See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Ex-CIA Man Warned Top Executives To Leave New York On 9/11
Source:
PrisonPlanet
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/ex-cia- ... -to-leave-new-york-on-911.html
Published: Nov 3, 2008
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2008-11-03 14:28:02 by Rotara
Keywords: None
Views: 242
Comments: 7
Report: Warner Bros. senior executive told staff “something big is happening that day” Paul Joseph Watson According to a report by Jeremy R. Hammond of the Foreign Policy Journal, senior executives of a major U.S. corporation were warned by a former CIA operative to leave New York on September 11, 2001, the latest smoking gun to add to a bulging stack of examples concerning specific prior knowledge of the attacks. The article cites an anonymous source who worked under a managing director as number two at a European branch of the media giant Warner Bros. The source’s boss was close friends with a senior executive who worked at the head office in L.A. and had also formerly worked for the CIA. During the memorial arrangements for a senior director from a foreign office who had died, the L.A. executive rejected September 11th as a date for the service because “something big is happening that day” and the top executives from the New York office would all be traveling out of the city. When asked further about this big event, the executive replied that it was a confidential matter and disclosed no further details, except to say that it was “not corporate”. The source told the Journal, “I had no reason to think that the ‘event’ could be anything more than perhaps a junket, an out of town think tank exercise or whatever – I remember that these possibilities ran through my mind.” But after 9/11, thinking back upon the conversation, he grew more curious and tried to ascertain where the board members had been that day. They had indeed been out of New York, he says, traveling not to one location, but each to their own destination. Destinations included overseas locations such as Paris, London, and Amsterdam. Foreign Policy Journal has not been able to verify the location of individuals on 9/11 or other aspects of the story concerning any potential warning received or given by any Time Warner executives, but did confirm the source’s position at the foreign branch office, the name and position of that office’s managing director, and the name and position of the senior executive from the Los Angeles office. The corporate media has given limited coverage to reports of general prior knowledge about 9/11, while almost universally ignoring specific examples of foreknowledge. Perhaps the most blatant example of specific prior knowledge is the fact that, as Newsweek reported in its September 13th 2001 issue, top brass Pentagon officials were warned the night before the attacks and cancelled a trip scheduled for the next day. Warnings about a big event happening in New York were widespread in the weeks and days before the attacks. In a story entitled Some Got Warning: Don’t Go Downtown on Sept. 11, the New York Daily News reported, “Some Middle Easterners in the New York area were warned ahead of time to stay out of lower Manhattan the morning of Sept. 11,” noting that federal investigators received tips about overheard conversations in which people were “boasting about or warning about coming attacks.” Another case involved a Palestinian boy at the New Utrecht High School in Brooklyn. On September 6th, 2001, the boy looked out of his classroom window towards lower Manhattan and said, “Do you see those two buildings?” while pointing at the WTC twin towers. “They won’t be standing there next week.” This was not an “urban legend” as some have claimed, it has been proven in triplicate by numerous mainstream media reports and acknowledged by federal authorities and the FBI. This was just one example amongst several reports of schoolchildren in the New York area circulating knowledge of the attacks before they happened. If school kids knew that a major attack was about to take place, how on earth could the most sophisticated intelligence apparatus in the world have failed to pick up on it? German police confirmed that an Iranian man frantically tried to warn U.S. authorities of an attack on the eve of 9/11, attempting to call them from his deportation cell. Another proven example of specific prior knowledge that the establishment has attempted to sideline as an “urban myth” is the story concerning the Israeli instant messaging company, Odigo. A report by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which was later confirmed by the Washington Post, related how employees of Odigo were warned specifically about the attack via instant messages two hours in advance. Mayor of San Francisco Willie Brown was set to fly into New York on the morning of September 11. However, he got a call from what he described as his ‘airport security’ late September 10th advising against flying due to a security threat. Brown awoke on September 11th to scenes of the WTC on fire and his flight was cancelled. A record number of ‘put’ options, speculation that the stock of a company will fall, were placed on American and United Airlines in the days preceding September 11th. This despite a September 10th Reuters report stating ‘airline stocks set to fly.’ Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options. On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. The investigation as to which criminals benefited from advance knowledge of the terrorist attack led straight to Alex Brown/Deutsche Bank - chaired up until 1997 by executive director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard.
Poster Comment: Charge of high treason with documentation, including his deceptive response about what he knew at Booker Elementary school and a creepy convergence of finance bigwigs at SAC. RELEVANT PETITION: George W. Bush Charged with High Treason for Complicity in the Attack of 911 (Oct. 14, 2003) by Sterling D. Allan The terrorist attack on America on September 11, 2001 was a tragedy of epic proportions. What few would care to find out is that the President of the United States is implicated strongly in its planning and its outcomes. The History Channel in recent years did a special on the attack on Pearl Harbor in which it gave documented evidence that President Roosevelt knew that attack was coming and actually allowed it to take place as a way to get Americans behind the war effort. Other, less glamorous precedents of this phenomenon can be given, such as Hitler's burning of the Reichstag to provide impetus for his war effort. As an outcome of the 911 attack, we have legislation such as the Patriot Act that significantly curtails fundamental rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. Also, the Iraq war has increased U.S. presence and control in the Mideast. The question of why and to what extent President George W. Bush was involved in the terrorist attack on America will take years of investigation and probing to conclude with any degree of finality. But what can be determined with clarity at this point is that he had foreknowledge, and he had an agenda -- and that his actions amount to high treason. The following is offered as a partial list of evidences for this charge. President Bush presented an image to the nation that on the morning of the attack he was going about his usual Presidential itinerary and that he was caught completely by surprise. However, a careful look at the timeline of the attack, and what he would have known with his intelligence sources, shows a premeditated intent to convey such an image with the intent to deceive. By the time he responded, it was too late to stop three of the four planes. Most Americans knew about the attack before President Bush responded. Does he expect us to believe that in this day of instantaneous communication available to the lay public that the President of the United States and those who advise him could be so slow to grasp the gravity of the situation? Fifteen minutes before he went into the Booker Elementary School classroom he confirmed to a reporter that he had been apprised of the first plane hitting the World Trade Center -- a known terrorist target. He was again briefed at the Elementary School. By this time, NORAD knew of at least two hijackings and possibly a third; and such information would have been available to the President. Then, moments before entering the classroom he watched live footage as the second plane hit the second tower. Nevertheless he continued with the education photo-op. Two or three minutes later Andrew Card came up to President Bush while he was reading to the children, and told him, "A second plane has hit the World Trade Center. America is under attack." Bush continued with the children for at least seven more minutes reading with them about a girl and her goat. His departure from the classroom was not in haste. When later asked by a reporter what he was doing and how he responded when he found out about the attack, his reply was worded to gave the impression that he saw the first plane hit, and then heard a few minutes later that a second plane had hit, and that he didn't want to scare the children, so he did not interrupt his event with them. He said, in part, "I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I used to fly myself, and I said, 'There's one terrible pilot.' and I said, 'It must have been a horrible accident.' " He could not have seen the first plane hit because that image did not come forth until later. The timing was such that it would have been the second plane he saw --hitting the second tower while the first tower was billowing smoke from the first hit. That alone proves he was lying about how much he knew -- at a minimum from the TV coverage that millions of other Americans were also watching -- and that he was purposely conveying an image of naivety, when the truth was that he knew much more and purposely did nothing. He is the only one who could have given permission to U.S. military jets to intercept and shoot down the hijacked planes thereby averting every target hit after the first. It is likely that he knew that other hijacked planes were in the air, and he could have given the command to intercept and shoot down if necessary. His known behavior constituted gross negligence at best, and given what he most probably knew, treason. Meanwhile, that same morning, Warren Buffett, the world's second richest man, worth $36.0 billion, was at the U.S. Strategic Command headquarters located at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha Nebraska (SAC), where the President was later spirited that day. Buffet had scheduled this event in advance. One of the people invited to his event was Anne Tatlock, the chief executive of Fudiciary Trust Co. International, that manages $44 billion. Her office space in the World Trade Center happened to be precisely where the second plane hit. She was en route to SAC when she learned of the first attack, and arrived at the Omaha, Nebraska base just in time to be rushed by military personnel into a room where she watched the second plane hit her office space, killing 87 of her 650 employees. Think of it this way. The whole world watched the events of Sept. 11 replayed over and over, especially the segment in which the second plane ran into the second tower. That spot on the second tower where the plane hit was Anne Tatlock's office space. She, as the chief executive of that office space, was the most relevant person to that attack in terms of its target. She was in the air, on her way to Offutt before the attacks commenced that morning; and arrived just in time for military officers to rush her in to where she could watch on television the second plane hit her office complex; and Bush would later that day go to that military base. Why was Warren Buffett, a civilian, hosting a pre-planned non-publicized charity event at a military center -- the very center where Bush was taken -- and where Tatlock arrived? Buffet is reportedly not famous for charity work, but has somewhat the opposite reputation among his peers. One must ask who the others of Buffett's financial prowess were in attendance at SAC on that day of the collapse of the World Trade Centers. Did they meet with President Bush. What was the nature of their conversation? A detailed report of President Bush's day on 911 speak of this incidental meeting of Buffet earlier that day, but say "it's unknown if any of these people were still at Offutt by the time Bush arrived in the afternoon." (cooperativeresearch.net; San Francisco Business Times, 2/1/02; Forbes 10/15/01; Wall Street Journal 9/12/01.) Published news reports of Bush's activities at Offutt mention several government individuals who were present with him, and mention that there were "others" as well. (ABC News, 9/11/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01, Washington Times, 10/8/02.) The foreplanned meeting there of at least two of these players of such global prestige, one of which would be most profoundly effected by the attack, is too striking to dismiss as sheer coincidence. The likelihood of conspiracy or complicity is too high to ignore. It must be investigated at length. The country recently watched as Arnold Schwarzenegger won a historic election in California. The prominent heavy weight economic advisors by his side that helped promote public confidence in his campaign was Warren Buffett. The precedence in history of wealth buying politics for control and expansion of power and gain at the expense of the freedom of the people is too clear to deny as a possible contemporary reality as well. Prophecy likewise speaks of such a beastly cabal that overthrow the freedom of all lands, countries, and peoples. It is that evil collusion of wealth, power and intelligentsia bent on self interest that has brought the downfall of previous civilizations, and which will likewise bring the demise of ours if we continue in our present course. President Bush is not the leader of this conspiracy, but clearly he is one of its willing players, a fact that can be documented from a host of other evidences spanning back to his initiation into a lifetime membership in the Yale Skull and Bones fraternity. He is certainly not the first U.S. President to be illicitly controlled from behind the scenes. He was not the one in charge on the morning of September 11. That much is obvious. He was being dictated to by others. But Constitutionally, he was under oath to be the one in charge, and the fact that he knew what was happening and purposely did not take measures to thwart additional attacks, in itself is treason. He could have averted the second and third attacks, but he did not. Instead, he purposely conveyed the image that the gravity of what was happening did not hit him until it was too late. The call has been going forth to Americans for years to awaken to a sense of their awful situation, and to throw off this secret combination that is getting above them, of which President Bush is yet another low-level player. Close analysis of his behavior on 911 bespeak a man who was not in control but who was being controlled by others. http://www.cooperativeresearch.net/timeline/main/essayaninterestingday.html People typically get the government they deserve or at least allow, and U.S. citizens have gradually been seduced by this international cabal into accepting the intoxications of socialism to which they have grown addicted. Such an addiction by such a powerful master will be enormously difficult to overcome; but the alternative is destruction on such a scale as this world has never seen -- a prospect that would be far more devastating and excruciating, and which would pale the events of 911 in comparison. American Politics and other high level corruptions have created a terminal cancer prognosis for this country with a prescription of heavy chemotherapy and radiation treatment, so to speak. I am an alternative medicine candidate who does not believe any cancer has to be terminal. There are alternative remedies, and one of the most important is the belief that a cure is possible -- the will to live . . . and to change. Let's begin by having more accountability in the U.S. media to investigate these matters and report them honestly to the American people so that we can have a clear diagnosis. Otherwise the media is complicit as well, and will have to answer accordingly.
Prison Planet
Monday, November 3, 2008
George W. Bush (and Warren Buffet) was Complicit with the 911 Attack on America
Andrew Card informs the President of second plane 
President Bush reading with students at Booker Elementary
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#2. To: Rotara (#0)
There are NO former high level employees of the CIA. The CIA is like the Mob - you might move to Miami but you are still in the Mob.
(((((Pinggggggggggggg!)))))
#4. To: Original_Intent (#3)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe article cites an anonymous source who worked under a managing director as number two at a European branch of the media giant Warner Bros. The source’s boss was close friends with a senior executive who worked at the head office in L.A. and had also formerly worked for the CIA.
#3. To: christine, TwentyTwelve, Wudidiz, farmfriend, Ferret Mike, angle, aristeides, Peppa, Scrapper2, CadetD, Jethro Tull, tom007, Cynicom, Rotara, lodwick, Burkeman1, Brian S, all (#2)
Replies to Comment # 3. Got it, thanks.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.