[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Palin calls attacks 'cruel' and 'cowardly'
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/07/mccain.palin/index.html
Published: Nov 7, 2008
Author: CNN
Post Date: 2008-11-07 20:44:57 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 4158
Comments: 155

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin called former aides of Sen. John McCain "jerks" for circulating unflattering stories about her since the Republican ticket lost its bid for the White House Tuesday.

Sources close to John McCain say Sarah Palin was denied a chance to speak at McCain's concession address.

The stories, which have been attributed to unnamed sources within the McCain campaign, include claims that Palin did not know Africa was a continent instead of a country, or which countries are part of the North American Free Trade Agreement, despite touting her familiarity with neighboring Canada.

Speaking with CNN's Gary Tuchman after returning to Alaska, Palin speculated those stories may have originated with campaign staffers who helped her prepare for her debate with Democratic Vice President-elect Joe Biden.

"Those were taken out of context and that's cruel," Palin said. "It's mean-spirited. It's immature. It's unprofessional and those guys are jerks if they came away with it, taking things out of context, and then tried to spread something on national news."

One source involved in preparing Palin for interviews and the vice-presidential debate told CNN "she had not paid attention to a single policy debate that's gone on in this country for 10 years."

Palin told Tuchman she remembers having conversations about NAFTA and Africa during her preparations, but that the stories about her "are not true." She said it was "cowardly" for staffers to make claims about her anonymously.

"It's not fair and it's not right." Watch CNN's Gary Tuchman's interview with Palin »

Two McCain sources said they were furious about Palin's supposed call Saturday with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, which turned out to be a prank by two radio DJs.

A source close to Palin told CNN that she had prepared to deliver a concession speech Tuesday night, and expected to address the crowd at the Arizona Biltmore in Phoenix, Arizona.

Several sources told CNN that McCain senior adviser Steve Schmidt told Palin no, in part because of built-up anger among some McCain aides who say Palin had become more interested in her own future than in McCain's election. Palin denies that claim. Watch what's being said about Palin »

There have also been reports of a somewhat distant relationship between McCain and his running mate.

"This is so unfortunate and, quite honestly, sickening," Palin aide Meghan Stapleton said Thursday in a written statement.

"The accusations we are hearing and reading are not true, and since we deny all these anonymous allegations, there is nothing specific to which we will respond. Watch more about the infighting »

"We have the highest regards for Sen. John McCain. Gov. Palin was honored to be chosen as McCain's running mate. And as governor of Alaska, Gov. Palin looks forward to working with President-elect Obama on securing energy independence for America."

On Election Day, Palin denied there was tension. Once back in Alaska, she said she would not respond to individual accusations. Watch Palin discuss the controversy »

"I won't comment on anyone's gossip or allegations that are based on anonymous sources," she said. "That's kind of a small, evidently bitter type of person, who would anonymously charge something foolish like that -- that I perhaps didn't know an answer to a question. So until I know who was talking about it, I won't have a comment on false allegations."

In response to the allegations that she was ill-prepared for interviews and debate, Randy Scheunemann, an aide assigned to Palin, called her "brilliant" and said she has a "photographic memory."

Despite the acrimony, many McCain aides say they are sad the campaign team dissolved so quickly.


Poster Comment:

Campbell Brown and CNN have given Palin a fair shake. Video here: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/07/mccain.palin/index.html#cnnSTCVideo

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 71.

#9. To: christine (#0)

Palin is a hateful, sick, racist, power hungry whore! Nothing more. The Republican party should be embarassed but since it was taken over by the Trostky communists in the 80s during the Reagan years it is no surprise they would select her and the Manchurian Candidate to be their representatives. I never thought I would say this but the Republican Party has made the Democrats look like the saviors of America. The Republican Party has become all that is wrong in America. These pigs have made me wish I had voted for Obama instead of Ron Paul just to spite them.

Sarah Palin blamed by the US Secret Service over death threats against Barack Obama

Sarah Palin's attacks on Barack Obama's patriotism provoked a spike in death threats against the future president, Secret Service agents revealed during the final weeks of the campaign.

Palin's tone may have unintentionally encouraged white supremacists Photo: Reuters

The Republican vice presidential candidate attracted criticism for accusing Mr Obama of "palling around with terrorists", citing his association with the sixties radical William Ayers.

The attacks provoked a near lynch mob atmosphere at her rallies, with supporters yelling "terrorist" and "kill him" until the McCain campaign ordered her to tone down the rhetoric.

But it has now emerged that her demagogic tone may have unintentionally encouraged white supremacists to go even further.

The Secret Service warned the Obama family in mid October that they had seen a dramatic increase in the number of threats against the Democratic candidate, coinciding with Mrs Palin's attacks.

Michelle Obama, the future First Lady, was so upset that she turned to her friend and campaign adviser Valerie Jarrett and said: "Why would they try to make people hate us?"

The revelations, contained in a Newsweek history of the campaign, are likely to further damage Mrs Palin's credentials as a future presidential candidate. She is already a frontrunner, with Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, to take on Mr Obama in four years time.

Details of the spike in threats to Mr Obama come as a report last week by security and intelligence analysts Stratfor, warned that he is a high risk target for racist gunmen. It concluded: "Two plots to assassinate Obama were broken up during the campaign season, and several more remain under investigation. We would expect federal authorities to uncover many more plots to attack the president that have been hatched by white supremacist ideologues."

Irate John McCain aides, who blame Mrs Palin for losing the election, claim Mrs Palin took it upon herself to question Mr Obama's patriotism, before the line of attack had been cleared by Mr McCain.

That claim is part of a campaign of targeted leaks designed to torpedo her ambitions, with claims that she did not know that Africawas a continent rather than a country.

The advisers have branded her a "diva" and a "whack job" and claimed that she did not know which other countries are in the North American Free Trade Area, (Canada and Mexico). They say she spent more than $150,000 on designer clothes, including $40,000 on her husband Todd and that she refused to prepare for the disastrous series of interviews with CBS's Katie Couric.

In a bid to salvage her reputation Mrs Palin came out firing in an interview with CNN, dismissing the anonymous leakers in unpresidential language as "jerks" who had taken "questions or comments I made in debate prep out of context."

She said: "I consider it cowardly. It's not true. That's cruel, it's mean-spirited, it's immature, it's unprofessional and those guys are jerks if they came away taking things out of context and then tried to spread something on national news that's not fair and not right."

She was not asked about her incendiary rhetoric against Mr Obama. But she did deny the spending spree claims, saying the clothes in question had been returned to the Republican National Committee. "Those are the RNC's clothes, they're not my clothes. I asked for anything more than maybe a diet Dr Pepper once in a while. These are false allegations."

Speaking as she returned to her native Alaska, Mrs Palin claimed to be baffled by what she claims was sexism on the national stage. "Here in Alaska that double standard isn't applied because these guys know that Alaskan women are pretty tough, on a par with the men in terms of being outdoors, working hard," she said.

"They're commercial fishermen, they're pilots, they're working up on the North slopein the oil fields. You see equality in Alaska. I think that was a bit of as surprise on the national level."

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/...against-Barack-Obama.html

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-11-08   14:17:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: bush_is_a_moonie, jethro tull, all (#9)

Palin is a hateful, sick, racist, power hungry whore!

You are a very sick person.

Coming here to spew your vitriolic gender hatred is an insult to all of us.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   14:31:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Cynicom (#12)

Cyni,

I never gave Palin much thought, but given the level of hatred - from all the usual suspects - suggests she must have something going for her.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-11-08   14:38:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Jethro Tull, all (#17)

I never gave Palin much thought, but given the level of hatred -

Palin was NOT running for president. None of the vitriol was ever aimed at McKooK.

From all sources and sides it has been based on her gender. This sick person here seems to have a problem with females. That leads one to just one conclusion.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   14:41:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Cynicom (#20)

Hey little boy.. .I'll tell you how sick I am of scumbags supporting those who are destroying our country. I have had it with this crap. If you little sissys don't have the balls to stand up for this country and would rather be poltically correct then you can kiss my ass.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-11-08   14:45:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: bush_is_a_moonie, jethro tull rowdee, all (#23)

Your language tells us your true character, your limited intelligence, and your sad lack of mature intellectual thinking.

Just look at your posts. A sad, despicable, woman hating person.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   14:48:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Cynicom (#27)

I realize now that this board has become just like LP and Freepers. You are all afraid to stand up and fight for our country. You run and hide and let it be destroyed. Well, if you don't like my language then tough shit. I don't like the fact that Americans are dying in unnecessary wars and that the scumbag neocons are making money from it. You are a coward for refusing to defend this country and I am damn glad there were not many of you in Nam or I probably wouldn't have made it home either.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-11-08   14:50:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: bush_is_a_moonie, Cyni (#30) (Edited)

Look........Cyni fought in the Spanish American War! :) [edit: to insert a smily face to signify a 'funny'--and not the truth cause he ain't THAT old!].Where were you when he needed you?

This has nothing to do with who has fought in which war for what cause, or why it was fought, or where it was fought.

This is about a woman who ran for the VICE PRESIDENCY.

That you think it is racist to point out who a candidate hangs out with is your problem, not hers. Ditto for a certain minister and his comments against America. That doesn't make her a racist, for cryin out loud! You're known by the company you keep. You hang out with a bunch of drunks and folks will think you're one, too. Hang out in a queer lounge and folks will think you're queer, too. Hang out with a terrorist and folks SHOULD think you're aligned with them, too.

However, over half the nation WAS RACIST in this election.....but it wasn't Sarah Palin or her fault.

Ask yourself......remember the Clinton days when all the blacks hung around him and with him--in fact the saying was that he was the first black president? Now, here just a few years later, and after years and years of still pandering to the black community, the black community, tossed Bil and Hil over in a heartbeat. Why was that? There was a BLACK man running. Plain and simple. They were racists. After all, she had a hell of a lot more experience than he; she certainly had more name recognition; better funded; and was essentially the big cheese in the dem party.

Your complaint/bitch about Sarah Palin is totally unjustified.

rowdee  posted on  2008-11-08   15:04:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: rowdee (#44)

Clintons are anti-American neocons just like the rest of that bunch. The only reason Clinton got into the whitehouse was because bush sr was terrified that the truth about Iraq and what his and Reagan's administration did would come out. America began to go downhill starting with Johnson and it hasn't looked back since. I'm tired of the gutting of our rights and liberties, the intentional destruction of our economy (and yes I got it from the horses mouth that the economy is pushed into recessions to "reward the wealthy for having had to pay and sacrifice to make the economy strong" (Senator Paul Laxalt told me that to my face while he was visiting his daughter who was my next door neighbor). It's about time we stand up aginst this crap and quit playing politics.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-11-08   15:14:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#51)

You might as well brace yourself, moonie..........America is not going to get better. There is no way this nation is going to go back to better days--said days being before LBJ, at the minimum.

Democrats are progressives--always moving towards their goal--their goal being total domination of your life and the national scene--they're socialists at heart, or communist.

They are more than willing to take a step, halt, take a step, half, go back l step, halt, go foward 2 steps, halt, go back l, step foward 2, halt, halt, go forward l, back l, halt, forward 2.

I'll give you an example. Teddy the Swimmer's goal is to put most of the budget into education. Bush was elected. Against conservatives who like Reagan wanted to get rid of the Dept of Education, he plays the stupid little game of trying to get on the good side, off to a good start, make fwiends, blah blah blah, and comes up with this NCLB crap, and put up some funding--a substantial increase in education spending.

The left just pitched a fit because there was 'inadeuqate' funding. Next go round, there's more $$$$$$$$$ put in the kitty; they still yowl and howl and piss and moan and groan; so whap--more money, more money, more money. But notice, they are never satisfied with the amount, though the total spending has tripled by now? In the cloakroom, they're laughing their assses off at pulling another coup off. And they don't even have to take the blame.......the damn gop and its rinos are busting their butts to give the president whatever he wants!!!

And it worked-- viola!--even for Clinton, when he had a gop congress!!! And the stupid gop, namely Pete Domenici stands in the halls of congress and brags that they, the gop, have given more education funding than even clinton ASKED for!!!

You need to learn how this goes......cause its working the same way with these wars and other ways to take the future from your kids and grandkids---and just think- -most of us have kids and grandkids, too, that we care just as deeply for as you do yours!! What a thought........

rowdee  posted on  2008-11-08   15:44:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: rowdee (#57)

Today in America the left is not the threat... the neocon fake conservatives are the threat. Remember, neocons are not conservatives. They are former ultra left wingers of the Democrat party in the 50s who insisted that the U.S. confront the USSR even if it meant a nuclear war. Research the background of neocons and you will see that some are former members of the American Communist Party, the Socialist Workers Party and other anti-Stalin communist organizations. The left in the entire 200+ years of existence of the U.S. have not come close to doing the damage to America and Americans that the neocons have in less than 30 years.

This anti-left propaganda started in the 80s and is part of the plan of the neocons to create a division between conservatives and liberals that they could take advantage of to promote their imperialistic world control agenda. All a person needs to do is look at what has happened since the 60s. Today's neocons were very much in favor of the Vietnam war, the attacks on Greneda, Panama, Iraq and other countries. Remember, the PNAC said that the U.S. needs to constantly be involved in two or more wars in multiple areas of the world to show its strength and that any country who even remotely appears to be a threat to the U.S., economically or militarily needs to be crushed and then controlled by the U.S. This is communism.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-11-08   16:51:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#60)

This anti-left propaganda started in the 80s and is part of the plan of the neocons to create a division between conservatives and liberals that they could take advantage of to promote their imperialistic world control agenda.

Oh puleeze.......... Division between conservatives and liberals? the left and the right have battled forever.

LOLOL.

rowdee  posted on  2008-11-08   16:56:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: rowdee (#62)

The left and right have not battled for ever. They had differences but they didn't play the hate game they have play..... oh never mind. The current vicious hatred of the liberals was started in the 80s by the neocons. I'm not going to waste any more time disucssing this. I doubt most of you even remember what it was like in the 50s and 60s.

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-11-08   19:23:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#64)

NEOCONSERVATIVES ARE FROM THE POLITICAL LEFT, GOT IT?

COLUMN: What the hell is a neocon?


University Wire

09-03-2003

(Michigan Daily) (U-WIRE) ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- Attila the Hun. Genghis Khan. Paul Wolfowitz.

Young freshmen, you as rising scholars are entering a stage in life when you begin to understand how the world works. But rather than let you wallow in four years of hard studying and personal misery to find the answer, I'll just tell you what causes problems like a dying economy, countries rotting in their own piss and bad things that happen to good people. It's all because of the neoconservatives.

Some people shy away from the neocon conspiracy theory because it is reminiscent of ancient anti-Semitic "Hymie rules the world" myths. For example, many of my fellow students (myself included) were offended when Hussein Ibish of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee called neocons "idealistic, crazy and chauvinistic Jewish-Americans," at a speaking engagement at the Michigan League last year.

But in that accusation lies a sad fact. They are hard-line ideologues whose personalities and foreign policy can be characterized as chauvinistic, and mazel tov, they're all Jewish. A quick note to the anti-Semites: This doesn't vindicate Jewish conspiracy theories, as most American Jews have remained Democrats.

A little background. Most neocons were all the same in their past lives as Trotskyites. This isn't surprising, as Trotskyism is similar to neoconservativism in that they are both anti-democratic and demand all-out, uncompromising war against their enemy (capitalists for the Trots, everyone who is not America or Israel for the neocons) and seeks to be the overarching, single ruling hegemony.

Furthermore, it's not uncommon for people to keep to the extremes. For example, the now-racist David Horowitz was thought to be na?ve by his friends for his enthusiastic support for the Black Panthers in his Marxist youth.

Most of them made the switch in the '60s, like Irving Kristol, when they found themselves supporting Israel when the left was rallying for the Palestinians. They also came from urbane, New York intellectual society, and were disgusted at what they perceived to be the filth that was sex, drugs and rock and roll that stood at the center of left-wing social life.

As Kristol in his trademark, elegantly pompous tone, said, "A neoconservative is a liberal who's been mugged by reality."

In short, nationalism got the best of them. Zionism started out as a left-wing movement, an anti-racist agenda that stood side by side with the civil rights movement. But along came a distrust among the Zionists. They felt no compromise could be made with the enemy. They shunned the leftist aspects of Zionism and traded "peace now" for "piece now" and salivated at the thought of armed conflict. Similar developments happened when violent, bigoted "white devil" attitudes emerged from Black Nationalism.

But what makes right-wing Zionists a problem for this country? A few of them, like Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Defense Policy Board member Richard Perle, hold high positions where they can dictate policy. Neocons care not about the domestic problems that plague our nation - abysmal public education and unemployment to name a few - but about funding Israel and sticking with the hawkish Likud Party and flexing military muscle against anyone that steps out of line with America.

Don't take my paranoid, left-wing word for it. Perle himself said, according to The Christian Science Monitor, "The President of the United States, on issue after issue, has reflected the thinking of neoconservatives." And just look at the numbers. There's never enough money for schools but there is always billions of dollars available for Israeli aid and whatever war Bush and the neocons want to fight. This nation doesn't suffer from a lack of money, it suffers from an unbalanced allocation of available funds. In fact, some estimate that the Bush administration is actually spending more money on the neocon agenda than Johnson did on his Great Society domestic policies.

This isn't to say that United States should stay away from brokering peace between Israel and the Palestinians. On the contrary, the United States should spend a reasonable amount of energy on ending war and securing ourselves from terrorist threats. But aiding the Israeli extremist position is unhelpful and damaging for the region, and turns a blind eye to more important domestic ills.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-11-08   19:35:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Jethro Tull (#67)

Springtime for Trotsky
by Daniel McCarthy
November 6, 2001
lewrockwell.com

Dakmar  posted on  2008-11-08   19:41:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Dakmar (#70)

The Trotskyist pedigree of neoconservatism is no secret; the original neocon, Irving Kristol, acknowledges it with relish: "I regard myself to have been a young Trostkyite and I have not a single bitter memory." Nor is there any doubt about the influence – one might almost say hegemony – of "former Communists" on the post-war conservative movement. Just read the words of one neocon, Seymour Martin Lipset:

From the anti-Stalinists who became conservatives – including James Burnham, Whittaker Chambers, and Irving Kristol – the Right gained a political education and, in some cases, an injection of passion. The ex-radicals brought with them the knowledge that ideological movements must have journals and magazines to articulate their perspectives. In 1955, for example, William F. Buckley, Jr., launched National Review at the urging of Willi Schlamm, a former German Communist. In its early years, National Review was largely written and edited by the Buckley family and a handful of former Communists, Trotskyists, and socialists, such as Burnham and Chambers. It played a major role in creating the Goldwaterite and Reaganite New Right and in stimulating an anti-Soviet foreign policy.

Worthy of note is that while ex-Stalinists tended to denounce their Communist roots vehemently, neoconservatives like Kristol and Schwartz remain at least wistfully fond of Trotsky. It's also worth noting that the neoconservative preoccupation with exporting social democracy abroad through war and mercantilism reflects the original split between Trotsky and Stalin. Trotsky argued that there could not be "socialism in one country" but rather that the revolution had to be truly international. And so the neoconservatives push for "human rights" and social democratic governments to be imposed on Serbia, for example, by force of arms.

Bingo, Dak.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-11-08   20:03:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 71.

        There are no replies to Comment # 71.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 71.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]