[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Los Angeles Braces For Another Day Of Chaos As Newsom Pits Marxist Color Revolution Against Trump Admin Methylene Blue Benefits Another Mossad War Crime 80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks Digital Prison in the Making? In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA 6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike I heard libs might block some streets. 🤣 Jimmy Dore: What’s Being Said On Israeli TV Will BLOW YOUR MIND! Tucker Carlson: Douglas Macgregor- Elites will be overthrown 🎵Breakin' rocks in the hot sun!🎵

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Why Dogs Are Better Than People
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 1, 2008
Author: Turtle
Post Date: 2008-11-01 18:28:57 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 600
Comments: 22

You cannot make a dog hate you, only fear you. You can make a dog love you, to the extent dogs can love, merely by being nice to them, petting them, playing with them, and feeding them.

You can easily make a human hate you forever, but you cannot make a human love you, no matter what you do. Not that people ever stop trying.

So...dogs are better than people.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#1. To: Turtle (#0)

Best test I know of... leave your wife and the dog in car for hour then watch who is more happy to see you on your return

robnoel  posted on  2008-11-01   18:37:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Interesting. I never figured out how to keep the woman in the car that long if she was of mind to exit the vehicle. Women do have opposing digits on their mitts, unlike dogs.

So, what do you do, bribe them, or handcuff them to the steering wheel to keep them there?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-11-01   18:48:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Having been raised in the bush I can tell you animals are more predictable than humans....sad but true I prefer the company of things with four legs than two...and if you have not noticed in previous posts I have a "women" problem so I can't answer your question

robnoel  posted on  2008-11-01   19:01:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I have a "women" problem

Oh oh. One woman is enough to handle for any one man, but women as in plural can present a very great challenge, indeed, and often a very costly one too.

scrapper2  posted on  2008-11-01   19:06:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I have lived a some what stress free life for the past few decades by learning to limit my exposure to women on a daily bases this will not win me any new friends here but what the heck same thing happens when I call for a repeal of the 19th amendment

robnoel  posted on  2008-11-01   19:14:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

when I call for a repeal of the 19th amendment

you should be ashamed, rob. fyi, there is not one woman on 4um who is voting for either/or of the establishment bastards. all of the partisans here are men. you should wish that we were your representatives.

christine  posted on  2008-11-01   23:12:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Nothing personal :-)

Is There Really a Bias Against Women in Politics? History Suggests Otherwise

By John R. Lott, Jr.

Academics have for some time pondered why the government started growing precisely when it did. The federal government, aside from periods of wartime, consumed about 2 to 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) up until World War I. That was the first war in which government spending didn’t go all the way back down to its pre-war levels. Then in the 1920s, non-military federal spending began steadily climbing.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal - often viewed as the genesis of big government - really just continued an earlier trend. What changed before Roosevelt came to power that explains the growth of government? The answer is women’s suffrage.

For decades, polls have shown that women as a group vote differently than men. Without the women’s vote, Republicans would have swept every presidential race but one between 1968 and 2004.

The gender gap exists on various issues. The major one is the issue of smaller government and lower taxes, which is a much higher priority for men than for women. This is seen in divergent attitudes held by men and women on many separate issues.

Women were much more opposed to the 1996 federal welfare reforms, which mandated time limits for receiving welfare and imposed some work requirements on welfare recipients. Women are also more supportive of Medicare, Social Security and educational expenditures.

Studies show that women are generally more risk-averse than men. This could be why they are more supportive of government programs to ensure against certain risks in life.

johnrlott.tripod.com/op-e...NewsBiasAgWPol052608.html

robnoel  posted on  2008-11-02   5:40:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 20.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]