[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson

Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest

Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music

Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok

Trump wants concealed carry in DC.

Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River

COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS.

Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Mini nuclear plants to power 20,000 homes
Source: UK Guardian
URL Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environme ... re-nuclear-reactors-los-alamos
Published: Nov 8, 2008
Author: John Vidal and Nick Rosen
Post Date: 2008-11-08 21:25:09 by Jhoffa_
Keywords: None
Views: 313
Comments: 15

Mini nuclear plants to power 20,000 homes

Nuclear power plants smaller than a garden shed and able to power 20,000 homes will be on sale within five years, say scientists at Los Alamos, the US government laboratory which developed the first atomic bomb.

The miniature reactors will be factory-sealed, contain no weapons-grade material, have no moving parts and will be nearly impossible to steal because they will be encased in concrete and buried underground.

The US government has licensed the technology to Hyperion, a New Mexico-based company which said last week that it has taken its first firm orders and plans to start mass production within five years. 'Our goal is to generate electricity for 10 cents a watt anywhere in the world,' said John Deal, chief executive of Hyperion. 'They will cost approximately $25m [£13m] each. For a community with 10,000 households, that is a very affordable $250 per home.'

Deal claims to have more than 100 firm orders, largely from the oil and electricity industries, but says the company is also targeting developing countries and isolated communities. 'It's leapfrog technology,' he said.

The company plans to set up three factories to produce 4,000 plants between 2013 and 2023. 'We already have a pipeline for 100 reactors, and we are taking our time to tool up to mass-produce this reactor.'

The first confirmed order came from TES, a Czech infrastructure company specialising in water plants and power plants. 'They ordered six units and optioned a further 12. We are very sure of their capability to purchase,' said Deal. The first one, he said, would be installed in Romania. 'We now have a six-year waiting list. We are in talks with developers in the Cayman Islands, Panama and the Bahamas.'

The reactors, only a few metres in diameter, will be delivered on the back of a lorry to be buried underground. They must be refuelled every 7 to 10 years. Because the reactor is based on a 50-year-old design that has proved safe for students to use, few countries are expected to object to plants on their territory. An application to build the plants will be submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission next year.

'You could never have a Chernobyl-type event - there are no moving parts,' said Deal. 'You would need nation-state resources in order to enrich our uranium. Temperature-wise it's too hot to handle. It would be like stealing a barbecue with your bare hands.'

Other companies are known to be designing micro-reactors. Toshiba has been testing 200KW reactors measuring roughly six metres by two metres. Designed to fuel smaller numbers of homes for longer, they could power a single building for up to 40 years

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Jhoffa_ (#0)

There is a Japanese plant similar that operates in Alaska.

The congress and the tree huggers will never allow this.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:29:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

I thought this was "Dirty Bomb" material?

I mean, we threw such a fit about "Uranium from Africa" Now the guys from Los Alamos want to bury some in everyone's backyard?

WTF?

~ Your failure to be informed, does not make me a wacko.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:31:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jhoffa_ (#2)

Not in anyones backyard.

Buried underground. I think the one in Alaska is above ground, been there for some time.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:33:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#3)

With a capacity of 20,000 homes, they're bound to be scattered everywhere.. There would be allot of these things.

Perhaps we'll need a "Global Hawk" type system to ensure they remain secure?

Otherwise, what stops me and Dak from getting drunk and digging one up?

~ Your failure to be informed, does not make me a wacko.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:36:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jhoffa_ (#4)

Otherwise, what stops me and Dak from getting drunk and digging one up?

checking on the Alaska one...seems is still in the works because of the tree huggers in government. I thot it had been built.

Ha...

I once worked on a atom powered aircraft process. That was years ago and just recently the industry is looking at that system again because of cost of fuel and pollution.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:42:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Cynicom (#5)

I once worked on a atom powered aircraft process.

Steam Turbine?

I suppose you could use an electric motor now.. They're small and efficient enough.

~ Your failure to be informed, does not make me a wacko.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:43:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Jhoffa_ (#6)

This by Martin aircraft, in the 1950s. It had only progressed to the stage of getting a reactor small enough and light enough to be carried aloft.

If you check, you will find information about a reactor being taken aloft many times by a B-36 years ago. The idea was scrapped but now is being reborn.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:47:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Cynicom (#7)

These things still have to be cooled, right?

I assume the system is evaporative, since they claim they are solid state.

How can one conclusively state that there can be no "Chernobyl type incident" when an earthquake, or anything really, could cause the cooling system to fail?

~ Your failure to be informed, does not make me a wacko.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:51:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Cynicom (#5)

the first reference to the Amerika Bomber was on July 8, 1938 in a speech by "Hermann Göring" saying, "I completely lack the bombers capable of round-trip flights to New York with a 5-ton bomb load. I would be extremely happy to possess such a bomber which would at last stuff the mouth of arrogance across the sea."

Can't agree with the bombing of American (or any other) cities, but that's a great line. It's a shame so few understand the feel-good face of belligerence trotted out every few weeks to unify the tribe. There comes a boiling point.

And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot

Dakmar  posted on  2008-11-08   21:52:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jhoffa_ (#8)

These things still have to be cooled, right?

That was the old technology with massive reactors, that produce huge amounts of heat.

New technology and downsizing must have done away with that. It is coming, sooner the better.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:55:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Dakmar (#9)

to New York with a 5-ton bomb load.

The Germans were close to their goal. They made at least one flight from France to twelve miles off New York City, non stop with a four engine bomber. What they lacked was in flight refueling and they were working on that.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:59:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Cynicom (#10)

I don't know.. Uranium, even in its natural state, is a toxic metal and it's even pyrophoric in small amounts.

To cite just one instance.. At the Kakadu mine, there were some people sickened when their drinking water was contaminated with water used for processing.

~ Your failure to be informed, does not make me a wacko.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   22:11:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Jhoffa_ (#12)

I don't know.. Uranium, even in its natural state, is a toxic metal and it's even pyrophoric in small amounts.

There are no obstacles that cannot be overcome. Man needs to stop research on weapons and turn his mind to peaceful pursuits.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   22:16:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Jhoffa_ (#0)

The now deceased Sherman Skolnick claimed that at least one major Chicago bank had a nuclear "pig" in its basement, and it could run its banking ops totally without incoming electrical service.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-11-09   0:56:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Jhoffa_ (#0)

I'm not knocking you, but when nuke-anything is promoted by a company that doesn't present any facts, just PR (see website) I must question the safety.

Beyond that, when these generators die, what do you do with the garbage? I've been asking that for a long time, but haven't had any replies.

...with the power of conviction, there is no sacrifice.

rack42  posted on  2008-11-10   22:18:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]