[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

New CLARITY Act Draft Could Shield Crypto Developers From Past Liability

Chicago Builds a Wall To Protect Illegal ALiens From Ice

Sens. Scott, Johnson Launch Investigation into Palisades Fire; Demand Newsom's Cooperation

"Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

Cash Jordan: Looters EMPTY Chicago Mall... as Mayor's 'No Arrests' Policy BACKFIRES

Caitlin Johnstone: They Just Bombed Greta Thunberg's Boat

Democrats MELTDOWN Over RFK Jr.

Bill Gates, Truth About Vaccines, & Big Pharma’s Plot to Destroy Doctors Who Question ”The Science”

Supreme Court upholds 'roving patrols' for immigration stops in Los Angeles

MN Gunman’s Pot Use Is Further Evidence Against Rescheduling Marijuana

Intense Exercise is Best

New Cars Are George Orwell 1984 Compliant

PEGASUS EVENT 201

Over Half Of Berlin's New Police Recruits Can't Speak Basic German, Officials Admit

Thomas Massie NAMES Epstein as a CIA and Israeli Asset

How Chickens See the World (Its CRAZIER Than You Think)

You remember TommyTheMadArtist?

Joe Rogan on the Belgian Malinois

Democrat New Mexico Governor Admits National Guard Making Progress In High-Crime Albuquerque

Florida banning vaccine mandates

To Prevent Strokes, Take Potassium.

Lawyer for Epstein VICTIMS Shares Details Trump FEARED THE MOST

WW3? French Hospitals Told To Prepare For A "Major Military Engagement" Within Six Months

The Zionist Experiment Is Over

Sen. Tim Kaine: ‘Extremely Troubling’ to Say Natural Rights Are from God

Israel & The Assassination Of The Kennedy Brothers

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER (Documentary)

The Pakistani mayor of Rotherham claims she proud to be British and proud to be Pakistani.

Khe Sanh 1968 How U.S. Marines Faced the Siege in Vietnam

Did Xi's Parade Flip The Script On US Defense Of Taiwan?


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Are Non Voters and Non McCain Voters Responsible if Obama is Elected?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 3, 2008
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2008-11-03 10:44:40 by Old Friend
Keywords: None
Views: 1657
Comments: 89

It is a simple question. Some people advocate not voting or voting third party. If you do that and Obama is elected and turns out to be a terrible dictator far worse then Bush. Are those people responsible for sitting on their hands and not voting? To a much lesser degree what about the thrid party voters. Would they have "wasted" their vote and come to regret it. Can we blame them for not voting McCain and at least trying to stop Obama. I suspect that if Obama is elected and these people who didn't vote may have some regret at some time in the future. Still undecided here. I guess I'll have to decide tomorrow.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

#4. To: Old Friend (#0) (Edited)

Can we blame them for not voting McCain and at least trying to stop Obama. I suspect that if Obama is elected and these people who didn't vote may have some regret at some time in the future.

On the other hand: Can we blame them for not voting Obama and at least trying to stop McCain. I suspect that if McCain is elected and these people who didn't vote may have some regret at some time in the future.

But as I decline to participate in the lesser of the two evils approach to American presidential elections (a mere quarterback controversy every four years), I voted for Ron Paul and shall have a crystal clear conscious for the next four years.

wbales  posted on  2008-11-03   11:13:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: wbales (#4)

Can we blame them for not voting Obama and at least trying to stop McCain.

The pre-destined policies of the cabal will NOT change over the next 4 years regardless which of their sock puppets they have selected to rule over us and usher in the final form of the North American Union.

The crisis is on the way.

Rotara  posted on  2008-11-03   11:52:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Rotara (#8)

Can we blame them for not voting Obama and at least trying to stop McCain.

Either way, the question is a stupid one. It presumes that one candidate is in some way "better" than the other.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-03   12:14:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#9) (Edited)

It presumes that one candidate is in some way "better" than the other.

Although you make general statements that both candidates are equally bad, you focus your actual criticisms only on McCain. Why is that?

scrapper2  posted on  2008-11-03   12:24:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: scrapper2 (#11) (Edited)

Although you make general statements that both candidates are equally bad, you focus your actual criticisms only on McCain. Why is that?

A few months ago, this forum was infested with Obamaphiles, and I spent most of the time arguing with them. They asked me the same question as you do, only in reverse, and accused me of being a McCain supporter.

Now that most of the Obamaphiles are gone (Ferret Mike is the only one I know of) and the forum is infested with McCain supporters, I naturally spend more time arguing with them. What's the point of arguing with people who don't post here any more?

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-03   12:26:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#12)

A few months ago, this forum was infested with Obamaphiles, and I spent most of the time arguing with them. They asked me the same question as you do, only in reverse, and accused me of being a McCain supporter.

Now that most of the Obamaphiles are gone (Ferret Mike is the only one I know of) and the forum is infested with McCain supporters, I naturally spend more time arguing with them.

I'm not accusing you of anything. I was merely curious about why your general pronouncements did not match your actual criticisms of only one candidate.

I wasn't active on the forum several months ago when evidently Obamaphiles were posting here.

I have become more active on the forum this month, but I must say I don't see "an infestation" of McCain supporters.

scrapper2  posted on  2008-11-03   12:34:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: scrapper2 (#17)

I'm not accusing you of anything. I was merely curious about why your general pronouncements did not match your actual criticisms of only one candidate.

I wasn't active on the forum several months ago when evidently Obamaphiles were posting here.

I have become more active on the forum this month, but I must say I don't see "an infestation" of McCain supporters.

I've had mcKein's number for so long I'm not sure I haven't pummeled every treasonous position he holds at least 3 times. ;-)

Rotara  posted on  2008-11-03   12:37:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Rotara, Rupert_Pupkin (#21)

I've had mcKein's number for so long I'm not sure I haven't pummeled every treasonous position he holds at least 3 times. ;-)

That's very true. McCain is very transparent re: his flaws and foibles and anti-America voting positions and has been so for many years. With McCain what you see is what you get.

But Obama is another kettle of fish. Finding information on his flaws and foibles takes quite a bit more work - there's not alot of federal Senate voting record on Obama. There's not alot of political activity even at the state level. We know little about his formative years except for what he chooses to reveal in his autiobiography. With Obama there's still a good deal to find out and we have only 1 day left.

That's why I enjoy reading posted articles or posting articles I find on Obama - McCain is a known quantity but Obama is still buyer beware quantity.

We can say that both candidates are equally bad. But that's not quite fair to say, because we know much about McCain but little about Obama.

scrapper2  posted on  2008-11-03   12:53:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 40.

#49. To: scrapper2 (#40) (Edited)

But Obama is another kettle of fish. Finding information on his flaws and foibles takes quite a bit more work - there's not alot of federal Senate voting record on Obama. There's not alot of political activity even at the state level. We know little about his formative years except for what he chooses to reveal in his autiobiography. With Obama there's still a good deal to find out and we have only 1 day left.

I think that I have Obama all figured out. Both his drooling fans and his biggest critics take him for more than what he really is.

He's a tool and prop of the DNC, a new version Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, or Joe Biden who was picked to project an image of "innovation" and "change" on account of his youth and skin color, and to neutralize the anti-war wing of the Left with empty promises in the primaries. In fact, he's nothing new, he's just another party hack and (supposedly) charismatic mouthpiece for the special interests who back the Democrats.

With Obama, we get a younger, blacker Ted Kennedy. With McCain, we get an older and crazier George W. Bush.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-03 12:57:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: scrapper2 (#40)

But Obama is another kettle of fish. Finding information on his flaws and foibles takes quite a bit more work - there's not alot of federal Senate voting record on Obama. There's not alot of political activity even at the state level. We know little about his formative years except for what he chooses to reveal in his autiobiography. With Obama there's still a good deal to find out and we have only 1 day left.

That's why I enjoy reading posted articles or posting articles I find on Obama - McCain is a known quantity but Obama is still buyer beware quantity.

What you said there is what I find to be frightening about Obama. All the unknowns. This guy came out of nowhere. At least McCain things will stay pretty much the same. Are you all doing ok? With Obama who knows what the hell will happen. Who knows we could even be pleasantly surprised (I don't think that but you never know).

Old Friend  posted on  2008-11-03 12:58:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: scrapper2 (#40)

McCain is a known quantity but Obama is still buyer beware quantity.

They're both as clear as the Council on Foreign Relations' / Trilateral Commission / Bilderberg agenda.

The flavor of destruction to keep the worthless sheeple baying day to day isn't even that unclear.

Buy ammo, food, rural land, water filtration, medical supplies and pray.

Rotara  posted on  2008-11-03 14:35:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]