including one that suggested he was talking about contemporary current events.
Strong's, that's it. ;-) Good advice, thank you and God bless you and yours.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Likewise.
I think I got you. The Zionists used that as their source material, thinking that God has ordained their supremacy?
The program got perverted but God is sovereign and made a dozen roses out of a booger or what ??
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Ask yourself something: Who wrote the Old and New Testaments?
Ahmadinejad in 2008! Doesn't matter. I'm only concerned with the truth contained there in. I value the spirit of discernment.
Are you all familiar with Acts 7:42-43 and Amos 5:26?
Ahmadinejad in 2008! I've had aholes in my family, and have probably been one, but we all come back around. You are a very wise soul, btw. ; )
Ahmadinejad in 2008! I wasn't but having now read them I think they do apply.
And the Masons, any number of European royal cliquelines, the Nazis that copied Biblical race law, Christians of many flavors, Muslims... I think everyone's taken a piece of the stone-age "we rule!" doctrine. I'm attempting to establish the source. In our culture, it's this collection of writings that is the source. I have a link re: this topic that'll I'll find. I'll ping you.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! The six-pointed star is Moloch/Saturn/Chronos/Chiun. In my mind, it's literally an old-school gang sign.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! Star of David ?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Yes. The hexagram. Whatever one wishes to call it.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! You're very kind. ~
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Predates David's reign ?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
It's a very old symbol, like the fylfot/swastika. One of my interpretations of the 20th century is that it was a battle between those two old symbolic forces and all of the twisting of meaning that went with them. The hexagram landed on the American dollar (above the eagle on the back of the bill, the thirteen stars make the hex) in about 1935 or so. Here's a Coke sign from 1916: Click on it for the larger image.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! Here's a cover of the Tibetan Book of the Dead. These two symbols were combined in Asia but became separated as they went west. Ahmadinejad in 2008! yes.
Excellent documentation.
Thank you. I try.
Ahmadinejad in 2008! I was in Thailand a couple years ago, near Pattaya Beach. We went to a Buddhist history/art exhibit. I noticed that all the Buddhas dedicated to science/life had the swastika on their chests. It use to be a symbol for life.
It's my theory that because of the universal presence of the swastika/fylfot (and its meaning), it HAD to be given an evil connotation to destroy the commonality of the symbol. It was known from Asia to Europe to North and South America and crossed all racial and cultural divides. The financiers and industrialists that backed Hitler knew very well what they were doing in getting that symbol in front of a narcissistic little popinjay like Uncle Adolph. Those fckers are always looking for any method to destroy any tie that binds us. Ahmadinejad in 2008!Utopia, world socialist style, globally with no opt out, is on the way !!!
#15. To: bluegrass (#13)
"For the LORD thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee." -Deuteronomy 15:6
#16. To: Rotara (#15)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#17. To: Rotara (#15)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#18. To: bluegrass (#13)
#19. To: bluegrass (#17)
#20. To: bluegrass (#17)
#21. To: echo5sierra (#18)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#22. To: Rotara (#19)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#23. To: bluegrass, Rotara (#17)
and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#24. To: bluegrass (#22)
#25. To: echo5sierra (#20)
Deuteronomy is stuffed with these if=then statements by God.
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#26. To: Rotara (#24)
It takes great faith imo.
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#27. To: farmfriend (#23)
and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow.
#28. To: bluegrass (#25)
That's beside the point. The issue was what is the source of the concept of the NWO/OWG.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#29. To: bluegrass (#26)
It takes great faith imo.
#30. To: farmfriend (#28)
That's beside the point. The issue was what is the source of the concept of the NWO/OWG.
#31. To: Rotara (#27)
The moment I completely cut the tether I'm going into some heavy duty bible study with a solid old Armstrong's Concordance.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#32. To: Rotara (#30)
I always viewed that as the revived Roman Empire, i.e. the EU and / or Vatican.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#33. To: farmfriend (#31)
#34. To: Rotara (#33)
God bless you and yours.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#35. To: bluegrass (#25)
#36. To: echo5sierra, bluegrass (#35)
The Zionists used that as their source material, thinking that God has ordained their supremacy?
#37. To: farmfriend (#28)
Doesn't Revelation clearly show there will be one?
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#38. To: bluegrass (#37)
Who wrote the Old and New Testaments?
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#39. To: farmfriend, Rotara, echo5sierra (#23)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#40. To: Rotara (#29)
It takes great faith to understand Jews and love them in a world of deceit that they love so seemingly much. ;-)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#41. To: bluegrass (#39)
Are you all familiar with Acts 7:42-43 and Amos 5:26?
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#42. To: echo5sierra (#35)
The Zionists used that as their source material, thinking that God has ordained their supremacy?
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#43. To: farmfriend (#41)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#44. To: bluegrass (#43)
The six-pointed star is Moloch/Saturn/Chronos/Chiun. In my mind, it's literally an old-school gang sign.
#45. To: Rotara (#44)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#46. To: bluegrass (#40)
You are a very wise soul, btw. ; )
#47. To: bluegrass (#45)
Yes. The hexagram. Whatever one wishes to call it.
#48. To: Rotara (#47)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#49. To: Rotara, farmfriend, echo5sierra (#47)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#50. To: Rotara (#47)
Predates David's reign ?
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#51. To: bluegrass (#49)
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. —Thomas Jefferson, 1802
#52. To: farmfriend (#51)
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
#53. To: bluegrass (#49)
#54. To: echo5sierra (#53)
I noticed that all the Buddhas dedicated to science/life had the swastika on their chests.
Everyone agrees that unanimity is hard to find.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest